Executive Brief
New tariffs, subsidies, and federal contracts can move cash flows, risk premia, and valuation multiples within days.
2025 is a live-fire test: tariff resets and national-security spending have already re-rated names in semis, defense, space, and critical minerals.
Don’t confuse contract ceilings with obligated dollars. Follow disbursements, milestones, and renewal options.
The big idea — policy is now a primary input
Investors once treated Washington as background noise. Not anymore. In 2025, U.S. tariff policy and industrial-policy tools (CHIPS Act awards, Defense Production Act spending, and large DoD agreements) are visibly changing company fundamentals and investor sentiment. These decisions alter unit economics (prices, costs, subsidies), capital intensity (loans and grants), and demand visibility (multi-year contract ceilings). Markets respond—sometimes violently—when the policy path changes.
Government Contracts and Congressional Holdings
Analyzing the Top 5 Performing Stocks
From my A-list database of 411 companies (222 American, 189 non-American), five stocks have emerged as the largest one-year gainers among NYSE/NASDAQ-listed companies: Rocket Lab USA (RKLB), MP Materials Corp (MP), Palantir Technologies (PLTR), GE Vernova LLC (GEV), and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS). While INTC dominates as this week's superstar trader, a deeper analysis reveals a striking pattern among these top performers.
The Washington Connection
Four of the five companies with the most substantial one-year gains are heavily involved with political decisions and investment from Washington, representing a clear correlation between government policy and market outperformance. These aren't merely companies with routine government contracts—they're enterprises whose success is fundamentally tied to strategic political decisions and federal spending priorities.
Government Contract Landscape
Rocket Lab (RKLB) has secured major federal contracts totaling over $565 million, including a $515 million Space Development Agency contract for 18 satellites and additional contracts exceeding $50 million from the U.S. Space Force. The company's success directly benefits from government policy supporting private space commercialization and national security space initiatives.
MP Materials (MP) represents the most significant government partnership among the five companies. The rare earth materials producer has entered into a multi-billion dollar relationship with the Department of Defense, including a $400 million preferred stock investment, a $150 million loan, and unprecedented 10-year price guarantees at $110 per kilogram for rare earth materials—double the current market price. This partnership reflects a direct political decision to reduce American dependency on Chinese rare earth elements.
Palantir Technologies (PLTR) maintains extensive government relationships with approximately 55% of its $2.87 billion revenue derived from federal sources. Key contracts include a $1.3 billion Maven Smart System contract ceiling and a $10 billion Army enterprise software agreement. The company's growth trajectory is intrinsically linked to Washington's artificial intelligence and defense modernization initiatives.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS) has secured major defense contracts totaling over $1.5 billion, including a $1.45 billion DOD hypersonic testing contract under the MACH-TB 2.0 program. With approximately 67% of total revenues coming from the U.S. Federal Government, the company's success is directly tied to defense spending priorities and hypersonic weapons development policies.
GE Vernova (GEV) stands as the notable outlier with minimal direct government involvement, having secured only limited contracts including a $1 million Department of Energy hydrogen AI assistant project. The energy infrastructure company primarily serves commercial markets rather than federal agencies.
Congressional Trading Patterns
Despite these companies' substantial government ties and exceptional market performance, congressional stock holdings remain surprisingly minimal. Analysis of congressional trading data reveals limited direct investment by elected officials in these top-performing, government-connected stocks.
Only Palantir has recorded recent congressional trading activity, with Representative James Comer (R-KY) and Representative Gilbert Ray Cisneros Jr. (D-CA) each purchasing up to $15,000 in shares during January 2025. Notably, no recent congressional trading activity has been reported for Rocket Lab, MP Materials, GE Vernova, or Kratos Defense, despite their significant federal contract exposure.
This trading pattern is particularly noteworthy given that members of Congress have generally outperformed market benchmarks in recent years, often focusing investments on major technology stocks rather than specialized defense contractors and infrastructure companies.
Ownership Structure Analysis
The institutional ownership patterns across these five companies reveal significant variation and strategic positioning:
Rocket Lab exhibits an unusual ownership structure with 59% retail investor ownership, only 26% institutional ownership, and 15% insider control. Bessemer Venture Partners VIII LP leads institutional investors with a 12.36% stake valued at $2.57 billion.
MP Materials features CEO James Litinsky as the largest individual shareholder with a 10% stake, while the Chinese company Shenghe Resources holds 7.7%. Following the recent DOD investment, the U.S. government is positioned to become the company's largest shareholder.
Palantir maintains a more traditional institutional structure with Vanguard Group holding 9.84% and BlackRock controlling 7.66%. The company shows 49% institutional ownership and 46% retail investor participation.
GE Vernova demonstrates heavy institutional concentration with 79% institutional ownership, led by Vanguard Group at 10% and Capital Research and Management Company holding a significant position.
Kratos Defense shows concentrated insider ownership with Bandel L. Carano controlling 14.6% of shares, while institutional investors hold approximately 64% of the company.
Market Implications
The concentration of top-performing stocks among government-dependent companies underscores the significant impact of federal policy decisions on market performance. The total government contract value across four of these five companies exceeds $15 billion, representing substantial taxpayer investment in enterprises that have become leading stock market performers.
This pattern raises important questions about the relationship between government spending priorities and market dynamics. Companies positioned to benefit from federal policy initiatives—whether in space commercialization, supply chain independence, defense modernization, or energy infrastructure—appear well-positioned for continued outperformance as long as political support remains strong.
The minimal congressional trading activity in these stocks, despite their government connections and strong performance, may reflect either heightened awareness of potential conflicts of interest or simply missed investment opportunities by elected officials who have traditionally favored broader technology investments over specialized defense and infrastructure plays.
As political priorities continue to shape market opportunities, investors may benefit from monitoring federal spending patterns and policy initiatives as leading indicators for potential market outperformers, while INTC's current trading momentum demonstrates that market dynamics extend beyond the government contracting space.
This analysis is based on publicly available NYSE/NASDAQ trading data, congressional trading disclosures, SEC filings, and government contract databases.