AI Paradox: Gemini and Grok’s Catastrophic Quant Failure

After today’s market close, Bill Cara decided to run the same instructions and CSV datasets through the best two AI platforms he has been using in an attempt to discover where the differences are and the seriousness of the problems he has been encountering. He then submitted the outputs from each service as well as the instructions and CSV to an independent audit. The conclusion concurs that both reports are unacceptable due to severe and systematic errors in data processing and rule application. For Bill, whose ambition is to foster global financial literacy and empower individuals, the AI output must be accurate; otherwise, it is unacceptable. However, Bill is determined to push on, viewing AI as the equivalent of an “army of employees” that he must train to meet his standards. Moving forward, the platform used must ensure strict, verifiable adherence to all quantitative steps, including correct handling of NaN values, accurate sorting (using the correct sort key to identify true Top 3/Bottom 3), and precise application of the complex, multi-variable INSTAT recommendation logic. As these reports are for paid subscribers, Bill has put them on hold until they meet his standards.