« Daily Report for Tue, Apr 22, 2008 | Main | Daily Report for Wed, Apr 23, 2008 »
April 22, 2008
Bill Cara's Community Chat, Tues., Apr. 22, 2008, 9:28am ET
You recall how I said that in the credit crunch of 1990, my parents bought their next door neighbor’s upscale country house and 22 acres of lake view property for $300,000, down in a few weeks from its initial price of $1.1 million, essentially valuing the house at near zero? The same thing is happening now in parts of America.
Reuters is reporting today that at a recent luxury property auction in Fort Lauderdale, the auctioneer took home after home off the block within moments after opening the bidding when nobody would bid.
”On one high-rise condo in the Miami enclave of Williams Island, a 3,100 square foot penthouse previously listed at $5.6 million, he opened bidding at $5 million, lowered his price to $3.5 million, $3 million, $2.5 million, and then closed the auction, all within a minute."There's just not that much enthusiasm or activity in the luxury market," said Jack Winston, a real estate analyst with Goodkin Consulting in Miami.
After the local real estate market peaked two years ago, local brokers said high-end real estate was the only thing propping up the condo market in Miami.”
Apparently Donald Trump dropped the asking price of a multi-million dollar Palm Beach property by 20% and it’s still on the market.
What everybody must recognize is that there is a cycle to every natural thing in life. The problems with banking industry credit come and go. The credit contraction phase we are in since early 3Q2007 will be a bad one because the credit expansion phase had been so extreme. This is nothing new to you, so why fight it?
Telling really was a UBS admission to shareholders in a pdf I have from UBS. On pages 40-41 of “Shareholder Report on UBS’s write-downs” this text is an admission by the leading wealth manager in the world that management failed their stakeholders abysmally. Particularly revolting is the admission regarding staff compensation.
6.3.6.6 Infrastructure Investment
ď‚•ď€ Inadequate systems: The existing risk management, finance and risk control systems were not sufficiently robust with respect to risk monitoring in relation to complex products. This led to an inability to obtain a portfolio view in certain products. These infrastructure issues had been raised but no substantial actions appear to have been taken to address concerns. Infrastructure limitations became even more problematic with the business growth into more complex, higher margin products.6.3.6.7 Silos
ď‚•ď€ Lack of strategic coordination: The risk functions (Market, Credit and Finance) operate as independent units, brought together to assess individual transactions. It does not appear that these functions sought systematically to operate in a strategically connected manner.6.3.6.8 NBI / TRPA Processes
ď‚•ď€ Shortcomings in approach: There was no NBI process for the CDO structuring business or for the AMPS business. AMPS trades were subject to repeated TRPA approvals – with the effect that whilst trade-by-trade approvals were obtained, substantively the depth and breadth of assessment was probably not at the same level that would have been applied if an NBI case had been submitted. Additionally, TRPAs for CDOs appear often to have been presented to the control functions for approval only at a relatively late stage, when the majority of the assets backing and to be transferred to the CDO special purpose vehicle had already been warehoused and the consequences of declining the proposal would have entailed costly unwinding of the warehouse.
ď‚•ď€ Focus on speed: The NBI and TRPA processes were also seen by some IB business areas, including Fixed Income, as bureaucratic and slow. The IB's NBI and TRPA processes weresubject to a number of reviews and recommendations for improvement, over a period of several months – but the emphasis was generally on speeding up approvals as opposed to ensuring that the process achieved the goal of delivering substantive and holistic risk assessment of the proposals presented.6.3.7 Finance Oversight
The basis of accounting for, and the valuations applied to, securities and synthetic positions was significant to the economic performance of the businesses with Subprime exposure and to the financial incentives for the staff involved in these businesses. In particular it was important to the timing and levels of profit recorded by the ABS / MBS and CDO desks in the Rates area that their strategies (for example the AMPS trades) were eligible for Day 1 P&L treatment. BUC operated as an independent control unit in confirming the determinations made by the ABS / MBS and CDO desks. UBS considered the approach to valuations and reporting taken by BUC in relation to the positions over the period and identified the following as a factor in UBS's lack of an effective response to the market dislocation:
ď‚•ď€ Inability to accurately assess valuation risk on a timely basis: A number of key indicators in relation to valuation issues over structured Fixed Income products were identified and reported in the period prior to Q3 2007. These included a reduced ability to source external prices to verify trader marks and general increases in the value of untested positions. Due to limitations in data, BUC were not in a position to challenge on a timely basis the assertion for valuation purposes of the flat or low risk nature of the retained Super Senior positions. BUC reported (as have other independent internal control units) that there were examples where significant manual intervention and reconciliation was required to assess the relevant risk nature, or where data was fragmented or insufficiently granular. These conditions existed for some time and represented latent and significant risks that were not reported by BUC as being of the highest priority until Q3 2007, after the impact of the Subprime crisis had become apparent.6.3.8 Compensation
UBS has identified the following contributory factors related to compensation and incentives:
ď‚•ď€ Structural incentives to implement carry trades: The UBS compensation and incentivisation structure did not effectively differentiate between the creation of alpha (i.e., return in excess of a defined expectation) versus the creation of return based on a low cost of funding. In other words, employee incentivisation arrangements did not differentiate between return generated by skill in creating additional returns versus returns made from exploiting UBS's comparatively low cost of funding in what were essentially carry trades. There are no findings that special arrangements were made for employees in the businesses holding Subprime positions. However, the relatively high yield attributable to Subprime made this asset class an attractive long position for carry trades. Further, the UBS funding framework amplified the incentives to pursue compensation through profitable carry trades. For example, several Super Senior trades had relatively thin overall positive carry.
ď‚•ď€ Asymmetric risk / reward compensation: The compensation structure generally made little recognition of risk issues or adjustment for risk / other qualitative indicators (e.g. for Group Internal Audit ratings, operational risk indicators, compliance issues, etc.). For example, there were incentives for the CDO structuring desk to pursue concentrations in Mezzanine CDOs, which had a significantly higher fee structure (approximately 125-150 bp) than High-Grade CDOs (approximately 30-50 bp). Similarly, the CDO desk had an incentive to pursue AMPS trades, as they provided, compared to NegBasis trades, a less expensive (and therefore higher return) form of hedging. Also, Day1 P&L treatment of many of the transactions meant that employee remuneration (including bonuses) was not directly impacted by the longer term development of positions created. The reluctance to allow variations between financial reporting and management accounting made it less likely that options to vary the revenue attributed to traders for compensation purposes would be considered.
ď‚•ď€ Insufficient incentives to protect the UBS franchise long-term: Under UBS’s principles for compensation, deferred equity forms a component of compensation that generally increases with seniority. Although incentivisation of employees broadly builds in increasing levels of deferred equity for increasingly senior people, it remains the case that bonus payments for successful and senior IB Fixed Income traders, including those in the businesses holding Subprime positions were significant. Essentially, bonuses were measured against gross revenue after personnel costs, with no formal account taken of the quality or sustainability of those earnings.
I frankly don’t know how any disgraced management such as UBS’s can remain in place other than they admit the problem is systemic and other bankers just haven’t yet come clean on the issue.
I suppose credibility doesn’t mean much to a banker these days.
Have a great day. I'm essentially on vacation, trying to clean up a few things before returning to Nassau.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 22, 2008 09:28:14 AM | Category: Community Chat
Discourse
Buy 100 Shares of DUG
Order Number:D22BKQPT Details Filled at $29.61
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 9:47 AM [link]
In at 43.40 QID
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 9:52 AM [link]
Casino operators (MGM, LVS,WYNN,MPEL) looking very strong this morning.
Posted by: JogyP
at
April 22, 2008 9:54 AM [link]
Adding to WGW at 2.96
Posted by: JogyP
at
April 22, 2008 9:56 AM [link]
JogyP
I was told to buy LVS yesterday I did not pay
attentin
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 9:58 AM [link]
NWA- adding at 8.48...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 10:19 AM [link]
U.S. Existing Home Sales Fell in March; Prices Lower
``There still is an imbalance in the existing housing market that needs to be corrected through lower inventories and higher sales,'' said Michelle Meyer, an economist at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in New York, which correctly forecast the sales level. ``The market will remain out of balance this year and most of next. As long as the housing market remains weak we think the economy will remain weak as well.''
Stocks composed of $DJUSEN (moves XLI & DUG):
Exxon 27% Chevron 10% ConocoPhillips 6.7% Schlumberger 6.3% Occidental Petroleum 3.67% Devon 2.67% Rig Transocean 2.6% APA Apache 2.42% Haliburton 2% Marathon Oil 2%
All are at or very near 52 week highs. OXY, RIG, DVN, APA, HAL have smashed through previous 52 week highs. XOM is under 52 week high by about $0.60, CVX is under 52 week high by $2.00. COP is under by $6, SLB is under by $10
Posted by: CapN
at
April 22, 2008 10:33 AM [link]
Buy 100 Shares of NWA
Order Number:D22BSVQC Details Filled at $8.2099
Buy 100 Shares of DAL
Order Number:D22BSWZS Details Filled at $7.48
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 10:34 AM [link]
2nd
i will be out by end of day
will not keep any overnight
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 10:35 AM [link]
WFC catching a bid...still working the long financials/short commodities thesis...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 10:58 AM [link]
Re: POG
Really good discussion from Kitco bullion dealers about where gold prices are at considering supply/demand fundamentals, with Jon Nadler(kitco) & Victor Adair(MF Global):
http://www.howestreet.com/index.php?pl=/fbn/index.php/mediaplayer/277
Two details this commentary does not address is how liquidity may affect gold prices, and how investment in bullion is generally not popular. If liquidity measures increase, then likely gold prices will benefit.
If renewed investor demand into bullion because of macroecomnic factors, it would overwhelm the gold markets.
That is, if all investors placed a portion of their investments in gold such as 5%, this would have a radical effect on gold markets. As it stands, investor demand is relatively stable, supply is stable, but liquidity measures are increasing.
Any change, such as dollar depreciation, or increased investor demand, or restrictions on mining or central bank buying can change the outlook. Its not as if any of these are thoroughly unlikely. Certainly the Bank Of Canada or the Bank Of England are two standout candidates for replenishing their supplies.
So, once again the day to day business of the gold trade is humming along, but the macroeconomic factors in play favour higher prices.
F6
Posted by: FranSix
at
April 22, 2008 11:03 AM [link]
todays TA on the XAU,
im sensing a similar pattern occuring on the XGD posted yesterday: a faint upward drift pattern within a broader trend. support is being tested and this week's price action will clarify if said patterns hold or are violated to the downside.
http://jglobal.blogspot.com/2008/04/xau-1-year-chart.html
i used the RSI-7 as prescribed by Bill, and the
W%R as prescribed by Jim sinclair.
comments are always welcome.
hey chuck what keeps happening to my posts?
Posted by: shark_attack
at
April 22, 2008 11:04 AM [link]
NWA- adding at 7.51...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 11:08 AM [link]
out QID
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 12:08 PM [link]
Bill and Friends,
The Oilsands were my friends this morning, after a couple of very uneventful days for me.
I failed to buy Chenerie Energy and thereby missed out on a fabulous move. This one will be good when it starts going up again. Also, still watching Talbots for a bottom.
Shoutout to Mike_NYC! How ya doin' Holmes? Happy Earthday everybody! Go find some vegetation and set it on fire!
Posted by: shark_attack
at
April 22, 2008 12:15 PM [link]
By the way did you hear Erin this morning saying that POT's expensive? She is such a coquetish, comely little morsel, along with her friend Trish. And Rebecca? Don't get my engine started...
Posted by: shark_attack
at
April 22, 2008 12:17 PM [link]
almost time to get long again, a little more down please :)
I think we are closed to 1300 S&P
than 1400
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 12:33 PM [link]
taking SMN off for now at 31.02...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 12:33 PM [link]
vinod- nice move on QID...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 12:40 PM [link]
That's funny...last night Cramer said it was still cheap.
Here's his reasoning:
The price of the product is still cheap to the farmers in terms of the marginal gain in crop yield per unit of potash. So they actually have some room to increase prices and/or sales. (aside: how many businesses can say that these days?) In addition, he mentioned that there are just not that many sources available.
Me? I have no idea. I'm just regurgitating last nights Cramer.
Cramer or Erin? When it comes to managing money, I'll go with the ugly old guy over the hottie. But I got no real dog in this POT hunt right now.
Posted by: MikeNYC
at
April 22, 2008 12:46 PM [link]
"Watching Talbot's for a bottom?"
Sorry, but that's pretty funny.
I find myself watching Abercrombie for the same....
Posted by: MikeNYC
at
April 22, 2008 12:50 PM [link]
Anybody know what caused FXI to get creamed @ 11:50 EST? Just curious.
Posted by: FattyArbuckle
at
April 22, 2008 1:05 PM [link]
WGW at 2.82.
Is it falling knife or time to add more?
Posted by: JogyP
at
April 22, 2008 1:14 PM [link]
I go away for an hour and the euro is now at 1.60 and oil at 119.50. yikes
Posted by: woolybear1
at
April 22, 2008 1:28 PM [link]
I'm starting to think that, with commodities reaching new all-time highs daily, and the dollar nearing the all-time low again that Bernacke will either have to raise rates by .25 or just hold steady on the 30th.
Maybe the G-7's message was to him and Paulson, saying it's enough and they can't cut anymore. We know he won't do if for the people. Who cares if they can't afford anything? But he may listen to the G-7, since they hold so much of our debt.
If he does cut, the dollar will hit a new all-time low and oil will likely start reaching towards 150 per barrel.
Rob.
Posted by: Finger Lakes
at
April 22, 2008 1:49 PM [link]
With food shortages being reported around the world, I'm surprised that there hasn't been any governments announce that they'll reverse their misguided food for ethanol program.
Rob.
Posted by: Finger Lakes
at
April 22, 2008 1:52 PM [link]
Capital One is offering 7&10 year CD's at 5.5%. This is the first time I've seen CD's being offered for over 5 years. Their rates are actually better than what National City Bank is offering. Could they possibley be in any more trouble than National City is?
Posted by: RosevilleBill
at
April 22, 2008 2:22 PM [link]
7 year CDs? i don't know...if inflation starts to take off, i'd hate to be stuck in anything beyond a 6 month CD...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 2:33 PM [link]
back into USD at 50.58 for a trade...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 2:37 PM [link]
Re: Junior Precious Metals Focus
Eldorado Gold bid for Frontier Pacific cheaper per ounce than others
Posted: April 21, 2008, 10:30 AM by David Pett
Mining, Takeovers
Eldorado Gold Corp. stock is down just under 1% on Monday morning, after the company splashed out and made a bid for Frontier Pacific Mining Corp., owner of the Perama Hill gold and silver development project in Greece.
Eldorado's bid is valued at approximately 90¢ per share or $148-million. On a fully diluted basis, the offer would be valued at $157-million.
"The deal would increase Eldorado's resource base by approximately 13%, currently at 10.4 million ounces and if developed, Perama would add 130 thousand ounces per year, bringing Eldorado to the 500 thousand ounces per year mark," Credit Suisse analyst Anita Soni said in a note to clients.
"Additionally, it allows Eldorado to increase its foothold in Europe and diversifies Turkish exposure as it currently owns the Kisladag mine and Efemcukuru development property in Turkey."
Ms. Soni added that based on the fully diluted deal value of $157-million, she calculated a value of US$115 per ounce of measured and indicated resources, That compares to Northgate Minerals Corp.'s offer for Perseverence at US$229 per ounce and Newmont Mining's acquisition of Miramar at US$335 per ounce.
Eldorado shares were down 7¢ to $7.35 at 10:35 a.m. ET, while trading on Frontier Pacific shares were halted.
Note: Some recent acquisitions by smaller companies were in the $40/oz. range, so prices for ounces in the ground have varied greatly.
Posted by: FranSix
at
April 22, 2008 2:43 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
When you import you put your entire lifestyle at risk. Try not to think of "imports" as strictly a global G7 thing only restricted to countries! If you buy power off a grid you "import". If you buy food from SafeWay you "import"! That's how I look at "imports" ... Then you have to look at other factors as to demographics that make such "imports" where you chose to live as more vulnerable or less vulnerable to shortages.
Yesterday I posted about food shortages in California. Here today you can read about Japan one of the G7 "rich" countries. Low and behold this article even mentions "self-suffciency" ... Japan has exceeded its government's "food budget"! Japanese shortages are similar to the shortages they experienced during WW2 ... If that is the case then just how advantageous is the concept of "globalization". Obviously we are now witnessing the downside! You can't depend on "globalization"! Shock of shocks ... it is always best to be "self-sufficient"! WOW ... I only learned that in Boy Scouts about 38 years ago! What was the motto then ... "BE PREPARED"? It looks as if none of the G7 leaders were ever Boy Scouts ...
The two main problems with the modern World is that there is too much money supply and too much "human supply"! Something has to give! Has the Pope approved condoms yet?
Read the last sentence in the entire article!
READ ON:
Japan’s Hunger Becomes a Dire Warning for Other Nations
By Justin Norrie
Mariko Watanabe admits she could have chosen a better time to take up baking. This week, when the Tokyo housewife visited her local Ito-Yokado supermarket to buy butter to make a cake, she found the shelves bare.
“I went to another supermarket, and then another, and there was no butter at those either. Everywhere I went there were notices saying Japan has run out of butter. I couldn’t believe it - this is the first time in my life I’ve wanted to try baking cakes and I can’t get any butter,” said the frustrated cook.
Japan’s acute butter shortage, which has confounded bakeries, restaurants and now families across the country, is the latest unforeseen result of the global agricultural commodities crisis.
A sharp increase in the cost of imported cattle feed and a decline in milk imports, both of which are typically provided in large part by Australia, have prevented dairy farmers from keeping pace with demand.
While soaring food prices have triggered rioting among the starving millions of the third world, in wealthy Japan they have forced a pampered population to contemplate the shocking possibility of a long-term - perhaps permanent - reduction in the quality and quantity of its food.
A 130% rise in the global cost of wheat in the past year, caused partly by surging demand from China and India and a huge injection of speculative funds into wheat futures, has forced the Government to hit flour millers with three rounds of stiff mark-ups. The latest - a 30% increase this month - has given rise to speculation that Japan, which relies on imports for 90% of its annual wheat consumption, is no longer on the brink of a food crisis, but has fallen off the cliff.
According to one government poll, 80% of Japanese are frightened about what the future holds for their food supply.
Last week, as the prices of wheat and barley continued their relentless climb, the Japanese Government discovered it had exhausted its ÂĄ230 billion ($A2.37 billion) budget for the grains with two months remaining. It was forced to call on an emergency ÂĄ55 billion reserve to ensure it could continue feeding the nation.
“This was the first time the Government has had to take such drastic action since the war,” said Akio Shibata, an expert on food imports, who warned the Agriculture Ministry two years ago that Japan would have to cut back drastically on its sophisticated diet if it did not become more self-sufficient.
In the wake of the decision this week by Kazakhstan, the world’s fifth biggest wheat exporter, to join Russia, Ukraine and Argentina in stopping exports to satisfy domestic demand, the situation in Japan is expected to worsen.
Bakeries, forced to increase prices by up to 30% in the past year, are warning that the trend will continue. Manufacturers of miso, a culinary staple, are preparing to pass on the bump in costs caused by the rising price of soybeans and cooking oil. And the nation’s largest brewer, Kirin, is lifting beer prices for the first time in almost two decades to account for the soaring cost of barley.
“In the past, Japan was a rich country with a powerful yen that could easily buy cheap imports such as wheat, corn and soybeans,” said Mr Shibata, who directs the Marubeni Research Institute in Tokyo. “But with enormous competition from the booming Chinese and Indian economies, that’s changed forever. You also need to take into account recent developments, including the damage to crops caused by drought and other disasters in exporting countries like Australia,” where the value of wheat exports has tumbled from $3.49 billion to $2.77 billion in the past three years.
The situation has been compounded by a surge in demand for bio-fuels such as ethanol, made from maize, encouraging farmers around the world to divert their efforts away from wheat and barley and into maize, further driving up prices.
Arguably Japan’s biggest concern, however, is its weakening ability to sustain its population with domestic produce. In 2006 the country’s self-sufficiency rate fell to 39%, according to the Agriculture Ministry. It was only the second time since the ministry began keeping records in 1960 that the population derived less than 40% of its daily calorie intake from domestically grown food.
Shinichi Shogenji, dean of the University of Tokyo’s graduate school of agricultural and life sciences, said Japan’s meat consumption had increased by 900% since 1955, in part because expanding incomes had enabled families to supplement the sparse national diet of rice, fish and miso soup with more Western-style food.
This trend, combined with rapid ageing and declining rural populations, had placed the country’s self-sufficiency at a perilously low level, Professor Shogenji said.
In view of recent predictions by Goldman Sachs analysts that commodities could experience “explosive rallies” in the next two years, many are wondering if Japan could become an example to other rich nations that have relied too much on foreign supplies to put food on their tables.END
WGW now 2.68 down 10%.
May be bad news leaking out? Tempted to add more but staying away for now.
Posted by: JogyP
at
April 22, 2008 2:45 PM [link]
vinod- hoping the headlines on oil prices are marking a (ST) top...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 2:50 PM [link]
Added WGW @ 2.69
Posted by: BillySundance
at
April 22, 2008 2:57 PM [link]
...talbots for a bottom...hehe.
Posted by: MtnGntx
at
April 22, 2008 3:07 PM [link]
yous guys have a dirty mind...I'm talking about a stock here.
Posted by: shark_attack
at
April 22, 2008 3:19 PM [link]
2nd
DUG is always dog for me
I never made money on Dam DuG
this time I am going to hold it for a week
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 3:23 PM [link]
"Last week, as the prices of wheat and barley continued their relentless climb, the Japanese Government discovered it had exhausted its ÂĄ230 billion ($A2.37 billion) budget for the grains with two months remaining. It was forced to call on an emergency ÂĄ55 billion reserve to ensure it could continue feeding the nation."
Why is the government of Japan responsible for feeding the people? Isn't that the people's responsibility? Are most people in Japan on food stamps? Am I missing something here?
Rob.
Posted by: Finger Lakes
at
April 22, 2008 3:26 PM [link]
Rob,
I'm only guessing, but maybe Japanese govt acts as an intermediary to international markets, maintaining its own stockpile from which it sells to local companies? Seems feasible given their reliance on imports and the importance of food availability.
Not entirely familiar with Canadian Wheat Board, but maybe the same kind of idea, except in that case its farmers selling to centralized entity rather than having individual farmers or small coops trying to get their grains to international markets...
Posted by: proudPapa
at
April 22, 2008 3:31 PM [link]
In uaua 13.70
Posted by: vinod
at
April 22, 2008 3:33 PM [link]
Re: WGW and the POG,
I have long ago concluded that an end to rate cuts will mean an end to this inflation-driven commodities bull. And with a new administration coming in and "freezing rates" or whatever other neo-Trotskyite nonsense Hillbama can cook up, and with rates as low as they already are, the writing seems to me to be on the wall for an end to the cuts, and then, an end to POG appreciation.
WGW has broken support and made a top of some sort, you'd probably call it a "triple top" but the name is unimportant. What is important is, the stock has broken support, which is now resistance, and a further decline is likely. I see $2.25 at least. How about you?
Posted by: shark_attack
at
April 22, 2008 3:34 PM [link]
Check out the weekly commentary from John Hussman (a fund manager and a professor of economics), posted yesterday:
http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc080421.htm
Yesterday he said that the market is overbought in an unfavorable market climate, and today we see what he meant. It is also interesting to note that his medium-term view of equities, bonds, and commodities exactly corresponds to Bill's scenario: a drop in equities -> flight to safety and drop in bond yields -> rise in bond yields as investors realize the inflation is too high -> drop in commodities as bond yields rise (he expects the yields to start rising significantly at about the summer time). So I guess I'll focus my trading on shorting the market on small rallies as opposed to buying commodities on small pull-backs.
DavidV
Posted by: David
at
April 22, 2008 3:42 PM [link]
ProudPapa,
I could see that. The government probably gets a better price buying wholesale. I'd hate to have to rely on the government for my food though. They'd end up feeding friends and family first and we'd all be left with the scraps.
Maybe that's what's happening in Japan.
Rob.
Posted by: Finger Lakes
at
April 22, 2008 3:58 PM [link]
shark- LOL->that's right, vinod and i dump dogs/sell dead cats/try to catch bottoms every day...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 3:59 PM [link]
Mexican oil production is dropping quickly and should put a floor under crude...
"Mexico's state-run oil company said Monday that oil production fell 7.8 percent to 2.91 million barrels a day in the first quarter as current reserves dwindle.
Petroleos Mexicanos, or Pemex, has struggled with falling reserves, especially at its main Cantarell oil field, and lacks the money and expertise to launch new drilling projects. Pemex only has enough proven oil reserves to last nine years at current production rates."
Posted by: fireworks
at
April 22, 2008 4:04 PM [link]
nothing beats squeezing shorts, though...;)
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 4:09 PM [link]
brcm up $2 after-hours...;)
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 4:13 PM [link]
unfortunately, it appears USD doesn't trade AH?
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 4:16 PM [link]
Looks like YHOO beat - wonder what that'll do to the MrSoftee takeover bid.
Posted by: writersblock
at
April 22, 2008 4:34 PM [link]
Dollar Gold
Some Caraistas have been speculating the dollar has bottomed as Fed rate cutting will be over after the meeting next week. And gold is done appreciating.
IMO- there may be a false temporary dollar rally if the Fed signals a temporary end to its cutting of rates but there is no way the Fed will begin to raise rates anytime soon with the current credit enviroment. They will continue to create liquidity at the current pace which is about 17%. Negative interest rates will exist through the end of 2008 and into 2009. That is negative for the dollar and positive for gold.
The financial storm is not over and the dollar is vulnerable for further losses which could turn into a dollar crisis later this year as world holders continue to lose faith in the greenback. Any temporary rise in the dollar should produce a golden buying opportunity in the shiny metal and those companies producing who produce it.
Gold has no counterparty risk....everything else does.
That's my view and I'm stickin to it.
Posted by: astral25
at
April 22, 2008 5:19 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
Did anyone here get in on the IPI IPO? A 58% pop on the first day with tons of demand!
I am glad to see the first of what I am sure will be many more commodity related IPOs to come. I am tired of seeing debt laden bank and services making all the BIG MONEY! The tide is turning ...
kaimu: yesterday you said commidities will not be like the 80s. COuld you expand on that? The commodity high was '81 I think. I have been fully expecting a return of oil/gold/crb to new highs in the coming 2-3 year timeframe. I'm wondering if I misread your quote. Thanks
Posted by: JRPauley
at
April 22, 2008 9:48 PM [link]
Any ideas how to trade the $SSEC Shanghai Composite? It looks like it's making a turn. FXI does not track well. Is it on a Buy Alert?
Posted by: SteveC
at
April 23, 2008 1:00 AM [link]
$SSEC Shanghai Composite?
Take a look at CAF.
Posted by: Telestar3d
at
April 23, 2008 1:17 AM [link]
Thanks for CAF. I plugged it in with $SSEC, but doesn't seem to be tracking well lately. http://tinyurl.com/63kvpr
Posted by: SteveC
at
April 23, 2008 1:31 AM [link]
Charlie Maxwell video over at Bloomberg. Sorry, they do not seem to provide url link anymore. Scroll down to portfolio advisor section.
Posted by: Telestar3d
at
April 23, 2008 2:35 AM [link]
ALOHA !!
JRPauley ... it was in reference to the article about the farmland prices bust in the 1980s.
Here is the statement from the article ... "Flinchbaugh and others says the U.S. agricultural economy bears a striking resemblance to that seen in the mid-1970s, when a seemingly insatiable demand for U.S. crops drove up land values and farmers took advantage of their soaring equity to increase debt.
When U.S. policy changed and demand suddenly dropped at a time of rapidly rising interest rates, land values and farm income plunged, pressuring thousands of farmers to sell out and leading to the failure of nearly 300 agricultural banks."END
There are crucial financial disconnects now that did not exist in the 1980s. Add in an extra couple billion people and the need for expanded food supplies will continue. Only a population decline due to bird flu or some pandemic wil cure that. Money supply certainly shows no signs of abating!
All I meant was you cannot compare 1980s prices to now. We are in uncharted territory. We are now witnessing the collapse of the first fiat based World Reserve Currency. All past World Reserve Currency collapses, like the British Pound, were still under a gold standard.
So you did not misread since I also fully expect new highs in oil/gold/crb over the next 2-3 years and beyond.
ALOHA !!
Are gas prices really that high? Inflation adjusted we are even with prices in 1980!
Link: http://zfacts.com/p/35.html
Look how Wars effect gas prices. Wars are inflationary not deflationary. Wars are about the most destructive and least productive activity governments can engage in!
ALOHA !!
Here was a prediction from the Talking Heads guru Mr. Larry Kudlow back in 2004. If you listened to him you lost tons of money! You lost DOUBLE, because you lost betting the USDX would go up and you lost out buying gold on its way up! Why is this guy still on TV?
REA ON:
Cunning Realist 4/22/2008
That Worked Out Well
Larry Kudlow, National Review, 11/16/04:
With the reelection of President George W. Bush, cowboy capitalism will continue and then some. Pro-growth policies on tax reform, Social Security reform, tort reform, and energy reform will all keep the capital in capitalism. Watch the U.S economy continue to outperform the other large industrial countries by a wide margin, as it has since Reagan.
Which brings us back to the dollar. In order to get a piece of Bush’s ownership-society vision, foreign investors are going to have to buy dollars, not sell them. ...
In narrower terms, the current guardian of dollar value is Maestro Alan Greenspan. He has spent a distinguished career at the Fed protecting greenback purchasing power and holding down domestic inflation. For those proliferating dollar bears on Wall Street, including a number of supply-siders who have turned into inflationist worrywarts, do you really think Greenspan is about to reverse his long-held convictions? Only a few years ago the rap against Sir Alan was deflation. Having corrected that mistake, do you really think he’s embarked on a massive inflation? Highly doubtful. ...
...the Fed will gradually remove the excess dollars they appropriately created following the dreadful 9/11 attacks on the U.S. As they remove this emergency liquidity and as pro-growth tax cuts are made permanent in Bush’s second-term tax-reform program, the future value of the U.S. dollar is likely to rise, not fall. ...
The liberal chattering pundits of the old established media will continue to prattle on about budget deficits, trade deficits, a weak dollar, higher inflation, and a jobless recovery. But America’s economic future is vastly more optimistic than these negativists would have us believe. Both politics and policy are pointing toward non-inflationary prosperity. The U.S. dollar will share in this bounty.END
The Good Stuff?
Larry Kudlow, would the real president please stand up!!
Posted by: FranSix
at
April 23, 2008 7:05 AM [link]
Good Morning.
One small change to the Cara 100 Ratings:
ECA - Target Price Raised from $78 to $82 @ Lehman Bros.
---------------------------------------------------
Have a great day.
Posted by: Bull Hunter
at
April 23, 2008 8:23 AM [link]
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
vinod- scaling in (small) DUG 29.69...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 22, 2008 9:43 AM [link]