« Saturday’s Commentary & Chat, 09/29/2007 6:50 AM ET | Main | Week in Review #39 (2007-09-29) »

October 1, 2007

Cara’s Commentary & Community Chat, Mon., Oct. 1, 2007, 8:18 AM ET

Most of us who have children are extremely proud of them on their wedding day. Will and Fiona have given their parents a lifetime of happiness and pride, and Saturday was merely the icing on the cake. They are and will be great partners.

There will be a lifetime’s memories of this wedding, but three in particular will be --

(i) when my daughter Stefanie (you already know her) and Fiona’s brother Brendan (Fan 590 Radio and ex-Steamwhistle Pub) broke out into dance during the arrival procession of the wedding party at the hotel ballroom. That set the tenor for the evening. Never before have I attended a wedding where I’d say 90 pct of the guests were up dancing in the first ten minutes. And did it all night. Awesome!

(ii) Another memory will be of the young girl from Ireland, Abby, about 6, who, regardless of the music being fast, slow, or in between, danced a continuous Riverdance solo performance of the Irish dance, often alone on the stage in her North American debut, to the appreciation and cheers of the audience.

(iii) And then there was Olive and Derry Fitzpatrick, parents of the bride, who were amazing in performing a set with the live band, Odd Little Man. Olive and Derry are popular entertainers in West Toronto Irish pubs. Odd Little Man’s leader Mike O’Grady, who was also MC for the evening, did a terrific job (as did the DJ). At the bottom of Michael’s myspace.com profile you will see the profile of one of his friend’s, Will, who is guess who.

Good memories. The best of life.

These are some of the many photos I took. Clearly I am not a professional photographer, but I think they tell a story.

BTW, Will Cara is one-eighth Irish by blood. My mother's father was Neely, a Protestant from (I believe) County Ulster in what is now Northern Ireland. The Cara name is also Irish but in my case was born in the Cara Inn, when after my first career in public accounting, on my last day on the job, while receiving hospitality from the Cara Operations general manager at the Cara Inn at Toronto Airport, I decided to cut the first three (CIC) and last three (LLI) letters off my Italian name, and change the E to an A to go from Ciccarelli to Cara. Later, my client's Chairman/CEO and majority owner, Paul Phelan, and I dined alone in the private dining room at RBC Dominion Securities where we discussed the etiology of the name. His father had arrived from Ireland to set up food, beverage and newspaper sales at the train stations across Canada. In time, they added the airports, in-flight catering, and Cara Inn, and after that Swiss Chalet, Harvey's and KFC. The name of the company was CAnadian RAilway News, which the Phelan family cut to CARA. Although I am not so sure of the accuracy, Paul Phelan told me that in Gaelic, Cara means a home or friend of a traveller. He said the name brought him good fortune. In China, I discovered the name is pronounced as "Glorious China". In any event, there is Irish history that Will brought to the table this weekend.


Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on October 1, 2007 08:18:33 AM | Category: Cara's Daily Commentary

Discourse

The bride is a fair colleen.

Thanks for the pictures. You're my kind of folks. Congratulations Bill and ad multos annos to the newlyweds.

Posted by: badius [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 8:28 AM [link]

Congrats to the newly weds.

Posted by: Quentusrex [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 8:30 AM [link]

Mazel Tov!

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 8:35 AM [link]

Good Job, Bill!


Chris

Posted by: shark_attack [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 8:40 AM [link]

Congratulations Bill, They look like a very happy couple!!!

Posted by: Finger Lakes [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 8:45 AM [link]

Highest Regards!

Thanks for the pictures.

Posted by: Rookie [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 8:50 AM [link]

Congratulations on a beautiful wedding and best wishes for a fulfilling life together!

Back to business. I have just posted a round-up highlighting some memorable / thought-provoking quotes from market commentators during the past week. It also briefly reviews the week’s market action on the basis of a few performance charts.

Here is the link for the "words from the (investment) wise for the week that was:

http://investmentpostcards.wordpress.com/2007/09/30/words-from-the-wise-for-the-week-that-was-sept-24-%e2%80%93-30-2007/

Posted by: prieur [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 8:58 AM [link]

Fabulous Bill!

May the road rise up before them,

And the wind be always at their back!

Posted by: Seamus [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:02 AM [link]

Bill,
Congratulations. Beautiful pictures!

I have posted Real PCE minus its Non-Durables component to minimize the influence of energy and food prices. I ended up with another series indicating a change in consumption behavior.
In the last few years, this series has failed to climb above its 38-yr average.

Posted by: Will Rahal [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:07 AM [link]

I have just read that Cerberus is trying to buy the US home loan part of Northern Rock. If I remember correctly didn't Cerberus also buy GMAC bank from GM? And GMAC bank is heavily involved in US home loans through Ditech?

Posted by: Quentusrex [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:13 AM [link]

Lovely wedding pictures, Bill. I married off my first daughter Siobhan a couple years ago and your pictures also bring back that happy time for me. The only downside was that my daughter didn't marry an Irishman! All the best to you and yours, and thank you for sharing with us your readers.

Posted by: aucourant [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:36 AM [link]

Western Goldfields flying.

Posted by: SiO2 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:39 AM [link]

They make a beautiful couple. Thank you for posting the photos of what must have been a wonderful time for all.

Posted by: writersblock [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:52 AM [link]

WGDFF: up over 17% in two days! I was WELL above Warren Buffett returns, sold a partial position this AM.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 10:00 AM [link]

Congratulation Bill.

Posted by: 1stMillionAt33 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 10:21 AM [link]

Bill,

Congrats on the wedding!

Can you explain why Anglo Gold (AU) would do a secondary offering of 61 million shares now? Down almost 5% today while most other gold stocks are up. Is this the time to buy more AU or sell what I have?

Thanks very much,

Adam

Posted by: AdamG [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 10:21 AM [link]

On WDGFF, Bill indicated some time in the summer that it was a candidate for listing on the NAS or perhaps it was another index. Does anyone know or have an idea if a listing is in the works and about when?

Thanks.

Posted by: BRC [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 10:30 AM [link]

Bill, from paesano to another, "cento anni", keep up the good work. Thanks

Posted by: hforadori [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 10:31 AM [link]

Congratulations to Bill and his family. I can't help but wonder if family members hid his lap top.
----------

The Economist has an article about China...sort of addresses the issue will emerging growth save the developed mkts. For my .02 I doubt we will read the real answer in the typical places.

http://tinyurl.com/3yv7pu

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 10:33 AM [link]

Re: GOLD

Bill, 2nd_ave: you have been suggesting that gold will rise from this point, then fall, and then rise to above $1000/oz by 2010. I understand why gold can be expected to rise now: there is a downward pressure on interest rates because of the slowing economy. It seems to me that the gold bubble being created now should burst when traders will realize that interest rates will not be lowered anymore because the economy is ready to start expanding again, which I think will happen in 2008. So why do you think gold will rise between 2008 and 2010? Do you think the economy will still be in a downtrend during these period?

Another argument I have seen repeated on this blog is that if a large amount of money was printed in recent years, then the price of gold should go up repeated on this blog a number of times. Isn’t it necessary to consider what has been happening to that money? If that money has been leaving circulation and was being invested in some projects that create new goods or services, then that money should have no impact on the price of gold. Only the liquid uninvested cash has the potential of really moving the price of gold, I think. Am I missing something?

Thanks...

Posted by: David [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:09 AM [link]

congratulations and much happiness to the newlyweds. thanks for sharing the pics. they were wonderful

Posted by: shopper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:10 AM [link]

David,
The basic argument is that when you print money you devalue the dollar and tempt inflation. Both a devaluation of the dollar and inflation make gold a more desireable holding.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:16 AM [link]

Has anyone heard any news regarding U.S. Gold (UXG)? I've searched the internet high and low and can't find any updates regarding their exploration efforts. Disclosure: I don't currently own UXG, I have in the past and I'm looking for an entry point.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:31 AM [link]

SNC-Lavalin (SNC.to) just hit an all time high. This is one infrastructure play that I think has room to run. I put this in the same category as SGR, FLR, FWLT, etc. The chart looks phenomenal.

Posted by: BillySundance [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:38 AM [link]

I bought back into Fancamp (FNC) and MacDonald Mines (BMK) this morning. As I've said before, I think that they are swinging gates with big volume and I will keep buying and selling them as long as they keep swinging.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:40 AM [link]

Congratulations, Bill! I drink a toast!

"Only the liquid uninvested cash has the potential of really moving the price of gold, I think. Am I missing something?"

It would come as a complete suprise, catching everyone aghast, non-plussed, stressed even, that the reason why Gold price appreciation may occur that sentiment should favour it.

Another confusing detail is that EU and other central banks have increased their money supply YOY to the tune of 10%+. No wonder they keep their interest rates a good 150 basis points over the central bank rate. Yet there is so much pontifiicating about the "profligate" Fed.

Posted by: FranSix [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:42 AM [link]

Fred, I think the economic argument you are using assumes that the newly printed money will cause the prices of all goods and services to increase. However, it doesn't always happen like that in reality. If that money is being invested into projects that create NEW goods and services, then it actually helps the economy and can even strengthen the dollar.

Posted by: David [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:45 AM [link]

I just need to vent about some bad journalism I came across recently. Serves as a good example of how cynical we should be of the news...

The article talks about falling real wages in Alberta. I live here, and while house prices have exploded, i thought they aren't included in CPI? could be diff in canada, article doesn't elaborate. At any rate, average raise for last bunch of years was 6-7%, which I'd hardly call 'falling behind'.

http://tinyurl.com/3amwm8

"real wages in construction have dropped
from $25.28 in 2001 to $23.35 in 2006".

Given the massive construction boom, trades unions getting large salary increases, very tight labour market, etc, I find this claim laughable. Construction industry has been able to write their own checks for last couple of years.

But what really pissed me off is comparison to corporate profits:

"Companies, on the other hand, are benefiting from the boom - with a rise in profits from $12 billion in 1998 to $54 billion in 2006."

Note the different time frame. I guess 1998 makes a great starting point as oil averaged $14/barrel bottoming under $12. Had they used 2001 like for labour stats, oil was around $28, and the comparison wouldn't have looked nearly as bad.

Rest of the article talks about homelessness, food bank use, etc. Well, don't mean to sound cold, but that's what happens when economy can't keep up with mass amount of immigration seeking opportunity.

Why is it journalists feel the need to incite fear and anger? Why can't they just stick with the facts? Ugh


Posted by: proudPapa [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:48 AM [link]

And all that money which ends up in someone's hands creates inflation David.

ING picked up all of Netbanks assets in the US. Netbank was shut down by the US government following losses on subprime mortgages and other loans.

Posted by: SiO2 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:50 AM [link]

anybody find any interesting setups/unusually large volume scenarios?

Posted by: shark_attack [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:55 AM [link]

David:
This assumes that new value added from new goods and services can overcome the loss of value from RE and inflation. Will we grow manufacturing at 10% plus? RE values in some of the biggest markets are down that or more. Then subtract the Fed's 2% they stole from you in Sept.
Then there is the question of who is going to consume those new goods and services. The growth there will be for export, not domestic consumption. See Will Rahal's site to have a look at the consumption trend. Not promising.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:56 AM [link]

I'm watching gold go up today and I regret that I missed the move from 700 to 750. However, if you look at the RSI's for gold in Bill's WIR as well as GLD, they definitely look toppy. This seems to be confirmed by a divergence in the MACD histogram and the MACD lines are just short of crossing. Does anyone think that Gold may shortly be taking a breather or going down?

FWIW, I did a simple quadratic regression of the gold price over 5 yrs beginning at a price of 350 and ending with a price of 650 on July 1, 2007. Predicted price for January 1st is 765. I will shortly be trying to fit a couple of trigonmetric curves around this regression curve.

Posted by: aucourant [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:57 AM [link]

I'm watching gold go up today and I regret that I missed the move from 700 to 750. However, if you look at the RSI's for gold in Bill's WIR as well as GLD, they definitely look toppy. This seems to be confirmed by a divergence in the MACD histogram and the MACD lines are just short of crossing. Does anyone think that Gold may shortly be taking a breather or going down?

FWIW, I did a simple quadratic regression of the gold price over 5 yrs beginning at a price of 350 and ending with a price of 650 on July 1, 2007. Predicted price for January 1st is 765. I will shortly be trying to fit a couple of trigonmetric curves around this regression curve.

Posted by: aucourant [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 11:57 AM [link]

Chris,

I mentioned SYNL last friday, showing large volume. It's up another 8% today again on large volume.

Posted by: JogyP [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 12:00 PM [link]

David,
I think that a lot of the printed money is going to fund the war in Iraq. I shudder to think what would be happening economically if the U.S. realized peace.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 12:04 PM [link]

On Friday, UBS published a discussion of the probability the US economy will be in recession over the next year.

Bottom Line: While the risk of recession increased during the August financial
panic, our estimates suggest that it has declined noticeably in the wake of the Fed’s
September interest rate reduction.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 12:24 PM [link]

Bill,
Who knows? UBS and Citigroup come out with bad news today and both are up. Citigroup says buy housing stocks and those stocks are having a great day. Meanwhile, the CEOs of those comapnies aren't seeing a turnaround. Fleckenstein says, it's not a question of whether a recession is coming, it's when?

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 12:34 PM [link]

Congratulations to you & your family. Enjoyed the wedding pictures! Will married a beautiful girl...I liked Will's myspace bio. He sounds very nice. He tells it like it is, kinda like his Dad!

Posted by: NT [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 12:47 PM [link]

I have been looking at CSCO as a buy and am in a delema....My real business has been very successful for 30 years and i have had great success increasing my net worth and have a great cash flow in real estate. Have 6 figure invested in gold and silver that i have bought mostly like a scrape or pawn broker would buy at very low prices (a sign on my office door).

My stock picking record is very poor, but is the next skill i am working towards developing. My skill here is poor, maybe because i have trouble thinking 5% or 10% profits are worth the effort.

Now my question.

Louise Yamada shows a chart of the life cycle of CSCO and says "it is a pounding buy".

http://www.cnbc.com/id/21036111

The CSCO part is at the 2 minute mark in video.

Now when i look at M/W/D/ RSI values it looks like it is in the distribution range.

Can any of the successful traders here help me learn from this?

Posted by: gademsky [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 12:54 PM [link]

Bill,

I loved seeing the wedding pictures. Fiona inherited beautiful
Irish traits; red hair and those unmistakingly Irish eyes. Will & Fiona looked so happy and how lucky they are to have a father like you.

mazel tov! Sarah-Hadassah

Posted by: SH [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 12:59 PM [link]

gademsky -

I believe that L. Yamada's call vs. RSI system differ in their time frames. Her position takes place in a multi-year (almost decade-long) context and borrows from a strategic philosophy (after living through a full cycle & extended purgatory (kinda of troubled teens for a prodigy child), CSCO is ready to enter successful adulthood with more consistent, broad trading patterns.

On the other hand, the RSI screen brings into focus tactical considerations as to the timing of entry/exit. So keep it on radar screen and try to spot a good near-/medium-term entry.

JML

Posted by: Jumble [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 1:21 PM [link]

2nd ave.
Warning. I'm in the vicinity of my account's all time high even though I have more cash on hand. That next wave that I think you might be waiting for could be in the making just beyond the horizon.

All my pm tickers will have trailing losses of around 5%..so I am giving latitude but not really that much since when these things sell off twice that loss seems to happen.

I have $xeu on my tool bar as a "clue" to the next decline, and looking at xau/gld and gld/slv ratios. What keeps me a hold is the sentiment that the public is not yet in (which Bill mentions in current WIR or is that an excerpt from an older comment), that emerging growth is intact, and the perception that existing mine production is precious in view of astronomical start up costs. Also, when I look at a 5yr chart of eza/s africa as proxy for risky mining the price is close to the bottom of an intact rising trend line.

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 1:24 PM [link]

gademsky,

(Cara 100) Cisco (CSCO) was "a pounding buy" in July 2006, when I listed 20 or 22 tech stocks. The price was 17 and change. CSCO is now 33.13.

When Louise Yamada mentioned CSCO at the Citi Capital Markets Symposium last week, she was referring to key stocks in Nasdaq that are still not close to their 2000 market highs, whereas the Dow 30 is back to record high levels. (Cara 100) Oracle (ORCL) is another chart similar to CSCO.

Would I buy either one right now? No. The last time I was interested was in July 2006.

I try to explain to this community that if you learn a trading philosophy and systematic approach based on strategy and tactics, you will not need Louise Yamada or Bill Cara. If you are patient you will let the market come to you, and that's when you buy and sell -- at extreme prices.

Once you learn this method of trading, Wall Street cannot fool you. You and everybody else will make mistakes, but you will make fewer of them, and your performance will rise above the majority of the crowd.

It's fine to tell a story like Louise and I and others tell. We have to be entertaining. But at the end of the day, if you didn't learn anything good and sustainable, then you probably learned something bad and forgettable.

When you follow discussions about trading or investing, did you receive info that may be ok for a few days, and maybe not, or did you learn something, like riding a bike, something you can do forever, and it will be ok.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 1:26 PM [link]

Jumble,

You are right about Louise Yamada's intention. Although she is a world-class market technician, she was saying that her charts lead her to think of why Cisco is looking great. This is a booming market, and the "great" ones are over-bought (based like you say on RSI), but the fundamentals show that Cisco has been laying the infrastructure for the next boom in digital communications. After a Bear market cycle plays out, Cisco will be a prime Cara 100 pick for the next Bull phase. Within a couple years, CSCO will surpass its record high price in 2000. And so will Oracle (ORCL).

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 1:40 PM [link]

"if you didn't learn anything good and sustainable, then you probably learned something bad and forgettable."

Now THAT is a good one. I'm writing that one down for future use. Thanks Bill.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 1:41 PM [link]

This morning I received this letter (anon), marked "Career question", from a long-time member of the Cara community:
-----------------------

Hi Bill, Your intro to your blog post today was really great. I hope you have found a residence and things are going smoothly in the Bahamas. Unfortunately, I have not been reading or contributing to the blog as much as used to (try to).

I have a question for you: What type of career position, in your opinion, would be a good one to strive for, for someone just out of university
(undergrad) with a Commerce Degree. I would not want to get caught up in 'the industry', and become a snake oil salesman to some unsuspecting folks, by selling them a mutual fund/stock/anything that I know would not do anything for them.

Would it be a prudent choice to try and just 'get in' somewhere and then pursue an MBA?


I know that you cannot possibly give me an answer without knowing much much more about my personality and situation, but I'm just really confused and questioning whether the financial industry is a good one to be in.

Anyways, a line or two would be appreciated,

Best of health and happiness to you and yours,

/"M"
--------------------

"M", You are correct in assuming that since I don't now much about you, I cannot give you advice.

Generally, I say to everybody to be constantly thinking of the things they love to spend time doing, and always be on the lookout for ways of turning that into a career.

In the financial services industry there are different careers, from sales, to analysis, to admin/management. In sales, you can find jobs that don't involve snake oil sales. But you have to love serving people and you have to learn sales technique in order to help people get what they need and want.

Going for an MBA is good if you are still looking for something that you would love to do. If you already know what it is, then an MBA is usually a waste of time. You should be spending time learning how to apply your primary interest into a business model. Later, if the opportunity is best done in partnership or employment, then take all you know and can do to the people who can help you meet your needs, recognizing that they are only interested if you are helping them meet their own objectives.

Best,

/Bill

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 1:45 PM [link]

Bill
Congratulation. I hope I can have photos like that of my sons one day.
Do your comments on the banks also apply to the Canadian Banks which I have a big part of my portfolio in? Shouldn't they be winners in the coming battle for survival.
Don

Posted by: don [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 2:01 PM [link]

Anon,
I spent my first career (16 years) managing and directing employment services centres and programs. From first hand experience I can tell you that it is only a very lucky few who know what they want when they are starting out. Most people will change their careers and industries several times throughout their working lives. An employment counsellor can take you through a battery of tests to help you identify your values, strengths and interests. I highly recommend that you see one. In many towns and cities these services are provided for free (government funded) or a nominal charge. Also, don't restrict yourself to the world of the employee. Look at entrepreneurship if it fits you.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 2:04 PM [link]

From earlier comment: "If you are patient you will let the market come to you, and that's when you buy and sell -- at extreme prices"...this is what I have to learn. I'm too impatient in trading. I frequently feel like the train is leaving without me when prices are falling when buying and jump in too soon. But, I am good at learning techniques, so will work on it.

Posted by: NT [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 2:10 PM [link]

boardcentral.com

an interesting (free)way to see what the masses are saying message boards; covers all the major ones; searchable by stock symbol

http://www.cotstimer.blogspot.com/

is suggesting traders move out of gold, and into S&P, particularly SOX. I'd SO enjoying WGDFF's run, that I'm not leaving yet! (This blog claims to have devised a way to get good trading signals from the commitment of traders report, namely following "the commercials" with a time-lag which the blogger claims has been successfully backtested).

Posted by: Jock [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 2:34 PM [link]

NT,

Bill's quote is the stuff that haunts me.

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 2:37 PM [link]

BRC,

According to Julie Taylor at WGDFF the paper work is in for listing on the AMEX, hoping for a listing by year end. Dsc: Very long WGDFF..

Posted by: RonK [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 2:47 PM [link]

RonK
I'm the novice here, and I might be over playing the theme of country political risk but could the demand pressure on WGDFF be related to the likelihood that this is one of the safer miners in terms of production and political risk, and that there is growing institutional demand for exposure to gold mining...and the supply here is limited in meeting this requirement? An amex listing may be one tips the scale in this direction,too.

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 3:06 PM [link]

jasper- glad to hear you're back near the high-water mark...and the lack of exuberance bothers me also...so we could see DJIA 15,000...not really participating much myself...

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 3:14 PM [link]

Anyone noting: XAU up 2.5% GDX up 1%


It would seem GDX is lagging it's index.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 3:28 PM [link]

I think that .gdm is the index, not .xau...
but gdx is still lagging .gdm
.77 vs 1.3

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 3:40 PM [link]

Bill,

Thank you so much for sharing the wonderful wedding photos with us. They were a happy delight to look at and brought back memories of weddings past, both family's and friends'.

~ G/S

Posted by: GemmaStar [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 3:45 PM [link]

Don,

I think the Cdn banks are on balance well managed and capable of competing in international markets. Royal, Scotia and CIBC have been doing that for years. With BankNorth and Ameritrade, TD have also changed their international strategy in recent years. BMO had success with Harris Bank, but I'm not so sure elsewhere. I don't know much about National Bank.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 3:51 PM [link]

GE is ME(the country's economic health)? Confirmation by the mkt of no recession perceived?

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 3:53 PM [link]

"The market is climbing a wall of worries." Sadly if you give journalists a clever line, they will over-use it on unrelated situations and in disconnected contexts until the quote has been thoroughly void of any significance. Or is it a sign of their laziness re. a critical inquiry into the actual reasons of a positive move in the face of adversity?

I always found this line very evocative in times of uncertain market conditions when the situation is muddled and yet new information is processed into the security's price. But come on, since mid. September and the Fed.'s not-so-subtle bull boost, the market cannot be too worried. Heck, we're back at all-time (multi-year) highs, shorts are running scared and CNBC has brought back the record watch countdown instead of the doomsday music. So no wall of worries to climb, rather an "it-just-doesn't-matter-anymore", a "nothing-that-the-next-rate-cut-won't-fix", a "the-worst-is-over", "we-have-abolished-the-economic-cycle", or a "this-is-different-now" attitude. Too optimistic a tone for the line to be accurate IMO.

JML

Posted by: Jumble [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 4:23 PM [link]

Things that make you go hmmmm? and, along the lines of "The bear market won't start until the last bear has thrown in the towel", long time bear, Tim Knight (http://www.slopeofhope.com/) is now calling today's move a breakout and we're on our way up.

Posted by: bb [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 4:26 PM [link]

Great day for the Bulls, but Garmin (GRMN) and Walgreen (WAG) of the Cara 100 took big hits today.

For WAG, it was a big earnings surprise.
http://tinyurl.com/2fybpb

For GRMN, the stock was downgraded by CIBC from outperformer to sector performer. But it was the Nokia (NOK) acquisition of Navteq (NVT) that made the difference here.
http://tinyurl.com/254uz6

I last mentioned GRMN on Sept 5, I think....

---------------------------

"The Cara 100 stocks that hit 52-week highs yesterday were Cisco (CSCO) and Garmin (GRMN). I am amazed at the strength of GRMN, but then again we do live in a crazy world and everybody wants a GPS to see where they are positioned under the satellites.

Speaking of wireless, I was telling an associate yesterday that the bandwidth needed by the new Internet TV, Phones and movie downloads was growing by leaps and bounds and was enabled by Cisco to the point where CSCO now has a $200 billion Microcap. Not being in the Dow 30, CSCO seems to fly under the radar.

Do you recall my May 10, 2006 report on Cisco? The stock price was $21.68 and I advised to buy when the RSI-7 dropped CSCO into the Accumulation Zone, probably down near 18.

Well, you know my favorite expression is “Proof of Concept”. Re-read the May 10 article, and tell me if this chart is good proof of concept?"

-----------------------------

Also, I spoke earlier about Cisco, and the lessons it can teach about patience. Here is my May 10, 2006 report re CSCO. CSCO closed today at 32.99 (33.19 in the after market).
http://www.billcara.com/archives/2006/05/ubs_rates_cisco.html

Re GRMN, on Sept 5 it closed at 105.87, then ran up to a high of 122.78 on Friday. Today the Nokia/Navteq was announced and you could have bought GRMN as low as 102.00. Does anyone (including the SEC chief investigator) honestly believe that traders with inside knowledge of the Nokia deal didn't manipulate the GRMN price during last week, only to short it before the close on Friday?

When you have been around markets as long as I have, that kind of stuff makes you want to puke. Meanwhile there will be no investigation by the SEC. They have a mandate to serve and protect the public, but sadly they are too busy chasing high profile targets like Martha Stewart and Conrad Black.

What the public needs is an SEC that has an investigation arm under an independent Auditor General. Somebody as tough as Eliot Spitzer.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 4:38 PM [link]

Deutsche Bank raised their 12-month Price Target on CVRD (RIO) from 30 (Buy) to 48. Last price 36.14.

Having financed the mega-billion dollar acquisition deals of the Humungous Miners, these big banks don't want any problems with the client failing to meet the debt service. Just a minor conflict of interest there, but what the hey.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 4:49 PM [link]

Hi,

How can a rally like this happen on a day with so much bad news?

Why is it that traders fail to see the impact of what's been going on in valuations, and why do investors fail to recognize that another shoe can drop anytime, erasing gains and furthering losses?

Is it a good idea to short this market here?

Bill is right: the time to sell into strength is here.

Cheers,

Posted by: maromatics [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 4:53 PM [link]

bb and Jumble, there is a lot of stuff going on here. I say to everybody, learn a trading system, build a trading plan, take notes every day, and stick to the plan. All the rest of this stuff doesn't really matter. Right?

And to jasper and NT earlier, you were discussing here how hard it is to stick to a plan when you see all this stuff going on. Emotions are telling you, don't miss the boat.

Well, you're right. Trading is difficult. Your brain tells you to buy and sell all the time you are most uncomfortable, but your heart wants you to go the opposite way. Your heart is looking for the warm and fuzzies. If you check death records, it's usually the heart that kills you.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 4:58 PM [link]

An interesting video from FT that argues that the recent rally is a result of emerging markets not the US market:

http://tinyurl.com/2qr8gz

Posted by: SiO2 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 5:05 PM [link]

maromatics, I say you need to sell with Trading Alerts after the stocks in your portfolio have reached their Distribution Zone. If they continue to edge higher, you need to raise your stops. But you are right in the sense that it is best to sell into strength and move on to other stocks you like that haven't yet had a run up.

The Techs are getting an extraordinary boost today after Thomson/Reuters researchers opined that earnings for the 3Q07 would be at an annualized rate of +10 pct, moving up to +20 pct annualized next Q and to +22 pct Y/Y for 2008. Interestingly, Standard & Poor's researchers are in general agreement.

But the stories are getting funny. The researchers are looking at tech companies that manufacture in the US, but don't import materials (with the need to pay in cheap USD I call wooden nickels) and sell most of their products abroad (where revenue is earned in high value currencies). This is the essence of synthesis (storytelling) instead of analysis (the work that analysts are supposed to be doing).

The problem is that many of these research people (not Thomson or S&P) work for banks that are in deep doo-doo, and if the Techs can pull the first rabbit out of the hat, the market goes looking for the next one. Somewhere down the line a Financials rabbit pops out. And everybody "earns" their bonuses! LOL

Now why Thomson/S&P feel the way they do about Techs is something I don't know. I do know I opined here a couple weeks ago that Techs would lead the next rally. Why did I believe that? Well, as I said at the time, I could "see strength in the old Bull yet" and since it would not be the unstable Financials leading the Bull charge, I figure it had to be the Techs. First I heard about multiple expansion (no proof, just stories), but that was strange because the $USD was sinking and gold soaring. It can't be top line revenue growth (except for a small pct of companies) because the economy is not that great. So, voila, it must be earnings. Today we heard the earnings story. Why? Well, I know why; the question is how. And, I started off by saying I don't know how.

Maybe Thomson and S&P researchers could make an argument we all can believe? Or is that the Wall of Worry? They are afraid we won't believe them when they pull out that Goldilocks stuff again, I guess.

BNN.ca had a good interview with Raymond James excellent analyst Jeffery Saut. I gather he can't figure out what's going on here either, and he's been doing this professionally for 37 years he says.

Speaking of BNN.tv, don't you just love the "Emerging Africa" stuff they are peddling. Kind of a cross between CBC and CNBC.

It would be nice to have advertisers at the same time as an independent editorial group though. Why the need for these infomercials?

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 5:28 PM [link]

Hi,

Thanks Bill! Agree.

It remains to be seen if DJIA can hold above 14.000. It also remains to be seen if SPX can break 1.550.

Many stocks show high RSI levels (depending on time frames), the same applying to the main averages.

Finally, as a European, from this side of the ocean we are focusing on what can happen this week as the BoE and ECB are expected to leave rates unchanged. This will trash the EUR / USD cross, but it is unclear what it will do to equity markets.

Cheers!

Posted by: maromatics [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 6:03 PM [link]

Bill,
Stress kills and I'm ready to let someone else use their brain to manage this stress. Of course, my stress could be someone else's fun. As I check around, your style is unique in the retail world. While others are allocating and theorizing about risk management, for whatever it is worth, I have this perception of yourself as a careful and energetic gardener.. pruning, amending, and exploring. You seems to always have a broad perspective (top down), while at the same time digging in from the the bottom up (ie buy low). Hint Hint. I'll be interested in your advisory services.

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 7:09 PM [link]

NOT.V-

may live to regret this one...purchased at 3.62 near the close as it has now filled in the opening gap from last thursday...we'll see...

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:09 PM [link]

Stock markets are overbought here -- technicals indicate that whithin one to five trading sessions we should start to go down. How much? Don't know and probably not much considering the bullish sentiment out there.

One issue that continues to trouble my mind is the fact that it seems to me that we have started a deleveraging process that has not yet stopped -- hence, asset prices should suffer. In other words, when I see that people are still negotiating $35 of ABCP in Canada, that ABCP in the US has come down by about $250 billion, that ABCP has come down by a large but yet unkknown amount in Europe, that banks have been reducing exposure, that hedge funds are being forced to reduce risk, that many hedge fund investors are asking out, etc. I can not conclude other than we are in a process like the one we started in 1997, but we experienced the full consequences of it in 1998.

Forget about the fact that the key drivers were overvalued EM currencies (we are in the opposite situation here), but the driver now is a bunch of overvalued things -- from subprime, to high yield bonds, leveraged buyout loans, CDOs, etc you name it. Actually this time it is more widespread.

Then we have ths stupid response from Helicopter that believes he can reflate everything -- if he suceeds, then he will be planting the seeds for the next one which would be larger.

I do not think lower rates are the response to everything -- Japan with zero rates took more than a decade to somehow stabilize.

Bottom line, I believe the U.S. economy is heading to a recession and there is little the Fed can do about it. Commodities as well as any assets will suffer from it.

The issue is that it may take some time to playout, but eventually it will. Economic indicators have been negative and below expectations for the most part. Corporate earnings are surprising to the downside -- from Citi and UBS, to bellwheathers like FedEx, Target, and Costo. Why do you think Wallmart is discounting toys 10 to 50% so early in the season. Simple: is is too late to change your Christmas order, so you best course of action is to get rid of them ASAP.

I believe the best trade are to be long volatility and short the market!

Good luck to all

Posted by: JP [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 9:28 PM [link]

Bill,
Great Wedding photos, and All the best to you and yours!
Today was a great day for the Bulls, Indeed! Bizarre is more like it. How is it that the Financials come out soaring with Banks UBS warning that it will take a charge of 3.4 Billion on its 3rd. quarter earnings, Citi warning its 3rd. Quarter earnings will take a 60% hit because of problems with its Mortgage backed securities ?
Credit Suisse will take a hit for the credit markets debacle, and Merrill Lynch with a 4 Billion write down ? I don't get it. It is astonishing how this manipulation (what else can it be ?) that HB&B can get away with this. With
Real Estate, Housing, Banks, Retail, etc... heading to the craper the Dow soars 191 points! and Financials soaring.
These are truly strange days

Posted by: BruceThomas [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2007 10:43 PM [link]

"Does anyone think it's odd that gold is down $8.40 and silver $0.27, with most of the move starting at 20:00 Eastern time?"

Blech, another timed "correction." Well, either its silver that gaps up, or gold corrects pretty hard here.

All factors being considered, fundamentals favour a higher gold price, though the chart is getting overbought on the daily, and just touching RSI 70 on the weekly, so yes technically a correction here.

Posted by: FranSix [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 2, 2007 12:59 AM [link]

Hi,

The EUR / USD retracement appears to have started, with important losses for the EUR this morning in early European trading.

I am looking at this in liaison with the drop in gold: Central Banks are selling gold to buy USD.

US equities will have to drop soon, as part of their nominal growth was based on the devaluation of the USD, which is now subsiding.

Cheers,

Posted by: maromatics [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 2, 2007 5:25 AM [link]

Its possible that settlements in short of gold operations in $US would require a slight rise.

It could be that a gap required filling:

http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=FOREX_XAUUSDO

Gold to be moving into seasonal lows, albeit that all the fundamentals favour a higher gold price.

http://spectrumcommodities.com/education/commodity/charts/gc.html

Posted by: FranSix [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 2, 2007 7:36 AM [link]

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?