« Cara’s Friday Report, Aug. 31, 2007, 6:58 AM | Main | Saturday’s Commentary & Chat, 09/01/2007 12:02 PM ET »
August 31, 2007
Cara’s Commentary & Community Chat, Fri., Aug. 31, 2007, 7:23 AM ET
Today will be all about Bernanke, which is understandable since traders and home-owners want to know the direction of interest rates.
But the story that caught my attention early today was the Wall St Journal piece on the collapsing US residential real estate market. This article will open up some eyes.
Goldman Sachs, for example, has opined that the national average of the price of homes will fall by -7 pct this year and -7 pct next year.
Should interest rates rally here, you can bet that the foreclosure rates will escalate from an already serious situation, and that house prices will fall even further.
Two years ago, Fed chairman Greenspan talked about the forthcoming debacle in the housing industry. He laid his cards on the table. Bankers, home buyers, mortgage companies and traders did not pay enough attention.
Actually, traders did. That was the peak of share prices for the US house-builders that summer of 2005.
You know, when all this stuff was going down in the summer of 2005, I was opining in this blog that investors were accepting 2 pct returns on residential real estate held for investment, and that was not an economic return. What those investors were doing was playing the Greater Fool theory that as long as the media was hyping real estate and the President talking up home ownership there would be some fool come to them with an offer they couldn’t refuse. This was a speculation that has gone seriously wrong for those investors. Now, many properties are foreclosing and the owners trying to walk away from their debt.
As I saw all this happening, I turned cautious-negative on the equity market, and was criticized. But at the end of the day, in speaking up, I think I have taken the right stand.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on August 31, 2007 07:23:39 AM | Category: Cara's Daily Commentary , Community Chat
Discourse
Khan Resources (KRI-T)wades through Mongolia's murky waters
---------------------
The Northern Miner, 8/29/2007
---------------------
After the market heavily punished Khan Resources (KRI-T) and Western Prospector (WNP-V) for news that licenses for some uranium projects in Mongolia were being revoked by the government, both companies rebounded on word that the news might not be as bad as initially thought.
On Aug. 17 Khan announced that the exploration license covering the Additional Dornod project had been declared invalid by a branch of the government known as the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Authority of Mongolia (MRPAM).
But just five days later, on Aug. 23, the company saw its stock rebound by 41% to $1.88 after issuing a release saying discussions with the government clarified that instead of the license being declared invalid, it may only be declared invalid in the future.
“I’m not sure they actually meant it,” says Martin Quick, Khan’s president and chief executive. “We’re trying to sort out what they meant. Right now the license has not been invalidated. We’re still waiting to find out what it is we have to do.”
That confusion is part of the cost of doing business in Mongolia -- a former communist country that shows signs of embracing the free market, only to relapse into old nationalistic habits.
The result is that foreign investors like Khan, while being encouraged to help exploit the country’s mineral wealth by some in parliament, are derided for robbing the nation of those same resources by others.
From the government’s perspective, the issue around both Khan’s Additional Dornod and Western Prospector's Gurvanbulag deposit, is that they were drilled-off with state funds in the past.
The government has decreed that it has the right to earn into up to 50% of projects where state funds were used for exploration or other purposes.
But both Additional Dornod and Gurvanbulag were drilled by the Russians with Soviet, not Mongolian money, the two companies say.
“For Mongolians to now claim that it was money they put in, is just as far as we’re concerned…well, we’re saying show us,” says Quick.
Some rumours have been circulating that the impetus behind MRPAM’s move was not to take away the licenses but to force the companies to upgrade from an exploration license to a more expensive mining license in an effort to generate more cash flows into government coffers.
But Quick says such an assessment doesn’t hold water. “I wish it were that simple,” he says, noting that Khan has been trying to secure a mining license for Additional Dornod but can't because getting its resources and reserves approved by the Mineral Council -- a necessary requirement -- is nearly impossible.
Quick says Khan has been held up because the Mineral Council hasn’t convened in roughly 2 years. “It’s a catch 22,” he says. “You have to get them to approve it but you can’t get it approved because the body that approves it doesn’t meet.”
While he says the government has made strides in establishing its fledgling democracy it still has a ways to go towards constructing a transparent system and engaging in open dialogues with companies doing business there.
“No one called us,” Quick says about the time leading up to the delivery of the letter which said the license was invalid. “No one said, ‘you better do something with your exploration license’. We could have sorted it out if they did. It came absolutely out of blue.”
In all, MRPAM said it was cancelling 34 exploration licenses, which would affect 18 companies.
Khan has a 100% stake in Additional Dornod, which is covered by the exploration license that was initially declared invalid. Additional Dornod has a resource of roughly 16 million lbs of U308 .
Khan’s mining license for Dornod remains unaffected. It has a 58% interest in the 48 million lbs. of U308 that are covered by that mining license.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 7:46 AM [link]
Green Arrow and friends
I can relate to last night’s discusions. I have been a reasonably successful person and thought I was quite savvy when it came to finances and investing. Then I started reading Bill’s blog almost 2 years ago.
At first I was attracted to Bill’s lucid writing style with very logical but thought provoking arguments. While I did not instantly understand everything Bill was talking about, I had a sense that he was somehow different, that he was a successful person with a wealth of experience and that he was willing to share his wisdom to help others and make our world a better place.
So I stuck with reading the blog every day. At first I scanned through it for Bill’s posts because quite frankly, I thought some of the bloggers were from another planet as I had no idea of some of the things they we talking about. But as time went on I started reading more of the comments and followed up on their links to other articles. My knowledge skyrocketed. I came to realize how valuable the shared knowledge of Bill’s readers were. I also became more aware of how complicated the markets are, how diverse our backgrounds and views are and how much we can learn from other.
Over the last 2 years I am amazed that I just kept learning and learning even though I kept thinking I had reached the point of saturation. I feel like the energizer bunny that just keeps learning and learning.
Bill truly is a wizard. His basic approach of concentrating on high quality stocks and using the AZ and DZ is pure magic. Like magic this approach sifts through the market fog and magically the rabbits named AZ and DZ are yanked from a hat. And like all good magicians, just when you think you have it worked out, Bill pulls another pearl of wisdom from his sleeves, whether it be options strategies or some different way to look at a market or technical indicator.
I would now like to share, two of revelations that helped clarify concepts being discussed on this blog. I hope this will help some of the newbies and rookies to this site get a head start.
1.
Bill often writes about different time frames. Sometimes his comments seem to be contradicting earlier comments but this is only because the time frames are different. For example at the moment he has said he believes we are in a bear phase that started in July but expects a short term rally with lower highs before declining to newer lows. I therefore find it very helpful to first of all clarify in my own mind the time frame thatis being discussed. Once I worked this out the markets started to make so much more sense. Different views could both be right once the time frames and market sectors were understood.
2.
There is a huge difference between investing and trading and each require a different approach.
INVESTING
• Usually based on fundamental analysis or prospectivity of the companies ideas, assets, intellectual knowledge etc.
• Usually held long term regardless of short term market fluctuations due to the belief that the long term intrinsic value being ultimately recognized by the market.
• Wide stops if they are placed at all. Usually only sell if something fundamental changes with the fundamentals or reason for investing in the first place.
TRADING
• Usually based on technical analysis but can also be based on gut feel or hot tips
• Short term from intra day to several days
• It is absolutely Imperative to have a solid trading plan with an entry and exit strategy and that you must follow the plan no matter what
• Very tight stops must be a part of the trading plan to ensure quick exit if your trade goes against you.
Not only did my understanding of Bill’s blog escalate but I also started making more money. An example is that I read that one of the most crucial trading rules was to have a stop on every trade. So I put stops on my junior mining stocks. But with the low volume and high volatility I was stopped out a couple of times on intra day lows just prior to the stock taking off. I then realized that I was actually investing in these stocks rather than trading which required a different approach as stated above.
Posted by: Aussieontop
at
August 31, 2007 7:49 AM [link]
Mongolia the "El Dorado" of the new millennium
Posted by: jk484
at
August 31, 2007 7:53 AM [link]
Hi Bill,
I only started investing, or should I say speculating just over 18 months ago.
I have expertise in the mining industry and have developed an interest in junior mining stocks recently. I hold a similar view to people like Jim Rogers and Don Coxe that we are in the early stages of a long term commodities boom and that there is money to be made in the Juniors if you pick the right ones.
I know mining and found I was quite successful at speculating and selecting a reasonable number of winners. The only problem was that I was not making much money out of these picks. I was poor at the execution. As Dr Alexander Elder would say, I am a good analyst, but very poor trader (investor)
So I spent some time analyzing my speculations and learnt from my mistakes. In the first 6 months I was lucky with a 10.5% gain, but in the second six months have had a gain of over 46% in my portfolio.
These are the things that I learnt from others and through my own navel gazing.
1. I lost a bunch of trades when I acted on a hot tip and bought them in a panic so that I would not miss out on the expected rise. I skipped my due diligence stage stage and paid the price. (eg purchase of Yukon Zinc at $0.80 on rumour and selling at $0.23)
2. I tried to get into too many “good things” and spread myself too thin. I have done better by concentrating on my most prospective selections.
3. I do best when I concentrate on companies that already have something concrete rather than just prospectivity or nearology. Eg decent drill results or are following up on old drill results in historical mining areas.
4. I do worst when speculating on greenfields exploration or nearology.
5. I missed good gains by becoming impatient even though my homework and due diligence was very solid. (eg after PDAC in 2006 I bought LBE.V at $0.60 SWC.V at <$2.00 and UUU.V at <$3.00. I became impatient and sold LBE and SWC to chase other stocks. I sold LBE.V at $0.82 for small gains before it continued to up over $4.00 and sold SWC.V at $3.30 as it continued on its way to +$6.00. Conversely I kept UUU which was in the $8.00 range before the merge with SXR and sold it for $15 when RSI’s were very high and Uranium market looked toppy so I put in a trailing stop which was took me out at $15 on the way down to $11.
6. Use an investment strategy for these stocks rather than a Trading strategy (See my previous post).
7. You must do your due diligence and then create a trading (investment) plan for your potential trade (investment) including entry criteria and exit criteria.
8. From Dr Alexander Elder – you must write down your trading (investing) plan for every trade (investment) and critically evaluate every trade (investment) and learn from it.
Posted by: Aussieontop
at
August 31, 2007 8:12 AM [link]
Aussieontop,
Yes you do "know mining". The community should know (without disclosing confidences) that you are mine manager for one of the most important mines of one of the largest gold mining companies in the world.
I am elated that you took the time to comprehensively share your views here today -- as you have in the past. As the community grows there are increasing numbers of busy people who have important contributions to make, even if done infrequently.
Thank you.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 8:37 AM [link]
Bill,
I have posted a chart of Durable Goods Consumption as % of Personal Consumption.
This percentage is at the 1982 and 1991 recession levels. What do you think?
Posted by: Will Rahal
at
August 31, 2007 9:02 AM [link]
spot gold made a move up +6 in about 75 minutes. Traders want to buy, but the Fed would like to cool it. Let's see the reaction to Bernanke's speech at 10am -- may be a quick pullback in gold just to confuse the market. That will be the time to buy if you missed the chance earlier today. The $XAU will likely have a good day.
I have meetings this morning and will not return until after lunch.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 9:07 AM [link]
Today we get the intellectual whipsaw, Ben followed by W. My spidey sense tells me Ben slightly disappoints on rate cuts but provides liquidity (and vigilance) and W announces a few minor fixes for home buyers via FHA/HUD like extended terms and fixed rates. Without home ownership what will W have to show for his term besides Iraq, massive debt and corruption as far as the eye can see?
Posted by: Craig
at
August 31, 2007 9:23 AM [link]
It appears from the FED funds rate data that FED has adopted a new unofficial target rate of 5.0%. The average rate since Aug-08 is 4.97%. FOMC meeting on the 18th will tell for sure...
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/fedfundsdata.cfm
30-Aug 5.00
29-Aug 5.00
28-Aug 5.30
27-Aug 5.27
24-Aug 5.11
23-Aug 4.88
22-Aug 4.77
21-Aug 4.89
20-Aug 5.03
17-Aug 4.91
16-Aug 4.97
15-Aug 4.71
14-Aug 4.54
13-Aug 4.81
10-Aug 4.68
9-Aug 5.41
8-Aug 5.27
Posted by: TimG
at
August 31, 2007 9:52 AM [link]
taking SLW off the table>adding to WGDFF
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
August 31, 2007 9:59 AM [link]
HMY....is a standout today. One ultimately has to let price tell the story.
The etf goldminer equally surprises me as a good way to capture an impressive proportion of a major move.
Posted by: jasper
at
August 31, 2007 10:18 AM [link]
2nd Ave:
Why are you taking SLW off the table?
Posted by: northvan
at
August 31, 2007 11:01 AM [link]
Anyone have any thoughts about President Bush's bailout plan for subprime mortgage borrowers. I understand that the markets have jumped because of it, but I cannot find any details or analysis of the bailout plan.
Posted by: Novice
at
August 31, 2007 11:05 AM [link]
Rumors of war with Iran are picking up with two different well placed intelligence sources saying it is coming:
Look for anti-Iran rhetoric and propaganda to begin by September 11th as confirmation of this. Also, the Defense Department has just set up a 24-hour 7 day a week press room for ostensibly for Iraq war propaganda purposes but may be for Iran war media management.
Posted by: moab
at
August 31, 2007 11:11 AM [link]
northvan-just a ST trade...went in tuesday at 10.68, out today at 11.30...plowed the net into WGDFF>much longer term position...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
August 31, 2007 11:12 AM [link]
Community,
I haven't been able to pay as close attention as I'd like to the markets for the last week due to work. What is the current outlook for XAU? From what I read today a lot will depend on Bernanke. What is the outlook for the different time horizons?
Just asking for the basic, "What'd I miss?" stuff. Thanks.
Posted by: Quentusrex
at
August 31, 2007 11:26 AM [link]
Hi Bill,
With regards to my previous post especially learning # 8.
I want to keep learning and improving. I therefore want to create a one page spreadsheet template to help evaluate junior mining stocks for investing. This template will include the basic knowledge about the company share structure etc, a checklist to ensure the required due diligence is completed, stock valuation, entry criteria, exit criteria and yet to be thought of information..
Once this template is created I hope to share it with the Cara community. It could then be used to evaluate the junior mining stocks that we often discuss. The template will help readers evaluate a stock they are interested in and share the results with the community. The results will provide a basis for discussion, comparison to other stocks and learning from each other.
I therefore request from yourself and your readers to provide suggestions for things they would like to see on this template. Also there are many different “rules of thumb” for valuing mining stocks and I would like to attach mining stock evaluation tools, calculators and models as separate tabs to the spreadsheet to assist readers. So I would appreciate if readers culd please send in any information or suggestions for this area as well.
The more input the better the template will be.
If there is enough interest in this I will make sure it happens.
Bill, I can also see the potential for developing a similar tool for readers to use on other types of stock. For example you could have;
- a template to evaluate stocks to determine if they are “Cara quality stocks” suitable for the “Cara trading method”
-
- a template to evaluate stocks for consideration as “Cara micro stocks”.
Posted by: Aussieontop
at
August 31, 2007 11:30 AM [link]
Aussieontop,
Some of the things to look into for the miners would be:
-Do they have any non-recourse loan?
-What are the all in costs for the separate mining locations/projects?
-(In the current credit crunch market) Where is extra capital stored? In corporate paper that is at risk?
Posted by: Quentusrex
at
August 31, 2007 11:38 AM [link]
Aussieontop:
I think a parameter to indicate country risk would be important - there's a lot of KRY holders that would agree, I suspect, as well as EGO, and EXA (so perhaps it needs to be refineable (bad pun) to include province/state within the country).
Also a "hedge" parameter, since a lot of juniors end up with horrible financials as a result of mark to market hedges when POG is rising. Looking forward to the result.
Posted by: cyderman
at
August 31, 2007 11:45 AM [link]
Thanks Aussie.
For your comments. Your investing education seems to mirror mine. Although, you are further along. I can't decide if I'm investing or trading. I agree with you in that I came for Bill's cut through the BS style. It has taken me some time to recognize that nearly every word he writes has a whole paragraph of meaning as you so aptly describe regarding time frames. Now I also read and reread the comments daily. A strange and diverse group, I must say. Keep it up!
I have taken trading steps because of what I am learning here. Time will tell if I sell as well as I buy.
To the Community, I am currently long SLW,GLD,WGDFF and one who shall not be named. I also have 2 inverse etf's, SRS and SKF.
peace and Thanks Capt'n
Gray
PS to 2_ave re the dentist thing. Had a bad event with my grown daughter going to the dentist for the first time after we stopped making appts for her. She sufferrred permanent facial scarring and a total stonewall by the dentist. The stonewall by the dentist included falsifying records and asking the lowest paid person in his office to lie. At least it sounds like your dentist treated you with respect in the face of your questions, after the fact.
Hello and good day one and all,
Today I am grateful and give thanks for this precious gift you all give so freely and always. Thank you.
So, I have a small gain in IAG as of now; but I think the charts are showing Bearish trend. Am I misreading it? Bill speaks of a September rally and seems to be saying as of today and IAG has been on so many outperform lists, I am doubting my eyes.
Just a quick hang in there or get out and wait kind of remark will help much.
Thank you IA.
Posted by: moneygenie
at
August 31, 2007 11:51 AM [link]
Aussieontop,
I've been looking to do the same thing with Cara 100 companies in an excel workbook. The ideal thing being, to have most of the information update automatically from the web (financial data). Excel has the ability to extract and update information from websites. A recent thing I've found is a group and files from a yahoo group:
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/smf_addin/
"This group is the home base for the Stock Market Functions add-in developed by Randy Harmelink. This add-in contains a number of user defined functions for EXCEL that can allow data to be extracted and/or retrieved from the web and placed directly into EXCEL cells or ranges."
One of the things I've been working on doing is using this to have Cara 100's RSI numbers automatically updated and then sorted.
moab,
Bill Cystol said in the past week to Jon Stewart,"That (invading Iran) would be a good idea." Not a bad source of real(istic) news. Maybe more to come with W.'s religion of democracy as his manifest destiny.
Posted by: jasper
at
August 31, 2007 12:28 PM [link]
re: spread sheet of rsi's for cara 100,
Anyone on board at Fidelity? Wealth Lab Pro software available there, will generate real time reports and charts, signal buys/sells, offer back testing and optimization of parameters, plus give alerts to your email when criteria met, and even make the trades if you want to.
Nice relief rally. So far, glad that I was gradually reloading my portfolio after stops hit in the past month. India per software signal(not WLP) and thanks to Bill's encouragement has been the best producer.
Posted by: jasper
at
August 31, 2007 12:45 PM [link]
Transports/viz railroads are doing well today thanks in part to Warren Buffet.
In July I used Fidelity's stock screen for large caps(I guess I'm touting Fido, but not really) with every long term/5 yr fundamental parameter available...
Book Value Growth (5-Yr Avg.): Highest 60%, EPS Growth: 5-Yr Hist.: Highest 60%, EPS Growth (Proj. 5 Yr): Highest 60%, Oper. Margin (5-Year Avg.): Highest 60%, Cap. Spending Growth (5 Yr): Highest 60%...
and railroads had the highest total scores. The railroads (BNI,GWR) I was holding were not doing too well until today. Nice to see fundies catch up to relative price strength.
Volume not impressive on this rally. BNI is the only position with good volume. Everything else not likely to even hit average daily volume.
Posted by: jasper
at
August 31, 2007 1:06 PM [link]
"It is not the responsibility of the Federal Reserve -- nor would it be appropriate -- to protect lenders and investors from the consequences of their financial decisions." -- Bernanke
Posted by: OldGoat
at
August 31, 2007 1:23 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
Anybody here ever heard the term "sailboat fuel"? In essence it is what Iraq private contractors call a truckload of "nothing" billed to the US taxpayers.
My friend who owns a concrete contracting business in Las Vegas, NV reported to me that yesterday he was out a one of the Air Force bases and when he drove up to the guard house to gain entry to the base he was greeted not by soldiers but by employees of a private security firm. Rightfully so he asked,"Where are the soldiers?" When you have an all volunteer Army you need the actual gun totting soldiers on the foreign battlefields not guarding the bases back home ...
After reading the following article you will come to see that George Bush did not only invade Afghanistan and Iraq but mainly he invaded the US Taxpayer!
Link: http://tinyurl.com/2fzcta
Here is an excerpt ...
In another stroke of genius, they found a bunch of abandoned Iraqi Airways forklifts on airport property, repainted them to disguise the company markings and billed them to U.S. taxpayers as new equipment. Every time they scratched their asses, they earned; there was so much money around for contractors, officials literally used $100,000 wads of cash as toys. "Yes -- $100 bills in plastic wrap," Frank Willis, a former CPA official, acknowledged in Senate testimony about Custer Battles. "We played football with the plastic-wrapped bricks for a little while."
Posted by: kaimu
at
August 31, 2007 1:31 PM [link]
From NOAA Hurricane Center this morning:
Atlantic SPECIAL TROPICAL DISTURBANCE STATEMENT
000
WONT41 KNHC 311310
DSAAT
SPECIAL TROPICAL DISTURBANCE STATEMENT
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
910 AM AST FRI AUG 31 2007
SATELLITE IMAGES AND SURFACE OBSERVATIONS INDICATE THAT THE TROPICAL WAVE AND ASSOCIATED LOW PRESSURE AREA LOCATED ABOUT 250 MILES EAST OF THE WINDWARD ISLANDS COULD BE DEVELOPING INTO A TROPICAL DEPRESSION. AN AIR FORCE RESERVE HURRICANE HUNTER WILL INVESTIGATE THE SYSTEM EARLY THIS AFTERNOON TO CONFIRM IF A DEPRESSION HAS FORMED. WATCHES AND WARNINGS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR PORTIONS OF THE
WINDWARD ISLANDS...AND ALL INTERESTS IN THAT AREA SHOULD BE READY TO TAKE QUICK ACTION...IF NECESSARY. REGARDLESS OF DEVELOPMENT... HEAVY RAIN AND STRONG GUSTY WINDS WILL SPREAD OVER THE WINDWARD ISLANDS LATER TODAY AND TONIGHT.
Posted by: OldGoat
at
August 31, 2007 1:46 PM [link]
NOAA photo and video of tropical disturbance:
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/browsh2.html
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huvsloop.html
Hope it's not headed your way, Bill
Posted by: OldGoat
at
August 31, 2007 2:03 PM [link]
Bill
Any insights on SSRI Coventry related woes ?
Posted by: dan
at
August 31, 2007 2:18 PM [link]
Listened to the last couple of Donald Coxe calls and following are my notes for your perusal:
• Credit crisis will not be that bad, not as bad as 1987
• Not a debiliting financial crisis which will not make everybody poor
• Crisis is that can’t evaluate price of about $2 trillion of financial assets
• Need to stop creation of products so that existing products can be valued based on actual prices
• Very difficult to tell when will be over
• To fix, will require massive reliquification which will cause a drop in the paper value of money and increase the price of gold in all currencies
• Rate cut in September not a given and may not happen
• If does, gold should really take off
• Risk is that if cut rates, foreign debt holders may rebel, drive down dollar and gold up
• Global commodities prices show that global economy is still good and actual commodity prices are only down slightly this year (commodity stocks are down more)
• Wants to be tied to basic materials (energy, metals, AG) as safest place with most upside as demand is real. Will also be best place to be when get through this tough period
• US Banks still at risk, but may not go lower; hard to know until assets can be valued
• Canadian banks are fine and should not be affected that much and will continue to raise dividends
Posted by: bb
at
August 31, 2007 2:26 PM [link]
Buffett (yes, it is him given the size of the position) has been buying BNI consistently on dips over the past 6 months.
Posted by: dan
at
August 31, 2007 2:26 PM [link]
Here is link to Deepak Lalwani's Aug 31 weekly report on India
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 2:33 PM [link]
Good Afternoon Kaimu:
I just finished reading the Rolling Stone article that you posted above. Thank you for posting it. Everyone who would like to understand how the US snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq should read it and watch the video too.
Posted by: lessmore
at
August 31, 2007 2:50 PM [link]
I'm looking into the excel function that Hoosier wrote about above and I can't seem to find a website that gives RSI information in a non graphic form. Does anyone know of a site that will allow you to view the RSI info on the free portion of the site?
Posted by: Quentusrex
at
August 31, 2007 2:52 PM [link]
Quentusrex,
That's the same issue I've been running into. The only one available is from Barchart.com. The problem is that it's 9 Day instead of 7 Day.
http://quote.barchart.com/techrept.asp?sym=SLW
The add-in has three formulas to get 9, 14, and 20 day rsi, using barchart.com. So, the weekly RSI is the only one in sync, daily and monthly are different.
anyone have a copy of the most recent Basic Points?
thanks.
Posted by: schnauser
at
August 31, 2007 3:10 PM [link]
On the future of the FED rate and markets direction:
This is the man we are all suposed to listen to!!What a remarcable article!
http://www.smartmoney.com/aheadofthecurve/index.cfm?story=20070831
I've never posted much about my personal investments, but reading others' stories and it seems I've made many of the same mistakes. Lately it's been following to many stories and spreading myself too thin.
I had a lot of luck with miners last fall which probably got me too excited and eventually had me holding more mining stocks than I ever should have. Now in the process of 'unwinding trades' like others, and also hoping for some kind of rally to sell into.
One of my worst recent trades was selling alamos after holding it down to the bottom (5.50), only to watch it pop back up to 7. Still looks to be a dog though...
One more thing I'd add to a investing model, which is probably obvious to most here, is to be on the right side of the trend as Bill likes to say. While near term miners seem volatile, next year or two looks positive given supply/demand fundamentals, so long is right side to be. When it turns however, no point buy & holding miners if there could be multi-year bear in those stocks...
As for call options, had my share of pain with those, and probably not enough experience to be dolling out advice. But I think one lesson i've learned is to either buy long dated close to or in the money when close to AZ. If it starts trading against you, don't ride it out, time premiums evaporate quicked than you think. Alternatively, and more like gambling, is to buy short dated call options on strong momentum. These 'strategies' are from a complete amateur, so any advice/slap upside the head is appreciated :)
Posted by: proudPapa
at
August 31, 2007 3:26 PM [link]
Oh, one more thing I'd add to my 'options strategies' is to take profits quickly. If you get lucky and make 10% on a long call after just a few days or weeks, take the profit and wait for the next pullback. Then if you want to buy back in, buy further out calls again. Time is always against you...
Btw, these are just observations. I'm not advocating trading in options and in the future would probably only risk a very small % of portfolio in such activity.
Posted by: proudPapa
at
August 31, 2007 3:32 PM [link]
OG-thanks for the NOAA update...NG futures has the potential to make your year, but we have lots of company in that regard, most with deep pockets...it was a simpler play when i was trying to time the 4-5% swings...holding for an "event" to drive prices has been more frustrating...hope you're keeping position size manageable...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
August 31, 2007 4:21 PM [link]
re Harmony, in pursuit of positive news, which there is not much of (a plus,right?.. for the contraian)...the tone is mostly "the vultures are circling"....but anyway, two items below, and i love the first excerpt, all in the last few days, from Afican or mining publications...
----------------------
In recent discussions with Harmony's major shareholders, they had raised two major concerns, Motsepe said. The first was the lack of consistency in Harmony's quarterly performance and the second was the absence of management depth and succession planning.
Harmony's board had also needed to ask itself whether it should have done things differently, he said. "The board needs grumpy old men who understand the mining industry and ask difficult questions." (calling BC...half kidding)
------------------
Diversified miner African Rainbow Minerals (Arm) was on Wednesday not excluding the possibility of partnering Harmony Gold at its copper-gold prospect in Papua New Guinea.
---------
Posted by: jasper
at
August 31, 2007 5:33 PM [link]
Aussieontop and others -
A standard format for trading juniors is a great idea. orking through US Silver for the microcap100 project, I learned that Juniors have LOTS of different features, which need to be accomodated in a std format.
US Silver, for ex, started up by acquiring (6/06) mines and lots of infrastructure from CDE at bargain prices. They listed in 1/07.
So, they're IN production, and aiming to ramp up quickly to major production. How to analyze the benefit to the stock price potential of a quick path to production? of exploration in already proven properties?
Posted by: Jock
at
August 31, 2007 5:39 PM [link]
jasper, you are too much (LOL)
"The board needs grumpy old men who understand the mining industry and ask difficult questions." (calling BC...half kidding)
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 7:17 PM [link]
Quentusrex,
I have for some time believed that $XAU would have a final spike top that would terminate the long-term (primary Bull) trend for both gold/goldminers and the broad equity market in the US/Western Europe. As of a week ago or thereabouts, I was saying that traders ought to buy the near-term dips as I believed the major (intermediate-term) sell-off was almost over and the PM's ready to rally.
I think that the $USD is going to gradually lose strength here and drop into the 70's, which will help push the POG (price of gold) higher (to the top end of a 690-750 trading range. Given time, the POG may even go higher than 750 with a spike top. Forex traders would be buying the Euro (to above 140) while the USD is breaking down. Too much higher and the ECB will be selling gold and buying USD to push the Euro down and the USD back up. That would be bad for gold. A tell for future negative Fed action is when the $CRB starts to zoom, which will also hold gold back.
The thing that old-timer gold traders are excited about are (i) the costs of production/overhead of the mining costs are up on average into the mid-600's now, and that puts a floor under the price because any lower and gold production starts stopping, causing central banks to sell even more than they want to, and (ii) the public has been educated about gold more today than ever before (by Financial Entertainment Media), and still most of the public have a passing interest (because they don't understand it) -- when the cycle starts to spike, like 1980, there will seem to be no end to the move because the public will go crazy. When gold fever hits, the price will likely do what my friend Rob McEwen believes, hit $2000 or more an ounce.
As the globalization process continues and traders in Indiana see how important gold is to the culture of India, they will want to jump on board. This is so inevitable to me, that I cannot understand why some members of this community can't see it. Call it the Thousand Points of Glitter or whatever. Ultimately it's going to happen. "g034" is a pro trader -- a long career trading on the floor in Chicago -- who continues to ask the gold Bears to give us reasons for their belief. He'll even let "Kaimu" pick them apart because the evidence that gold is going to continue moving up is over-whelming.
I am going to finance and become managing director of a private (ie, non-trading) gold operator in Guyana because I want to have control over the production of the physical. That's how much I believe in the future of gold, and in the decline in the value of paper money (not just the $USD but all paper money).
I'd like everybody to read about the Gold Standard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard
You'll see my constant references back to the years 1933-34, when the lobbyists for the US banking and financial services industry effectively managed to get the govt to turn over control of the debit system (real wealth) to their side (the backers of the credit system and paper wealth). They legislated a ridiculous price of $35/oz for gold. When the gold market was freed, the price escalated, and gold mines opened up again. I see another round of this nonsense by interventionists coming soon (within five or ten years) because the all-in cost to produce and sell gold by the major operators is close to the current price and international govts need to keep selling their gold holdings to keep the world from seeing how bad inflation really is. But with a global market now for gold, there will always be a black market price at which the physical will be sold. So the price will continue to rise.
I hope I have given a glimpse into the dance between the free market (the debit side aka the buy-side) and the credit side aka the sell-side. Ultimately the price of gold (a storehouse of value) will always rise in the long-term. In the short-term, there are times when the credit system works best and borrowed capital is used to build economic (not speculative) wealth. During those times (1981 through 2001 -- a 20-year cycle), credit markets/paper assets worked best. Then bankers (ie, sell-side) got greedy and killed their market. Now it's the debit markets/hard assets like metals and PM that will hold the winning hand -- whenever the interventionists (govts and central bankers) have to ease up in order to avert a financial crisis caused by the lack of collateral behind the paper securities they have been issuing to buyers who no longer accept wooden nickels.
Quentusrex, we all have to decide for ourselves what we will do next. My strategies and tactics and trading discipline tell me the time is ripe to buy gold and the goldminers now and to sell after the public rushes in near the end of the cycle. That spike might happen soon or it might happen later, but I expect it will happen in stages, the first being this year with the next peak for the broad market equities in US/Western Europe and the second being with the peak for the broad market equities in the rapid growth emerging economies, like Brazil, India, Russia and China.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 8:35 PM [link]
I'm still in awe at the responses I received yesterday. Getting advice from Bill is like getting golfing lessons from Tiger Woods. Everyone who wrote had great advice and I appreciate it. I was surprised there was no bashing, no throwing me under the bus, no vulgar words that permeate so many message boards. I'm spending the weekend reading 'Trade your way to financial freedom' by Van K. Tharp, and will then pick up a book by Elder as recommended by many on here. Thanks again.
Posted by: Green arrow
at
August 31, 2007 9:12 PM [link]
just reading today's discourse...
great posts, everyone!
Aussie:
"Also there are many different “rules of thumb” for valuing mining stocks and I would like to attach mining stock evaluation tools, calculators and models as separate tabs to the spreadsheet to assist readers." I eagerly await your offering!!
A question for you, Aussie, and Bill and others: do you use technical indicators to time your purchases of junior miners? Given how thinly some juniors trade, is there a liquidity threshold, beneath which TA is not helpful?
regards al.
joey
Posted by: joey
at
August 31, 2007 10:40 PM [link]
aussie,
somebody posted this site here before, but it may have some info/metrics that could be useful for your spreadsheet.
i look forward to seeing it and thanks for offering it to us.
http://www.resourcestockguide.com/comparison_table_page.php?p=0|1|3|0|0|33|0
Posted by: rob d
at
August 31, 2007 10:57 PM [link]
joey,
For micro-caps, I find money flow (ie, price change times volume) is the best indicator.
In a bull phase I expect to see positive money flow on the bull run and negative on the bear run.
If the group has paused after a sell-off and a junior has a few block crosses without much price change, I expect the price is soon going to lift.
On the other hand, if I see, after a bull run, a couple block crosses without further price advances then I expect the stock to fall.
In a small cap, the promoter, friends and family are moving money to/from high-taxed accounts to low-taxed accounts.
In a large cap, the exact same thing happens, except the players wear suits and white shoes.
In the penny stocks, the hype machine is usually the bought-and-paid-for newsletter touts and the spammers. In a large cap, the hype machine is bought-and-paid-for Financial Entertainment Media and HB&B research departments. Same game -- just a different crowd.
People are people; trading is trading. The market is us; it's just a different "us" that influences/controls/manipulates small caps vs large caps.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 11:01 PM [link]
Bill,
Understanding the policitical and economic hx of gold alongside investing in gold, ideally, should overlap. I'm not there yet and kind of think that very few buying gold, for better or for worse, will have the depth in knowledge that some, like Kaimu, already grasp and appreciate. How much should we know?
From a lay pespective, fwiw, this is what keeps my interest: I've been watching my country print money at will for decades, it has the feel of a dirty secret by virtue of little public interest, there's a disconnect that no country is on the gold standard but central banks have a need to store gold, the u.s. is faltering as a super power and the usd may no longer be the common coinage, and since there is no free lunch the chickens sooner or later come home to roost. Then again I have no idea how gold would be formally structured into future trade relations in order to meet issues of trust, or as you refrain...no one wants a wooden nickel. There remains a mystique as to how this end game gets played out. Most of us just want the bankers to do whatever they have to so long we have employment and purchasing power.
Re production cost, is this a good thing or bad thing? Good if it can dictate higher prices of gold; bad if not.
Re increased demand for gold, is it true that the relatively new access to gold etfs is increasing the pog? If so, Japan has just opened up their gold etfs.
As always I appreciate your role as the great communicator for matters of practical significance.
Posted by: jasper
at
September 1, 2007 12:37 AM [link]
Hoosier, I don't know if you'll get this or if I'll have to repost in the morning, but I spent the day creating a way to accurately compute the Monthly, Weekly, and Daily RSI on an excel sheet. It doesn't use public RSI numbers from the internet. Instead it downloads the actual closing prices for each stock, then does the calculation manually. Then spits the RSI's into a reference-able format. Let me know if you want a copy of the excel sheet. Any anyone else if they want it. I'm glad to share the fruits of my work.
Posted by: Quentusrex
at
September 1, 2007 3:38 AM [link]
g034,
With Bill's comment as to your futures background I have a question. With many instruments backed by options in the futures markets I struggle with the fact that some of the commodities do not "share" the bid/ask spread in real time. How does one determine a price to pay or a price to sell if there is no recording off the floor? Theoretical value as based on Black Sholes? Is that all we have? Even brokers can't get the spread on the Nymex. Is there a more efficient way? One either pays too much or sells for too little. tia
Posted by: stktrader
at
September 1, 2007 9:10 AM [link]
Quentusrex,
I'm interested. Please let us know where and when you post it.
Posted by: writersblock
at
September 1, 2007 9:41 AM [link]
Bill, love the photos of the new workspace. How do you ever concentrate on something as trivial as the market, when you have such peaceful surroundings in which to do your thinking? I couldn't. Looking at those photos, I can almost smell the salt air, and hear the gentle lapping of the water at the sides of the boat. Cheers, and thank you for all you do for us, even from Paradise. :-)
Posted by: writersblock
at
September 1, 2007 9:42 AM [link]
Quentusrex,
Would appreciate very much. Sounds like just the thing am looking for.
Thanks IA
Posted by: moneygenie
at
September 1, 2007 10:28 AM [link]
my gold short was pretty poor timing by the looks of yesterdays action, will close it out if we clip $685 on monday.
interesting times.
Posted by: dr.cosa
at
September 1, 2007 11:08 AM [link]
Quentusrex - I'd love a copy of your RSI-calculating spreadsheet.
jockgunter@yahoo.com
Posted by: Jock
at
September 1, 2007 12:03 PM [link]
While I find Bill's scenario for gold very persuasive, I also can't forsee the world actually returning to a gold standard.
In college before Nixon decoupled the US$ from gold, I heard economics profs smugly dismissing the gold standard as anachronistic. After all, how could world trade and investment be constrained by how much yellow metal can be dug from the ground?
Little did they suspect the irresponsibility of today's governments!
While I think gold will explode in price as faith in fiat money declines, I also think some other form of global financial discipline will evolve. Perhaps this will be based on a range of hard commodities.
After all, in a sense the professors were right !
Posted by: Jock
at
September 1, 2007 12:13 PM [link]
Quentusrex,
As Bill says, "Wherever we are, I have a feeling we are on the same page." I did the same thing, setting up the sheet to download closing prices automatically and then calculating the daily RSI 7. However, I haven't been able to figure out how to do weekly and monthly... so you're two steps ahead of me. I would really appreciate your offer of sharing your work. tpwilliamson@gmail.com
To me at least, when I get this tweaked correctly, it would save me a lot of time and effort in monitoring of stocks of companies I like... allowing me to focus limited time. Thanks Quentusrex!
very generous quentusrex. i would love a copy. maybe you could send it to Bill and he could use the site to distribute it like he does for research reports. although i don't know if it is feasible given the ISP problems. thanks so much!
Posted by: rob d
at
September 1, 2007 1:43 PM [link]
I'll ask Bill if he wants to host it. If not I'll still send it those who asked.
Posted by: Quentusrex
at
September 1, 2007 4:44 PM [link]
Quentusrex,
If you are not able to post it. I would very much appreciate you emailing it to me. Not being the most computer competent. It is slow going for me. It would be a great help. Your offer to help is greatly appreciated. And, that is what makes this community so special.
jsuttie@verizon.net
Thanks again. jfs
Posted by: jfs
at
September 1, 2007 5:15 PM [link]
The current excel file is here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?7sxl1g9tfor
One thing to know about the file is that you have to have an addon installed. Here is where you get it:
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/smf_addin/
Once you have those setup the file is pretty easy to use. Sheet3 has all of the tickers for the Cara100. If you want to replace a ticker with one of your own, you must replace it on Sheet3. All the tickers on Sheet1 are references to Sheet3.
Let me know what changes I should make. I plan to release another version soon that should make things a bit simpler.
Posted by: Quentusrex
at
September 1, 2007 5:31 PM [link]
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Here is what I wrote in my Dec 20-06 report:
----------------------------------
Traders and maybe bankers are taking their eye off the ball. The issue is our ability to service debt, not the price of the assets (ie, collateral held by bankers) we own today.
The same thing happened last year with speculators in the U.S. housing market. People with no financial resources were buying multiple housing units in hopes they could, with minimum fix-up, flip the properties for huge price gains. For a while the prices escalated because of debt-created money flowing into that market. Then the investors realized that a suitable economic return (ie, cash coming in versus cash committed) wasn't happening. Sure, the housing market thrived as long as investors were prepared to accept returns of 2 pct! For a while, that is. Then they saw that the prices were not still rising, but the taxes and maintenance costs still had to be paid. So they tried to sell. The only thing that gave them a reprieve this cycle (unlike other real estate cycles like 1990) was that the Fed continued pumping money into the system to keep interest rates from rising. Eventually it was high oil prices that sunk that market.
-----------------------
Bank stocks tanked after that. Real estate spectulators have been taken to the woodshed and spanked.
It was inevitable.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 31, 2007 7:41 AM [link]