« Cara in The Bahamas, Mon., Aug. 27, 2007, 11:55 PM ET | Main | Cara’s Tuesday Report, Aug. 28, 2007, 7:28 AM »

August 28, 2007

Cara’s Commentary & Community Chat, Tues., Aug. 28, 2007, 5:20 AM ET

Borat Sagdiyev where are you? Eni is calling. They are having difficulty for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan.

Italy's oil giant Eni SpA, which manages an alliance of Western oil companies in the Caspian Sea, the heart of the world's largest oil-development project, Kashagan, is up against three formidable foes: “Ice, Lethal Fumes -- and Kazakhs” reports the Wall St Journal.

How big is the project? WSJ says, “Kashagan, discovered in 2000 in Kazakhstan's sector of the Caspian, was the world's largest oil find in 30 years. In 2019, production there is expected to plateau at 1.5 million barrels of crude a day, more than the output of established producers Angola or Qatar.”

But, "From today, work on Kashagan will be frozen," said a Kazakhstan official.

That would be the mother of all work stoppages or cost over-runs, however you want to look at it. Projected costs over the 40-year life of the project have increased to $136 billion from $57 billion, says Eni.

The point to this is that the third-world has become first-world players. When they sneeze, you and I catch pneumonia. $70, $80, $90… and counting, for oil. 90, 80, 70… for the $USD.

Do you now see the problem? Higher oil prices …inflation …Dollars made of wooden nickels …higher interest rates …housing and mortgage industry collapse …wealth destroyed, including our pensions … jobs lost … economic calamity … nobody in control as they are all too busy getting theirs … commodities-rich Third World governments and rebels and terror groups who want to be govts so that they too can join the Rich & Powerful, Friends & Family circle …and on and on.

There is value in gold my friends.

If they are going to print paper money and create debts as fast as central banks do today, there needs to be a balance. Storehouse of value …color it yellow. An amazing concept.

Even Borat might understand. After all, he’s a Kazakh.


Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on August 28, 2007 05:20:27 AM | Category: Cara's Daily Commentary

Discourse

Moin from Germany,

nice number that shows how the junk market hit the wall during the last few weeks...

Eleven junk-rated borrowers have sold bonds since the beginning of July, compared with an average of 41 a month in the first half of the year, Bloomberg data show. Three found buyers in August.

And i bet the three in August had to made substantial concessions like Home Depot to unload the debt.... :-)

Posted by: jmf [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:00 AM [link]

Reference prior comments on the big option bet in September.

Now I can think of a possible scenario.

Countrywide made a 4.5 billion dollar loan, no money down, to a foreigner with a local U.S. address, something like Clark & Addison (Wrigley Field). Whoever it is, they put it all on black in September. Hmm, wasn't there a group called Black September?

Yeah, there was an eclipse of the moon last night.

Posted by: Seamus [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:23 AM [link]

test

Posted by: dabonenose [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:38 AM [link]

people bet big the wrong way all the time...ask brian hunter of amaranth...we may be working too hard to explain the "terrorist put"

only bet i have right now is on NG, which may finally have a positive open...neutral o/w on market direction...sorry to lose markm for the time being...

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:39 AM [link]

Seamis,,,or was that "Black Sabbath" ???

Posted by: dabonenose [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:41 AM [link]

BIll, you wrote, "I think I’ll watch Bloomberg from the boat and spend my day bobbing in the harbour. I think I deserve it." You definitely deserve it! Thank you for all you do. Please post photos of your new workspace, out there, "bobbing on the water." :-)

Posted by: writersblock [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:49 AM [link]

ALOHA !!

Bill ... I was just looking at the Bush FY Budget for 2008(mid year version) and this year they have forcasted a $410bilUSD budget just for defense with a possible float of an additional $49bilUSD in supplemental emergency funds. God knows what is in their "other" set of books ... off-budget. Add them together and the USA has decided that we would rather squander $459bilUSD this year on military solutions! Thats 3.4 Kashagan oil fields in exchange for highly inflationary death and destruction of humans and fiscal irresponsibility. The repercussions of the "War On Terror" will be felt for many generations not just now and will hasten the fall of the US Empire ever faster, just as Bin Laden had planned. That is how he defeated the Russians through fiat fiscal attrition ... bleeding money ... bleeding productive wealth. At some point we won't even be able to afford to defend ourselves as a Nation much less willy-nilly invade other countries or police the US Peso!

Yesterday, I posted a portion of the 1964 LBJ tapes where LBJ discusses going to war in Vietnam. He knew it was wrong but did it anyway and 58,000 US kids died for no reason! Those tapes show just how insane our leaders have been in the past and are probably now. What will we be hearing in 40 years listening to the Baby Bush tapes about Iraq?

BB: "Now damn it Dick and Karl are you sure this Iraq invasion is gonna work? Get on the horn and call Rush ... I wanna be sure!!!!"

I am amazed that a bunch of Vietnam War draft dodgers got elected to Pres and Vice Pres in the first place! What must highly decorated military commanders from the Vietnam era think listening to the likes of Bush and Cheney talk military strategy? I think I would have to resign ... One thing is for sure the Bush administration sure has used up a lot of Generals!

Yet another hallmark of fiat regimes is the ability to fund endless wars ... See "fiat" in of itself isn't evil, its just fiat requires a highly responsible and honest egoless government to be responsible and not spend or live beyond a country's means. As long as a human being is President of a fiat currency there is no chance of that ever happening. It is not the nature of humans not to be greedy or use power. This is why no fiat currency has ever survived. Historically there have been many, many fiat regimes and they have all failed. Back during the Weimar Republic days money printing required an actual printing press and paper and ink, now with the advent of the computer and spreadsheets $1trilUSD can be created with a mouse click ... Not even the Weimar Republic could print up $1tril marks. In fact a biz friend here in Hawaii has a Weimar Mark with only one side of the note printed. That's how desperate things got! Aside from all the red flags that pop up every other day now I feel desperation in the air! I see nothing "riskless" anymore ... except gold!

The longer we voters elect leaders that continually police the World offering only military solutions to economic problems the faster we will live in a Third World freedomless lifestyle ... if we're lucky it'll be "Third"!!!


Posted by: kaimu [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:51 AM [link]

With more US$230 trillion in open derivative contracts, much of it in the form of collateralized obligations, the global financial system is bracing for massive writeoffs.

It is for this reason that credit evaporated. Banks are slashing lines of credit, paring back trading positions and refusing to roll over commercial-paper obligations because they must husband their cash. That is why a 50-basis-point cut or a 400-basis-point reduction in Fed Funds will not do anything to restore confidence. It is also the reason the markets will panic the day after the Fed's hand is forced on September 18, when they realize that financial institutions will still be unable to move the collateralized derivative structures off their books.

Basel Accords were a stealthy virus that contaminated the global financial system.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/IH29Dj01.html

Posted by: jk484 [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 9:07 AM [link]

Safe way to invest in gold?

5-Year MarketSafe Gold Bullion Certificates of Deposit

"If the Spot Price of Gold has increased in value over the term, you earn a Market Upside Payment equal to 100% of the percentage change in the average Spot Price of Gold, calculated as an average of ten semiannual pricing dates."

"If the Spot Price of Gold has decreased in value, you will receive 100% of your principal at maturity."

http://tinyurl.com/33bqel

And silver:

http://tinyurl.com/2mulnc

Posted by: JIM [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 9:15 AM [link]

The vol. stinks and will stink until it comes back from vacation. I went to all cash till I see better vol.

Personally, I think we are bottoming for a fall run.

A double bottom off the lows of a few weeks ago would be nice.

Any thots 2nd Ave.??

Dab

Posted by: dabonenose [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:05 AM [link]

What do you think 2nd? I think Peter's thesis of testing the previous low (or thereabouts) is on.

I'm sitting on my powder until I see the whites of their eyes.

I'm also in UNG with a similar basis. I have time. I sold GFI and AUY on Friday into the AM strength and have reloaded partial positions waiting for a bigger drop to load up.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:09 AM [link]

dab-can't get too excited about the long side until we retest the lows...cashed out the miners and financials earlier this month...long UNG and spec holdings in KRY/BMD...o/w about 85% cash...

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:10 AM [link]

..so craig and i are on the same page...and yesterday i see leisa and i crossed paths again buying a little UNG around 34.03 at the open...

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:13 AM [link]

starting to look at NGAS-last played this one in the 7.50-7.90 range, now gapping down to 6.87...

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:36 AM [link]

long NGAS @ 6.84...adding to WGDFF at 2.27...

UNG: was it OG who quoted JL as adding to positions only on the way up>opened my posiltion at 41, stopped averaging down after it dropped to 36, but then couldn't resist adding some at 34...will wait for a spike back >37 from here to continue adding...OK with staying underwater for now...

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:46 AM [link]

Re stocks: the recent rally due to short squeeze when discount rate dropped on that friday is suspect due to; lack of Institutional stock support (net distribution into low volume buying) which is needed for bull markets AND the massive liquidity did not go into stocks (as I opined weeks ago), it went into the credit market. No institutional support along with the fed pushing on a string with regards to the stock market point to a possible retest of recent lows.

Re gold: Myth - slowing economy leads to gold bear market. Fact - a slowing economy -> lower tax receipts -> lower dollar -> higher gold price...very simple but POG can do whatever it wants in the short term. Gold longs don't need some kind of credit meltdown to profit, although if some paper failure leads to a bank failure gold should rocket higher. Is the credit situation systemic? Wish I knew who was correct on this issue.

Re European Central Bank M3 growth at 11.7%: you guys need to take some notes from the Americans in keeping your inflation "low". See; changing index calculations, hedonic indexing, substitution effect, possibly outright lying or simply drop the public publication of M3 like we did here in America...call Bernanke and Paulson, they'll help you out. Also, with money supply growth so high, will they need to raise rates to counteract this inflationary policy? Will the euro rally in usd terms?

Re bonds: the second week of June, I posted that the bond downtrend line (ief) was broken to upside in oversold conditions giving a "buy" signal in my model. It looks to be peaking, will sell on uptrend line break. Buying at 80 and selling at almost 84 may not seem like a GREAT trade in just over 2 months, but this is my best (not most profitable) trade of the year because; I stated that I didn't like bonds at the time but I stuck with my plan and bought up to my asset allocation target - lighten up at highs, go "all in" at lows - over and over again for nice gains over time. Sometimes you just need to shut your eyes and hit buy/sell and follow trade in the days/weeks ahead with possible stops put in place. Plan the trade/trade the plan. What I mean by this is that if your allocation in any sector/security/asset class etc. is a low of 20% of your portfolio and a high of 30% of your portfolio you sell down to 20% at high prices and you buy up to 30% at low prices using technical analysis with the "art" in fundamentals. If your portfolio is diversified, you will do this with many securities and will be covered regardless of conditions.

good luck to all.

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 11:05 AM [link]

NGAS - Daily chart has a H&S look to it.
MCO - Ugly chart. Death of a thousand cuts.

Interesting that the utilities are holding up better than the rest of the market, after leading to the downside yesterday.
Long UNG, MU; short UNH (via puts)

Posted by: OldGoat [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 11:14 AM [link]

GFI is bucking the mkt....signed or is signing labor agreements in South Africa.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 11:17 AM [link]

Re US Steel (X) and Stelco, here is the summary of the Credit Suisse research report:


Following the announced acquisition of Stelco (STE.TO, C$37.63, NOT
RATED), we are maintaining our relative Neutral rating and our 12-
month price objective of $110.

US Steel announced it plans to acquire Canadian flat rolled producer Stelco
for a total of US$1.85 billion in cash (see 8/24 “A Logical, But Pricey,
Acquisition” flashnote for initial thoughts). Subject to customary regulatory
approvals, the companies are targeting closing in the fourth quarter.

Estimate revisions – After adjusting for the estimated net impact of the
Stelco acquisition, we are raising our 2008 EPS estimate from $8.35 to
$8.94, and our 2008 EBITDA estimate from $2.0b to $2.3 billion.

Valuation - Shares of U.S. Steel are trading at 6.0x our revised 2008
EBITDA estimate (vs. 6.0x prior to the transaction) and 10.4x our 2008 EPS
estimate (vs. 11.1x prior to the transaction).

Our view - While Stelco arguably enhances U.S. Steel’s strategic position
via complementary intermediate slab production and finished products, we
believe US Steel paid a full price for this bolt-on acquisition, with X shares
trading at the same EV/EBITDA multiple as it was prior to this transaction
(i.e., 6.0x 2008 EBITDA). As a result, in our view it remains to be seen if this
transaction will enhance shareholder value over time. Bottom Line – We
maintain our recently revised preference for the shares of Nucor (NUE,
$53.47, OUTPERFORM, TP $70.00, MW) based on (1) relative valuation,
(2) current timing of the steel cycle , and (3) relative raw material cost
positions.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 11:22 AM [link]

Bill -

http://www.anatoliaminerals.com site is unusually informative and easy to penetrate, with recent drillng report. I wonder if you will recognize any of the "jockeys".

Corporate secretary: Jay Kellerman, "over 15 years of experience specializing in corporate and securities law matters with an emplasis on the mining sector. Jay spent a year on secondment to the General Counsel's Office of the Ontario Securities Commission."

The others seem US or Brit.

Posted by: Jock [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 11:24 AM [link]

I'll take more photos once I get new AA batteries for my CX7530 camera. The rechargeable ones finally gave out.

I am now two steps closer to getting what I wanted done to get my feet on the ground here. I must admit to being the architect of my own problems in one case, but I was here for four years in the 90's, and I won't compromise. It's a bit like trading; if you wait long enough, you'll get what you want. I just have to learn how to stop the whining during the interim.

I hadn't counted on HB&B jumping their own ship this morning. Short-term, this will hurt. Volatility picked up yesterday and is worse today.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 11:30 AM [link]

2nd,
Now that GFI is due to settle with the union I suspect our premkt shenanigans will cease. With this tape it's looking like the $17+ stock it was before the labor issues.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 12:02 PM [link]

I don't know why the Cara Community has gone quiet in the past few days other than the possibility that nerves are setting in.

If you'd care to do something positive with your time, why not spend a half hour reading this research report from Credit Suisse on Cara 100 Swiss conglomerate ABB? This is a solid core stock in any long-term oriented portfolio. The company is financially strong, has good management, very diverse operations but particularly strong in emerging world power utilities construction, has great operating metrics, growing dividends, and so forth. The only thing wrong here is the PE, which is always too high because the company is a peak performer.

So maybe if the stock pulls back say -20 pct in a broad market pull-back in the next six months, I could say it would be a great buy.

http://www.billcara.com/CS%20Aug%2028%202007%20ABB.pdf

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?c=abb

For traders who are seeking to diversify from US corporations, ABB would be a good switch with GE. The companies are quite alike, but GE is more focused on corporate lending.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 12:26 PM [link]

UNG:
Gaining some strength. Some of the Septemeber near the money calls look like a good bet.

Posted by: JogyP [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 12:36 PM [link]

craig-you may be right about the reason for the extended hours trading prices with GFI...

UNG finally catching a bid...now up 3%

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 12:56 PM [link]

Thanks for the ABB report Bill. Much appreciated.

This market is still following the '87 crash script, in my opinion. I am watching this to define risk, not to scaremonger.

In '87 the first leg down was 10% in 28 days (calendar), almost identical to 2007 first leg down. The snapback rally in '87 was 7.8% up in 10 days. We just had a snap-back rally that was 10 days in length but only about 60% retracement.

Behavior around support at 1440 and 1370 will be critical. September is typically a tough month for the market.

I am largely in cash and short the financials waiting to see a clearer trend.

Posted by: moab [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 12:58 PM [link]

When was the last time we saw Newmont (NEM) the top 10 volume trader on the NYSE? It's also up +3 pct on a day that the DJIA is down -150 points (-1.1 pct) and $XAU goldminers down -1.2 pct so far today.

It helps there is talk that Barrick (ABX) is going to make a bid to buy NEM. That would be an excellent merger. Kudos to Peter Munk if it should happen.

Btw, Barrick ex-CEO Randy Oliphant is chairman of Western Goldfields. Randy would like to be the next Peter Munk I am guessing.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 1:09 PM [link]

NEM:
Barrick dismisses talk of Newmont bid

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKTOR00201420070828?rpc=44

Over 60,000 Sept NEM calls traded so far today!

Posted by: JogyP [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 1:16 PM [link]

Bill - Re fewer posts of late - There may well be a correlation between short-term market direction and number of posts, especially from those seeking opportunities on the long side. Also, some individuals (especially those with a short-term trading horizon) may have become reluctant to post in view of previous complaints re "pollution".

Posted by: OldGoat [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 1:19 PM [link]

Bill,
When a stock is in the accumulation zone en daily RSI breaks above 30, but after a several days again falls below 30 is this a falls breakout and should we sell the stock or should we hold it. In other words, can we use daily RSI 30 as a kind of stop-loss ?

I know you don’t have any Dutch stocks on your Cara list but here are three interesting stocks from Euronext Amsterdam in the Accumulation Zone:
-USG People (Yahoo Finance = USG.AS) at eur 23,65 with RSI D/W/M at 36,19/25,71/28,46.
In July the stock was trading around eur 37,50.
-Crucell (Yahoo Finance = CRXL.AS) at eur 14,39 with RSI D/W/M at 33,20/29,59/28,07.
-Ordina (Yahoo Finance = ORDI.AS) at eur 13,20 with RIS D/W/M at 35,32/15,48/30.

When talking about Petrochina today you still look at RSI-7 Daily dropping below 70 but I thought you had lowered your Daily RSI lines to 15-50 instead of 30-70 ?

Thanks again for your reply.

Posted by: toptrader9 [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 1:21 PM [link]

With the XAU looking like it just bounced downward off of the 200 day MA. Is this the calm before the fall for the miners? or is this the basing before a break through... (these are my thoughts for the last 2-3 trading days)

Posted by: Quentusrex [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 1:47 PM [link]

Hola from Dominical, Costa Rica!

I am on a backpacking vacation and having a blast. Costa Rica is one of the most beautiful and diverse countries I have ever visited. I recommend it highly (though the capital San Jose is a bit seedy) the beaches are beautful and the rainforest is incredible. Also very eco+friendly and a general reverence for mother nature! A pretty decent exchange rate taboot! I can go to dinner here with a few daquiris for half or less of what it costs me just for food in the US.

There are lots of Europeans down here traveling for their Ferragosto *midAugust thru first week of September vacation, so perhaps it is part of the reason for less posting lately.

Thanks to everyone who posts , its a great way to do a quick chronological market perusal as I stop in the internet cafe!

Also, Bill, I about spit my smoothie out while laughing at the title of your post today!
Pura Vida!

Posted by: BillySundance [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 2:37 PM [link]

SLW-going to start accumulating here at 10.69

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 2:56 PM [link]

What'll it be 2nd? A reversal or continue to sell into the close? Feels weak to me. I think they want to see DOW 12,600 or so and 120 or so XAU, but it just turned 12 pdt and it looks to be trying to get off the floor. Small move, we'll see.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:03 PM [link]

somehow i don't think there is enough fear right now to take it down...how much money have they drawn in from the sides over the past two weeks-i would wager not much....

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:06 PM [link]

Any thoughts on why SLW is dropping a lot more than other mining stocks?

Posted by: Novice [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:10 PM [link]

As you know, there is a difference between market risk (ie, volatile prices affecting your positions) and capital risk (ie, potential harm done to your wealth on account of insolvency or bankruptcy of your financial services provider).

A couple weeks ago, when a major financial institution believed it could not pay monies owing to a group of forex dealers, and decided to seek court protection over about $100 million in cash, the court heard arguments that there may have been up to a dozen other bankruptcies caused as a result. The court ordered the funds released, and I reported that. I also asked each of you to carefully monitor the ongoing viability of your financial services provider, which was something I said I don't ever recall doing before.

Today, a leading forex dealer, FXCM, sent the following letter to clients. If you have accounts with small forex dealers, I think you can take this letter as either a piece of marketing by FXCM or as a heads-up to give careful consideration to the contents.

-------------------------

Dear Client:

The Forex industry could be in for a major structural change — soon.

This change has the potential to benefit Forex Capital Markets, LLC (“FXCM”); however, we believe many forex brokers may not survive.
Our industry’s regulating agency, the National Futures Association (“NFA”), has proposed new financial requirements for every Forex Dealer Member (“FDM”). Spelled out in their “Request for Comments on Forex Proposals,” dated June 19, 2007, the NFA’s proposed requirements call for the following:

• All FDMs must maintain at all times a net worth of $5 million;

• Larger FDMs, particularly those that have a dealing desk, could potentially face net excess capital requirements significantly higher than the minimum under the proposed new rules;

• Where appropriate, the NFA may require an FDM’s annual financial statement to be certified by an independent public accountant.
FXCM’s current financial situation well exceeds NFA’s proposed requirements.

As of June 30, 2007, FXCM has over $44 million in adjusted net capital, and for the last six years we have had our financial statements audited by an independent, certified public accounting firm.

We believe the NFA is proposing these requirements because of the troubling number of insolvencies and near-insolvencies that have recently plagued the forex industry. According to the NFA:

• In 2003, a Forex Dealer Member misappropriated almost $2 million in customer funds, driving the company into bankruptcy. (The CFTC is currently attempting to salvage some of the customers' funds.)

• Since March of this year, eight different FDMs have fallen under the “early warning” requirement of $1.5 million.

• More recently, NFA took a Member Responsibility Action ("MRA") against an FDM whose liabilities exceeded its assets by over $1 million.

Industry-wide, there is now concern that some Forex Dealer Members may be unable to meet their financial obligations to customers in the event the increased capital requirements take effect.

A review of the current net capital positions of the 43 Forex Dealer Members available on the following CFTC web page clearly demonstrates that this concern is justified. View the CFTC Web Page at http://www.cftc.gov/marketreports/financialdataforfcms/

As you can see from the financial data compiled by the CFTC, FXCM reports an adjusted net capital of over $44 million—far greater than the proposed financial requirement. Based on the most current available CFTC financial data, at least 22 FDMs would not be able to meet the new $5 million minimum net capital requirement.

These firms are currently reporting net capital levels below $5 million. If the new capital level is imposed, these firms will either have to obtain more capital or close down. Because larger brokers may also face higher capital requirements, FXCM believes that several of these larger firms may also be unable to meet the new requirements, even though they presently have in excess of $5 million in adjusted net capital.

In the event that some of these firms close down—or worse, are shut down by the NFA—we are concerned that customer funds, or at least their timely and orderly repayment, could be jeopardized.

We realize that many forex traders have accounts with multiple forex brokers. That is why we advise you to make sure all your trading accounts are held at firms that are adequately capitalized.

If you have an account with a possibly endangered firm, we believe, depending on when the NFA proposal takes effect, that the time may be fast approaching to consider moving those funds while the opportunity still exists.

Our industry is changing, and the new proposed regulations are intended to put every FDM, and the industry itself, on a more secure financial footing. We welcome the NFA’s proposed changes because the effect will ultimately lead to clients trading through regulated brokers that are better capitalized or have access to greater financial resources.

Please contact us if you have any questions regarding these changes.

We look forward to serving you.
Best regards,
Sales & Client Services
Forex Capital Markets, LLC
Financial Square
32 Old Slip, 10th Floor
New York , NY 10005
1-888-50-FOREX (36739)
info@fxcm.com
www.fxcm.com

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:41 PM [link]

End of day rabbit must be stuck in the hat....

Posted by: OldGoat [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:44 PM [link]

Novice,

A couple days ago, I opined that Silver Wheaton (SLW) had moved too early, which I didn't trust. I am, however, a believer that silver will soon break out to the upside, as it usually does in August-Sept.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:45 PM [link]

The S&P went through support at 1440 pretty easily. This is not looking good, granted volume i light. End of day weakness is bear market trait. We will see what tomorrow brings.

If momentum continues to build double-bottom support at 1370 may not hold and small investors will really panic this time.

SLW may be dropping on missing estimates and silver underperforming gold. I will be a buyer under 9 where long term support is.

Is anyone suspicious of Wells Fargo computer problems over the weekend that prevented people from making withdrawals? That would be a good excuse to cover up solvency issues.

Posted by: moab [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:45 PM [link]

looks like mkt rout today. Maybe big dip in the morning will set up another short squeezw??? Any thots

Posted by: dabonenose [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:47 PM [link]

Only 15 of the S&P 500 are up on the day, headed into the close. I think there was a major disappointment in the release of the Fed notes, which gave those traders who were anticipating a surprise mid-meeting Fed Funds rate cut a let down.

This market environment is very fragile. The DJIA is down -265 points on very little volume. This is a pulling of bids, not a rush to the exits.

I remember 1973-74 was much like that.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:48 PM [link]

A "pura vida!" from BillySundance in Costa Rica. Doesn't get better than that for me.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:50 PM [link]

Thanks for the comments on SLW. As I am new, I only remember last September when silver was breaking out before suffering a big breakdown, and again in October. With the Dow almost 300 points down, I'm in a pessimistic mood.

Posted by: Novice [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:55 PM [link]

toptrader,

whip-saws occur all the time. It's why I say you need to look at the weight of the evidence as opposed to a single indicator, and why you need to understand the time frame you operate under. If my horizon is 5 years, I don't worry about my initial position; I even stated that it would be a partial position, to be followed up by additional buying on the dips if they were to occur. The point is that by using the weight of the evidence -- similar technical indications across a stock's group or several similar groups -- I have more confidence to stick to my initial conviction.

That's one of the reasons I like trading fairly homogenous groups, like gold or silver miners, home builders, casinos, and the like.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 3:59 PM [link]

toptrader9,

I forgot to say that changing the RSI-7 levels is an art form, something like setting stops at 3 pct, 5 pct, 8 pct, etc. Like horses for courses, there are tools for jobs. With experience, you learn to adapt the horses and the tools to your strategies and tactics.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 4:02 PM [link]

Bill it looks to me from these recent sedar filings for WGI we may see 12 million + shares up for sale. About 6 mill from NEM.
Can you comment please?
http://www.sedar.com/DisplayCompanyDocuments.do?lang=EN&issuerNo=00025569

August 8th and 23rd filings for WGI.

Posted by: golden7 [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 4:07 PM [link]

Like Templeton's Mark Mobius, I am still in the bullish camp (short-term). If the economy was lousy, and the market prices were too high relative to fundamentals, I would be concerned that the Fed and other G-20 nations might just let this equity market sag. But there is reason for hope in the economy and in the financial strength of the non-financial industry companies to figure that the problems in the financial services industry and the house-builders can be worked out over time.

So, and this is important to my thinking, the Fed is likely to continue to add liquidity and help stop the bleeding. Each sell-off is likely to be met with buying at some early point -- until trader confidence is restored one more time.

Do I think that all the action in the world of central bankers can stop a Bear market in equities from unfolding in North America and Europe later this year? No. But, you see; I'm going to give the Fed credit for doing what they are for trying to stave a crisis in the short-term. I think the Fed is prepared for an orderly Bear.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 4:13 PM [link]

Well well.....
I traded my plan today and when it started playing out I leaned into it a bit with a little SDS and DXD. I expect more of the same until we see the previous low. If we stop there I sell the ultras and buy my list. I'm not sure about PM's now as it isn't a sure deal we see the Fed cutting rates at the next meeting. If not the mkt will definitely throw a tantrum and take er' down even more and PM's will do the same so I'm looking for return.

I sold TM for a profit and am bottom fishing to reload. Have 1/3 position today. Hoping for $110. Holding PGH LT will buy more on any serious pullback.

Ugly close, over night will be telling.

Posted by: Craig [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 4:16 PM [link]

close at the lows, but as bill points out, a lack of bids feels markedly different than panic selling...and as craig pointed out this morning, absent panic no compelling reason to buy...so i guess we have an ongoing game between buyers and sellers until one side caves in....

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 4:19 PM [link]

Bill there is 5 monts left to the year and your bullish for what the next 60 days? I am not sure I am following along here. Why bother to say "bullish" since this to me implies something longer than a 60-90 day time horizon, at least to me. Maybe this sort of thinking is more for the traders out there rather than long term oriented investors? I read your stuff and think why bother taking the risk for a possbile 60 day run only to have a bear start soon. I say this with the highest regard for your work.

Posted by: geckojb [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 5:46 PM [link]

Paul Farrell on a recent talk by David Walker, head of the GAO:

Excerpts:

"The Roman Empire lasted 1,000 years, but only about half that time as a republic. The Roman Republic fell for many reasons, but three reasons are worth remembering: declining moral values and political civility at home, an overconfident and overextended military in foreign lands, and fiscal irresponsibility by the central government. Sound familiar?"

"Entitlement reform is especially urgent. Unless we reform Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, these programs will eventually crowd out all other federal spending. Otherwise, by 2040 our government could be doing little more than sending out Social Security checks and paying interest on our massive national debt."

Full story: http://tinyurl.com/24nu3g

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 6:03 PM [link]

geckojb,

You do make a good point. I am actually bullish or anywhere from six weeks to 4 and a half months, and that is a time when 10 pct moves in stocks can happen. With a long-term bearish outlook, I am simply looking for an exit point for stocks (for example, for those that didn't rally or rally much from my list of 41 stocks I gave almost two weeks ago).

The thing is you never know how much these stocks will rally (if they do at all). Recall that in July 2006, I gave a list of about 20 tech stocks I believed were ready to rally. At that point, I had called a primary Bear market starting (I thought) on about May 10 2006. So I didn't think that rally would be more than a couple weeks, with a 10+ pct upwards move then too. But the rally lasted through several months, with much bigger gains, and there were more than tech stocks that rallied too.

So, by taking a tactical position of waiting for rallies to help you sell into strength, you are trying to stay on the right side of trend and you leave yourself flexible enough to change your longer-term perspective based on the changing events of the short-term.

Maybe, like August 2006, you see enough of a broad market move to say to yourself that there is sufficient capital inflow to drive the market higher. In the situation today, the rally so far has not even taken indexes back to the 50-day MA line before looking shaky. If the weakness persists, I think that would be real bad for the long-term Bulls, and for my short-term bullish outlook. A technical break-down here could lead to a major downslide that I believe will be more severe than the most recent one.

I hope that helps.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 6:27 PM [link]

Mark Hulbert's update on short-term timers suggests the market is more likely to rise than fall over the next few weeks:

http://tinyurl.com/ysylcf

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 6:35 PM [link]

for anyone following SWC, downgraded from hold to sell today by TSC:

"Miner of palladium, platinum and associated metal Stillwater Mining Company (SWC) has been downgraded to a sell from a hold. The historical performance of the company's stock has been generally disappointing, and its profit margins have been poor. Stillwater's net loss widened to $2.52 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $2.34 million a year earlier. The company has reported somewhat volatile earnings recently, and TheStreet.com Ratings believe it is likely to report a decline in the coming year."

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 6:45 PM [link]

geckojb,

Well, and nicely, said. Personally, in deep, and resonate with the caution of why try to catch the next rally when there could be a trainwreck.

In the past 5-6 yrs, since sept 2002, here are the very different returns on different asset classes:
emerging mkts: 28o %
developing intl: 140
small caps: 120
xau 100
.spx 80

(gfi 25..what a laggard!)

I'm not sure what this means. Global growth is going to outperform for many years? Are our large caps due to catch up? Have we just come too far?

When I draw a channel on a weekly chart over the past 5-6 years for .rua/russell 3000 it's not a pretty picture. Looks line we over shot the upper trend line and there's a long way to the bottom trend line. The powers that be may be putting the squeeze on the fed to make good on hope of lower overnight rates. As my simple mind hears it, the discount window is not being used since it's still more costly.

Some sectors remain above the 200dma: energy, oil services, and emerging mkts. Hope springs eternal.

Posted by: jasper [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 7:34 PM [link]

Thanks Bill for the clarification. I will be watching the trend here seeing if we break down or can recover and at least break the cycle of lower highs.

Posted by: geckojb [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 7:39 PM [link]


In addition to the generalized weakness well documented throughout the day here, I noticed some of the same "dump the winners, buy up the weaklings" trades a la 2-3 weeks ago. Maybe some quant/hedge players are still deleveraging and forced into this unwind to maintain net market exposure.

With the down moves across-the-board this week so far, one may be tempted to rush in definitive judgements along with the media frenzy and the fall-like flow (I have been guilty of overreaction in the very recent past, and will likely fall under its spell in the future).

As noted before, we made this move on volume lower than last week (which was lower than the previous dreadful one); FETv experts and their mini-mes have been repeating ad nauseam that the correction is not over, that we need to retest, etc. Just like this market hit a perfect DJI 10% correction nearly simultaneously with Naz & SPX, today's action strongly suggest that we are on script to fullfil the expected re-test (and hoped-for double bottom formation). In a somewhat less bullish stance than Bill's ST, I would expect that the players will not deviate from the widespread expectations: re-test and rebound strongly. At this point, I am growing uncomfortable that the past two weeks (since Fed. intervention in truth) have been strictly by the book on decreasing participation. I don't trust markets that behave according to a pattern known and advertised by the majority. I would rather have a more disorderly tug-of-war between bulls & bearson stable-to-increasing volume.

JML

disclosure: no positions. SDS and TWM triggers were not reached yesterday (1,485+1,490 and 800+805 resp.)

Posted by: Jumble [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 7:49 PM [link]

ALOHA !!

Anybody have a Schwab account? Why did Charles Schwab sell 70% of his stock on 8/15?

Link: http://biz.yahoo.com/t/34/189.html

I do give insider trading at these volumes a lot of weight.

Posted by: kaimu [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:19 PM [link]

kaimu -

I don't know how you come up with Charles S. liquidating 70% of his holdings. I see from SEC Form 4 about 8% across the board liquidation likely for diversification.

http://tinyurl.com/3yn7wc

JML

Posted by: Jumble [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:32 PM [link]

Wow - took off for a long weekend since this was supposed to be the "slow week" and come back tonight to this carnage.

My biggest long term holdings are in Oil and gas stocks and I see Oil up about $0.40 from Friday's close and XLE is down over 3.5%. Nat gas down a bit, but not that much.

Posted by: bb [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 8:46 PM [link]

IMHO, the pressure is on for the fed to lower the discount rate..and i think they're going to do it..

Posted by: 2nd_ave [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 9:22 PM [link]

21 period SMA on the 1-min TICKQ exceeded the lowest levels of Aug 16th and Aug 10th. -548.

A/D on the NASDAQ closed below the lowest levels of Aug 16th.

To me, that spells selling pressure. The big question to me for tomorrow is: Who's going to buy? and Why?

Wish I'd seen the '74 bear market... if Bill is right and there's no bid under this market, all that's left is offer -- which leads back to my question: to Whom?

AAPL continues to be the tell for me.

LOL OldGoat... "End of day rabbit must be stuck in the hat...."

Posted by: omphalos [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 9:47 PM [link]

Wow. Schwab sold 17 million shares on 8/15 for $350 million and is left with 8 million shares. That is a big red flag for me.

Thanks for the head's up Kaimu

What is the excuse - he is buying a house!

Posted by: moab [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 9:51 PM [link]

Here's a funny cartoon I found on my wanderings today: http://tinyurl.com/36fn4r

I've found that there's a popular wisdom in humor; I've often maintained that Johnny Carson's monologue caught the pulse of the country better than any "Executive Summary" which might land on a president (or Fed Reserve chairman's) desk.

Posted by: omphalos [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 9:57 PM [link]

CEO Barrick,> BOE tried to destroy gold mining!

"(But) The industry has really struggled from a lack of investment," he said. "It's fine to talk about great gold prices for the last couple of years, but the Bank of England tried to put the gold mining industry out of business back in 1999 and there was very little adjustment for many years."

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKN2827949720070828?rpc=44&pageNumber=1

Posted by: yada2 [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:23 PM [link]

Late night Stock market hypothesis.
The fed will do everything it can to prevent a stock market collaspe while trying to protect the dollar. If there current plan of injecting liquidity in the market does not work, the fed will end up having to sacrifice the dollar by reducing interest rates.

The current support level for the DOW is between 12600 and 12000. If this support is broken we may see a free fall in the markets. AT this point brokerages and hedge funds will be liquidating everything they have to pay debt, since these funds are very heavily leveraged.

Thus, the fed will be getting extremely nervous as the DOW gets close to the 12000 support level. At this time or just before this happens the fed will make a statement to reduce interest rates. If the fed acts fast a 25 basis points reduction might stop the market free fall, however the longer the fed waits a more drastic cut will be needed.

In conclusion, the reduce interest rate environment may cause investors to exit the treasury bill and start buying gold.

JMHO

Posted by: indptrader [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2007 10:50 PM [link]

ALOHA !!

Jumble ... Apparently Edgar Online is mistaken about share ownership or SEC is ...???

At any rate, scrolling down the record of shares sold going back to 2005 the amount of shares Schwab sold on 8/15 is almost 42 times higher than the average(390,000) over the past two years. You may rationalize it as "diversification" but I see it as a red flag and something as out of the ordinary that should be reported to this community.

Posted by: kaimu [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 29, 2007 12:53 AM [link]

"I remember 1973-74 was much like that".

Posted by Bill Cara at August 28, 2007 3:48 PM


Bill, do you recall the resistance level going into 1973 on the gold contract?

Best of luck,

The CoinGuy

Posted by: The CoinGuy [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 29, 2007 1:24 AM [link]

Omphalos, your cartoon was GREAT!

Thank you for posting it.

Posted by: GemmaStar [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 29, 2007 1:25 AM [link]

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?