« Western Goldfields (WGI), rising star, Tues., June 19, 2007, 10:45 AM | Main | Cara’s Daily Commentary, Thurs., June 21, 2007, 9:00 AM »
June 20, 2007
Cara’s Daily Commentary, Wed., June 20, 2007, 8:36 AM
Market Chat
Today we get US Energy Dept numbers for Crude Oil, Distillates and Gasoline; as well as earnings reports from Circuit City (CC), Federal Express (FDX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Morgan Stanley reported spectacular numbers, which will pump the market. But Circuit City reported a horrendous quarter, just like Best Buy (BBY).
CC shares are getting hammered in the pre-market, and MS is being boosted.
I have lots to cover today, so I better get to it.
Economics Calendar and Reports
Economic calendar from Econoday
Econoday prior week's international economic report.
At 8:30ET yesterday, the May Housing Starts data was released. Econoday provided a summary. I feel that Housing Starts may not be reflective of underlying market conditions, which are better shown by new permits issued.
US Housing starts data.
Global Equity Markets Review
US Equity Markets Review
NASDAQ Composite (interactive) chart
Here’s the closing data of the Asia-Pacific equity markets..
Green arrows across the Asia-Pacific region today, except for Shanghai (-2.1 pct) and Seoul South Korea (1.3 pct).
Here’s the chart of the Japanese Nikkei 225..
The Nikkei Dow gained +48 points (+0.26 pct) today, which was another rally. I am watching the Dollar:Yen trade.
Here’s the chart of the Shanghai equity market..
Shanghai tumbled late in the session. Apparently, traders are concerned that interest rates are on the rise in China (as they should be). That would bost the Chine Yuan against the USD.
Here’s the chart of the Bombay India Sensex 30 index..
The volatile Indian equity market consolidated the gain of the prior day, and the gap open to the upside today, closing up +116 points (+0.81 pct) on the BSE 30 index. The latest IPO's are whipping up more enthusiasm for stocks in India.
I hope that India goes through several years of doing IPO's. That extra product availability would serve to lessen the impact of speculators.
Here’s the latest session data for the bourses of Europe.
Stocks are lifting in Europe today (as of 7:07 am ET). Clariant and CIBA, two Swiss specialty chemical companies, are strong this morning. Both are target take-over companies. So the M&A beat goes on in Europe too.
Bonds & Yields Review
Here is the T-Bond chart.
Bond prices moved up again yesterday. The T-Bond closed at 107.1875, up from 106.625. That is five straight positive sessions for the T-Bond. Aren’t you happy to see my Alert?
The Talking Heads sure didn’t see that coming. But, I figured that the market was at a crossroads and needed lower or flat yields, which meant it was time for the Fed to intervene. There is far more market engineering going on today than I have ever experienced in at least 30 years. I don’t think that’s a good thing.
Today, Merrill Lynch will auction off $800 million in high-yield structured debt instruments of a failing Bear Stearns fund (or two). This is a big story, I feel.
Forex Review
Here is the $USD chart at the close of the prior session.
The $USD (at 7:12am ET) is at 82.499, down from 82.727 at this time yesterday.
The $USD is on a slide. You see, the Fed cannot have their cake and eat it too. If they want to goose bonds, it’s going to hurt the $USD at this point. And it ought to help commodity prices, and gold.
Commodities Review
The $CRB closed yesterday at 317.82, down from 320.90, but up from 311.69 last Wednesday. The lower oil prices early in the session helped. But after the close of the $CRB, oil prices headed north again.
Here is the $CRB Index chart.
Oil Review
The e-MiNY Jul-07 contract for Crude Oil was 69.10, up from 69.05.
The recent strength appears to be linked to reports of increased fighting in Nigeria and the Middle East.
The US Crude Oil price discount to Europe’s ICE Brent is now about 3.50 pct, as the $WTIC is trading below the Brent for some reason. Could that reason be that (i) the US economy is slowing, or (ii) the US refineries are holding off purchases in order to drive up gasoline prices from the refineries, or lower their purchase costs?
Here's the rub. The US Administration and govt are spending money as fast as they have for many years. That is pushing up inflation. The oil companies too are caught in that inflation spiral. Their exploration and development costs, capex, material costs, labor costs, admin costs, etc, are all going through the roof. So they look for every possible way to maintain margins and net earnings that meet shareholder expectations. Is it wrong they do this, or is the problem at the source (which is govt) the one that has to be addressed?
Here is the e-miNY July-07 Crude Oil chart.
Interactive Chart of Daily Crude Oil:
Interactive Chart of Weekly Crude Oil:
Gold & Precious Metals Review
Spot gold at 7:28am ET today is 660.90, up from 655.3, at about this time yesterday morning.
I don’t see gold headed for another test of 630. That weakness would only be caused by a combo of rising interest yields and soft econ data, at this point. Then gold traders would tend to think that inflation would be held in check, and they would want to get the higher returns from bonds.
What will happen, I feel, is that interest rates and bond yields are kept in check by the US monetary authorities, and without the attraction of rising rates, traders will place more of their unallocated assets into Gold, Silver and Platinum.
In markets, these interrelationships are constantly at work. It’s why I call the market a dance.
Here is the Recent Spot Gold chart.
At 7:34am ET this morning, the Spot silver (AG) was 13.31, up from 13.17 yesterday, and up from 12.98 Thursday morning, but close to Monday’s high of about 13.35.
Here is the Recent Spot Silver chart.
This morning at 7:36am ET, Spot platinum is at 1291, up from 1285 yesterday and about +14 since the open this week.
Here is the Recent Spot Platinum chart.
Palladium (at 7:37am ET) is at 368, flat to modestly higher for several days. No break-out yet. I think we need to see a 372 floor before PD will lift.
Here is the Recent Spot Palladium chart.
Precious Metals Stocks Review
$XAU has been trading in a very narrow band for about seven weeks.
There are many analysts who hold the view that gold stocks ought to be sold here. I don’t share that view. I have written that for a week, following a knock-down in the index. But the index has now recovered, closing yesterday at 141.17, up +1.01 (+0.72 pct).
We still need to base in the 143-144 for a couple days before I think the gold stocks will ‘rock and roll’ as I have been suggesting.
Here are the $XAU charts, courtesy of StockCharts.com:
Interactive Chart of Daily and Weekly US Goldminers Index:
The U.S. goldminer share trust ETF trades under the ticker symbol GDX.
The Toronto Exchange-listed goldminer iUnits S&P/TSX Capped Gold Index ETF trades under the ticker symbol TSE:XGD.
Here are the Daily and Weekly data charts for the TSX Goldshares (XGD) index:
Interactive Chart of XGD Daily data:
Interactive Chart of XGD Weekly data:
To watch the moves in precious metal miners, you will have to monitor the individual stock charts, preferably in real-time, as follows:
ABX NEM GG GFI KGC AU HMY AUY BVN
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
MDG LIHRY AEM BGO IAG EGO RGLD GOLD CDE GRS
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
CBJ SSRI SIL NG KRY UXG GRZ TSE_HRG TSE_GUY TSE_AGI
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
NXG GSS MNG DROOY MFN RNO RANGY MRB CLG
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
Here are the key Silver miners and the SLV ETF:
SLV SIL CDE HL PAAS SSRI SLW MGN
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
The Cara Global 100 Stockwatch
This data is supplied every day by the folks at KNOBIAS, Inc.
Here are the previous session’s Cara 100 gainers. Interactive charts of the top 12 Watch List gainers.
India’s ICICI Bank (NYSE:IBN) has an IPO in process, which has lifted the US trading price as I have suggested here a couple days ago.
But the big news is that the Funds are buying up GE on huge volume. The move in GE is confirmation the market is going higher, for a short time at least. Traders have to continue to move up their stops, and roll over their puts (it costs I know, but it is necessary) for portfolio protection.
Here are the previous session’s Cara 100 losers. Interactive charts of the top 12 Watch List losers.
Here are the Cara 100 stocks that hit 52-week intra-day highs or lows in the previous session.
Thirteen new highs and only Hovnanian (HOV) hit a new low. Traders new to this website ask why would I keep a dog like HOV in the portfolio. The answer is simple: I keep Hovnanian in the Watchlist, based on a series of metrics compared to its peers, like financial strength, operating growth rates, margins, etc, which is what the Cara 100 represents.
HOV, on the other hand, is a stock, which ought to be traded based on technical indicators. There was a time to sell HOV, when the RSI-7 for the Monthly-Weekly-Daily price series was over 70, just as there will be a time to buy HOV. The time to sell HOV was back in the Summer of 2005, when I was screaming mad in these pages at the travelling circus show that CNBC’s Bill Griffiths was leading to major cities across America. I told readers as it was happening that it would turn out to be a classic teaching model of the nonsense that goes on at CNBC.
HOV is now in the Cara Accumulation Zone (RSI-7 for M-W-D is below 30), but no Buy Alert would be in place until the Daily RSI-7 runs up to 30 or higher. That would be an Alert for a short-term trader, and would be combined with other analysis such as MACD and peer group analysis before buying. Then when the Weekly RSI-7 moves up over 30, that sets in place the Alert and possible buying opportunity for the traders having an intermediate time horizon. Of course, those traders would also be looking at the Daily RSI-7, etc.
In the big picture of what is wrong with capital markets today, part of the story is the control of public media by a very few powerful individuals and organizations that have other conflicting interests. The problem with markets is, as I continue to say, the blatant conflicts that exist, and the layering of rules and regulations that are said to be for the public’s interest but that is pure b.s. These rules and reg’s are put in place by sugar daddy sponsored legislators to help the minority gain control over the majority. It sucks.
GE ought to be ashamed at owning that CNBC property, and even more ashamed at thinking they could brand it by acquiring Dow Jones & Co and putting the Wall St Journal and Barron’s together with CNBC. Dow and Barron must be rolling in their graves today!
And Jack Welch must be really chuckling that he bought the old Financial News Network (FNN) property for $7 million, when it was located in California and run as a media support operation for boiler rooms. What makes me puke is that Jack Welch had never stepped foot in a boiler room at that point. He didn’t know the game, and yet he arrogantly crossed the line that independent media absolutely requires to do its job. Now Jeff Immelt is following in those footsteps. Maybe Immelt should spend some time in a wealth thieving boiler room, rather than waste his time attending Federal Reserve Bank Board meetings. He might think twice after watching account openers and loaders stuff crap down the throats of GE employees and retirees.
Traders can stop the nonsense by refusing to support CNBC, and letting their elected reps know that control of the media by the GE conglomerate, or by the Fox conglomerate, is the last thing in the world that the Founding Fathers had in mind for the Republic.
Here are the Cara 100 stocks that had extreme volume changes in the previous session. This is a good list to watch anytime markets start trending in the extreme. It pays to watch the price and volume extremes. That btw is called Money Flow.
As I say, GE money flow was really strong yesterday.
Here is the current Relative Strength Index (RSI) analysis of the Cara 100 company stocks
Here, from “Chris”, are the interactive charts of up to a dozen stocks with (unsmoothed) RSI-7 above 70 and below 30:
“Chris” takes this data from BillCara2.com, which is not smoothed like David’s data (from Worden). I ought to be able to introduce a Wilder Smoother to this data in upcoming months.
Here, from “David”, are the stocks in the Cara 100 trading with the highest and lowest RSI-7 sorted by (i) daily and (ii) monthly values, for the previous session.
Other Recent Wall Street upgrades
Other Recent Wall Street downgrades
There are various sources for up/down grades by broker-dealers. One is at Briefing.com. Traders ought to check everyday for ratings changes. That website is updated later in the morning.
Most of the recent initiated coverage ratings are positive.
Community Chat
I think you will notice that I am now highlighting reader comments in grey, whereas nothing I write in the blog, or the comments, is. According to your letters, I think that helps.
I’ll see what can be done about your other comments. The text on the menu bar is my error. I didn’t like the spec that came back from the graphic artist, so I changed it. Now it is too small.
Please keep your comments coming in. It all helps.
Crystallex (KRY) will hold their AGM June 28 at the King Eddy Hotel in Toronto -- one of my top three in the city. I'll be there, and I'd like to meet some of my readers who discuss this company at length here in the blog. You'll recognize me, so just come up and say hello. I’ll be off to the Bahamas on that weekend.
I’ll also be back to Toronto in late October for the Cambridge Gold Show at the Metro Convention Centre.
I am not one to promote a vendor’s sales meeting, but frankly I have been to so many Investor Shows over so many years in major cities across Canada and the US that I think it is all marketing. In fact, I have a saying that the market is marketing. Most people don’t buy stocks; they have them sold to them.
Anyway, when I looked into the Dallas Currency Trading Expo 2007 of FXCM, to be held July 14-15, I figured why not give that marketing exercise a free plug. Maybe they’ll bring their act to Bahamas next year as one of almost two dozen cities they plan to attend? What really turned my head though was that over 2,000 participants are expected. If you are in the Dallas area in mid-July, why not join the FXCM crowd and learn something?
Nobody twists your arm to buy anything at these seminars, but I believe the extra knowledge you pick up is like money in the bank.
In fact, if trading prices is your pastime, why not check out all the seminars put on by forex service companies, like FXCM, CMC, Man Financial, etc, and the trading software services companies, and so forth? The more you see, the more you’ll learn. Invest in yourself.
If you do attend one of these shows, why not write up the experience here so that other students of the market can also learn from your experience?
Life gets easier, the more that we help one another. Have a great day.
Btw, I rushed this report. Hopefully there are not too many typos.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on June 20, 2007 08:36:08 AM | Category: Cara's Daily Commentary
Discourse
Hard to believe a company like Circuit City would experience a bad quarter immediately after firing their most experienced sales staff and then hiring them back at migrant worker wages. Hard to believe indeed. And not a peep from the owners about that brilliant move, it seems.
Here's the obligatory tell all from a former Circuit City employee:
27 Confessions Of A Former Circuit City Worker (Consumerist.com)
Mike
NYC
Posted by: MikeNYC
at
June 20, 2007 9:07 AM [link]
I received this mail from my techie, which explains some background issues regarding the website changes. One of the problems is that this website is combined with a blog. I want to use the features of both. I have also attached databases that are faily complex. In any event, here is Steve's letter:
Hi Bill,
For a typical web site the image comments are valid.
The size tags are missing on purpose in your blog because the images we are talking about may change dynamically weekly, daily and some during the day - these are refreshed by batch jobs or are images that you insert into the body of the blog. If you force a specific size then the browser will know in advance how much room to leave but it also resizes any image that is not the size you specify. This can distort images very badly if the size is not the same as the real size. Adding size tags in your site is not an option.
You cannot pre-load because that is not a known statically i.e. you control the content so it changes. Your pages change as comments are added so even a cached copy of the page doesn't help. Your pages are far longer than most sites and have many images so this is more visible. Your content is the value so my view is it's worth waiting for.
As for changing font sizes dynamically - that is going to be very tricky because MT takes data from a file and creates a static page from it so some things, with care, can be changed on the fly if they are part of included code when a viewer hits a link and can make decisions. MT makes inserting dynamic code difficult since it has the first shot at processing and can mess up any code that it sees - the code has to be hidden from MT and run at view time.
/Steve
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
June 20, 2007 9:09 AM [link]
Forwarding a (bleak) summer market outlook from Frank Barbera (from leisa's blog):
http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm
No one doubts we are in a topping process...and Barbera's outlook fits in with Bill's call for a melt-up followed by a correction to maybe DJIA 9500. It's all in the timing, right? Barbera looks for a major break in mid-July, with 10 signals to track, calling the Shanghai Composite Number One on his list->sees a continuing rise to 4500 around June 25, after which, if it drops below the 50-day MA, a change in trend for global markets...
Does anyone else have a feel for an impending break...I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried...my wife wants me to think about parking my LT holdings in the Money Market Garage for the summer and picking them up again later...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 9:13 AM [link]
re HOV, Bill don't you think do to the significant risk still involved in the housing market that the stock remains a high risk trade? I agree in general with the technicals but the market and housing specifically seem to have a lot of froth to still burn off...thoughts?
Posted by: began329
at
June 20, 2007 9:14 AM [link]
I received this mail from jmf in Germany. Unfortunately I don't have the time to follow up. This blog management could turn out to be a full-time job (LOL).
hi bill,
unfortunately when i try to post links (not to my blog :-)
they got blocked.
can you please fix this.
here is the link i wanted to post. maybe old news but this chart is just amazing!
Saudi Arabia Oil Reserves / The Oil Drum
http://www.theoildrum.com/files/Saudi_reserves_06.png
thanks and keep up the excellent work
jmf
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
June 20, 2007 9:14 AM [link]
Hello??!!?? Have I unwittingly offended the site upgrade diety as my last posting must have found the wrong coordinates through the Worm Hole....;)
Anyhoo, maybe a few noticed that Home Despot divested itself of what CNBC and other 'economic experts' considered to be the weight holding down its earnings to a trifecta of PE firms. The sale price just might have covered the cost & investments to date (I'll have to check up on that), but the after market trading shows a 2+ point surge into the $40/share range.
When I read the news my first thought was of my Daughter's fate as she is employed in the Supply division. Thankfully she was tapped to join HD Corporate in a related capacity concerning sales coordination within the home improvement division. My office is safe once more! D
Posted by: redclaydawg
at
June 20, 2007 9:18 AM [link]
Blackstone IPO moving up http://www.ft.com/cms/s/73f28748-1e82-11dc-bc22-000b5df10621.html
Maybe Bush's college roommate Schwarzman has been given the signal to get this IPO done ASAP before liquidity dries up.
From Reuter's coverage of yesterday's housing report: "Permits for single-family homes fell 1.8 percent to their lowest level since July 1997, but permits for multi-family units jumped 16.5 percent." Folks got to have someplace to live, eh.
Posted by: RobBoss
at
June 20, 2007 9:25 AM [link]
began329, my job is to try to get you out of HOV at 70 and in under 20 by showing you the tools. I don't have a Buy Alert on HOV today, but then you happen to be an individual (probably) and not a Fund manager. There isn't a Fund manager alive who wouldn't prefer being out of HOV at 70 just 24 months ago, and into it today at under 20.
The same people who are worried today about HOV under 20 (a cycle low) are the ones who would have been content when it was at a cycle peak. You want me to say more. What do you want me to say?
There is something about the expression, you can lead a horese to water...
I am not here to pick tops or bottoms, or be a psychologist. I do what I can do to show whomever wants to learn the lessons I learned from my journey. That is just the beginning. For some of you who get it, it could be the first day of the rest of your life.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
June 20, 2007 9:26 AM [link]
...melt-ups are difficult to play...if shanghai follows the nikkei 1990 or nasdaq 2000 it could have a long way to go...i think barbera is correct in his outlook, but do we need to bring more money in from the sidelines first? are tops marked by fear or exuberance?
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 9:35 AM [link]
...melt-ups are difficult to play...if shanghai follows the nikkei 1990 or nasdaq 2000 it could have a long way to go...i think barbera is correct in his outlook, but do we need to bring more money in from the sidelines first? are tops marked by fear or exuberance?
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 9:35 AM [link]
taking rig and oih off the table for now...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 9:44 AM [link]
..adding to kry
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 9:50 AM [link]
Bill,
You didn't ask but, I vote that the gray boxes go. I find that they make reading difficult for my old eyes.
Posted by: Fred
at
June 20, 2007 9:56 AM [link]
mu up 3.6%
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 9:58 AM [link]
adding to kgc...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:05 AM [link]
Bill,
I think it may work better for the gray boxes to be for your comments, and the rest to stay white. Just easier on the eyes.
Posted by: chas
at
June 20, 2007 10:07 AM [link]
Mike,
Loved your Circuit City story. Can you imagine, stealing, with no commish and for a few lousy bucks an hour? They oughtta split the booty with the peeps, it'd improve morale.
Kry confuses me a bit. I used to have such a good feel for this stock, and I don't seem to understand it. Am looking long though out of this consolidation-thingy.
Posted by: shark_attack
at
June 20, 2007 10:15 AM [link]
I also agree the gray boxes are the opposite of an improvement. Am starting to warm to the new picture though...lol
Posted by: shark_attack
at
June 20, 2007 10:17 AM [link]
...and adding to uxg/wgdf/gdx...so officially rotating from oil->PM rather than paring the LT position for now ;)
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:17 AM [link]
chris-i think your confusion stems from position size...objectively, i see nothing strange in the fact it's not moving straight up...if there are in fact major bidders looking at it, no one wants to see volatility...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:23 AM [link]
Regarding KRY ... this has gone as expected for me as I don't expect any movement until the end of the month, when we either get news about the final permit or we don't.
I like an October 5 collar here.
Posted by: number2son
at
June 20, 2007 10:24 AM [link]
...forgot to preface my last comment with Re KRY...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:30 AM [link]
Perhaps the gray could be made a shade or two lighter. That might help Fred, while still offsetting the comments the way Bill wants. It might also make it easier on mobile screens, if anyone is using those to read the blog. I think it would make the whole page look more 'smooth.'
Or perhaps put Bill's comments in the gray, since typically he posts fewer comments to each entry than the aggregated masses.
Just thinkin'
re: HOV. I don't know much, but I recall Bill making a positive comment about homebuilders several months ago (6?) and I thought "He's nuts! There's obviously more shakeout to come." Damn if homebuilders all didn't take a little break in the freefall and climb a bit for a while. That's why he's the 'trader wizard' and I walk around scratching the back of my neck wondering what the heck is going on.
re: circuit city story - I'm not a big fan of that whole blog family/company, but I like Consumerist.com a lot. Like Bills site, it's about helping the little guy deal with the big powers. I'm looking forward to the upcoming Geek Squad sting story - they've taken to sending people in to get jobs in some of these anti-consumer places and reporting back from the inside. I love it!
Mike
NYC
Posted by: MikeNYC
at
June 20, 2007 10:31 AM [link]
Gold consolidating back to Monday's levels. Hopefully this scares people out of the miners so we can pick up some more on the cheap. Waiting to see how gold spot plays out before I bite.
Posted by: chas
at
June 20, 2007 10:40 AM [link]
Re Fred's complaint about reading gray text boxes,
Black text on gray is very difficult to read, especially for long periods of time.
A better combination, one that has maximum legibility and still allows distinguishing Bill's posts from everyone else, would be to print black text on very, very light warm yellow background. (Very very light being very very important in this instance--too intense can be 'off-putting' and equally as tiresome to read as black on gray)
Legibility will be enhanced and viewers can easily distinguish Bill's comments among the crowd.
Posted by: johojo
at
June 20, 2007 10:45 AM [link]
2nd ave, re mkt outlook
As i talk to you, i talk to myself. Fear and greed love to ping off each other. The inner me, or you, may like the stimulation but it is stress that has the potential to do harm. If I had to choose my own psychic role model it would be more dispassionate, less interested in what others say, and stuck to whatever rule based model I had chosen. The more I disregard all this the more likely i am to loose money. All markets top. The issue is whether or not I'm prepared. Will I sell into strength or depend upon stops. I plan to do a little of both. Bill has more tools (puts/calls) in his pocket. Earlier this year fear just immobilized me. They said emerging mkts were gonna crash, but if I had stuck to my low trade relative strength model I would be up 29% and no big deal to have a trailing stop loss at 9%...or even higher. The voice in the back of my head says, "whatever makes you happy." (ok, too preachy, stops are loaded, as is my port, time to go for a swim.)
Posted by: jasper
at
June 20, 2007 10:47 AM [link]
Same show, diff episode.
Semel made $282,000 a day the past six yrs.
http://tinyurl.com/382bc6
I wonder if they included weekends in this calculation.
Posted by: NYUgrad
at
June 20, 2007 10:50 AM [link]
It says including Sunday... that is incredible
Posted by: chas
at
June 20, 2007 10:55 AM [link]
jasper, you're right about trying to tune out the noise...gold/oil beats any fiat currency hands down right and i think 1000/100 are good targets...it's in my nature to try avoiding the periodic routs, and i can see i'm trying to find ways around the "disciplined" approach...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:58 AM [link]
Mike, I keenly recall Bill correctly calling the oversold condition of the homebuilder stocks at the end of last summer. It was a painful lesson for this N2S.
That said, the fundamental condition of the housing market has deteriorated further since that time and the builders are in terrible shape. I would follow Bill's advice to watch price here and not move until the daily RSI (7) moves back above 30. For me, that would be a signal to take profits on my shorts.
What's the saying again? "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me again ... um ... eh ... uh, don't get fooled again." ;)
Posted by: number2son
at
June 20, 2007 11:01 AM [link]
began329,
As a guideline for scaling into homebuilders, I would take a look at their levels before frenzy set in to find attractive entry points at secular supports (around maybe Spring 2003). A cursory look at HOV shows a $15-18 range where I would have a strong look.
JML
Posted by: Jumble
at
June 20, 2007 11:03 AM [link]
i see both gfi and slw are bucking the trend today...both up >1%
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 11:08 AM [link]
BILL,
THE GREY IS VERY HARSH AND BREAKS THE "FLOW" imho.
maybe your comments in grey font not background will work.
Thank you for your generousity always.
If you think of it, pls. opine on the idea of when it was that "we the people" owned and controlled capital. Or point me to books and info that will enlighten me. I'm thinking of the the Nathan Rothchild's myth of the London 'change post.Surely that was since the beginning of time??
Hope others will chime in as well. I am really curious as to why so much resources still is not enough to provide for "the people".Pls. share.
Thank you.
Posted by: moneygenie
at
June 20, 2007 11:15 AM [link]
Re: colored comment blocks
I would advise leaving user comments on white, and highlighting Bill comments with a light tone. I suggest a screen of one of the greens you use in the header to be consistent. Try hex: e4fcb4.
Posted by: nimblecow
at
June 20, 2007 11:17 AM [link]
In a similar vein as my CC post, I see that Home Depot will move to dump their Business Supply unit to Bain/Carlyle et al and focus on their retail business.
It's sad what they became. I recall going to Home Depot years ago and I almost always walked out impressed and happy with the service I got. There were plenty of those orange smocks around, and the reps knew their stuff and seemed genuinely happy to help. They knew where stuff was and always walked me right over to it, as opposed to the 'grunt and point' I get now. Sometimes they would even see me wandering around and just come up to me and ask to assist. It was good and I was the sort of customer who would tell friends about it.
Fast forward a bit, and this last rotten CEO they just fired made the brilliant move to shift everyone to 'part-time' status and shave costs. I hope everyone knows what a huge shafting 'part-time' status is these days. And now Home Depot symbolizes crappy customer service and they, so they say, are dumping business supply to focus on fixing retail.
Hello! You had retail working just fine. But you sacrificed it to 'cut costs.'
Will Wall Street, ever, someday, reward a cut of experienced sales staff with a _drop_ in share price? With all the choices we have as customers at the retail level, sooner or later those chickens come home to roost. Personally, I moved from thinking of Home Depot first to looking for alternatives where I can find them, and HD is a last resort. Kinda like Wal-Mart - they are now 'stores of last resort' for me.
Sorry for ranting here! That's all for today, I promise.
Mike
NYC
Posted by: MikeNYC
at
June 20, 2007 11:35 AM [link]
Dear Genie,
You seem confused as to be history of "We the People". "We the People, were, until the 18th century living in squalor and poverty, struggling under the burdens of both aristocracy on the one hand, and the all-powerful Church on the other.
The French Revolution (1790s) was the beginning of putting action behind the writings of Enlightenment scholars such as Rousseau. But progress was slow. And so as history unfolded, and up until this present day, the hisory of mankind is a progression towards freedom but tempered by the reality that resources can be difficult to come by and only by pluck and lucky circumstance do we as individuals prosper.
Why do we as a race not prioritize the protection of the rest of the species? That is a question anthropological in origin, and the answer probably comes down to some Darwinian competitive thing.
This has been a roundabout way of saying, "We the People" are a bunch of peasants, and though exceptions will be many, as a classss, it will always be thus.
Chris
Posted by: shark_attack
at
June 20, 2007 11:46 AM [link]
I like the grey background, easier to read for me. Maybe you could even consider putting a very light grey on your blogs...it's really easier on the eyes than white. White always has a glare factor. I'm one of your older readers. NT
Posted by: NT
at
June 20, 2007 11:50 AM [link]
re background
light brown/yellow may be an easier read as mentioned above, when using stockcharts.com that color has seemed a good choice. light grey ok,too.
Posted by: jasper
at
June 20, 2007 11:54 AM [link]
This may be of interest to some readers. Geologix Explorations Inc. (GIX) announced today that warrants totalling 2,768,200 units @ $0.65 expiring June 19, 2007 have all been exercised. Also, MPEL looks to me to be in the accumulation zone. It has been a falling knife however.
Posted by: Fred
at
June 20, 2007 12:04 PM [link]
jmf,
a great book on the subject of saudi oil 'overestimates' is called 'twilight in the desert' written by matthew simmons. it's very technical, and disturbing, and a pretty tough read, but well worth it if the subject interests you. matthew simmons has also been interviewed over on fs, a great listen.
what about having the entire blog gray, but for user comments Bill? I set my backgrounds to gray on WORD, EXCEL, etc and I think it's much easier on the eyes than a bright white. just a thought.
being forced to sign in again after trying to post. good thing i ctrl-a, ctrl-c beforehand/
had to post this a third time before it showed up (hopefully it does this time)
Posted by: Eric
at
June 20, 2007 12:13 PM [link]
Does anyone have any thoughts on the price action today of MU?
It gapped up on the opening and traded above $13.00.
Many thanks for any commentary offered.
regards all.
joey
Posted by: joey
at
June 20, 2007 12:14 PM [link]
Eric,
I read twilight in the desert, and I came away a non-believer. Whether or not it's "peak oil" now or ten years from now matters not at all. We have enough oil for the foreseeable future, alternatives abound, and Simmons came off like a shill for the oil industry and their 3 dollar a gallon oil. And yes, the charts and tables were indecipherable.
Posted by: shark_attack
at
June 20, 2007 12:22 PM [link]
Hello Bill and others,
Would I look here or on the thread yesterday for WGI/WGDF for potential cash flow and earnings per share multiples for mid tier gold stocks in a bull market?
Thank you for checking on this for me as per your response yesterday.
Tom
Posted by: golden7
at
June 20, 2007 12:24 PM [link]
Bill—not having any problem reading comments with shading. Checked two different monitors, a laptop and all look fine FWIW. (Disclosure: I’m not a youngster).
MTRX—a falling knife today, down 18% despite reaffirming guidance although earnings disappoint. Looks overdone IMO. No position, but watching closely.
SLW continues to fight the trend and the 12 handle. Long.
Picked up some TRA 2 days ago; like today’s move. Long.
MikeNYC—agree with HD comments. That’s why I prefer to shop at Lowe’s.
Posted by: Seamus
at
June 20, 2007 12:36 PM [link]
For what it's worth, I like the grey background but I agree that it is hard on the eyes after a while. Something lighter (be it a lighter grey or a light yellow or green or blue) would probably be a good idea.
Posted by: korvus
at
June 20, 2007 12:46 PM [link]
ibn and mbt:
I doubt Bill intended this way, but the cara 100 are looking to me as a wonderful cross section of the best of the best for making entries based on strength. When I look at the top third ranked by a risk adjusted roc (alpha) 15 period these look like having had good entries last week: ibn,mbt, and oxps. I took positions in the first two. When Bill shared information about ibn, that one was the easiest decision. OXPS has a long base but recent move may be too predicated on take over rumors/? CHA looks like a good value play on the underperforming russian mkt. A sell occurs when a ticker falls below 30th rank or violates a trailing stop loss. Weekly data only.
Posted by: jasper
at
June 20, 2007 12:49 PM [link]
fwiw...not cha but mbt is russian company
Posted by: jasper
at
June 20, 2007 12:54 PM [link]
Home Depot (HD) is up almost 7% today because they plan to repurchase $22.5 billion in stock and sell their HD Supply business. My analysis of this is that HD can see no business opportunities and they expect their mid and long-term market to shrink.
Posted by: Fred
at
June 20, 2007 1:20 PM [link]
Re: Bill's Comment "There is far more market engineering going on today than I have ever experienced in at least 30 years. I don’t think that’s a good thing."
The term "financial engineering" has become quite common, in fact I think Bill or someone else recently mentioned a friend or relative who has just graduated in just such a specialty and is going to work in analysis in the oil and gas industry.
I have not heard the term "market engineering" before.When I saw this I wondered right away what qualifications one must have to enter this field. I can only imagine.
To wit: a little something about engineers and engineering -
Structural Failures and Engineering Ethics
J. Struct. Engrg., Volume 119, Issue 5, pp. 1539-1555 (May 1993)
W. M. Kim Roddis,1 Member, ASCE
1Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Kansas, 2006 Learned Hall, Lawrence KS 66045
Major engineering failures act as a catalyst for change in standards of practice and therefore create the opportunity for establishing better ethical practices for the profession. When examining ethics in engineering practice, it is useful to make the distinction between ethics in engineering and ethics of engineering. Ethics in engineering deals with the ethics of actions of individual engineers. Ethics of engineering deals with ethical issues that involve the role of engineers in industry, the ethics of the organizations in which they work and of professional engineering societies, and the ethical responsibilities of the profession. This paper presents case studies of two major structural disasters—the 1907 Quebec Bridge collapse and the 1981 Kansas City, Mo. Hyatt Regency walkway failure. The effect of each failure on engineering ethics is examined from the viewpoint of both ethics in engineering and of ethics of engineering. In response to failures, engineers need to change professional procedures and practices so that they reinforce, rather than place obstacles in the way of, moral action.
©1993 American Society of Civil Engineers
Posted by: DancingWithBulls/Bears
at
June 20, 2007 1:41 PM [link]
Re the emergence of notion "we the people", which by any account has a complex ancestry:
I highly recommend Neal Stephenson's ( http://tinyurl.com/ffrw4 ) epic trilogy, _The Baroque Cycle_ for a rip-roaring, entertaining and highly enlightening (even though fictional) account of the emerging Enlightenment world of modern global finance, contending national financiers and suspect currencies, bickering philosophers, democratic, republican yearnings and more.
The trilogy comprises three novels spanning several decades following the great fire of London in 1666: _Quicksilver_, _The Confusion_, and _The System of the World_ also serve as prequel to the modern setting of his _Cryptonomicon_, which richly explores overlapping lusts for data, technical prowess and gold.
The more we the people change the more we seem the same . . . .
Posted by: johojo
at
June 20, 2007 2:06 PM [link]
i sense gold is getting ready to move one way or the other...since i "feel" like it's going to drop, and i'm wrong 2/3 of the time on ST direction, guess the smart bet is it takes off to the upside...playing it that way...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 2:37 PM [link]
I lust for data, technical prowess and gold, is that wrong? ;>)
Posted by: Craig
at
June 20, 2007 2:40 PM [link]
Merrill Lynch seizes $800mil of Bear Stearns bonds before BS can sell them to bail out their hedge fund. Sweet! Let the games begin. They have done this to themselves. Next I bet GS cleans Merrill's clock. http://tinyurl.com/2qmf45
Weird, type key though I was signed on a blank several times, had to jump through hoops to post this.
Posted by: agaunv
at
June 20, 2007 2:44 PM [link]
And on the housing front B of A CEO says that the housing slump is just about over, Economy to pick up in Q3 and 4.
Sure it's over!
Posted by: agaunv
at
June 20, 2007 2:47 PM [link]
Just a reminder....
check your missives from colin Twiggs RE: the DOW support, which as of last report was 16629 (Friday's low). Note where we are now and that we may be heading for a test of 13,300.
NASD is 2590 down to suuport at 2525-2500
S&P is 1490 support at 1460-1375.
So far no biggie except to watch the DOW. I've upped stops and am thinking of buying inverse indexes if we start to build momentum on the downside.
Posted by: Craig
at
June 20, 2007 2:48 PM [link]
Re: "I lust for data, technical prowess and gold, is that wrong?"
Just "we the people" in our typical predilections . . . .
Posted by: johojo
at
June 20, 2007 2:51 PM [link]
Sure that wasn't the B of S CEO, agaunv?
Posted by: number2son
at
June 20, 2007 3:07 PM [link]
what are you trying to say, craig..i was about to reply to professor roddis' post and then i see you kind of hit on the motivation behind trading (and i happen to think you list things in the right order-the gold helps you keep score, but the challenge/Zen of being able to navigate the markets [interpreting data and acting on it] is what keeps you playing)...of course i would put it another way...both ethics in financial engineers and the ethics of financial engineering deserve a good look...but in the end, it is traders who play the game, and the sum total of their executions that comprise the movement of prices...of course, i think roddis is referring to the damage inflicted on the average citizen when the market collapses due to irresponsible behavior by a different class of financial engineers..
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 3:12 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
I have been researching the 1978 US economy and the markets, especially currencies and PMs. The year 1978 was important because it was the year prior to the POG/POS and consumer interest rates melt-up!
Even some 30 years ago, in 1978, the FED was busy manipulating markets on a semi-daily basis. Here is a part of my article that was published at another paid subscriber website.
FOMC Meeting Minutes(conference call) dated 1/5/78(pages 9-10):
MR. HOLMES. I only hope that we can be lucky as well as wise.
CHAIRMAN BURNS. Well, we can all join you in that hope. Do you have any recommendations to the Committee?
MR. HOLMES. I think the one thing we need, Mr. Chairman, is an authorization, at least from the Subcommittee, so we will have at least some money for intervention tomorrow.
CHAIRMAN BURNS. I am sorry I asked that question!
MR. LILLY. Let tomorrow take care of itself.
CHAIRMAN BURNS. You know, your best day was yesterday when you didn’t spend a penny.
MR. HOLMES. Those are the days we like, Mr. Chairman, but we can’t expect to do that every day.
CHAIRMAN BURNS. No, but you don’t have to intervene every day. I like the question that was put to you, I think by Mr. Partee: Do you expect to intervene every time the market declines? After the kind of rise that we had yesterday in the market, today in the foreign [exchange] market a little reversal in the New York market is only to be expected. That’s the way the markets function.
MR. HOLMES. Mr. Chairman, we have had that reversal today. The rate is now 2.1435.
CHAIRMAN BURNS. And what was it before?
MR. HOLMES. It has been as high as 2.1575
CHAIRMAN BURNS. Well, considering the movements we’ve had that’s hardly a movement at all. What do you think it would have been if you had stayed out of the market?
MR. HOLMES. I think it would be back to 2.06 to 2.07.
CHAIRMAN BURNS. I don’t believe it for a minute. I don’t believe it for a minute and I say it loud and clear.
VICE CHAIRMAN VOLCKER. Compromise on 2.10.END
What's this "lucky" thing? Is that these guys count on?
Here we have the US Federal Reserve documented in meeting minutes back in 1978 talking about intervening in the USDX on a daily basis. Their efforts are to intervene in a way that resembles "free markets". Laughable at the very least. This is conclusive proof of manipulated markets that dates back some 30 years, manipulations that occur on a frequent basis. The fact that Bernanke insists that the PPT does not meet every day is an out and out lie. Perhaps they skip a few days but the likelihood they only meet once a month,as he says, is truly very ridiculous.
Further, if you read the entire transcript you would see the word "psychological" mentioned a number of times. You would also see that the US Federal Reserve was spending billions of taxpayer funds to manipulate the USDX. Just imagine what amount they must be spending today to "manage" not only the USDX but all other
markets including the DOW under the auspices of the PPT. Even with all this taxpayer money adding to market sizes and monetary inflation the performance over the past 30 years has been dismal based on what a US Dollar can purchase in 2007. It is clear to me that the US Federal Reserve in conjunction with the US Treasury
has had a long and storied past of market manipulations. I have to question whether such manipulations have been worth the cost? Of course we will never know since there have never been "free markets" since the creation of the
US Federal Reserve. One thing is clear ... we have had some 100 years of monetary inflation and the fact that I can no longer purchase any thing for a penny speaks volumes to the success of "fiat" monetary systems and the US Federal Reserve. We were warned over 200 years ago about printing money ... Now there is no turning back!!
Link to FOMC 1/5/78 meeting: http://www.federalreserve.gov/FOMC/transcripts/1978/19780105confcall.pdf
Posted by: kaimu
at
June 20, 2007 3:15 PM [link]
CNBC commentator Ron Insana is starting a hedge fund.
Posted by: writersblock
at
June 20, 2007 3:24 PM [link]
Already took a position in SDS on Monday and am darn glad I did it, this is my first short position ever. Just feels good to have one foot going out the door.
This whole market is being held together with duct tape and bailing wire and the PTB, HB&B are quickly exhausting the supplies.
Hmm 3M and Steel wire makers might be a good market play at this time.
number2son: regrettably you are quite right, HOV is on record today as saying that there is no end in sight for the housing slowdown. Sniff.
Posted by: agaunv
at
June 20, 2007 3:24 PM [link]
Eric, Bill once suggested copying one's comments somewhere before posting, since there seem to be consistent posting glitches. I find that works. I just go back, recopy, and paste my comment. Usually I only have to do this once. Saves rewriting it.
Re: the colored background: I find the copy harder to read on color. That said, I'd love to see Bill's comments separated by color. We all look for his comments, after all. Color would make them easier to find.
Posted by: GemmaStar
at
June 20, 2007 3:41 PM [link]
playing this on pure instinct (with a nod to agaunv)...putting on a hedge with sds into the close...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 3:46 PM [link]
...MAJOR hedge...can't say why right now...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 3:51 PM [link]
2nd_ave:
Looking at the way market is tanking in the last hour, I too bought some SRS (52.29), just for the fun of it.
I also exited some miners (GRS, GFI). Ff the market goes down miners and GLD will follow.
Posted by: JogyP
at
June 20, 2007 3:59 PM [link]
if they're going to drop the market on you, why not now, and why not lull you into thinking it's another modest dip that will get bought, only to crank up the selling into the close, ready to gap down tomorrow---that's as close as i can come right now to "explain" my last minute move...i think a major drop right now would catch 90% of market watchers off guard...glad to see JogyP's intuition worked the same way...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 4:11 PM [link]
..."explainING"
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 4:11 PM [link]
P&F DOW Chart posted a High Pole Warning 6/20
Posted by: Stokbot
at
June 20, 2007 4:14 PM [link]
stokbot, do you mind explaining what a high pole warning is, and its significance...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 4:19 PM [link]
2nd Ave
Its a P&F reversal signal
You can find this info on the stockcharts site, use search:
The high pole warning is given when a chart rises above a previous high by at least 3 boxes but then reverses to give back at least 50 percent of the rise. The reversal implies that the demand that was making the prices rise has given way to supply pressure. The pattern is a warning that lower prices could be seen in the future.
Shanghai chart did not make new high:
Posted by: Stokbot
at
June 20, 2007 4:51 PM [link]
ok, thanks...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 4:53 PM [link]
Seeing as I was the one who "complained" about the gray, I'll offer an opinion on the green. I like it!
Posted by: Fred
at
June 20, 2007 7:27 PM [link]
James De Porre "put on the biggest hedge that I've had in some time," in the final hour also...so I don't think the bearish vibes are that far off:
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 7:48 PM [link]
Any thoughts on RBY? Rob Mcewen will be on BNN tomorrow -probably discussing positive drill results.
Posted by: jc173
at
June 20, 2007 8:05 PM [link]
..currently positioned at 25% long (LT) oil/PM, 15% long ST gold, and 25% SDS...despite the fact that SDS is a turbo-charged double-short position, I think the higher volatility in PMs leaves me net neutral at the moment...and hoping the hedge will be unnecessary and can be taken off soon...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:05 PM [link]
I like the new green color. I also like the way Bill's comments are in an opposing color, like in the King James Bible. :)
Bought PEIX today for 12.01 and sold it for a $350 gain. Boy I love those support zone trades. Own 2K WGDF @ 2.00, 2K KRY @ 4.44. I am trying to buy another 2K of WGDF at 2.25. That is a tough stock to purchase on limit. stk
Posted by: stktrader
at
June 20, 2007 10:18 PM [link]
I vote with Fred: I not only like the pale new color, but I think the copy is easier to read against the color background.
Maybe Bill should keep his comments against the white so that we can find them quickly.
Posted by: GemmaStar
at
June 20, 2007 10:19 PM [link]
JogyP-if gold and miners go down with the market, and we agree with current headlines that higher rates are behind the drop, what are the odds that this time gold reverses quickly and shifts to the more traditional relationship of higher rates=higher POG?
just thinking aloud here-with the last few broad market drops, price movement in the miners were positively correlated and had beta values>1 (ie, the market drops one step, miners drop maybe 1 & 1/2 steps)...if we further assume that the majority of gold timers will reflexively exit their positions in the face of broad weakness (ie, they are now conditioned to expect another out-sized drop in gold, and who can blame them), then i think betting against the majority means expecting a quick reversal in the POG and a straight shot >730...that would be the difficult-to-play-but-highly-rewarded move to make...but i think it would take either strong conviction or strong nerves to make that play...at some point the POG will need to diverge from general market direction (if history is any guide)...why not now, when no one expects it? any thoughts...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:31 PM [link]
...in which case the ultimate position is short the market but long gold...so i should disclose that that happens to be my current position, although i did not arrive at that position based on the reasoning in the previous post...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:36 PM [link]
Lew Rockwell has a great piece about Ron Paul's chances in the forthcoming US Presidential race: http://tinyurl.com/2h8lm4
I think Ron Paul will also do well in gaining support in the Unity08 online convention: http://tinyurl.com/38terp
Posted by: johojo
at
June 20, 2007 10:38 PM [link]
i also see i scanned the "financial engineering" post too quickly earlier, and any mention of Roddis in my post should be replaced with Bull/Bears...
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
June 20, 2007 10:56 PM [link]
johojo, did you see Thomas Woods article on Rockwell titled Excluding Ron Paul? He gives me a public thanks at the bottom, which was real nice of him. Nice writer and a seemingly good guy.
I had come home from work yesterday and saw the news had just broken about him being excluded in Iowa and boy was I steamed. I started Google-ing these guys like mad. I turned up the changed lineup card, though the organizer had said it was set in stone months ago, and I turned up the campaign contributions to McCain, both of which I forwarded to Woods and via phone to the the national campaign. Not that both wouldn't have been found by the public very quickly anyway, but it's a good feeling to have made some small impact (besides the two NH voters I've personally converted to Dr. Paul.)
Anyway, I'm sure Bill doesn't want this to become a political/Ron Paul blog. I actually came here to see if Bill or someone can talk about RIO and what happened with the price due to the new "Manditorily Convertible Notes," but I'm going to wait until tomorrow and make a comment/question about it then. I'm not in it, but I inadvertantly put a guy at work into it by mentioning what a great company I though it was - I really do like RIO a whole lot, and I had enumerated why I liked BHP, RIO and TCK, not as a stock, just as a company. (Next day - "Hey, I bought that stock you were talking about, in Brazil, RIO or something?" Me: "You did WHAT!!??")
It worked out lucklily for both of us, as it happened to be a day that RIO tanked after nickel plummeted several months ago, and he actually got in at almost Soros levels (I heard Soros is in from 20-32) But I learned a good lesson in talking about companies around guys who spend a month studying about some new MP3 player and can't spend ten minutes reading about a company they put thousands into. This fellow is now sad he didn't put more into it, of course, and though I know it's not a Cara Buy Alert, I'm wondering if this pullback is a good dip upon which to add a small bit to a succesful position?
(Yes, I just de-cloaked myself with the Woods article reference. I had been planning on doing that anyway and now I think I can make my email address public via this TypePad account - nothing to hide here!)
Regards all,
Mike
NYC
Posted by: MikeNYC
at
June 20, 2007 11:42 PM [link]
MikeNYC,
Good job! In the interest of social equity, not just politics, I salute your support of Ron Paul. I signed the petition and hope he gets included in the upcoming debate.
Posted by: johojo
at
June 21, 2007 2:02 AM [link]
Change.
G'day Bill,
Just a few problems with your revamped site.
Could not register as new viewer from your menu.
Cannot get many of the menu items at top to work eg contact details, Cara 100 for US, Asia Pacific, etc.
Problems would probably only be noticed by a newbie to your site!!
Very impressed with your blog. I have already adapted some of my analysis from your process and methodology.
Regards, Aussie Dave
Posted by: Aussie Dave
at
June 21, 2007 3:28 AM [link]
sv
Posted by: sv
at
November 11, 2008 2:54 PM [link]
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Moin from Germany,
i agree with Bill on CNBC!
Posted by: jmf
at
June 20, 2007 8:45 AM [link]