« Week #15 (2007-04-14) in Review (FINAL) | Main | Cara’s Bull Board, Tues., Apr. 17, 2007, 7:55 AM »
April 16, 2007
Cara’s Bull Board, Mon., Apr. 16, 2007, 8:58 AM
One look at the chart of the $USD trading for the past couple days appears to be saying that the jury (G-7 Finance Ministers, Central Bakers, and Friends & Family) has decided where the dollar trend is going. Just before 6:00am ET today, the $USD touched 81.976. How far off is a 70's-handle?
Maybe we need to wait a day to see what those G-7 VIP's do at their home offices. And after phoning Friends & Family.
Headline in the Toronto Star today reads, “Indian firm to buy Algoma (Steel) for $1.85B”. That’s 32 million shares at $56 apiece, representing a +48 pct premium to the recent 20-day average price.
The CIBC steel analyst says $56/share cash is too low and he expects the final take-out will be at 62 to 65. Oh, where was this analyst when the Stelco shareholders needed him?
How quickly we forget that a group of Toronto law firms, a so-called re-organization specialist and a Toronto-based judge who now works for the biggest of those firms stripped the Algoma Steel shareholders of 100-pct of their equity, giving their clients new shares at $3 apiece. Theft is a nice business if you can get away with it.
Oh, pardon me, this same group of rounders not only got away with it, they returned a couple years later to do it to Canada’s biggest steelmaker, Stelco. Same modus operandi but somehow all politicians, all securities regulators and police forces couldn’t see the thefts that were occurring at the end of their noses.
In case you happen to be a new reader, I think this bit of editorial (see link) recaptures the emotion I felt over the screwing of Stelco shareholders, bondholders, employees, and the good people of the city of Hamilton Ontario. The article was titled, “Deceit is Their Stock in Trade”.
Yes, people say I have passion and go out on a limb when showing it. But I also know right from wrong, which sadly too many people quickly ignore if, as and when they think they can get away with white-collar theft. If being called "eccentric" is the media response for calling a spade a spade, I’ll proudly accept the moniker.
The cost of terminating 17,000 staff has hurt the bottom line of Citigroup (NYSE:C). Continuing operations beat top and bottom line estimates, however.
A couple weeks ago, Forbes Magazine asked me to comment on the stock as part of their introduction of the Forbes Billionaires List. I stated Citi is a Cara 100 company but I opined that I would wait for a small pull-back in the share price before buying. I really like the company though.
Today Citi tells me that:
"Refining stocks are still seasonal plays. We are raising estimates but the good news is in the stocks. We are downgrading TSO/VLO from Buy to Hold due to strong performance this year (TSO +70%, VLO +37%). SUN is still a buy. Switch to SUN: SUN remains our preferred name in the sector – and only Buy rating – as earnings from organic investments kick in during 2Q. We feel this should give a relative performance boost versus the peer group. We may be too early: Possibly because earnings momentum is still strong and we are heading towards peak gasoline demand season. While we raise earnings across the board, we feel this is largely factored into share prices and see the value opportunity as much less compelling. Sector Thesis Is Unchanged: Volatility will continue. While share prices will remain seasonal, over time we expect valuations to shift higher because earnings are becoming more sustainable because of expanding margins."
Just thought readers would like to know.
There is another broker I like on Wall Street. Interactive Brokers will be doing an IPO soon. It will be an auction deal like Google (NDQ: GOOG) was. I see net income for the year ending Sep-06 was $734 million on revenue of $1.627 billion. This, folks, is proof of concept that proprietary trading – if you are good – is hugely profitable. Btw, I highly recommend IB’s electronic brokerage services – one of the world’s best. The company might even make the Cara 100. With a market cap that exceeds $10 billion, IB is probably in Wall Street’s top dozen. Aggressive, forward-thinking people.
A reader from Wall Street, has written me subsequent to my first posting:
Bill, Just wanted to make you aware that IB does no speculative trading whatsoever. Their profits are generated from two separate businesses, their electronic brokerage (~30%) and market making. Their market making business is strictly effected by volume, not the direction of the market or of any specific security.
Just thought your readers might benefit from that additional information. A good place to learn more is the S-1 they filed in early April.
Maybe somebody can link that SEC filing in a comment. TIA.
Economics:
Economic calendar for next week.
Big green arrows. Hooray for G-7 agreement to print more money.
Big green arrows. Hooray for G-7 agreement to print more money.
Downhill racer is my name for the $USD. The last trade at this point is just over 82.00, which is close to Friday morning’s level, but after bouncing off 81.976 three hours ago.
Few traders, it seems, placed confidence in Friday morning’s $USD rally.
U.S. Treasury Bond Jun. 2007 contract
US Treasury yields are rising on Monday morning. Any higher will start to have additional serious negative implications for the US housing and mortgage market.
The e-Mini May-07 oil contracts were up slightly to 63.975 this morning, which is a reflection of the falling $USD “as OPEC has determined not to receive wooden US nickels”. Right now, a few minutes later, the contracts are flat.
Spot gold is momentarily at 687.90, which is up +10.70 from this time Friday morning, but about the same as late Friday.

Spot silver has moved back down nine cents to 14.05, about where it was on Friday morning.
Spot platinum is up to 1273, which is up +9 to this time Friday, but down about -6 in the past couple hours. The high overnight was 1284.
Spot palladium is up to 373 this morning – trading much higher than a couple days ago.
$CRB moved higher Friday to close at 318.06. As the $USD breaks down, the commodities index continues to rally. The 320 level is important because that’s where I believe the Fed has drawn a line in the sand – not that they can do much other than a temporary holding action.
Cara 100 Stockwatch
Here are the Cara 100 gainers on Friday.
Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List gainers
Here are the top Cara 100 losers for Friday.
Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List losers (Interactive link)
Here are the stocks of the Cara 100 for Friday that hit 52-week intra-day highs and lows.
Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List gainers on Friday.
Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List losers on Friday.
JP Morgan has upgraded Moody’s (MCO), believing that future reports will “materially exceed expectations”.
Here are the current Cara 100 RSI-7 values, sorted by highest and lowest, first by Daily values and then by Monthly, prepared by “David” using TC2007 (Worden) [based on Welles Wilder smoothing].


Here are the stocks in the Cara 100 trading at extreme values:

Here are the interactive charts of up to a dozen stocks with RSI-7 above 70 and below 30:
We are still over-bought with 29 of the Cara 100 having a RSI-7 > 70 and only 4 < 30.
It’s Monday, have a great day. I’d like to but my LA-based ISP has been down for the past couple of hours. I can’t work like this. I’m looking into alternatives because I continue to be fed up with their lousy service.
You'd think they'd care. Here is a statistical summary I just took off the server: "Average successful requests per day: 178,812" (which is about 12.5 million in 69 days since I made the switch to Dreamhost).
I demand a lot of myself. Maybe I expect too much from others? In any case, I'm on track for one million unique hits per day. I hit 300,000 in one day early this month. Amazing thing, this Internet!
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 16, 2007 08:58:43 AM | Category: Cara's Bull Board
Discourse
FMT...here we go again. Fremont finds a buyer for $2.9b in subprime loans. Same buyer in talks to buys its residential lending business and assets.
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 16, 2007 9:27 AM [link]
SDS now at its 1 year low.
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 16, 2007 9:45 AM [link]
AMGN back above 60.
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 16, 2007 9:52 AM [link]
2nd: "SDS now at its 1 year low."
... and still, it doesn't appear to be on sale yet.
Look at a weekly chart of the VIX; it is now in no-man's land, searching for a bottom.
SDS trends with VIX, QID trends with VXN.
Qs have nearly filled the gap from the Feb "hiccup" (that's all you can call it at this point), and created a new gap this AM - something to look forward to ;-)
t4k
MarkM: Godspeed, I look forward to hearing from you again soon!
Posted by: trade4keeps
at
April 16, 2007 10:12 AM [link]
Even the Group of Seven (G7) knows you can move mountains with what you say, or what you omit to say...
t4k: Maybe the highs get taken out and make the "hiccup" callers look good--that would have to be the ultimate fake-out for '07. I like the James DePorre's opening caption this morning: Hand on the Throttle (don't fight the market), Finger on Eject.
For now, Helene Meisler is looking for an overbought peak sometime this week. Also speculates a breakout in gold and a falling USD could provide some excitement while everyone is focused on earnings.
Adding to MU and BMD this morning.
of 2007 ..we exceed the highs and make
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 16, 2007 10:26 AM [link]
alright, i guess feeding my 5 year old while cutting and pasting doesn't work too well
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 16, 2007 10:29 AM [link]
For the past couple of hours my June gold minis have been trading within a buck on either side of spot. Right now they are behind spot.
Usually they run about 5.50-5.60 over.
What does this mean? Is spot lagging or is the future price failing to confirm the spot move?
I have a feeling I'm about to get a lesson, one way or the other.
Mike
NYC
Posted by: MikeNYC
at
April 16, 2007 10:35 AM [link]
When the market *does* make a real top, VIX & VXN will begin to be supported by longer term MAs on daily and weekly charts. These became resistance this month, so looks like it's bull-city until volatility comes back.
t4k
Posted by: trade4keeps
at
April 16, 2007 10:48 AM [link]
There's your G-7 answer on gold. Coming back for another buying opportunity?.
Are you guys getting in on the ultra-short sales or waiting? I made a few $ trading the QID but sold into what I preceived would be a rosey reading of last weeks reports. I'm leary of getting in with this tape, yet they are on sale....
Posted by: Craig
at
April 16, 2007 10:59 AM [link]
Craig,
I think it's OK to start scaling into a short position with the goal of adding to it over the next few weeks. But I would wait to start a trade. There's probably a good reason to be leery right now--it kinda feels like it wants to take off.
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 16, 2007 11:03 AM [link]
With the G7 having just met, and Bill talks above about a rate increase tomorrow, I think there is a strong risk that in the very short term that the USD will gain some strength.
So, tactics wise what would be some ideas for short term plays. Or reasons not to dabble with a bounce in the USD, rather focus on the longer term decline.
I was thinking that with a rate increase Freddie and Fannie would be hurting. Today there was a significant jump in Freddie because, I believe, Freddie found a buyer for 3/4ths of a billion dollars worth of loans. Would Freddie still be hurt if there is a 25bps rise in the treasury yield?
-Quentusrex
Posted by: Quentusrex
at
April 16, 2007 11:23 AM [link]
Craig,
Bill has been reminding us to keep an eye on the Financials as a tell for what HB&B are up to. Well, this morning XLF is up over 2% on a ton of volume ... be careful out there, indeed.
t4k
Repeat after me: "I will not buy inverse ETFs on the way down."
Posted by: trade4keeps
at
April 16, 2007 11:24 AM [link]
MikeNYC
I noticed that GLD is also trading $0.50 to $0.60 below the normal spread with spot gold. I too am curious to know why the extra lag today.
cb
Posted by: cb
at
April 16, 2007 11:27 AM [link]
Thank you so much 2nd.
Who was it that pointed out BUCY?
Bless you. Up 6% since then.
Posted by: Craig
at
April 16, 2007 11:33 AM [link]
Great stock markets! :)
Is it always the same story? Just carry trade, borrowing yen and investing in more speculative positions, with higher rates of interests.
Look at the graph comparing the New Zealand Dollar and Yen ratio, against the SP500:
3 months
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=NZDJPY=X&t=3m&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=%5EGSPC
12 months
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=NZDJPY=X&t=1y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=%5EGSPC
The curves are so similar. Is it a pure coincidence? I don't think so.
Posted by: Lelik
at
April 16, 2007 11:38 AM [link]
The drop on gold was right on the daily schedule again, slightly smaller than normal.
For those expecting bad mortgage news, Wells Fargo reports tomorrow, and First Horizon (FHN) on Wednesday.
Posted by: SiO2
at
April 16, 2007 11:39 AM [link]
Quentusrex,
I would also be careful of a short USD position until month-end given that (i) the Euro may encounter some turbulent weakness if the French presidential election provides muddied first round results next weekend (with further uncertainty for the two-week runoff if no clear favorite emerges), and (ii) the market momentum begs for a retest of the carry trade set-up in Feb. (i.e. Yen 121-122).
t4k/2nd_ave,
After flying up in the wind in Jan./Feb. with heavy shorts on indices, I have taken a more cautious step approach to rebuild my bearish stance. I also agree that financials are generally a good tell of impending marketwide weakness (and today is a clear show of strength). Yet, with all the headwinds very well advertised on Financial Entertainment TV over the last month, we may witness some seller fatigue for now. While the mortgage/consumer credit risk may worsen at a varying pace (May resets will provide a huge tell IMO), I don't believe that traders fully appreciate the risk of an "accident" in the syndication of a borderline PE deal. It just takes one bad earnings quarter in the process of selling down the debt and the equity to shock the system. Finally, I sense that the giddiness in reporters' snapshots & experts' comments is slowly returning to the airwaves (remember Feb. 26 TXU deal, DOW rumor, "we are invicible" chants) and that PE is picking up the pace of deals once again (as if time was starting to run out).
JML
Posted by: Jumble
at
April 16, 2007 11:46 AM [link]
Craig I mentioned "BUCY" last week, it is a core holding in my IRA however I would be careful at these levels. How about a dollar bounce here, would like to see Gold consolidate back to the 50 day Bill until then $ 700 will continue to see FCB, IMF selling.
Posted by: Rick45
at
April 16, 2007 11:47 AM [link]
Thanks T4K, rule added to the list.
Looks basically like the falling knife rule.
We can all wait, right?
Anyone ever wonder who would be buyers of short indexes at their top?
That's one reason to think about actually shorting when the time comes.
Posted by: Craig
at
April 16, 2007 11:50 AM [link]
I Thank you again Rick.
I just tightened my stop on BUCY. Nice gain in a short time after falling about 4%.
Gold is coming back slowly. You all expected it.
Anyone watching WGDF? Making some small progress against the gold current today.
And CCJ is going even higher. Up a dollar today. Where does uranium stop?
Posted by: Craig
at
April 16, 2007 11:58 AM [link]
MarkM called this the "Rocky Balboa" market; I think it's more like the Harlem Globetrotters, with short sellers & top callers playing the hapless Washington Generals. The Globetrotters display lots of fancy footwork, and they never lose.
http://www.harlemglobetrotters.com/events/
(plays "Sweet Georgia Brown" for you)
Rocky at least had to deal with some adversity...
Craig - the main difference in trading the inverse ETFs is that they generally grind down and shoot up, so you need to be "in" at/around a local bottom. You can short most of them as well, but I don't think you can short the double long variety (I know QLD is not short-able at Schwab)
t4k
Posted by: trade4keeps
at
April 16, 2007 12:07 PM [link]
Bill mentioned a nice 58' boat....
Anyone here fish? If you were HB&B fishing for traders $ and you wanted them to rise to your bait, wouldn't you have to put financials on your hook today? I mean, they SUCK for how long and TODAY they throw the fish the financials?
To this fish it LOOKS like bait.
Okay, back to work....
Posted by: Craig
at
April 16, 2007 12:07 PM [link]
im finally profit taking on slw. i will reenter at a lower price.
Posted by: jeremy
at
April 16, 2007 12:46 PM [link]
anyone think its a good idea to enter mu? im sitting on a huge pile of cash looking for ideas.
Posted by: jeremy
at
April 16, 2007 12:58 PM [link]
Jeremy. When I get a pile of cash I just keep buying gold and sit on it.
Posted by: Horatio
at
April 16, 2007 1:01 PM [link]
ive considered that but there is considerable resistance at this price.
Posted by: jeremy
at
April 16, 2007 1:05 PM [link]
2nd_ave,
Possible reason why MU is down today
http://www.digitimes.com/bits_chips/a20070416VL201.html
Assuming DRAM prices keep going down and NAND up:
Which one would bw a better buy here: MU or SNDK?
Posted by: JogyP
at
April 16, 2007 1:24 PM [link]
GLD jumping in the last few mins
http://www.kitco.com/charts/livegold.html
Posted by: JogyP
at
April 16, 2007 1:27 PM [link]
Anyone follow TAH.v? I watched Blood Diamonds and it stirred my interest in Diamond stocks. I like the fact they are partnered with Teck and Tiffany's, but i am hearing they are having troubles with their Jericho mine.
A micro cap i didnt mention because it didnt meet the revenue requirement is running like a freight train Ticker ONT. I believe the move might be over, but i sold at 1.80 range. my cost basis is 0.74. this has no options. Small company that powers adobe video codec for flash and skype video to name a few. I sold at a nice gain but was stuck under $1 for what seems like forever, and the previous ceo was a dud. well i am looking at the ticker kicking myself since i just missed a super run to $2.50. I want to say overbought when looking at rsi but it just keeps going higher.
take a look at the ceo interview on their homepage www.on2.com. technicals here at billcara2
http://tinyurl.com/2o75t9
BUt proceed with caution. My gut says this thing can go back to $1 when you look at their balance sheet.
Posted by: NYUgrad
at
April 16, 2007 1:46 PM [link]
I followed diamonds stocks a bit a while back and something didn't feel right about it. With the De Beers cartel artificially keeping prices high and gem-quality synthetic diamonds becoming cost competitive (http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/diamond.html) I don't know that I'd risk any more capital in this space. Just my humble opinion.
On another note, Bill had mentioned Bombardier here before. From my incredibly novice technical analysis, looks like it's been forming a bullish pattern, possibly ready for a breakout? On the other hand, daily/weekly/monthly RSI's are 60, 62 and 70... Any other opinions?
http://www.investertech.com/tkchart/tkchart.asp?stkname=TSE_BBD0B&wt=0&ind=nn
Lastly, on friday BNN guest mentioned Gentry (smallcap natural gas). Checked chart, was bullish on all measures, looking forward to getting on board today, but already popped 15-20% :(
Cheers
Posted by: proudPapa
at
April 16, 2007 2:03 PM [link]
The hardest thing for me is to be happy with the profit I take. I used to lose $ trying to get back in. Now I take the profit and remove the symbol from my screens and leave in victory.
Otherwise I screw with my *own* head. Not good.
My mantra: Do not chase.
I'm so-so on living my mantra.
Posted by: Craig
at
April 16, 2007 2:04 PM [link]
What's up with Glencairn Gold (GGG.TO)? Up 13% in the past two sessions, almost three times daily volume so far today--haven't seen any news. Long GGG from quite a while ago.
Anyone pay much attention to the TSX? Looks to be getting overbought here, EWC even more so. Daily/weekly/monthly RSIs are all over 70. I suppose this has lots to do with $USD weakness, and strength in the energy and metals areas.
I'm toying with the idea of taking a small position in HXD.TO, Horizon beta pro bear plus, basically 2x inverse TSX60 index, launched in January. Seems to be exhibiting full blown symptoms of falling knife syndrome, so perhaps further patience is in order.
Posted by: doug11
at
April 16, 2007 2:18 PM [link]
Bill,
I laughed out loud when I read this morning that Alinda Capital Partners paid $1.74 Billion for UE Waterheater Income Fund. In 1999 Union Gas spun off the waterheater rental business into Union Energy. Last year I think I found out why. Being concerned about my rising energy costs I decided to replace my UE waterheater with the purchase of a Rinnai hot-water-on-demand unit that hangs on the wall and heats up water as you use it. The contractor told me I was spending so much in part because I was being billed for two rental units, and that this was a problem everywhere. I contacted Union Energy and they confirmed that they showed two heaters and agreed to pay me back for the several years of double-billing. They bounced me back to Union Gas for the pre-1999 billing recovery but I was told that it was Union Energy's problem as they now had all the records. I spoke with a work associate who told me she had a similar double-billing problem. And UE claims to have how many million customers? Now I see they rolled this dog into an Income Trust. We know how much of the IT business involves bundling of third-class properties. So let's hope Alinda has done their due dilligence or they may be facing a rapidly declining customer base and class action lawsuits to boot.
Posted by: TerryC
at
April 16, 2007 2:25 PM [link]
anyone follow moly stocks today with the sprott moly fund ipo? i bought TJS.V (tenajon) late friday on a gamble, so far paying off well.
Posted by: rob d
at
April 16, 2007 2:39 PM [link]
SNDK is filling the gap. Make of it what you will.
Posted by: Telestar3d
at
April 16, 2007 2:59 PM [link]
Sure my pleasure Craig I have a VERY tight stop on my CCJ thinking that now shoulder season has arrived energy will atleast fill the gap some (or is it different this time noting the G7's generals have their gophers juicing bids today on reports like from "C"). Raising loss reserves by roughy 500 million is hardley anything to brag about; aaahhhh the beauty of fractional reserve banking :)
Posted by: Rick45
at
April 16, 2007 3:06 PM [link]
I was looking at GMO as a moly play a few months ago when it was $2.50. I didn't realize moly would be the next bubble. Could have made 150%.
I have a junior miner that has 600+ million pounds of molybdenum - Copper Fox CUU.V, plus 8.6 million of gold and 9 billion pounds of copper. They are about to update their resource estimates any day now. I wonder if people will start chasing it as a moly play when they get some press on the resource estimate.
Posted by: moab
at
April 16, 2007 3:07 PM [link]
Some links on moly.
http://www.sprott.com/pdf/Structural%20Change_Denis%20Battrum_March27.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdenum
http://www.infomine.com/Investment/HistoricalCharts/ShowCharts.asp?c=molybdenum
http://www.stockhouse.ca/blogs.asp?page=viewpost&blogID=629&postID=15679
http://www.sprottmoly.com/Investor_Presentation.pdf
http://www.sprottmoly.com/Prosectus_SEDAR.pdf
http://www.sprottmoly.com/investor.htm
Sedar has more info...
I wonder if this will turn into another Uranium Participation, where Sprott corners the market and blows the price sky high. Moly seems to have stagnated over the last year...
Anyone else have more info?
Me to Jeremy SLW at $ 9.37 was a screaming buy ; that 14 handle for silver gettin folks attention!
Posted by: Rick45
at
April 16, 2007 3:10 PM [link]
Rick, i bought it at an avg cost of $9.48. The RSI just screams overbought and i think there will be a great opportunity to reenter at a considerably lower price.
Posted by: jeremy
at
April 16, 2007 3:14 PM [link]
I'm looking for advice,
I'm not so much an owner and manager of capital as I am a poor guy who has learned to micro-prop-trade pretty well in the last year. Has anyone got any advice about how hard it is/what I might try to do to get an actual job at a real prop-trading firm?
Any advice/stories welcomed.
Chris Hunter
Posted by: shark_attack
at
April 16, 2007 3:23 PM [link]
any opinions on the Interactive Brokers IPO - customers have access to the bidding online.
Posted by: sergio
at
April 16, 2007 3:23 PM [link]
Jeremy interesting perhaps it will take some sort of event (e.g. rate hikes in europe next month) noting Gold just got bitch-slapped at $ 695.
Posted by: Rick45
at
April 16, 2007 3:27 PM [link]
Rick, i believe we are headed for a hard landing very soon. that should do the trick.
Posted by: jeremy
at
April 16, 2007 3:34 PM [link]
Bill from Jeff Saut's note today; perhaps plays like KOG worthy of your micro list consideration via a genre playing higher "mean" energy prices (e.g. solar, bio-fuels, oilsands, fiber materials for turbines, etc...):
"In such an environment, where we can’t decide if the economy is slowing into recession, slowing to a muddle, or reaccelerating (although recent figures have a decided slowing tint), we have tried to focus on themes, and special situations, that make sense to us. Energy is one such theme, for while the U.S. seems to be slowing economically, the rest of the world is not, as demonstrated by China’s roughly 13% increase in crude oil demand. To take advantage of that demand we have recommended most of the Canadian oil sands complex, which had a fairly big rally last week. This is particularly impressive in light of the Canadian Dollar’s recent strength (we remain bullish on the Canadian Dollar). We have also recommended a number of energy names that presented at the Raymond James Institutional Conference in March. Accordingly, ideas like Petrohawk (HK/$14.36/Strong Buy), Kodiak (KOG/$5.14/Strong Buy), 6.7%-yielding NGP Resources (NGPC/$15.85/Outperform), and Helix (HLX/$39.40/Strong Buy) have performed well over the last few months. Yet for non-stock-specific investors, our recommendation of the 5%-yielding Blackrock Global Energy (BGR/$29.83) ETF has been a risk-adjusted way to participate in the energy theme, whose shares broke out to the upside in the charts last week. We have also embraced non-economic-sensitive themes like homeland security using L-1 Identity Solutions (ID/$18.86/Strong Buy), which recently received a large contact. Then too is our non-economic-sensitive “water theme.” While the non-stock-specific investor may want to consider the Water PowerShares (PHO/$19.00), our Canadian-based analysts have been recommending Laperrier & Verreault (GLV.A/$29.44/Outperform) as a way to participate in the water theme. As always, Canadian securities should be checked for Blue Sky laws in this country."
Posted by: Rick45
at
April 16, 2007 3:35 PM [link]
Had to leave for a couple of hours late morning, but sold UXG (7.11) earlier after 65% move since 4/4. Thanks Bill!
Also sold non-IRA HL position after 45% move in 3 months.
On 10/19/2006, Bill Cara wrote:
"Hecla Mining under the microscope, Thurs., Oct. 19, 2006, 3:26 PM
Hecla Mining (NYSE: HL, US$6.00) Price Target: US$9.50
These shares have a solid base of support at $5.00. As silver prices improve in the next year, I expect the shares to set an all-time high of at least $9.50."
Great prognostication Bill!
(ed. note: HL high today 9.87, closed 9.80. I try to please!)
Getting my MZZ toe in the water bitten. Down 5.7%. Glad it wasn't a foot in the water. Will eject if it reaches @ 8%.
Posted by: Seamus
at
April 16, 2007 3:43 PM [link]
any interesting news on junior miners?
Posted by: jeremy
at
April 16, 2007 3:54 PM [link]
GLE -
taking out the B-point. 18MM weekly vol at teh pivot. looking good.
Posted by: QQQBall
at
April 16, 2007 4:10 PM [link]
GLE -
taking out the B-point. 1.8MM weekly vol at teh pivot. looking good.
Posted by: QQQBall
at
April 16, 2007 4:10 PM [link]
Seamus--I was a little ahead of you--I extinguished my MZZ pain. There will be time enough for it.
Guessing you mean Glencairn Gold by GLE - down 10% after close. Ouch!
Posted by: proudPapa
at
April 16, 2007 4:30 PM [link]
Water crisis looms worldwide
For consideration if interested:
WTR
AWR
CTWS
AMN
SWWC
CWT
CWCO
PHO is an ETF
Energy is important for our lifestyles but water is necessary for our lives. An important topic to be aware of IMHO.
Posted by: Telestar3d
at
April 16, 2007 4:38 PM [link]
Hi Bill
I am new to the site. My nomination to the microcap / mining stocks is PLM. Home page:
http://www.polymetmining.com/s/Home.asp
It has base metal and palladium resources in the ground in North America and is due to begin production in '08. I have not seen the stock mentioned during my brief review of past postings. I hope this is the kind of information you are seeking.
Great group and site!!!
BRC
Interative Brokers IPO(IBKR) roadshow video and propectus. ( link via trader mikes site)
http://www.retailroadshow.com/roadshows.asp
Andrew
Posted by: Andy
at
April 16, 2007 7:34 PM [link]
JogyP,
Rather than give you my opinion on MU vs SNDK, offering you an opinion from Cody Willard, who was mulling opening a long position in SNDK last Friday: http://tinyurl.com/2vq3rj
Note that he was also net long MU as of Friday. And the range on MU today was certainly within Bill's Accumulation Zone. That's enough for me to be building a position, although I'm aware Bill is holding off in anticipation of a broad market sell-off. You can, however, lower your cost basis by selling options against your holdings.
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
April 16, 2007 7:41 PM [link]
JB - Have you read of the recent success in producing laboratory diamonds? (WSJ recently had a feature story on this.) Lab diamonds are said to be flawless, and have been produced up to 1/2 carat. 1 carat is said to be in the offing. They are cheaper to produce than mined diamongs. Won't this undermine the pricing of mined diamonds?
Posted by: Jock
at
April 16, 2007 7:57 PM [link]
Jock,
Thanks for the response. Yes, I would think that would put pressure on mined diamond markets. And with the De Beers cartel artificially keeping prices high I would agree with proud papa and stay away from diamonds.
Posted by: JB
at
April 16, 2007 8:14 PM [link]
"A federal judge in San Francisco has dismissed most of a shareholder derivative lawsuit against Cnet Networks regarding backdated stock-option grants, according to The Recorder."
"Late last week, reported the legal publication, Judge William Alsup of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that it is not sufficient for the plaintiffs to state simply that since backdating occurred, a fraud has also occurred."
http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/9028174/c_9024377?f=home_todayinfinance
Posted by: JIM
at
April 16, 2007 8:36 PM [link]
trade4keeps - QID is the inverse of QLD - you can "short" QLD by going long QID.....
Posted by: score22
at
April 16, 2007 9:58 PM [link]
re: diamonds -
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/diamond_pr.html
re: water
not that it will happen anytime soon, but i am not so sure water will always be a problem if these guys get it perfected:
Posted by: rob d
at
April 16, 2007 10:13 PM [link]
TS3D, couple more that are my faves in this space: PICO, MWA
I got stopped out of PICO on the first swoosh day. MWA is a tremendous Graham-style value that has gotten killed with the housing stocks, though it is not nearly as levered as many others.
SmartMoney guy was on FET talking about TTEK, WTS.
Posted by: ZackAttack
at
April 16, 2007 10:44 PM [link]
re diamonds: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/diamond.html
an interesting read.
also for water:
http://www.aquasciences.com/
http://www.airwatercorp.com/
if this gets perfected, watch out. serious distech.
Posted by: rob d
at
April 17, 2007 7:27 AM [link]
Telestar3rd and ZackAttack,
Thanks for your listings of companies involved in water.
I, too, am interested in the water issue. Here's an ADR that has done very well for me: VE.
It's in four major business lines, one of them water-related, and all four are important.
Again, thanks for your listings.
Posted by: GemmaStar
at
April 17, 2007 9:16 AM [link]
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)



This past week: “The Peoples Bank foreign exchange reserves finished the 1Q07 at $1.2 trillion, which was a gain of +$135.7 billion, including (get this) a gain of +$73.3 billion that nobody can explain.”
Well, we know what it wasn’t. They did not invest in U.S. Treasuries or the yen to earn these returns since both weaken during the first quarter.
This to me means China has changed its foreign exchange policy. As a result they are earning more and improving returns just like any country would want to with a massive surplus. I’m sure the Chinese desk is under pressure for results like anyone else.
How are they improving returns? Although, the majority of recent past investments were Treasuries, I’m surmising they diversify more and look elsewhere. Perhaps they seek a basket of other currencies as the Euro, the Malaysian ringitt, the Indian rupee and the AUS$ had big moves over this time.
You know what could be goosing their returns based on the first quarter? They could be buying gold. (Maybe they read the billcara.com in the first quarter!). They will still invest in Treasuries (don’t want to kill the golden goose for their exports) but they will not purchase as much.
I don’t know this for sure, it’s just my 2 cents worth. It will bear more watching as the months go by. It is more negative for the dollar and should continue to boost PMs. I think the all time low for the dollar is around 79.5-80. It closed at 82.17 Friday. And to think it was just a few years ago the dollar was at 120. A sign of the changing times!
Posted by: Seamus
at
April 16, 2007 9:11 AM [link]