« Is the world awash in capital or credit? Wed., Dec. 27, 2006, 9:30 AM | Main | Electing directors is a changing picture, Wed., Dec. 27, 2006, 4:33 PM »

December 27, 2006

Elitism and management options, Wed., Dec. 27, 2006, 2:15 PM

The privilege and wealth via management stock options is out of control.

The Wall Street Journal has published an excellent piece today on the problems with stock options.

What is the problem?

Shareholders, where do I begin? I recommend you read this and weep. Your company may have been hijacked by self-serving management whose actions are covered up to an extent by dubious accounting and share buy-backs.

Management control rather than share control has always been more valuable to people who seek their personal fortune through legal schemes. The problem here is that corporate Boards of Directors -- some not all -- have permitted and are profiting by the opportunity.

The granting of options as a privilege bestowed by shareowners to corporate managers as an inducement to make them work harder has somehow been converted to a right where some managers now expect to receive compensation without their having earned it.

There needs to be a re-assessment by the owners and managers of capital as to how Boards are elected and how they in turn appoint and monitor management.

Personally, I believe that the power has to remain in the boardroom, but I believe that management, like the independent auditors, ought to be invited to the boardroom, not, as it is today, to own and control that boardroom.

At the heart of almost every problem in life is the notion of conflict of interest. You remove the conflicts, and life becomes much simpler. Corporate life is no different.

There is, as we all know, a conflict between the many persons and organizations who own a corporation or property and the people who manage it. Unfortunately, within a widely held business corporation there are insufficient checks and balances to stop motivated people from exploiting this conflict. Consequently, management has gotten the upper hand and the directors -- in too many cases -- have ceased working for the owners, which has led to problems.

These are serious problems, involving in the aggregate, over the years, hundreds of billions of dollars.

The nonsense we see today must stop, and it will as soon as the owners and managers of capital become aware of such abuse and take action to sell the shares in those companies where we are being exploited.

We can all do our part for social equity.

Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on December 27, 2006 02:15:17 PM | Category: Cara Today in the Market

Discourse

It seems that all the companies that my company does business with in the silicon valley have become convinced that all the cash that they generate belongs to management to be divided as they see fit. Management also sees that their stockholders are making money trading their stock shares. They feel that they also deserve a portion of that increase which they give to themselves by means of options or stock grants. As I see it, diluting the stock and taking more cash from the stockholders. Are we doing nothing more than holding pieces of paper that are not shares of the company, but trading objects like baseball cards? That is so if there is never any intent of management to deliver the profits of the company to the stockholders.

Posted by: marvin7197 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 27, 2006 2:31 PM [link]

Much of the current management and boards of directors of publicly owned companies remind me of crooked casino operators who are engaged in skimming profits from the operation. Along with this analogy, the use of baseball bats and kneecaps come to mind. I really do not like dishonest creeps.

Posted by: IdaRed [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 27, 2006 5:19 PM [link]

"The Securities and Exchange Commission, in a move announced late on the last business day before Christmas, reversed a decision it had made in July and adopted a rule that would allow many companies to report significantly lower total compensation for top executives."

Hey, you can comment all you want, but so what...

"The commission said it would take public comments on the latest change for 30 days, but it added that the new rules were now final."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/27/business/27place.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Posted by: JIM [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 27, 2006 5:53 PM [link]

ALOHA !!

This all reminds me of the biggest publicly owned entity in the World ... The United States Of America. After winning the last election the CEO of America, George Bush, proudly announced he had won many political chips and he intended to cash them in!

Beware of CEOs cashing in their chips!

Posted by: kaimu [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 27, 2006 10:56 PM [link]

I wish somehow there is a way of stopping all these. Every time the proxy vote comes, the item that I most abhor to see is ".... granting XXX stock options to management/board....". When can they stop this? They are just never paid enough.

Posted by: 1stMillionAt33 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 29, 2006 9:57 AM [link]

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?