« Cara's Daytrader Bull Board, Tues., Dec. 19, 2006, 5:55 AM | Main | Northfield drops off the radar, Wed., Dec. 20, 2006, 1:36 PM »

December 20, 2006

Cara's Daytrader Bull Board, Wed., Dec. 20, 2006, 6:55 AM

Global equity markets rallied yesterday and earlier today after Thailand reversed its stand on imposing strict new regulations on the Baht that had been taken to try to stabilize their currency. The abrupt reversal was a reactionary move to try to stabilize the sudden and sharp currency move in the opposite direction. Currency markets are nervous.

The initial move by the Thai monetary authorities immediately led to a currency crisis in South East Asia, threatening to become a global crisis. The hope now is that the global currency imbalance that hangs like an executioner's sword over the neck of capital markets can be resolved slowly through natural market forces.

That's not likely to happen.

What I believe happened immediately after the first Thai move is that the Bank of Japan intervened by selling Yen and buying USD, which stemmed the plunge of the USD. That was done to help Japan's manufacturers that export to China and the U.S. But that strategy of the BoJ did not resolve the spending and debt crisis of the U.S., and the central bank sell-off of USD by countries like Iran, Venezuela and the like. So the Japanese remedy is too little, too late. There will soon be another currency crisis (or several other crises) in any country that relies too heavily on a strong USD.

As the USD was plunging over the past couple months, I observed major shifts of money flow occurring in global capital markets. I have been stunned by the rapidity of the money flow. This is "hot" money as the world has never seen it.

In the past few days as equity indexes have been hitting new cycle highs, and all-time highs in some cases, I have come to a belief that the equity market is not rising on a wall of worry but on the losses of hedge funds and traders who are short. They are being squeezed like Amaranth.

In the big picture, as I see it, the $USD will continue to fall (except maybe against the Yen, where sooner or later the situation will require higher interest rates by the Bank of Japan), and precious metals will rise as central banks continue to reflate to try to protect the fall of the USD, and to push their own currencies down in order to protect their own tourism and manufacturing.

So the Thai crisis avoidance did not solve a single thing other than delay the inevitable.

Yes, I have come to the belief that the major issue in global capital markets is not one of inflation or deflation, but currency imbalances and international trade. The administrations of other nations have collectively determined that if the USD falls too low, there would be a burden of cost to the American consumer that could no longer be carried, and these countries, as you know, rely on the U.S. consumer.

I think markets will only truly revert to normal after the next spike in gold -- something like we saw in the 1970's, where currency imbalances had to be dealt with (and gold spiked), which led to a series of Bear markets (1973-4, 1978, and 1981-2).

At this point, traders can expect a growing number of analyst downgrades and fewer numbers of upgrades because objective analysts on Wall Street can no longer ignore the fact that debt (public and private) is being created faster than wealth (ie, the increase of real enterprise value).

Some of the upgrades I see today are dubious, eg, Merrill Lynch's upgrade of Citigroup after C had already increased in price by about +15 pct in six months. By this measure, would they re-iterate a Buy on General Electric after GE was pumped almost +7 pct (between $25 and $30 billion in market cap) in just 14 consecutive session hours last Thursday, Friday and the open on Monday?

Traders and maybe bankers are taking their eye off the ball. The issue is our ability to service debt, not the price of the assets (ie, collateral held by bankers) we own today.

The same thing happened last year with speculators in the U.S. housing market. People with no financial resources were buying multiple housing units in hopes they could, with minimum fix-up, flip the properties for huge price gains. For a while the prices escalated because of debt-created money flowing into that market. Then the investors realized that a suitable economic return (ie, cash coming in versus cash committed) wasn't happening. Sure, the housing market thrived as long as investors were prepared to accept returns of 2 pct! For a while, that is. Then they saw that the prices were not still rising, but the taxes and maintenance costs still had to be paid. So they tried to sell. The only thing that gave them a reprieve this cycle (unlike other real estate cycles like 1990) was that the Fed continued pumping money into the system to keep interest rates from rising. Eventually it was high oil prices that sunk that market.

Yesterday I noted in this space that "volatility has been introduced into this market, (i) partly because of over-bought equities (where share prices are growing at an alarmingly fast rate compared to Free Cash Flow of the underlying companies), (ii) partly because of a global currency imbalance, and (iii) partly because of economic and credit bubble pressures."

Nothing changed in a day because the Thai central bank reversed its position. They had taken action because the country needed it, and now they are reacting to the global interest, which was slapping them for trying to put the brakes on the growth of money. I think Thailand had it right, and the rest of the world will soon discover that the world cannot continue to print money and increase debt. What governments, corporations and individuals need to do now is to reduce debt, and build financial resources for an aging society that will not have the income to support itself.

Rising costs of housing, home insurance, energy, fuel for the car, healthcare and so forth will soon be impossible for the retired to meet. I saw it on the faces of the Florida retirees during the CNN series last week called War on the Middle Class.

Yesterday, the market tried to shrug off the rising costs of the U.S. Producer Price Index. A couple days ago it shrugged off the nation's international trade deficit. Ignorance will not keep equity markets rising forever. Just as I did in 2H1999 and 1H2000, I am simply putting the writing on the wall. Traders who are shrugging it off must not have heard of the Greater Fool Theory.

Yesterday in the U.S. equity market, the Dow and Nasdaq started weak, gained strength and later closed weak. There were inflation worries after the PPI data was reviewed and considered. The Gainers List is chock full of my favorites: KRY, SLW, GFI, etc. Precious Metals did jump as I had expected, and so did Crude Oil (the Cdn oilsands plus CVX and XOM) and Coal. Gold was up +1.2 pct and silver up +2.3 pct. The Consumer Discretionary sector was weak again for the third straight day after a batch of bad economic data and negative guidance from companies like Circuit City (CC) (-18 pct ON THE DAY) and Hovanian (HOV -2.6 pct). ICSC and Redbook Research reporting soft holiday sales. Retailers (RLX) dropped -1.2 pct. The Tech sector (especially anything to do with TV sets and communications and programmable logic) was soft, such as LLTC, MXIM, BRCM, TXN, ALTR and XLNX. Software giant Oracle (ORCL), which had run up without explanation (as I continuously pointed out my concerns), sold off in huge volume to a three-month low after reporting an in-line (ex-items) EPS number. Micron Technology (MU) sold off (-1.9 pct) on large volume. And Biotech is also under pressure.

So, yes, a couple stocks, many at the heart of the so-called U.S. military-industrial complex, like BA and GE, may be holding your interest, but the writing is on the wall. This is not the time to be buying the dips. It's time to let this market sag.

That may not be obvious as the charts of international equity markets are full of green arrows today, and the headlines scream of new record highs. But you ought to be concerned nonetheless.


Asia-Pacific indices (Interactive link)



European indices (Interactive link)


Gold spot chart (Interactive link)


Silver spot chart (Interactive link)


Platinum spot chart (Interactive link)


Palladium spot chart (Interactive link)


$CRB Index (Interactive link)


$USD Index (Interactive link)


U.S. Treasury Bond Dec. contract (Interactive link)


Open Futures Contracts (Interactive link)


NYMEX Oil near futures contract (Interactive link)


Goldminer stock watch (Interactive link)


RSI Highs in Cara 100 (Interactive link)


RSI Lows in Cara 100 (Interactive link)


Wall Street upgrades (Interactive link)


Wall Street downgrades (Interactive link)


Economic calendar

Yesterday's portfolio movers from Cara Watch List:

Here are the top 25 gainers on the day.

001l007.gif


Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List gainers (Interactive link)

Interactive chart of the next 12 Watch List gainers (Interactive link)


Here are the top losers on the day.

001l008.gif


Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List losers (Interactive link)

Interactive chart of the next 12 Watch List losers (Interactive link)


Here are the stocks with higher than daily average volume on the day.

001l009.gif


Here is the End of Day RSI-7 values prepared by "David" using a data vendor that is different than Investertech. The differences apparently is that David's data uses a Welles Wilder smoothing that tends to eliminate or at least reduce erratic numbers. In any case, the more you discover the nuances of my work, you'll see that I study RSI more in connection with peer groups than individual stocks. I am looking for money flow changes by theme because that's how the major capital pools move into and out of markets. As they have gazillions of Dollars (and Euro and Yen) to move in and out, I can beat them to their game most of the time.

001l010.gif


I will be gone for the day -- and, as they say, hopefully not forgotten. Have a good one.

Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on December 20, 2006 06:55:48 AM | Category: Cara's Bull Board

Discourse

Bill,
Thank you for taking the time to discuss your thoughts about the Thai government's actions from a macroeconomic perspective.

My favorite posts to read on your blog are your macro views. They help me to piece together the market dance that you often reference.

Have a great holiday and I hope you are able to power through and finish your book.

Posted by: cb [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 7:30 AM [link]

THE 1997-98 ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS REPORT TO CONGRESS:

http://www.fas.org/man/crs/crs-asia2.htm

Posted by: JIM [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 8:05 AM [link]

This can't be good for the US or the $.
This report was quietly put on the site. It says that the US is now insolvent. It's also from the US Treasury......

http://fms.treas.gov/fr/06frusg/06frusg.pdf

Does anyone have any comments about this?

Posted by: Quentusrex [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 8:28 AM [link]

Bush is speaking at 10am et. U.S is planning to expand the military. Anyone recommend any bullet manufacturers that are public?

http://tinyurl.com/y54avh

Posted by: NYUgrad [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 8:37 AM [link]

NYUGrad, I guess a little gallows humor is in order. Indeed, just when I think things can't get any worse in the U.S., Bush announces a new initiative.

Worst president in the history of the republic.

Posted by: number2son [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 9:18 AM [link]

Bill,

Your entry today could almost qualify as a WIR.

Well done and many thanks.


Posted by: Todd [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 9:48 AM [link]

NYUgrad,

Re: "Bush is speaking at 10am et. U.S is planning to expand the military. Anyone recommend any bullet manufacturers that are public?".

If he is indeed speaking of expanding the military, then gold will be sold down & USD supported to give the appearance that all is ok with the spending programs. It seems like every time Bernanke or Paulson speak, gold is sold down temporarily, why not today?

Re: spending and the US financial conditions posted by Quentusrex, I haven't had a chance to peruse it, but I believe that this is the document that shows that the creative accounting used by the gov in order to say that we are not as bad off as we actually are is bs. In other words, the headline numbers are massaged via creative accounting, but the real numbers (given in the document) are not given the time of day via the media. If these were our books, we would be given the boot by all lending institutions and told to declare bankruptcy. Eventually, the truth will get out with the $usd down hard until the government spending practices change.

Re: creative government accounting and trading. CPI has been massaged and reworked on a regular basis since Clinton was in office. The real CPI as calculated Pre-Clinton would be multiples higher, maybe double digits I have heard. But here's the rub; even if all traders know (and most do, btw) of the bs, they will still trade off the numbers regardless of the "truth" as long as the capital markets react to the data as they should. In other words, you can't fight the tape and if CPI comes out tame and the "powers that be" start selling gold (for example), the tape will reveal that the market "believes" the number. IMO, the government can continue to "paint the tape" in this way to keep traders "in line" for much longer than equity shorts can remain solvent. The question is; when will the credibility die?

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 9:52 AM [link]

Dear Bill,

I'm with cb and Todd: today's weekday commentary hit it out of the park. Thank you very much for writing it.

Posted by: GemmaStar [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 10:14 AM [link]

Ken Fisher (who has 70% market call accuracy) says that US borrows at 5% and gets 12% return on assets. This sounds like a good deal to me. However, others (e.g. Ned Davis in Barron's ?) have said in the past that US borrows four dollars for every dollar of GDP growth, which does not sound like a good deal to me. Who is right here ?

Posted by: ghosalb [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 10:33 AM [link]

Ned Davis is correct.

Ken Fisher? If he is referring to the ability for the US gov. to issue treasuries (borrow) with interest rates around 5% (payment to creditors) and in turn is able to print money to pay for the repayment of the treasuries and new spending programs at the rate of 12% (roughly the hidden M3 number), then I guess he is right also. But, like I said, I don't know exactly what he is referring to, maybe you would want to quote him?

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 10:43 AM [link]

GLD is finding support by:
50 dma
200 dma
38.2% retracement

Will it hold?

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 10:46 AM [link]

Bill - Just have to say again what a tremendous help your writing today (and yesterday) is to me. Thanks to you I can tune out the noise. Best Wishes - Bill

Posted by: Bishx [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 10:47 AM [link]

50 dma
200 dma
38.2% retracement
are currently, roughly, overlapping.

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 10:48 AM [link]

Today, I was hoping the surgeon would do a small procedure in office, but she has to dig into my leg, so she scheduled a hospital procedure Feb 2. I wanted it done earlier, but with a Bahamas trip scheduled she wouldn't do it till after I was out of the sun. She looked at my chart, shook her head and then asked if I ever used sun screen. Then told me this scar would be 1.5 inches long. We should have known about these problems 50 and 60 years ago!

About Ken Fisher: that story about Americans not having enough debt is the flat out most stupid thing I have ever read from a supposedly intelligent person.

In my book, there will be a piece about 'good' debt vs 'bad' debt. Pied Piper Fisher must be ignored. He is relying on the continuous price increase of assets, which I addressed earlier today in this blog.

In the long-run, price increases are sustainable only with real growth in wealth (the value of assets based on additional net free cash flow), which in the long run does not occur when money is being printed by governments and banks faster than wealth is being created by the private sector.

A debt-inspired bubble has been created, and Fisher would like to add to it. Ignore him. He must be looking to sell you some real estate or positions in stocks he can't unload.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 11:00 AM [link]

3rd year Presidential term S&P Returns

Bush 2003 - 28.7%
Clinton 1999 - 21 %
Clinton 1995 - 37.5%
Bush 1991 - 30.6%
Reagan 1987 - 5.2%
Reagan 1983 - 22.5%
Carter 1979 - 18.4%
Nixon/Ford 1975 - 37.2%
Nixon 1971 - 14.3%
Johnson 1967 - 24 %
Kennedy/Johnson 1963 - 22.8%
Eisenhower 1959 - 12 %
Eisenhower 1955 - 31.6%
Truman 1951 - 24%
FDR/Truman 1947 - 5.7%
FDR 1943 - 25.9%
FDR 1939 - -0.4%
FDR 1935 - 47.7%
Hoover 1931 - -43.3%
Coolidge 1927 - 37.5%

Average return 20.1%
Median return 23.4%
Positive 3rd yrs 18
Negative 3rd years 2

Posted by: TheAdonis [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 11:04 AM [link]

g034-it looks to me that the 60-61 area in GLD is a pivot area-an area with the .382 and .5 retracements as boundries. Yesterday's low came right on the 89 day moving average, an important measure of intermediate trend. On all markets I use that level as an objective indication if one is invested on the right side of the trend. That level in GLD is 60.6, and with the 55 day MA sitting just above this level (61.03 and gently sloping higher) and the 8 day EMA moving down at a 45 degree angle (61.86) the moment of truth for gold is fast approaching. I would guess if this area doesn't hold a move to the lower support area of 55-57 is in the cards. Long some junior minors and awaiting some clarity in the gold market. No real opinion at the moment-looking to kick back and get some rest, warmth, and sunshine on vacation over the next few weeks. Hope everyone has a great holiday and a prosperous new year.

Posted by: optionoracle [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 11:16 AM [link]

NYGrad,

ATK makes bullets and guns, SWHC makes handguns. No positions.

Bill,
I only listen to you. Good luck with your Feb 2 appointment.

Posted by: ghosalb [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 11:20 AM [link]

Just watch the Trannies. Everything hunky-dorey with the economy? Then why are the Trannies breaking below 4600?

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 12:37 PM [link]

I think I heard that FedEx has issues with gasoline prices. Have you been reading news reports from the Middle East over the last few years? Seems to be getting worse over there according to my reading, Bush seems to be admitting the same. So, if geopolitics get worse over there and economies continue to grow on a global basis then oil prices should rise over time. This will trickle down and even though the CPI will show low inflation, my guess is that no one will believe the data anymore.

IMO, gold will hit new highs before it ever hits 560 again, regardless of the technicals. Eventually, even tech traders must understand the fundamentals of the markets that they trade. But then again, I don't have a crystal ball and will stick to my trading discipline which trumps personal views always.

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 1:25 PM [link]

Interesting article on Gold/Silver ratio. Getting closer to turnaround, but not yet.

http://news.silverseek.com/CharlestonVoice/1166643780.php

Posted by: Seamus [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 3:46 PM [link]

Ken Fisher? Is that the dude with the humongous head on the streaming video ads on thestreet dot com? "Hi, I am Ken Fisher..." man he has a big head. now i know why. Wants americans to take on more debt? lol.

http://tinyurl.com/tzwd8

Posted by: NYUgrad [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 3:51 PM [link]

Sorry for the insult comment above. this is not the place. But i had to post this!

Pentagon wants $99.7B more for wars
http://tinyurl.com/yyru27

Posted by: NYUgrad [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 4:09 PM [link]

NYUgrad,

Although overbought, PPA may be your answer.

Disclosure; Long PPA for a few months.

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 5:21 PM [link]

Bill
I am no doctor of medicine, but I have long heard that with melanoma, time is of the essence. Are you sure you can't do better than Feb 2nd?
I know you have other priorities and commitments, but there is nothing more important than timely attention to one's health. It can mean the difference between life and death.
Not trying to be dramatic, but my father was a surgeon who wrote three editions of his tomb: Tumors of the Eye, so I grew up hearing about cancer at "the kitchen table", and what I have said above comes from his beliefs.
We (men) all tend to scoff at and procrastinate these matters. Don't.
Wishing you, and all of the caring and generous people who have so enriched this past year for me, the very best of holidays and a healthy and prosperous new year.

Posted by: Rigdon [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 5:57 PM [link]

Thanks ghosalb and g034, i will look into ATK,PPA further.

Posted by: NYUgrad [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 6:10 PM [link]


Does anyone know about Peyto Energy Trust? It is being pumped by a well known newsletter as a buy, buy, buy! They say it is extremely undervalued and overlooked by Wall Street.

Posted by: stktrader [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 20, 2006 9:32 PM [link]

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?