« Cara's Daily Planet, Fri., Nov. 3, 2006, 6:24 AM | Main | Week #44 (2006-11-04) in Review (FINAL) »

November 3, 2006

Community Chat, Fri., Nov. 3, 2006, 7:47 AM

This space is intended for students-of-the-market who wish to pursue any topic of interest where market knowledge and experience can be shared. Today I have much to discuss (below), but won't be back until I give you the Week In Review.

Yesterday, you may have noticed that my webmaster added the Google search to my website. Now when you enter a keyword, the search also goes right inside the Week In Review and pulls out the relevant text.

Today I have a lot of stuff to consider from the Merrill Lynch research team, particularly by David Rosenberg, head economist for North America.

Before I start, I'd like to say that excellent market strategist Larry Berman (do a search on my site to review earlier comments) called me last evening. We had not spoken or met previously, so Larry wanted to say he had departed from CIBC World Markets in order to follow his dream of managing his own fund, and working out of his own home/office north of Toronto without a 2-hour daily commute. Seventeen years of that was enough, he says.

After hearing his plan, I'm sure we can arrange a strategy of working together in some way in the future. If you wish to catch him on ROBTV, there is a Replay from yesterday on ROBTV.com, which is extensive, and is Larry without the corporate shackles.

Larry was telling me that Merrill Lynch's David Rosenberg is a fellow Canadian who works out of New York about 1 day a week, and is on the road a lot, but still resides in Toronto. "Hardest worker I ever met. Into the office at 5am and out late in the evening," says Larry about David.

You know I really like David's work too, so here are several of his current reports.

Today is U.S. Jobs Report Friday (1st Friday of every month), and the numbers are likely to be down because as we all know by now, the auto and housing industries are in chaos, and the impact is starting to show up in consumption/retail spending: ergo Wal-Mart problems, and when the 800-pound gorilla starts pounding his/her fist, the other retailers had better watch out.

So in this report by Rosenberg, he reviews the 3Q06 softening productivity, and opines that U.S. labor cost growth will slow.

Removed at the request of Merrill Lynch counsel

In a review of the Fed's Richard Fisher's statements, Rosenberg states that inflation pressures and the inflation cycle peaked in 3Q06, and now unemployment has bottomed and will start to become a problem.

Removed at the request of Merrill Lynch counsel

Economists everywhere might want to take note of Rosenberg's warning of "hard landing" in this Nov 1 report. The U.S. economy is in trouble. How much of a problem? Rosenberg figures that there is a chance of a negative Jobs number in the next quarter. Equity Bulls take note.

Removed at the request of Merrill Lynch counsel

A large part of the U.S. economy is manufacturing and the ISM manufacturing index is going to drop below 50 soon (but for sure) according to Rosenberg. Equity Bulls take note. BTW, I accurately forecasted this Industrial Production "problem" in May-June in an article I co-wrote with RiskFile's Edward Liu (do my website Google search to find it).

Removed at the request of Merrill Lynch counsel

Merrill Lynch offers up their usual excellent North American Precious Metals Weekly. Those researchers too remarked about Rosenberg's opinions that we are in for a lower $USD, lower U.S. interest rates starting in 1Q07 (where gold does well says Rosenberg) and higher gold prices.

Removed at the request of Merrill Lynch counsel

Base metal markets in China are also reported on. Did you know that alumina prices production in China is up +52-pct Year over Year, including +64-pct for Sept.

Removed at the request of Merrill Lynch counsel

For those of you who are keen on the oils, there is a report from the Energy Conference by Merrill Lynch where 19 companies presented.

Removed at the request of Merrill Lynch counsel

My final point is that not only politicians are grandstanders. There are market letter writers too. Yesterday Dennis Gartman brought his "stuff" to Toronto " carried by ROBTV so the Replay will likely be available.

Dennis says he's down on PM Harper, calling him a liar.

My comment to Gartman: keep your nose in your own manure. You are a grandstander as bad as any of these politicos. You are doing this to cause a stir to sell your books and subscription letters. It's nothing more than Sunday morning political television from the U.S., where half truths, part arguments are peddled by proselytizers.

In the case of politics, we understand their need to sit in the seat of power. In Gartman's case, I suppose one can say we understand his need to build subscription revenues. His effectiveness as a communicator is without question. Like Larry Kudlow, communication skill does not always translate into correct independent and objective analysis.

Gartman ends his The Gartman Letter the same way he ended his discussion to the largely Canadian audience of ROBTV: "We here at TGL have been very vocal supporters of Mr. Harper and the Tories, but our support has now been shattered. How very, very sad."

I say about this bit of histrionics; the man's arrogance is over the top. Other than his own flock, who does this shepherd think cares a whit? This is CNBC at its best; ROBTV shouldn't stoop so low.

In my case, using Gartman's own Five Stages; "We are at stage 4; stage 5 lies just ahead, and that is the "puke point";

My comment to readers is that if you intend to listen to arguments from the Ann Coulter's, the Larry Kudlow's, the Rush Limbaugh's, or the Dennis Gartman's, at least listen to the other side to get the whole picture.

Better still, if you are trading real money, don't listen to any of these Talking Heads. These people are skilled communicators; you need to acquire skills in effective trading and portfolio management.

It starts there and ends there. Forget these so-called "personalities". They just are starting fights to draw an audience " a paying audience.

Industry professionals like Merrill Lynch's David Rosenberg, (ex-CIBC) Larry Berman, BMO's Donald Coxe, Raymond James' Jeff Saut, Banc of America's Tom McManus; and so many like them are not grandstanders. They are as I say, professional.

As to Gartman, where's the value-add? Many may disagree, but I think you file The Gartman Letter under "G". (lol)

Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on November 3, 2006 07:47:04 AM | Category: Community Chat

Discourse

The base metals report says that aluminum production is up 52%/64% not price. The prices has been steadily dropping although the report shows that demand is increasing in China. I've been watching ACH as a possible buy. Could anyone (including Bill) give their take on ACH as a longterm investment?

Thanks -

Posted by: BeeThousand [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 8:51 AM [link]

"More than one million Canadians across the country own units in Income Funds and it is estimated that another million Canadians invest in Income Funds indirectly through mutual funds. Pension funds invest in Income Funds to earn returns that fund payments to their retirees. For example the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan has over $2.2 billion invested and earned over $900 million in 2004 from Income Funds."

http://www.caif.ca/background/FactSheet.htm

Is that $2.2B now 700 million in today dollars?

Posted by: wavesmash [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 9:21 AM [link]

Business News America Article on Crystallex and Gold Reserve. Any thoughts to it's impact and what it could mean?


Govt proposes partnership with Crystallex at Las Cristinas - Venezuela
Published: Thursday, November 2, 2006 18:17 (GMT -0400)

Venezuela's mining and basic industries ministry Mibam has proposed a partnership with Toronto-based Crystallex International (TSX: KRY) to develop the company's Las Cristinas gold project.

E-mail this story
Contact the editor
Printer-friendly version
Reprint Permission



"This possibility was presented to the company just as a suggestion. [The ministry] cannot make a direct proposal since we still do not have the new law, but we made it known that we are looking at the possibility," Venezuela's deputy mining minister Iván Hernández told BNamericas.


According to the official, the ministry made the same suggestion to Gold Reserve de Venezuela, a subsidiary of Spokane, Washington-based Gold Reserve (TSX, Amex: GRZ), which owns the Las Brisas gold project adjacent to Las Cristinas.


"We are waiting for the new mining law to be approved which will allow for the creation of joint ventures. That is under discussion. However right now we are regulated by the existing mining law," he said.


While the national assembly (AN) - responsible for discussing and approving mining law reform - is still at work, projects will not be able to start moving forward "although we know that that law is going to be approved in coming months," he said.


The companies recognized the government's posture and President Hugo Chávez's social policy, according to Hernández.


To create the state-private partnerships, Mibam will re-launch the social production company (EPS) Minera Nacional, the official said.


CRISTINAS RESOURCE UPDATE


Meanwhile Crystallex said in a statement that it has launched a 40-hole drill program at Las Cristinas with a view to completing an updated resource and reserve estimate by May next year.


The 11,500m program will cost some US$1.6mn and is slated to wrap up at end-January.


The idea is to upgrade inferred resources to the measured and indicated category. Current proven and probable reserves at Las Cristinas are estimated at 13.6Moz of gold contained in 353Mt of ore grading 1.20g/t, the statement said.


The estimate, based on US$400/oz gold, also outlined measured and indicated resources of 17.7Moz of gold including the proven and probable reserves, plus inferred resources of 4.5Moz of gold, Crystallex said.


By Harvey Beltrán
Business News Americas





Related Companies / Entities:
Crystallex International Corporation
Gold Reserve Inc.




Posted by: dlmetzer [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 9:49 AM [link]

ERF has had a nice bounce today.

Posted by: Leisa [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 10:54 AM [link]


Leisa Re: ERF

Kind of funny - even with the big bounce the thing is still yielding less than 10%

I remember when Energy Trusts used to yield 18%

Now those were the days

Maybe the game now is this:
They are all going to turn back into corporations or 'someone's going to buy them out'.

Never underestimate the ways and means for the financial spinners to try to make money and the public to lose money. Are they pumping this stuff to get out - or did they load up after scaring the public?

I can't help but think there is still another wave of sellers waiting to get their money back on these things though.

While were on the topic of Income Trusts.
Some of the actions by the Canadian Brokerages and Houses have been shameful - pathetic - worse than in the US.

I saw one House that downgraded a Trust to a target of $20. The thing dropped 35%
Then magically once the price went close to $20 - they (yes the same House!) upgraded it right back up to $26.

Same with Telus the Telco...
Downgraded it by $10.
Telling everyone the price was going to drop by at least 15-20%.
Then magically 24 hours later - they it was upgraded right back up by $10 again.

The Public has been ripped off here.
Dumping those they should be keeping.
And piling back into ones that the Houses want to dump.

Shameful shameful...

Posted by: Tradesman [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 11:29 AM [link]

Tradesman...

Direct question to you and the other trading talent...any trades on the VIX?

Re ERF...I'm in it for a short term trade. I believe that if this taxation thing is 4 years off a 10% yield is still pretty good (and that presumes that oil $ doesn't tank.

Talk about unusual stuff...I'm still mesmerized by Prudential's bearish report on the non-precious metals only to have all of the shares rally just a couple of weeks later. This space has made me realize how duplicitous (I'm not saying Pru's report was) the information is.

Posted by: Leisa [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 12:04 PM [link]


Leisa... I don't trade any fancy stuff like the VIX or options...

I just keep it simple - shorterm intraday and multiday swings on equities and indexes

Re: ERF - if there is another hit against these trusts or oil ... IMO ERF and Penn West will be hit hard again. Relative Yield is too low.

If no hit - they won't go up as much as the other Oil Trusts that are yielding 14-16%. That is unless they are part of some T.O play based on their assets.

Posted by: Tradesman [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 1:04 PM [link]


Excuse the double post... added something at the bottom...

Leisa... I don't trade any fancy stuff like the VIX or options...

I just keep it simple - shorterm intraday and multiday swings on equities and indexes

Re: ERF - if there is another hit against these trusts or oil ... IMO ERF and Penn West will be hit hard again. Relative Yield is too low.

If no hit - they won't go up as much as the other Oil Trusts that are yielding 14-16%. That is unless they are part of some T.O play based on their assets.

---
... btw there is a battle going on with oil to keep it down today - this is obvious.
Oil stocks have not reflected this yet and are trading on Nigeria Terror threats.

If oil closes below 60 today and it opens down on Monday I expect a big hit on these trusts again. Otherwise yesterday was a perfect timed entry. I took a little bit of the table - as I am short term oriented. Rest is running on a stop.

good luck

Posted by: Tradesman [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 1:08 PM [link]

To what extent did the US play a role in the Canadian Trust debacle? The US, it would seem, had the most to gain from removing the tax benefits. The US will see more tax revenue, or more importantly, they can increase their confidence on the forecasted revenue numbers produced within the DC bubble.

Why would someone time this annoucement for October which is already a pretty busy month for financial news?

I had trouble sleeping last night, and the thought that kept turning over in my head was "its all a rigged game." If your not an insider, sooner or later, your going to get burned.

Posted by: ableape [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 1:08 PM [link]

ableape...I'm no tax expert, but I have some SLF stock from when they de-mutualized. They withhold the canadian incom tax from my dividends. So the canadian gov't, if I'm extrapolating correctly, will receive it's taxable share through a required withhold. You'll get a dividend statement including your withheld foreign tax.

Tradesman, thanks for your post. I very much appreciate your perspective.

Posted by: Leisa [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 1:23 PM [link]


Leisa .. and others...

..Canadian wires reported at 12:30PM TODAY that:

"(CA) Canada will not exempt oil & gas firms from the new income trust tax rules - Aide to PM"

So I guess it's official - for now anyways.
The rumours this morning about them maybe getting exempt are untrue.

Posted by: Tradesman [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 2:29 PM [link]

Larry Berman on ROBTV always seems to straight-forward and DECENT. He's TERRIFIC; Doesn't feel much like a tout-tv guest at ALL !

Posted by: Jock [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 5:12 PM [link]

WFMI a Cara100 stock took a 23% hit today driving it down to $US 46.26.

Does anyone consider this a good buy??

Regards

Posted by: bob [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 5:19 PM [link]

Bob, as I see it, WFMI is one of the first to put out honest guidance and has been killed for doing so. Their courage is impressive, and good reason to keep them on the radar for a future investment. They are clearly worthy of being a Cara 100.
As for now, I'm not gobbling up shares (even though I frequently shop there, and gobble up all their freebies).
My problem is that they are the high priced provider and, if we are heading into a recession..or worse, they will be hit a lot harder than Walmart (even though they appear to be taking a hit).
I think there will be better time to buy this excellent company.
Good weekend to all. Next week will sure be "interesting".

Posted by: Rigdon [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 5:41 PM [link]

Bob,

I remember Bill called a while ago that WFMI will go below $50 and enter accumulation zone. Personally, I think it is a buy and bought half today. If you look at the monthly, weekly, daily and hourly RSI, you do see it is in accumulation zone.

I also agree with Ridgon it may get hit hard in recession. There may be better entry price ahead, when I plan to add more (I did sell some puts at $40). My personal opinion is that if it goes to $42, it will be absolutely cheap with trailing 30 PE, considering their potential. (When I did research on how many stores they have in each major city, I can see at least another 60% inrease in # of stores domestically before reaching saturation. I live in a big mideast city and have to drive 15 mile to get to the closest one.)

It probably will have a lot of volatility ahead though. Hopefully, Bill will share his opinion.

Posted by: yc32 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 6:34 PM [link]

Regarding the new trust regulations from 'The Honourable James M. Flaherty, P.C., M.P. Finance '.

Check his smiling photo and perhaps offer a comment as suggested by this website.

http://www.fin.gc.ca/comment/minfine.html

I would like a comment from a constitutional expert.

Does this initiative need to be voted on by Parliament and could the current government be defeated in a non-confidence vote over this issue. If they were...would the Liberals cynically promise a return to the status quo as PM Harper did last fall.

The announcement coming on Oct 31 permits the Government to evaluate and perhaps re-formulate their position prior to the average investor actually seeing the hit in their monthly statements…………..

This situation is still very fluid

Posted by: quail [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2006 8:51 PM [link]

Regarding WFMI, it is also owned by funds with strict guidelines for social equity. It doesn't surprise me, then, that the company is being forthright about its fundamentals.

I don't own it yet, but it's on my watchlist. I expect it will go lower as I know that we are in the early stages of a recession. I believe WFMI will suffer over the next several quarters as people switch from Peets to Folgers.

Posted by: number2son [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 4, 2006 2:13 PM [link]

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?