« Understanding the implications of yield curve inversion, Tues., Oct. 24, 2006, 9:16 AM | Main | Cameco shares plunging, leads to opportunity, Tues., Oct. 24, 2006, 12:15 PM »
October 24, 2006
Where is the excess liquidity coming from?, Tues., Oct. 24, 2006, 10:21 AM
"Mike" wants to know "where is all this excess liquidity that is driving the reflation coming from?"
Another reader today points out that by googling "reflation," he came up with an article of mine, which I suppose infers that others are not seeing the occurrence or possibly the importance of this issue as I do.
But, then, neither are you hearing the term Stagflation from many sources either, but that's what's happening. People don't want to hear that term because the implication is deadly for stocks and bonds, which goes against our positions, and is a negative for wealth.
I on the other hand are not so much forecasting as I am trying to get readers to think about what's happening today, and stop listening to cheerleaders.
Reader "Mike" goes on to say: "Looking at the 2 attached charts of M1 and M2, it doesn't appear to be coming from the U.S. So, is global money supply really growing that much more rapidly?"
Here are the charts of M1 and M2 that Mike passed along. I hope they aren't under copyright.


For M3, I encourage readers to go to John Williams' Shadow Government Statistics website.
Here is the Williams chart of a reconstructed M3, which he says (i) uses a formula that has five-9s correlation to the original data back to 1980, and (ii) adjusts for the missing Eurodollars element, which in any case affected (pre-adjustment) only about 3% of total M3 so should not have a material effect on the total.

So, as the Fed Open Market Committee (FOMC) begins its two-day meeting on interest rates and monetary policy, it behooves us to focus on M3 data they deliberately are withholding from us.
It would be important, I think, for the next Congress to make demands of the Federal Reserve to return to transparently reporting this M3 data.
It is not a coincidence that conspiracy theories started and that the public's and Wall Street's understanding of capital markets ran off the rails after Ben Bernanke took over the Fed and Henry Paulson left his chair of the Goldman Sachs firm to take on his duties as Treasury Secretary.
From the Williams' reconstructed M3 data, which reflects the +10 pct growth in Money Supply I have been referring to in my Week In Review, I'd say it's time for traders to zero in on the reflation debacle I see about to unfold in 2007.
This situation is really not much different than the late 1990's Y2K-related reflation. Equity markets first boomed, and then went bust.
It happens every time politicians and their puppets get involved in capital markets. All we can do is raise our stops, get positioned long in hard money plays like precious metals, and wait for the paper crash.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on October 24, 2006 10:21:30 AM | Category: Economics
Discourse
Reflation has gone beyond what the interventionists originally planned so inflation (cpi) persistency should pressure Bennie and the Jetts to hike one more time later this year. I think we see this in the wording of the fed statement tomorrow. So the primary ingredient for the soft landing gang is removed while housing deterioration continues-Houston we have a problem.
Bill L
Posted by: bill
at
October 24, 2006 2:42 PM [link]
What ever happened to "were in the eighth inning?"
Or remember this gem...
http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow/kudlow200512131623.asp
Such a dismal science.
Thats why IMO its useless to trade on econ or fundamental data. And its useless to have an opinion on the economy and trade on it - price tells all..
The way things have been trading it appears the Fed is 'fighting' inflation by intervening in the commodities markets and taking them down - and intervening in the 'paper' markets and melting them up.
I expect more of the same tomorrow - no matter what he says - the Fed's 'traders' will no doubt be active to ensure that the market receives Bennie's message correctly (ie: stay away from oils, golds, commodities etc..)
Whatever equities do - they won't fall far - hidden M3, coupon passes, TIO's, 'mysterious' (probably foreign based) futures buyers - are all standing by...
Long live central planning!
Posted by: Tradesman
at
October 24, 2006 3:16 PM [link]
In fact here's another 'risk free' $5 billion dollar 7-day loan out of citizens tax receipts.
The money printing possibilities are just endless aren't they.
http://fms.treas.gov/tip/auctions/tio-auction-results-267-10242006.pdf
Posted by: Tradesman
at
October 24, 2006 3:27 PM [link]
Bill, check out this article: http://www.minyanville.com/articles/index.php?a=11492
It seems pretty clear that the Yen carry trade is back big time. The correlation between the VIX and the Yen (inverse) is seemingly very high. The M3 expansion may very well be more international than domestic.
I will be watching these two charts closely.
Posted by: moab
at
October 24, 2006 8:34 PM [link]
Thx Moab. Pomboy is one of the best on the macro front. Numerous hedgies underperforming benchmark creating the reach for yield fostered in part by the BOJ. Note, the PPI in Japan was the highest in 25 years last month-more aggressive rate hikes in store? Also see the Forbes piece last month regarding leverage in the US banking system helped in part by over and under the counter derivatives-Twighlight Zone economy?
Bill L
Posted by: bill
at
October 25, 2006 11:49 AM [link]
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
This can't last!!! May end badly??
The Financial Times' John Dizard takes a close look at "free money" being generated these days by so-called "negative basis trades."
"Free money? Sounds too good to be true," you say. Man, you people are so cynical!
Here's how it works, according to Dizard. "Over the past few months professional managers of US dollar bond portfolios have been buying corporate bonds, then buying the credit default swaps (CDSs) that allow them to cover the default risk on the bonds."
Now that should not be profitable, you are wisely saying to yourself, because the cost of full credit default swap protection should be greater than the cost of the bonds.
Yes. And the difference between the two is called the "basis."
And yet, Dizard points out, "thanks to a bizarre anomaly in the financial markets, the cost of protection using the CDS market is less than the interest yield on the bonds. So we have “negative basis.�"
In other words, because of the negative basis you are being paid for taking the risk of owning corporate credit, but you don't have to actually take the risk! It's like magic.
Of the 150 most frequently traded corporate names in the US bond world, about a third have negative basis spreads available that are more than 10 basis points, Dizard notes.
That means a bond manager can buy, say, 10 bond positions of $10,000,000 each, then buy the corresponding credit default swap protection and collect (given the negative basis spread of 10 basis points, $100,000 a year. Risk free.
According to Dizard, this is all the result of our old familiar friend... excess liquidity.
Chris Whalen, of Institutional Risk Analytics, tells the FT: “It's kind of sad. People are running out of ways to deploy their capital intelligently, so they turn to this kind of financial masturbation, trying to get their performance far enough inside the herd so they don't have to deal with redemptions.�
Posted by: rayg
at
October 24, 2006 11:32 AM [link]