« OptionsXpress is new add to Cara 100, Thur., Oct. 26, 2006, 1:55 PM | Main | Autonation calls Detroit to "Get real!" Fri., Oct. 27, 2006, 6:47 AM »
October 26, 2006
Enjoying my day; how's yours?, Thur., Oct. 26, 2006, 2:50 PM
Today I was dissed by a real VP with a major Wall Street firm. It's all part of the fun I have in writing this blog.
Then I thought, hey this person made some legit points, and I didn't want them to go in the trash can. So I struck out the person's name, firm name, address and tel number, and replaced it with "R".
As the joke goes, you can call me anything, just call.
Actually, I did have to trash something a couple months ago (by another reader) where I was called anti-semitic. In fact, that person did subsequently apologize. Just don't go there, or similar places that have nothing to do with me, thanks.
But taking offence to what I write is no big deal. Nobody's perfect; I'll let you expose your ignorance. (lol) No, I mean: I'm not perfect " nowhere close " so bring it on.
So, here's the fun I had today. BTW, I didn't change a thing, italics, and spelling and grammar mistakes included.
Opening salvo from "R"
From: "R" Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:36 AM To: BCara@BillCara.com Subject: Thank you Mr. Cara I have been reading your postings for about a year and I want to thank you for the service you do for me and (I'm sure) many investment professionals. Typically I ignore diatribes like your own but in the blog I read, you insulted your detractors as "clowns" and questioned the "'intellectual honesty' of many professionals in the professional world---time to gag on the crow you are eating. I was particularly struck by what may have been the most bearish piece ever written by you on June 8, 2006 where you trumpeted the sleeping bear market which of course was only a prelude to one of the greatest bull runs in years. Amateurs like you are what makes my job easy. Try reading your charts right side up next time;and keep up the good work! ~"R"
First reply from me:
From: Bill Cara [mailto:b.cara@rogers.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:45 AM
To: "R"
Subject: RE: Thank you
Hi "R",You are so welcome.
I gather you haven't been reading my blog too closely or else you would see that (i) I don't recommend selling/shorting (ii) almost all the recommendations I make are bullish, and happen to turn out pretty well, and (iii) my job is to get independent traders to be more cautious at times because they don't hear that enough from the sell-side.
But I guess your salesman's rose-colored glasses wouldn't permit you to see that.
To my knowledge I have never referred to one of my detractors as a "clown". I refer that way to many of the sell-side Talking Heads who frequent Tout TV, but certainly not all of them. Off the top of my head, I can give you at least two dozen people who are frequently interviewed on television who I have a very high regard for, many of which, like Don Coxe and Tom McManus, I often write about.
As to the "intellectual dishonesty" factor, I clearly direct those remarks to those persons at the top of your industry who manage to sustain the status quo where the financial service industry controls capital markets, and trades against the client order-flow. It ought to be the other way around, but thanks to ETF's and blogs, there is a new paradigm rapidly evolving to where people like you will be forced to add value or you'll be redundant. Many of my friends in your position do add value, and they know I respect them highly. In your case, if you were to be found redundant, it would have nothing to do with me, or to my views on the intellectually dishonest structure of your industry, which btw used to be my industry.
As to my being an "amateur," you are technically correct. When I was a professional, like you, I managed to found and manage the Eastern Canada operations of Canaccord, which is one of North America and Europe's largest independent broker-dealers. I also architected, co-founded and managed as CEO, Canada's top-rated national electronic brokerage firm, which got the personal investment of the Deutsche Bank Global Asset Management Chief Investment Officer, and his agreement to become a company director, before I even had an office or a telephone number for the company. Prior to that I was a registrant with various duties, including research, sales, investment strategy, and executive management, and as a portfolio manager for Dominion Securities Investment Management, Canada's biggest (where I was #14 in seniority after less than two years). As a financier and corporate finance specialist, I started up many companies, including Genesis Microchip (GNSS), which like some others was started in my private office, with my money and my friends' money. Due to my success in the industry, and my values, I have been requested to address the chairs of all of Canada's securities commissions in formal session, and the Senate of Canada Banking Committee, and to deliver a two-person speech ("Trading with and investing in Canada") with Canada's senior trade commissioner in the Asia-Pacific market. So, I wasn't always an amateur.
Be that as it may, the market reflects opposite opinions, and both of us are entitled to our own.
Have a good day.
Best,
~Bill
p.s., If you intend to be a smart-ass, be prepared to see it in print. You should be aware that my blog is being read at head offices of most of the major banks and broker-dealers. Many of those people too don't agree with me, but they are professional enough not to send me the type of smart-ass letter you did, which I suppose speaks to their quality.
Follow-up from "R"
From: "R" Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:16 AM To: Bill Cara Subject: RE: Thank youMr. Cara
Sorry I struck such a sensitive vein...doubtless, many of your "detractors" have been reminding you of your imbecilic assessment of the markets at the absolute bottom of the market back in June. You are very correct, we are all entitled to our opinions and mine certainly dictate that recommending 100% cash positions, chiding your vaguely defined "talking heads" for, in essence, getting it right, and piling into gold at the most dubious juncture in 25 years was sophomoric at best. I spend many hours each week reminding the people I advise about the relentlessly positive upward drift and the fool's game of trying to time the market by skittering in and out of their positions. Investing is a difficult proposition; without the benefit of enjoying 15% percent 3 moth moves like you certainly missed, it is next to impossible.
As for "quality" communication...your points would be more greatly legitimized without the profanity. My esteem for your opinions and judgment of your character appear to be right on the mark.
"R"
Second reply by me:
From: Bill Cara [mailto:b.cara@rogers.com] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:05 PM To: "R" Subject: RE: Thank you "R",You are mistaken if you think I got anywhere in life by being, as you say, "sensitive". And as to detractors, surprisingly I don't have any from the sell-side who have tried to diss me like you. I get about 500 mails a day, and except for political-related material, I figure the response is about 1000 to 1 in favor of what I do, even if many disagree with some of the market calls. Many of my supporters would include people in your industry at a much higher level than you.
As to your remark about profanity and my character, those Sir are fighting words. Nobody has ever questioned my "character" " my opinions, fine " so it's either dueling pistols at dawn or we carry on this debate in my blog. I'm sure you will have quite a support system in place, which makes the prospects all the more intriguing.
As to my use of profanity, you are wrong. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000 legitimized the noun and the adjective "smart-ass" as slang referring to "a smart aleck". There was no profanity used or intended, and so no apology is in order. Besides, it's the name of the magazine of the Berkeley College Democrats at the University of California at Berkeley.
So you can drift your arguments upward if you wish, but be prepared to see them in my blog.
Best,
~Bill
Final submission by "R"
From: "R"
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:39 PM
To: Bill Cara
Subject: RE: Thank youMr. Cara
There are surely many people in my industry who are at a "higher level" than me...and I am sure that due to the partisan nature of most of you correspondents that the preponderous of sentiment is on your behalf. It's been my experience that holding/investing in the aftermath of one of the most devastating bear markets in history is so challenging that "staying the course" with good quality equities (which I perceive that you espouse) that many (such as yourself) have succumbed to the siren song of bearish sentiment. I enjoy a good debate and certainly educational discourse...however the tenor of your comments don't make me optimistic about the chances of that occurring. Suffice to say that for the time being, the best I can do is to agree to disagree with you.
And in several months, if I have similar egg on my face and you have the time or inclination to equally take me task as I have you, I would welcome a brief smart a--ed email...;-)
Sincerely,
"R"
Sign-off by me. I have meetings to go to, places to be.
Tonight, btw, we'll be having a special birthday dinner from my son Will and his fiancé and her parents, at the restaurant atop the CN Tower. It's a perfect day.
Preciousss.
"R",No harm, no foul. I enjoyed the chat.
You happen to work for a fine firm, albeit too constantly bullish for my tastes.
Good trading,
~Bill
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on October 26, 2006 02:50:14 PM | Category: Cara re: Cara
Discourse
If he is truly a professional Bill then he knows the name of the game is risk/return. 15% runs from bottoms are as common as weeds in my yard. It's cherry picking data.
Does he think that markets don't correct? Oh wait! HE can pick tops AND bottoms! HE has the secret sauce! He'll preserve ALL his gains and take NO losses by getting out with it all while we "amateurs" are left holding the bag! Yeah, right.
I have been as bearish as the next but I'll put my 13.1% annually from July 2000 til now up against most. Trailing this year. Beat it the last. Trailed 2004 some. Whomped it in 2003. Etc. So I know you don't have to catch every rally to do well. You can trail for months, even YEARS and do well. As you and I know, it's about avoiding the big losses.
He sounds like some low level functionary that is proud he caught a low for once. Big effing deal. What an ass-hat.
Posted by: MarkM
at
October 26, 2006 3:55 PM [link]
15% move? You can get almost half of that in the U.S through an online savings account.
if he thinks he can justify his profession with a 15% move he should just go jack off to this blog and repent his sins for stealing money from his clients.
You really can't blame him. I guess most people would choose the dark side for a nice salary and bonus every yr, along with all the hookers and toys you can buy.
Unreal!
Posted by: NYUgrad
at
October 26, 2006 4:05 PM [link]
Bill,
It sounds to me like you have them running scared... Independent and transparent dissemination of information and analysis along with interactive discussions, is a threat to these "stockbrokers". As your site gets more and more popular the "fun" will only rise.
With great delight I read your analysis and opinions; I love the way you present yourself...
but then I am only an ordinary investor with an inquiring mind... the fact that you got people like me "hooked" is the real threat to them...
I used to pay these "Jokers"... you on the other hand ask for nothing... it's what I call true "free" enterprise.
best regards
Posted by: yaba
at
October 26, 2006 4:12 PM [link]
May I kindly suggest "R" purchase the following book before writing any further e-mails:
That "final submission" has some egregious errors.
Posted by: just_observing
at
October 26, 2006 4:28 PM [link]
Wow; just wow. How can someone who directs such an obvious and adolescent flame towards a *free* yet invaluable service which you so generously provide, possibly claim to "enjoy a good debate and certainly educational discourse". Perhaps 'R' is really out of the office today and left his/her computer unlocked and coworkers are having a little fun.
I suppose the discourse was educational in that it reinforces everything Bill's been preaching about the sell side. If the clown shoe fits; wear it--'R' does.
This morning I couldn't possibly have thought I'd read something more asinine than Wade Belak's comments following the latest episode in the Battle of Ontario, but I was clearly wrong. :)
Posted by: doug11
at
October 26, 2006 4:35 PM [link]
Ha-ha-ha, Doug11 the Belak call made me laugh out loud.
Posted by: leewar
at
October 26, 2006 4:46 PM [link]
A VP with nothing better to do? "R" might have provided the contrarian signal I've been waiting for....:)
Posted by: glenn-mp
at
October 26, 2006 4:53 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
It has been simply amazing for me to hear the sales pitch from none other than both Morgan Stanley and Merill Lynch hucksters since I have had to deal with my Fathers estate. To a one they have all pointed out how historically the DOW has been going up since its inception except for the "brief ten year blip" during the Great Depression ... but none of us were alive for that, so therefore, it does not count. Then they ply you with that oft used word "diversify". Diversify? Where is my diversification from the US dollar? Of course none of them recommend gold except for the ETF or maybe they mention Newmont or Barrick. Tricksters all ... since none of their recommendations are outside of debt ridden paper IOUs.
Yes, I admit I missed that brief 15% rally but my portfolio of miners even with the $120 drop in the gold price is still up 70% since Jan 2006. That is one of my worst performers compared to the physical gold and silver I started buying in 2000 and even buying art ... yes "art", but quality like Picasso and Man Ray ... has outperformed the DOW, gold, miners, real estate and CDs !!!!
The problem is anytime you consult a salesman, which is what a broker is, they will only sell you their product. Like a used car salesman ... they don't tell you that you'd be better off with a motorcycle! What do you expect a stock broker to tell you? Don't buy stocks?
Ask this broker what he told his tech stock clients especially the ones holding Global Crossing or WorldCom ... The NASDAQ is still 50% off its highs years later after the crash!
All these guys do is sell you one bubble after another ... one fantasy after another ... Its all about commissions and profit for their boss ... nothing more!!!
Posted by: kaimu
at
October 26, 2006 5:29 PM [link]
VP, no doubt, is for the revenue he generates, not for the returns he generates for his "buy and hold" clients.
R, if you have something to contribute, please feel free to add to the dialogue here. You must find it to be valuable, or you would have stopped reading long ago.
Posted by: g034
at
October 26, 2006 5:33 PM [link]
MarkM nailed it. It's about avoiding the big losses. The more I look at this market the more it remembers me of 1999 and the immense bloodbath the following years.
Posted by: tinman
at
October 26, 2006 5:47 PM [link]
I have to play a bit of devil's advocate here, but "R" has a point. Looking back to your archives in June, in a number of posts you did state the fact that you believed a serious bear market is at hand - with 20/20 hindsight, that call was just plain wrong, but that's ok.
I think that the tone of the letter was definitely unwarranted, but I think it is important to recognize that we all get it wrong sometimes.
P.S. I never took your sentiment to mean "GET OUT 100%" which I think is the misinterpretation of "R"
Posted by: dave
at
October 26, 2006 5:57 PM [link]
kaimu
Enjoy your posts. Congratulations on your miners' year. I don't think your alone with those who frequent this blog.
Just a quick note. You reminded me of a case from the past. The sell side is active in the art world also. Years ago the feds halted a counterfeit art scheme which originated in Hawaii. A number of arrests and seizures went down. The seizures included many famous artists including Picasso, Chagall, among others. The paintings were "masterpiece" forgeries which netted millions. I'm not saying your properties are forgeries, just the old caveat emptor applies in the art world also.
Posted by: Seamus
at
October 26, 2006 6:03 PM [link]
VPs at broker dealer firm are usually junior executives, probably wants to take a break from cold calling retired folks and trading of his company's name than his own track record. Always thought a good analyst eventually leaves to start their own funds rather than seek the shelter of stock options in a 401(k) and a pink slip when a down turn hits. Always bothered me when a money manager wants to be RIGHT vs RICH...SCARY...
Posted by: esu
at
October 26, 2006 6:41 PM [link]
kaimu
I too love good painting.
I grew up two blocks from the Gug, and took it on as church. At 12 I had a student's pass and worshipped the likes of DeKooning, Rivers, Joan Mitchell, Franz Kline, I could go on and on. American art blossoming at the same time as rock and roll, etc.
Very heady times.
I had (have) acquantances who have made fortunes on this play (Glimscher, Stone, Beadleson, etc), but I fear that valuations have exceeded reason, in the context of the "world we live in" today.
I have a great friend who regularly buys art and after holding it for a time, donates it as an alumni to a school that he wisely convinced to start a little wing in his name.
He is a pediatric neurosurgeon (read: very high income). I don't need to tell you how well this has worked for him using appraised value against real income.
I would be concerned, however, how this (the most esoteric and thinly traded market in the world) will hold up in a period of disinflation, or even just financial uncertainty.
I am sure you have taken this into consideration, but how do you hedge art?
Just concerned as I have a few good paintings myself, but have always thought I would leave them to the kids and hope that they might experience some affluent times in the future.
My experience with art is that one always pays retail and sells at wholesale. Paper profits are the only profits, but one doesn't know that until it's time to sell.
Just my take. Best of luck
Posted by: Rigdon
at
October 26, 2006 7:20 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
What becomes irritating is all this hoopla over a 15% gain on the DOW. That gain does not mean everyone's DOW portfolio is automatically up 15%. Did GE go up 15%? All it really becomes is a sales tool for brokers to con the minions into an overbought market that depends more and more for survival on false government data and trading IOUs(which ETFs and derivitives are). It's all a "risk hot potato" or "risk musical chairs" ... At the end of the game whoever holds the most defaulted risk looses. Risk or liability is embodied in IOUs masked as ETFs or derivitives or a US dollar or a Euro for that matter. If you hold paper ... someone else's liability ... then you hold high risk.
Seamus ... yes I know of the art frauds, but even a Picasso fraud cannot be reproduced in unlimited quantities like a US dollar or a stock certificate. My uncle, who is no longer alive, was a very famous fashion designer and what I learned from visiting his homes and the homes of his wealthy friends is that they all "owned" lots of hard assets like real estate, art, jewelry, cars, coins, wines, antiques, gold and all the other hard assets wealthy people "diversify" into. These assets are owned with no debt attached(IOUs). These assets I have noticed have retained value for many generations and in fact seem only to increase in value generation after generation. If you think about it ... even in the Great Depression people got rich. Even one of Mad Money Cramers tv ads says "there's always a bull market somewhere ..." So it occurs to me that those who are rich one generation may not be rich the next, yet the hard assets the wealthy accumulate are still in demand and retain value as they have for centuries, therefore, there is always old money or nuvo rich who quest for the illusive status of a Picasso or a Monet or Gaugin.
I tend to believe that those in the equity markets are not so much there to preserve accumulated wealth as they are to leverage bets so as to one day "own" hard assets instead of leveraged IOU bets ... Most sane people I know want to pay off debt not get more. Yet those same people see no conflict of interest to play the stock market risk game while they simultaneously pay a $3000+ a month mortgage for thirty years. What is even more distasteful is stockbrokers who are more than happy to have their clients in risky markets having no concern for the consumer debt their clients carry at the same time. A responsible broker would first ask what sort of debt their prospective client has and then advise against market participation in the event the clients debt burden is excessive. Yet I have never encountered a single broker who cares what sort of debt burden I or my family have ... no credit report required. Yet to even rent an apartment most landlords require a credit report.
The difference between the haves and have nots is the haves "own" and the have nots "mortgage or margin" their future.
Posted by: kaimu
at
October 26, 2006 7:27 PM [link]
Sorry
Should have aded: congrats on PM's, me too, 10% to 20% gains since I thought I caught a ST bottom on or about 10/04.
Tightening stops in case this turns out to be a swing, but very optimistic considering that miners are no longer tracking PM spot prices dollar for dollar.
Bill
Go get 'em
R sounds to me like some wet around the ears WS ego-case who will soon get a lesson. Probably end up being one of your best fans in the long run.
Posted by: Rigdon
at
October 26, 2006 7:36 PM [link]
Re Enjoying My Day,
There has to be an agenda behind the opening salvo-it's amazing how all of our bull---- detectors work the same way. (Wise men don't fire opening salvos, they parry.)
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
October 26, 2006 7:59 PM [link]
Tangential post to Kaimu and Ridgon's art conversation.....I literally just came in the door with a piece of family art. My deceased uncle was a metal sculptor and made a large table-top chess board (32.5"'x 32.5"). The pieces are hand cast bronze. The king is 10.5 inches and weighs 5.5 lbs. I've not weighed the other pieces. It's spectacular. Rather than white/black, they are bright/dull. I also have a couple of other bronze sculptures of his. He wasn't famous, and I never met him, but the sculptures and the set are meaningful to me in that they clearly required both extraordinary time and talent.
Posted by: Leisa
at
October 26, 2006 8:39 PM [link]
Well, Leisa, isn't that what it's really all about?
That our art, music, our homes and properties, our children, all our labors of love, indeed our very lifestyle.. are, at some point, appreciated by those for whom we labored.
I am sure that your uncle would agree.
Cheers.
PS. I suppose that would include our clever investments, but something tells me that the chess set will carry more long term importance.
Posted by: Rigdon
at
October 26, 2006 9:57 PM [link]
Dave
Yes there was a call for a bear market and as i understand there still is, there are a lot of unnatural market forces at work here and they have been pointed out and substantuated, its just taking a little longer, what is being pointed out here by Bill and many of the other pro s is that caution is warranted, stay close to the sell button.
Posted by: tgifbipo
at
October 26, 2006 10:52 PM [link]
This guy says this rally is the "biggest bull run in years". Load of bullcrap. The SPX is up 13.5% since the June low. Guess what the Oct05-May06 rally was? That's right, 13.5%. What about the Aug04-Mar05 rally? 12.7%. Sense a pattern?
This rally, so far, has been pretty much in line with all the other rally legs we've had over the past three years. If we go substantially higher, he might be on to something. But right now, he's just full of bull.
Secondly, the SPX is now 4.7% above the May high. But I'm having a hell of a hard time finding many stocks that are higher than they were in May. Energy stocks? Nope. Smallcaps? Nope. QQQQs? Nope. Golds/metals? Nope. Materials? Nope. There just aren't that many indiv stocks and sectors that are above their respective May highs. Most are well below.
Even some of the sectors that are actually higher than May are only higher by a fraction. Take the BKX (banks). It is now 0.5% higher than May, severely underperforming the SPX even though financials are the biggest weight (23%).
How about retail? The RTH is 1.3% higher than it was at the Aug05 high, even though the SPX is 11.4% higher. Big retail rally? I don't think so.
I could go on and on, but it's pretty obvious that this rally is primarily on the backs of the Dow 30 and the SPX and is futes-led.
If the banks and retail and other sectors starting moving significantly higher, along with the indexes, then maybe a real bull is happening. But so far, color me vastly unimpressed. Yes, i'm long. But not for long unless these divergences clear up.
Posted by: leewhee
at
October 27, 2006 2:01 AM [link]
Kaimu: I believe there are two categories of brokers -- "asset gatherers" and "craftsman." Based on your post, you have encountered the former. Although much rarer, craftsman exist -- so please, don't lump us all together!
Posted by: cb3
at
October 27, 2006 12:47 PM [link]
cb3
Can you post, somewhere, your CV and audited performance say for the last 10 years, so some might consider your services?
Posted by: Rigdon
at
October 27, 2006 5:14 PM [link]
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Bill --
Why waste your time (or elevate your blood pressure!) with people like R?
Stuck in an HB&B bureaucracy, I suspect his ultimate ENVY of you, and what you are achieving with this blog.
I don't CARE if he feels you missed this brief rally. What counts is that you are developing in your readership an ability to think critically and independently about markets.
You have offered me more useful insight and information that would a thousand HB&B brokers who are perpetually "bullish on America".
Thanks again!
Posted by: Jock
at
October 26, 2006 3:30 PM [link]