« All eyes on Europe, Fri., Sept. 22, 2006, 8:49 AM | Main | Well-timed news at Amaranth?, Fri., Sept. 22, 2006, 10:12 AM »
September 22, 2006
Soft/hard landings and Wright Model explained, Fri., Sept. 22, 2006, 8:59 AM
Overheard on TV this morning: "Whether or not it's a soft or hand landing I don't know, but I'm certain the Goldilocks story is out the window".
Aussie technical analyst did a good job today (www.incrediblecharts.com) showing a chart that speaks to the type of economic landing that can be expected in the U.S. It's all about the Yield Curve and the Wright Model.
By way of background, Twiggs states:
Jonathan Wright, a research economist at the Federal Reserve, in his paper titled The Yield Curve and Predicting Recessions, tested the ability of various models to predict recessions. While his study confirmed a significant and relatively stable relationship between the yield differential (or spread) and subsequent recessions, Wright found an important second variable that substantially improved predictive ability. When the federal funds rate is low, Wright's model showed that chances of recession are significantly less than when the funds rate is high, even if the yield differential is negative. This is best illustrated by comparing output from the model with the fed funds rate set at 3.5% and at 5.5%. The spread is calculated as the difference between ten-year and three-month US Treasury securities.
So, it is important to watch the U.S. Treasury yield spread. Every week in the Week In Review, I show the spread between 30-year T-Bonds and 3-month T-Bills, between 10-year and 2-year Treasury Notes, and between 2-year and 3-month Treasuries.
As these spreads narrowed and then inverted over the past year, I continued to say: The U.S. economy is not healthy, and that banks are not is the financial health to the extent their share prices indicate.
To me the words "soft or hard landing" are rather ambiguous, but the single word "landing" is not. It implies a fall. The fall (or decline) in U.S. GDP growth could turn ugly. Anything's possible.
All I say is that what is happening today was obvious many months ago but was purposefully ignored by media personalities working for vested interests.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the same "personalities" will soon be telling you that they had it right all along, yada yada.
That is a reason I call these people clowns. They obviously don't take things as seriously as the rest of us, especially Colin Twiggs whose work from "Down Under" should not be under-rated.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on September 22, 2006 08:59:03 AM | Category: Economics
Discourse
We, in the US, are already living in a very artificial environment. We live in million-dollar home communities that can't afford to pay for public services such as schools, hospitals and libraries. Where as our parent's generation lived in thirty thousand dollar homes when communities were happy to fund and build public facilities.
The current administration has promulgated a series of very artificial government programs to keep the economy going. We have had tax cuts during rising deficits, a war against a mental state and who knows what back room manipulations.
I don't know what is next but after two massive bubbles, I think the flexibility of policy makers to mask under lying economic facts is getting exhausted.
My concern is that the pathways for poor people in the US to the middle classes has been severed in favor of creating an artificial feeling of wealth these past two decades. I think Americans can deal with the pain once it comes better than we can deal with the prevention of it.
Posted by: ableape
at
September 22, 2006 12:18 PM [link]



You know Bill that all the kings horses and all of his men will be behind the effort to not let any of this happen before the midterms.
I suspect that the turn in gold will come sometime shortly after as well. When unnatural, and powerful market forces involve themselves in the market place it can effect charts, but the time will come when the market rights itself and goes where it should instead of where its told to go.
Posted by: tgifbipo
at
September 22, 2006 9:09 AM [link]