« A chance to express your views re Goldcorp, Tues., Sept. 26, 2006, 4:14 PM | Main | McEwen lays it on the line, Tues., Sept. 26, 2006, 7:16 PM »
September 26, 2006
My view of U.S. Gold, Tues., Sept. 26, 2006, 5:27 PM
U.S. Gold is a gold drilling play, which means they are exploring for a mineral resource they hope one day to find, and then put into mining production.
Principal investor and CEO Rob McEwen is going about the process in a methodical way. But it's a game of high risk -- high reward.
Everybody in the industry is hunting that elephant, often called the Motherlode. Very few discover it.
We tend to think of discoveries by brilliant scientists like Isaac Newton or Thomas Edison. The contribution to society of people like this is so huge it is virtually immeasurable.
In the minerals exploration business, it has been many years since a monster ore body has been discovered, and seldom is a discovery made any more by a freak accident. But whenever these discoveries are made, there is a huge contribution to society nonetheless.
Today, the process entails much research, planning, investment, financial risk, and determination.
Rob McEwen is one of those people who constantly tries to add value. He's like a miner's version of an Edison or Newton. Rather than exploit the discovery of others, he spends his time and money to make completely new discoveries.
So far, with his latest vehicle, U.S. Gold, McEwen has invested tens of millions of his own money. The prospects look good, but are far from certain.
Yesterday, Rob McEwen told his U.S. Gold story to about 600 people at the Denver Gold Forum. You can view/listen to the webcast here. It's worthwhile to any person interested in the gold market because Rob tells you how he sees the gold market as well.
I believe that U.S. Gold (USOTC: USGL and TSX: UXG) is the best of the pure exploration plays. A couple weeks ago, Rob McEwen sent this open letter to his shareholders to keep them current.
A few days back I received the following letter from a reader that concerns me because shareholders should never allow their broker to lend their shares to short-sellers.
"Bill, you might find this of interest re USGL:I received today via UPS overnight a detailed 10 page loan agreement from Schwab (Howie Kennedy, Director of Securities Lending in San Francisco) to officially borrow my 25k shares of USGL. They are offering 6% interest with monthly payments, etc. You know the drill from there.
I will not accept this offer because in my view it further enables market manipulators (covers shorting and failure to deliver issues...). It would take a lot more than 6% to encourage my participation!
What galls me here is 1) No phone call to set up the discussion and then 2) a contract out of the blue with boilerplate BS. What nerve!
Anyway, if you have any further insights, I'd appreciate it if you might post them if and when appropriate. It goes without saying if you'd like further details, I'd be happy to scan the papers and email them to you."
If a broker's client cannot borrow a stock to deliver on a short sale, they are not supposed to short sell it. But, why would a broker presume that another client would want those shares sold short, effectively pushing down the share price?
I believe this letter went out just prior to the U.S. Gold listing on the TSX. Soon the company shares will be listed on Nasdaq, AMEX or NYSE. On all of these exchanges, a broker has an easier time of borrowing stock for a short-seller client, but on an Over The Counter stock, if the broker doesn't have the share position on their own books, with a right to borrow and lend out, the broker has to ask the clients.
That happened here, and the client was upset. In the case of the small cap companies, shorting can have a major impact on a stock, especially if there is a short-selling syndicate involved.
This situation is going on today with mutual fund positions. The fund manager, who has a fiduciary obligation to get the best price for the unit holder, is taking in additional fees by lending out shares that are then sold short, which knocks the price down.
I just don't know why there aren't class action lawsuits against the fund administrators who do those things. In the case of a mid-cap or large-cap stock, there is no problem because there is much less chance of causing a run on prices because of short selling. In fact I believe in the practice of short-selling " but only in cases where the shares are widely distributed, quite liquid, and there is a narrow bid-ask spread.
In any event, if your broker has asked your permission to lend out your U.S. Gold, or any other small cap stock, I'd turn down the request. Furthermore, if my mutual fund administrator was lending these shares behind my units, then I'd find a new fund.
Gradually, the owner of capital will understand the risks behind owning and controlling their share positions in small companies, and they'll see that under somebody else's control somebody else's interest will be served.
It's enough just taking the investment risk. You shouldn't have to take on additional risk.
The price has been knocked down. The price closed down -8.7 pct today to CAD$4.50.
I hope there are traders short, and I hope they get a call one day that the lending source dried up and they'll have to buy back those shares in the open market. That'll help.
The stock has dropped from a 2006 high of US$10.30 to $4.20, which was a gain of +3.7 pct on the day.

On the Toronto Exchange through yesterday, you can see the stock has had a rough ride.
The market is coming to you. It's a buyers' market. Once again, I hope you click on the link to the U.S. Gold webcast to see why I say that.
Rob tells a convincing story.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on September 26, 2006 05:27:06 PM | Category: Gold Explorers
Discourse
Another McEwan question for Bill:
As I understand it, USGL is acquiring 4 properties adjacent to its main holdings, all of which are now owned by McEwan Capital.
Doesn't that place McEwan as a principal on both sides of the transactions? Unless he is "Saint Rob" - thoroughly beyond temptation - doesn't this put all of us USGL shareholders' interests in jeopardy?
Posted by: Jock
at
September 26, 2006 8:49 PM [link]
I don't get it. First we get outraged at naked shorting, now we get outraged at a legitimate, if coldly worded attempt to borrow real shares.
So only large cap liquid shares should be shortable?
Guess we want small caps to be in a permanent state of squeeze, only sellable by the annointed holders of shares, who , coincidently, never sell unless they have to. Up , Up , and Away!!!!!!
Posted by: procol
at
September 26, 2006 8:58 PM [link]
Bill,
I guess it is safe to expect even more pressure for the pps to go down once it isnt OTC? And that pressure will remain strong until a substantial deposit of gold is found by USGL?
Posted by: NYUgrad
at
September 26, 2006 11:17 PM [link]
This looks like, no, this is Rob McEwen's day here on Bill's Blog.
Bill, why don't you have Rob post the exploration map details here like he did at GG and award prizes for those sticking the pen in the right place finding GOLD in them ‘thar' hills out in West USA. My USGL shares sure could use the booooost.
Posted by: C.Note
at
September 27, 2006 7:14 AM [link]
C.Note,
Rob McEwen was a success as a broker-dealer, money manager and miner. There is a reason. He's brash, he thinks independently, and he has strong personal values.
This doesn't endear himself to many managers and directors in the industry who range (at the extreme) from what I refer to as 'pigs at the trough' to superficial promoters.
Almost all the managers who present at shows like Denver are very competent professionals, but they still (in some cases) resent the direct personal approach of McEwen. McEwen doesn't rest on his laurels, but he sure uses them to push forward to more success in the future. I am not threatened by that; it's an admirable quality.
But yesterday was Keynote speaker day, which was McEwen day. Today, Goldcorp's team will fire back. That should be interesting.
In terms of getting info from U.S. Gold, they put on in-office lunches every two weeks or so, and you could have yourself invited. Besides the company management - including Rob or Ian Ball (VP Investor Relations) - is just a phone call or e-mail away. It's their job to talk to you, and your right as a shareholder to ask these questions.
The same is true with all public companies. It's just that you'll find the miners more available/accessible than any other industry group I know.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
September 27, 2006 7:54 AM [link]


I listened to McEwan's keynote and presentation on USGL. What a guy! Philosophically, right on.
But, if GG's bylaws do not require a shareholder vote on the GLG acquisition, how can McEwan hope to accomplish anything - with a proxy fight - other than damaging the company and his own GG holdings?
I admire Don Quixote, but wouldn't have chosen him as my co-investor ...
Posted by: Jock
at
September 26, 2006 8:29 PM [link]