« Finding the way, Wed., Sept. 13, 2006, 6:58 AM | Main | The Bill Cara Day-trader's Bull Board, Wed., Sept. 13, 2006, 7:49 AM »

September 13, 2006

"Brace yourself" says RBC, Wed., Sept. 13, 2006, 7:37 AM

Canada's biggest bank and broker, RBC Dominion (my alma mater), has this to say to staff and clients: "Brace yourself". In case you missed the point; they put that advice in the opening paragraph of a 26-page Fall Strategy report.

The "risk of a growth scare" is the reason RBC advises to go more to cash. Can you imagine the nation's biggest bank advising a 20 pct cash allocation? When was the last time that occurred?

In any event here is the RBC report. It is dated Sept 5, so I'm sure they don't mind my sharing it with the world. Download RBC Report.

By the way I still have the highest regard for the staff at RBC Capital Markets. Whenever I write blog articles like the last one, I'm trying to push the reader into thinking about capital markets from a common sense perspective. I do not try to impugn the integrity of the professionals who work in the securities industry.

The market is really a simple place to figure out. The problem is that many of us lack the self-confidence to make the tough decisions and so we expect to have instant feedback. We use day trading expectations with a long-term strategy, and we often disappoint ourselves.

I say, relax. Let the market come to you.

If RBC Dominion advises 20 pct cash, it only means you should be in 50-75 pct cash. As part of the HB&B syndicate, should RBC Capital Markets ever advise the feasibility of holding that much cash, their competitors would soon be lined up at the doors of major clients. I'm actually surprised RBC went that high.

But I respect what they are doing in this Strategy report. This is an important read.

Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on September 13, 2006 07:37:52 AM | Category: Cara Today in the Market

Discourse

Bill, this is a fabulous report.

Page 3 of this report mentions the current probability of recession is at 46% and shows how it is computed. The lowest seen before a recession is 67%, but once it crossses 50% there has always been a recession. This would be triggered by a slightly larger bp inversion between 10-y and 3-y yield rates (currently the difference is 0.3%, needs to go move another 0.45% for the recession to kick in, if the current fed. rates stay the same). Many other interesting notes as well.

Posted by: ursus [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 9:42 AM [link]

To Bill and the Board,

Should I be preparing to move my small cap fund for my 401, which has has outstanding growth over the past 2 years to a more cautious fund, heavy in PG/JJ/GE/Pepsi etc.
The report said it may be too early to switch to the cyclicals but at the same time it could be too late for some to change stride if something abrupt happens.
would the small caps be more at risk during a recession, if it were to occur?

Posted by: dlmetzer [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 10:52 AM [link]

What I found very interesting was on page 14 where they looked at the Sector/Group performance the year after the fed's last rate hike going back to 1956. In the U.S., the Gold and diversified metals & mining sectors were the bottom two sectors and in Canada were in the middle of the pack. So like everything else right now we are being pulled by conflicting analyses. Does the data over the past 50 years point to a dismal 1 year future for precious metals, or does the bull run continue?

Posted by: bobj [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 12:18 PM [link]

I wouldn't touch the consumer defensives like PG/CLX/GIS/etc with a pole right now. The "flight to safety" since June has attracted the mo-mo monkeys and now these stocks are grotesquely overvalued. PG trades at 25 p/e right now.

These stocks are overowned at this point and under distrib, IMO. They will likely be a source of funds for a while here. So I would urge extreme caution in adding to any "safety" positions here, despite what Jimmy Krammer says.

Posted by: leewhee [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 2:27 PM [link]

Thanks for the input Leewhee.
I am just wondering if I should worry about my more aggressive funds, and even though the defensives may be overvalued, there losses would be less extreme than say small caps?
I am just trying to maintain the worth of my 401 during possible tough times. It was shredded in 2000-2001 because I kept an aggressive stance through out. It has paid off since, but I'd hate to lose that ground again.
Then again, Bill just posted what is described as a very Bullish outlook on the sp500 by a lady economist (Grazenelli?) or something close.

It's all very confusing.

Posted by: dlmetzer [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 4:24 PM [link]

dlmetzer,

I posted the article regarding Elaine Garzareli because I want readers to see the diversity of viewpoints that exist in this current environment. I clearly said that Elaine is calling for Dow 12600 and I feel inclined to Dow 8800. So she is advising aggression and I'm recommending that traders be defensive.

I am afraid that whe the air comes out of the present hype, that most readers will have missed the slide -- just like 2000-2001. I didn't then, and I'm not going to now.

But then I only concern myself with risk management. I let the upside take care of itself. I don't have a need to chase stocks ever. I am a very patient person.

Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 4:38 PM [link]

Sorry Bill, I should have pointed out your stance was still Bearish. I caught that. I meant only to say that her stance was Bullish. I did not mean to blur the lines there.

My stocks are easy. But My stocks are also play money that hopefully leads to early retirement.

My Actual retirement is in a 401A plan, and I am just looking for ways shore it up in case you are correct and we do see DOW 8800. Currently I am in the more aggressive funds offered by fidelity, and am thinking of redistributing my money to more conservative funds that may be less severly hit.

Posted by: dlmetzer [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 5:07 PM [link]

dimetzer - there's nothing wrong with cash (usually a money market option in your 401K plan. Your capital will be safe & you'll sleep very well. Then, when te RSI's are nicely lined up, buy the aggressive funds again...

Posted by: DaveB [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 5:55 PM [link]

Thanks DaveB.

Posted by: dlmetzer [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 6:59 PM [link]