« Week #32 (2006-08-12) in Review (Final) | Main | Gold rockets this hour, Mon., Aug. 14, 2006, 12:55 PM »
August 14, 2006
Web 2.0 not immune to deceptive practices, Mon., Aug. 14, 2006, 12:17 PM
There was an interesting story in the Toronto Star today that caught my eye because it referenced blogging and deception in the same sentence. After I thought about it, I had to agree with the writer.
Everything today is spin. Certainly not just the blogosphere, but increasingly in the blogosphere.
From the media, we have come to expect it. I turned on CNBC today to hear the anchor say: "Good morning, it's 8 AM in New York; 1 PM at London Heathrow".
These people at CNBC can't even say a simple "Hello" without trying to spin you! Like the Sprint TV commercial, these people need "Spin Artist" stamped on their forehead. Permanently tatooed.
I am a little ticked that the same sophisticated marketing has gotten into the blogosphere.
Recently I received an e-mail from a well-known Wall Street self-promoter who now has a blog. He started to survey some better known financial bloggers as to their weekly bullish or bearish opinion " a one-second sound bite if you will.
That's fine " harmless really " except he copyrighted it, which pissed me. And then he sent me an e-mail to thank me for participating in his survey, which I didn't, and which offended me because on first contact I told him I had no interest because I could see where he was taking this self-marketing scheme.
I was pissed that somebody would think my public opinions are for sale, and that he owns them.
Worse, the e-mail he sent (still sends) lists the e-mail addresses of all the trading bloggers he has contacted, representing that they are participants " me included, even though I objected and he replied that basically I had a bad attitude and hence he would remove my name. As if this was my fault!
It's not that he didn't have the courtesy of blind copying; the point is that he never intended to.
His clearly-marked list is a slick way of marketing his apparent acceptance to a group of people that includes me. I resent my name being associated. Moreover, there are people on that list that I'd never want have a thing to do with (and they perhaps with me) " including Dr. John Rutledge, as well as the blogger himself.
There are things I value highly " like my reputation, the people I associate with, and blogging freely to contribute what I can to society. I believe, on the other hand, that if you have private clients, that's a private matter. What's copyrighted should be made available for money and password protected to private users.
Anything a blogger puts into the public domain ought to be public and free, and I resent the word "copyright" and the slick marketing of some people who are trying hard to exploit the blogosphere.
I guess anything good (and free) will sooner or later be corrupted by money-grubbing carpetbaggers.
Anyway, this is my opinion. I own it. But, for what it's worth, you can have it.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on August 14, 2006 12:17:11 PM | Category: Blogging World
Discourse
Great post.
I posted that Tradingmarkets.com is doing a shady kind of baiting as well.
Lots of sneaky things going on in the blogosphere
Eric beat me to the punch. That is exactly what I was going to suggest, that you hit "reply all" (or copy and paste all the addresses) and let everyone know what you think of this characters scheme. You may even have a few on the list see your wisdom and join you. You could even just copy and paste most of what you have written here above. I'm willing to bet he will then remove you from his e-mail list.
Posted by: RJ
at
August 14, 2006 10:53 PM [link]

when someone openly cc's a lot of people like that in an email, you can always consider "replying to all", especially if your response is critical of their behavior. they will be unlikely to do it again!
Posted by: eric
at
August 14, 2006 1:36 PM [link]