« A mid-term view on gold, and a pick, Tues., Aug. 29, 2006, 3:28 PM | Main | Golden morning, Wed., Aug. 30, 2006, 9:28 AM »
August 29, 2006
Energy markets studied by government, Tues., Aug. 29, 2006, 11:32 PM
Regulators in the U.S. have lost control of hedge funds, which is an argument I made June 2 in a Wall St. Journal debate with a hedge fund manager. On June 27, the U.S. Senate concurred with my position in a report on the excessive speculation of hedge funds in the U.S. energy market. This is mandatory reading.
Download U.S. Senate Report on Energy Market Speculation.
Unlike most important research reports issued by government, this one is easy to comprehend. There is a list of findings and recommendations on page 7. In the words of the Senate Committee, the upshot is that there is "a need to put the cop back on the beat".
This report delves into the mind-boggling investment of hundreds of billions of dollars into the U.S. energy futures market, largely by speculators, and the unconscionable profits made by a relatively few companies and individuals trading against the energy companies and the rest of us.
The Senate Report talks a lot about supply and demand over several years, showing that supply from the oil companies and demand from the public has never been an issue.
Also discussed is a loophole in the law that has permitted U.S. traders to make a mockery of the reporting mechanisms set in place by regulators, referred to as the COT reports. It has to do with legislation pushed by Enron's Ken Lay (and I'm sure with help from another well-known Houston oil family that's been in the White House for some ten of the past 20 years).
So while Mr. Lay has passed on from this life, hundreds of millions of Americans are suffering the consequences of his actions. But I don't want to be accused of politics here, so I'll let you read and interpret the Senate Report any way you want.
What has transpired in the past three years is I believe beyond all concern for American moral or social values, and that is the transference of blame from those who are guilty to those who are gullible. The American public has had it shoved down their throats that the bogeymen in the oil and gas markets have been, let's see, Shi'ites and Sunnis, Chavez and Nigerian rebels, Chinese and Russian authorities, and Big Oil, among others. This lie is despicable.
I think the world had better wake up and smell the enemy. It's not those foreigners; it's a few players among us.
This is not honest capital markets at work; it is a captured and controlled market that feeds the greed of a relatively few people.
At the end of the day, billions of dollars in profits have poured into the pockets of traders at Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Citigroup, as well as at hedge funds like BP Capital, Amaranth Advisors, Centaurus Energy and Tudor Investment.
But the granddaddy beneficiary of them all is a solitary individual, a frequent CNBC Talking Head for his hedge fund industry by the name of T. Boone Pickens. Those in the know estimate the personal take of this good old boy in 2005 to be $1.5 billion.
According to the Associated Press, this hustler has made more money in five years skimming from the futures markets than he earned in 50 years in the oil business. In 2005, his fund returned about 700 pct, according to Trader Monthly. Pushing "Peak Oil" has certainly helped him.
And you wonder why I was asking readers last year to question why CNBC continuously went to that man to forecast oil prices? Was there any other direction than "Up!"?
Mr. Pickens and a very few players in the hedge fund community and on Wall Street have cornered the oil market. There is no other word for it.
And where did you and I first hear those startling words "$100 oil!"? Goldman Sachs right?
Well it was Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley proprietary traders who earned oil-related commodity trading profits of $2.6 billion in 2004 and $3.0 billion in 2005. How much of that profit was made trading against their own clients, or did GS make it off the MS clients and MS from the GS clients?
If there was ever a case for a class action suit, how about those reports by Goldman Sachs representing "supply shortages" and "tightening fundamentals" at the same time that Big Oil was stating it wasn't so (see page 8 for quotes) and the chart on page 15 shows that for the past few years, supply has exceeded demand.
Did Morgan Stanley publish similar reports?
Now that the U.S. Senate has spoken, it's up to the American public to fight back, and demand that new legislation puts an end to the racket that these oligopolistic traders have run since 2003.
By the way, on page 23 of the Senate Report, there is a discussion that the one fear of the oligopolies is backwardation in the futures market.
I have written before about backwardation and contango. Backwardation is a subject that everybody should understand, and, when it exists, take advantage of.
I wrote about backwardation on May 30 and May 3, 2006. I don't know how many individual traders were listening.
Once a market exists where the spot and near term contracts are higher than the long-term contracts, traders who buy the spot and sell the forward contracts could, in numbers, break the oligopoly and send those pigs to the slaughterhouse.
Or you could elect representatives to government who do it by closing the loopholes and putting the cop back on to the beat.
Solving the problem will lay the groundwork for the next great Bull market in global equities.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on August 29, 2006 11:32:23 PM | Category: 10 Energy , Commodities
Discourse
And whoops here is the link about that Alien seed
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/GMO/Monsanto/monsanto.html
Posted by: agaunv
at
August 30, 2006 5:07 AM [link]
Every market anywhere sees a big increase in speculation when there is a big price move. This carries the move to excess. the excess encourages a supply response, over time supply response is recognized prices retreat and speculators flee. Time frames are different in markets based on speed of production increase. Grains respond in a season, miners or energy producers take longer. i don't see where a conspiracy is needed to explain any of this. The profit numbers are huge because the energy markets are so enormous. The otc stuff needs some regulatory scrutiny but the rest of it is just the same old game.
Posted by: bbl
at
August 30, 2006 7:04 AM [link]
I'm shocked -- Shocked! -- to learn out there were speculators in the energy markets!
To all,
The same people who treat this material cynically are the ones who think that Eliot Spitzer had no right to sue Richard Grasso for "earning" $180 million in a year as manager of a not-for-profit institution.
It's a Wall Street mind-set that is so intent on taking from rather than serving the owners and managers of capital that is the problem here.
It's all coming to an end.
Mock them if you wish, but mark my words. Nothing is going to stop the People from getting their fair piece -- certainly not an attitude and a few words from a relatively few "connected" people.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
August 30, 2006 7:37 AM [link]
Re: "What has transpired in the past three years is I believe beyond all concern for American moral or social values, and that is the transference of blame from those who are guilty to those who are gullible. The American public has had it shoved down their throats that the bogeymen in the oil and gas markets have been, let's see, Shi'ites and Sunnis, Chavez and Nigerian rebels, Chinese and Russian authorities, and Big Oil, among others. This lie is despicable."
Bill...Bill...Bill,
Me Irish heart and eyes is smiling this morning me Lad.
Such Eloquence! Such Resolve! Such Commentary!
Posted by: oratier
at
August 30, 2006 7:43 AM [link]
Re: "futures market,"
The lessons contained is this commentary is the primary reason I personally employee the KISS (keep it simple, stupid) principle in trading: I only trade equities because that's all my financial, technical and intellectual resources can handle.
Oil Futures, Metals, Currencies, Options, are just too complicated for my psyche (and the average traders', IMHO).
Backwardation??? Contango??? Say What!!!
Posted by: oratier
at
August 30, 2006 8:03 AM [link]
Ok, GDP came in a little shy of expectations. I'm still waiting for bigger brains to analyze the data, but in the meantime gold and silver is going up.
Also, after the dust settled the FOMC minutes were kinda hawkish on inflation, so I don't see the cause for yesterday afternoon's rally. Caught me flatfooted and, when in doubt, don't make the trade.
Today should be "interesting".
Posted by: number2son
at
August 30, 2006 8:53 AM [link]
For some reason this did not get mentioned in the WSJ.
Last week either Bill or another poster pointed out that the shares of Goldman-Sachs and some of the other big brokers were not being kept afloat like the other major equities. Perhaps this is the reason. WHy buy your stock now when you know it will go down on negative news/publicity soon.
Posted by: rick s
at
August 30, 2006 9:55 AM [link]
I was drawn to Bill's WIR Section 40, XLF senior financial equities chart, and pondering as to why the group shows +30% 12 month change. The enormous fees associated with hedge fund shenanigans in the energy sector provide one answer. When the regulators decide to turn out the lights on this game the fees will disappear and the financials will go down. It seems that we have not only Peak Oil but Peak Financials. I wonder if insider selling in financials is prevelant at this point?
Posted by: TerryC
at
August 30, 2006 10:44 AM [link]
as the futures market are a zero-sum-game someone has lost "all the profits the GS/MS-traders have made" in taking the short side of their long future.
Posted by: Jansing
at
August 30, 2006 11:24 AM [link]
I think everyone is missing a point here again IMO.
No one cornered the market. It always IS cornered. It is controlled - it is not free - these players determine the prices - not the market - they ARE the market. They do the global planners bidding.
It WAS the central bankers & global planners who encouraged and abetted these hedge funds, GS, JP etc.. to pump up the prices of commodities - they wanted this to fight off deflation and fund the US's geopolitical forays.
In May the planners said - enough is enough. Things got out of control - the speculation they encouraged got out of control - 3rd world dictators stepped out of line - Russia was flexing its muscle - so they took all these commodities out in May.
How? By using the same players. So now they take commodity prices down- as low as they want to keep the US out of recession and the stock indexes afloat. Various stories will now appear to justify this.
So what is a trader to do?
I keep shorting the TSX, oil stocks, gold stocks on stregth and buying tech on weakness.
tradesman
Posted by: Tradesman
at
August 30, 2006 11:55 AM [link]
I agree ICE should be regulated and positions established there should be included in the COT. I don't believe regulating ICE will have an effect on the prices of oil and gas. Although I wonder if the ETFs like USO and GLD can be used by speculators to hide their position size. Cheaters will always look for new ways to cheat.
In consideration of the situation in the Mid-East, I think speculators have been wise to bid up the price of energy and stockpile it, and the government has been tacitly approving the process of building up commercial supply cushions.
I believe the long-term positive trade-offs from higher energy prices offset the short-term negatives. Encouraging more exploration, developing the oil sands in Canada, encouraging more coal use and clean coal technology, making nuclear fission a topic of discussion again, and making consumers more concerned about fuel efficiency are all things that needed to be done but couldn't when prices were much lower.
Yes, some very big speculators have become even richer, but so have small-timers who have done well trading energy stocks from the long side.
P.S. - Love the blog.
Posted by: Craig H
at
August 30, 2006 12:10 PM [link]
tradesman - I think you hit the nail on the head, though I'm picky about buying tech on weakness..
Posted by: ClaudeG
at
August 30, 2006 12:52 PM [link]
Thank you Tradesman. Will they be able to keep doing this *if* volume picks up after Labour day?
At this point I am just wondering if volume will pick up siginificantly or not (?). All the big sellers seems to be out of the market already and will have little reason to come back in.
Posted by: ursus
at
August 30, 2006 1:09 PM [link]
Ursus I'm asking myself the same question, the volume on a lot of these stocks is really quite questionable
- all the volume comes in at resistance not at support it seems
- a lot of these stocks just seem to be "trading up" - not being "bought up"
- I'm just short-term trading and even then very reluctant to hold things overnight.
With the holiday weekend coming you would think everyone would want to cash out.
You could be right also about sellers (at least short sellers) being forced out of the market - but I would expect more sellers to come in around NAZ 2224 - but I could be wrong - this "when oil goes lower buy tech" could run into Sept.
good luck....
tradesman
Posted by: Tradesman
at
August 30, 2006 1:51 PM [link]
Telecom has had a good few weeks, check ALSK, CZN, among others. S RSIs went below 30 about 10 days-2 weeks ago and is now slowly turning around. Long S.
Bollinger bands tight around KRY awaiting VZ approval. Long KRY.
Posted by: Seamus
at
August 30, 2006 3:56 PM [link]
When any one person or group, from anywhere in the world, can trade U.S. energy futures on exchanges that do not have position limits on their contracts and require no Large Trader Reports, there is certainly potential for manipulation.
Two bills, one in the U.S. Senate, the other in the U.S. House of Representatives, have been introduced requiring increased "transparency and accountability" in the over-the-counter energy markets.
The bills can be tracked here:
House bill: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.05248:
Senate bill: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:s.02642:
As for the "supply and demand" of oil not being an issue over the last couple of years, all one has to do is to look at Exxon Mobil's balance sheet as of June, 2006 and ask yourself why they are just sitting on over $33 billion in cash?
Posted by: JIM
at
August 31, 2006 1:26 AM [link]

We should be outraged, however when one fire gets stomped out another will erupt, it is our job in the meantime not to let them take it all.
I am learning that there are ways that we can navigate these treachorous waters and still do well. By staying abreast of political, social and macroeconmic trends we can make informed decisions that can do as well as those that manipulate man and markets.
Interestingly Donald Coxe who is mentioned in the prior thread to this via the link to the BMO report admits as well as you do Bill that peak oil is upon us and what you mention is just making a bad situation worse; damn the profiteers!
And there is Engdahl as well. He points out how the U.S. is working on it's full spectrum to the point of cornering the seed market and exploiting the entire Blue Jewel of this universe by spreading their terminator seed that cannot be used to grow cops year after the year.
If the government cannot out politic, out militarize, out manufacture, out economize or out bamboozle then they can just cut off the worlds food supply they opine. And look at the who has been involved Right, Left, Big Finance and one of the worlds largest drug cartels.
Outrageous!
As a friend of mine used to say SON OF A BUNNY!
Also hey what about that new listing on the TSX; NWG New West Gold. I acually worked for them at their Northumberland mine way back in 1987, they do have some Gold in the ground!
Steve
Posted by: agaunv
at
August 30, 2006 5:04 AM [link]