« Phelps Dodge undervalued says Bear Stearns, Tues., June 27, 2006, 11:00 AM | Main | A ‘special situation' worthy of investigation, Wed., June 28, 2006, 8:15 AM »

June 27, 2006

A tough day at the office, Tues., June 27, 2006, 5:59 PM

In last evening's article, I started to show concern for the downside for gold. You know I have been thinking that way for the broad equity indexes, but not for gold. Late this morning, all these prices headed south.

What set it off was two-pronged I think. First, the average inventory period for new homes for sale grew significantly as existing home sales dropped. Although the softness in sales was expected, there was concern. Then the General Motors CEO said that the current sales environment in the U.S. is "brutal".

Traders stepped back and asked themselves why all the cheerleading for a +50 basis point jump in the Fed Rate this week. Surely that would pump mortgage rates to a point where trying to sell one's home might also be "brutal".

Getting their heads around the economic weakness ahead, which has been foretold earlier by the Leading Economic Indicators in any event, and the notion of a 17th straight Fed hike by either +25 bp or +50 bp was the end of the line, I think.

Yesterday I was starting to feel this scenario coming together for the reasons I gave, and so, while I said that a few pleasant surprises were there for the gold market, I gave specific "stop" sell prices. I haven't done that before.

You know, I don't like to do that either because once I go down that road a single block, there is an expectation I go all the way. That's something I do not want to do. My job here is to talk strategy, not specific tactics.

In any event, for the golds, I put in a stop for the GDX (U.S. listed goldminers trust ETF) of 35.50. For the bullion it was 575.

So what happened? GDX at that time was 36.63 and it fell minutes to the close today to 35.50 (yes, to the penny), and closed 35.52.

Spot gold dropped as low as 576.50 from 587.80. It also closed at the low, after trading as high as 592.60 at about 10:30am today. But in the after-market the GLD (gold bullion ETF) traded down to 575.80 bid.

The monitor shows a lot of damage. I don't think it stops here, so I'm glad I'm out.

What concerned me after 9:30am was the strength in the bond market did not translate to any strength at all in the equity market. That basically told me that bonds were doing a dead cat bounce (short covering only). So when I saw equities roll over at 10am following the release of the soft existing house sales data, I wasn't surprised equities were starting to head south, but I was impressed that there was a rally in gold bullion, which I wrote about.

That rally soon showed itself to be a sucker rally however. By the end of the day, gold and silver miner stocks were about second worst on the day, even worse than semi-conductors and autos.

So now I have to think that Pierre Lassonde got it right yesterday in his talk in Switzerland to the London gold traders group. The +25 pct hike is priced into the market, and gold is likely to trade back in the 550-580 range for another month. So, my summer rally for goldminers is likely to be deferred. Nothing was lost here in any event.

The question mark now is, what's to happen to U.S. equities after the 2:15pm Thursday announcement of the Fed. Is the bottom just going to drop out of equities? That seems to be the most likely scenario shaping up.

Now if you are a conservative trader with an eye to the long-term, you have already positioned yourself in cash and some of you are looking to switch into bonds (and even more cash) and out of some of the remaining long equity positions.



003a002.gif


003a004.gif


003a003.gif


003a001.gif


Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on June 27, 2006 05:59:15 PM | Category: Cara Today in the Market

Discourse

Posted by: Jason22 [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 27, 2006 6:42 PM [link]

Bill-

Looks like we were correct for nowto keep this buttoned down tightly.

The problem seems to be that the market can't seem to rally off this oversold condition. That, folks, is not a good sign. When the SP500 turns down, a lotta stuff is being dumped. Although people seem to be hiding in staples, health care is being taken out back and shot. So that removes that sector as a bid. Instead energy continues to play a positive role, and that too is an iffy proposition. All in all, a very bad and strange trading environment.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 27, 2006 6:45 PM [link]

Right on. I moved to the sidelines significantly myself today, too.

A weird market, indeed.

Posted by: number2son [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 27, 2006 7:56 PM [link]

Folks,

Trust me…trading equities, commodities, precious metals, futures, currencies, etc., (US and high-quality Corporate Bonds excluded), is pure speculation and as the old saying goes: “Everyone's is a genius during a Bull Market!� The real challenge is surviving in a down trending Market when all the man-made rules are not working as predicted.

Maybe, just maybe, our Government (USA) has finally made the responsible determination that in order for the economy to fully recover beyond these bogus statistics being published daily (GDP, CPI, basis points, new housing starts, existing home sales, etc.,) and compete in the global markets (China, India, emerging markets), they are going to have to curtail consumer borrowing (spending-NOT) and induce consumer saving. Not a pleasant strategy, but a necessary one if the infrastructure is to recover and flourish. Forcing interest rates higher will most certainly induce Middle America to scale back acquiring those Lexus' and Mac-Mansions they couldn't afford when they began using those ridiculous ARMs and mortgage equity loans to acquire them. The day of reckoning may be at hand – if we believe our Government has the “Cojones� to implement said strategy.

“Won't this strategy surely bring about inflation?� Inflation in a free market economy is a not-very-pleasant fact of life. I recollect a not too distant past when bread (a consumer staple) was a dime a loaf and better tasting, gasoline cost a quarter a gallon, and a good US-made automobile (loved those late 1960s Mustang Mach I's) was priced at three thousand dollars using organized labor to manufacture. These days we tolerate incompetent economists who brainwash the we the public with phrases such as “adjusted for inflation� to justify the exorbitant prices we pay for goods and services while never examining the underlying costs to produce said goods and service to discourage excessive profit-making.

The above is just speculation; however, I would not fault the Government if such a policy is implemented – once our current President and his minions leave office, of course.

Posted by: oratier [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 27, 2006 8:25 PM [link]

If nothing else, your admission that you might have been early on the gold play, and setting a specific STOP, was a good lesson for all. That's how it's done , so you live to fight another day and don't damage your account.

There's a certain bald guy that plays an advisor on TV that would never have done that so close to the original call.

Posted by: procol [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 27, 2006 9:01 PM [link]

Awhile back, I said that either the gold market or the bond market has it wrong about inflation. I think it's the gold market. As usual. Bond market is a much better tell, IMHO. Always has been. Long term rates have done squat. Why? Because inflation is mild.

The Fed is jawboning, that's for sure. If they think rising energy prices are inflationary, outside of the energy complex and transports they're wrong. If folks are sending an extra $100 a month to OPEC instead of spending it at Cheesecake Factory or the shopping malls, it's not inflationary. Especially with wages not keeping up with the stated inflation rate as it is! The Fed isn't monetizing inflation, either.

I think investors are leaning in the wrong direction.

Disclosure: Long to the hilt!

;)

Posted by: muckdog [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 27, 2006 10:37 PM [link]

I sincerely hope that all this mirror bowing holds water. Lower entry points in gold may be the buy of the decade...but me thinks it's too obvious. Another retest and massive capitulation? I can only hope.

IMHO, Big Ben wants two things; to help out the man who chose him by having the economy, the housing market and the stock markets on firm footing come the fall elections AND to fool market participants into thinking that he will be tough on inflation. So, the fed statement will attempt to do both. Rates will be raised while talk will continue to stress beating down inflation. Behind the scenes, money will be printed and put to work to support stock and bond markets while depressing the gold market. If that is how it plays out, the actions are inflationary. This is simply a guess, of course.

I have the largest cash position in years with the longest shopping list to go along with it. I hope to have use for both. Go Ben!

to jason22 - best answer I have ever heard, LOL!

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 27, 2006 11:42 PM [link]

"military formation is like water - the form of water is to avoid the high and go to the low, the form of a military force is to avoid the full and attack the empty; the flow of water is determined by the earth, the victory of a military force is determined by the opponent....

so a military force has no constant formation, water has no constant shape: the ability to gain victory by changing and adapting according to the opponent is called genius." sun tzu. the art of war.

let's not kid one another. if i cannot change my opinion on a dime, i am not a trader and i do not believe in the auction. kudos bill.

Posted by: mtzion [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 2:17 AM [link]

oratier-

If that happens, you will hear an Allelujah from this quarter. But in order for the US to act in a long-term responsible manner, we will need a wake-up call.

Re: GLD and miners, Bill's entry point was fine and, of course, I have no problem with setting tight stops here as I mentioned that as my preferred tactic. This is a range-trade to me (550-590) til Fall and I will play it that way. Once rate cuts loom on the horizon, gold will anticipate them and start moving up as the $USD tumbles.

It was a surprise to me also that XAU didn't get a pop to the 144 level by now but again the whole equity complex is in the fight of its life. Lowry's is still reporting Selling Pressure near multi-year highs. Buying Pressure is still at multi-year lows. So be careful out there.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 6:43 AM [link]

Existing home sales in May were down nationally, but prices in many areas "continued their climb". That sadly, my friends, is what's called stagflation. As I stated previously, unless oil prices collapse, I think only a recession will stop this cancer, a condition that Ben's predecessor and mentor, Easy Al, was deathly afraid of because he felt that it stymied creative minds whose work leads to invention and increased productivity. But Easy Al forgot one thing, recessions stop bubbles from becoming mega bubbles which can threaten global stability.

Posted by: alan [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 8:22 AM [link]

Stagflation = gold bull

Posted by: g034 [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 8:35 AM [link]

Stagflation = gold bull

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 8:59 AM [link]