« A high market on close for TLT, Fri., Apr. 28, 2006, 3:54 PM | Main | Going for the gold on May Day, Mon., May 1, 2006, 6:30 AM »

April 29, 2006

Week #17 (2006-04-28) in Review

This was a strange week where I think the Fed and the Gnomes conspired to intervene in markets, and barely had enough fingers to plug the dike, which is threatening to burst. Consequently markets were all over the place.

As evidence of that look no further than: (i) examples of trends and counter trends, (ii) rising new lows along with new highs, (iii) bigger moves on both the upside and the downside, (iv) prices moving against the flow inferred by economic data, (v) startling moves in gold and silver, (vi) diversion between Naz/small caps versus Dow/S&P 500 indexes, and (vii) a myriad of other examples that show the market is roiled.

Mad Money's Jim Cramer must be loving this.

At the end of the week, here is how I sum up the events: The $USD index is in danger of collapse, so the U.S. Administration and Feds have stepped in, calling on some help from their friends in Congress and at a few of the Money Center Banks.

Almost all the action took place at the open on Thursday and Friday, which became the most important hour of the day in spite of the words of Ms. Bartiromo at CNBC. But that's what happens when extraneous forces impose their power on supposedly free markets " it shows with gap opens in selected areas.

The 60-Minute data charts I show below cover a 3+ week span. When you glance down the 10 discrete sectors I show, you can easily pick out the little fights that are ongoing across the whole war theater. Most times, these charts present a picture of a market in basic harmony ebbing and flowing in ways where some of us can sit back and appreciate the music. This week there was a lot of noise, unfortunately.

This situation will pass.

It had better or else the owners of capital will start looking for other places to put their capital to work.

In one case, however, we can understand the abnormal market, and that's because we are causing it. There is so much demand for silver, gold and platinum for immediate delivery that there is backwardation in the futures market, which is not the usual fare and must be closely watched. More on this situation later.


Global Market Summary

International Equities: The Nikkei made a small gain W/W, which offset a loss in Toronto. The small loss in Canada was occasioned by the first loss in commodity indexes for many weeks, but, like Japan, Canada is in good economic shape " for now. The Footsie did well because traders in Europe are thinking central bankers there can now cut rates because of a crashing $USD index and resulting strength of the Euro and Pound. That's like hope on top of hope.

U.S. Equities : Six of ten ETF's and 17 of the Dow 30 were up, so it's not as good as last week, but fair nonetheless. It was, however, another manipulated week.

Dow 30 : 17 up and 13 down. While a week ago only 3 losers were down more than -2.0 pct, this week it was seven (7): MSFT (-11.2 pct), AA (-4.6 pct), BA (-3.5 pct), XOM (-3.0 pct), CAT (-2.7 pct), HON (-2.4 pct) and UTX (-2.2 pct). Offsetting this extreme move were ten (10) Dow components that rallied more than +2 pct W/W. Only thirteen (13) of the Dow 30 stocks were trading in a narrow range this week!

U.S. Sector ETFs: 5 up and 5 down (XLF best; XLE worst)
First segment: most influenced by commodities, forex and capex spending
10: Energy (XLE): #10 (-4.4 pct); traders don't like politicians
15: Basic Materials (XLB): #9 (-2.6 pct); followed the oils
20: Industrials (XLI): #8 (-1.0 pct); segment move rather than w/$USD
Second segment: most influenced by consumer spending and economic growth
25: Cons. Discretionary (XLY): #3 (+1.3 pct); but WMT was -3.0 pct
30: Cons. Staples (XLP): #2 (+1.8 pct); MO and PG at #2 and 3
35: Healthcare (IYH): #7 (-0.4 pct); traders don't like politicians
Third segment: most influenced by interest rates and general economic health
40: Financial (XLF): #1 (+2.5 pct); friends in high places
45: Tech (SMH chips): #5 (+0.6 pct); down w/MSFT, HPQ & DELL
50: Telecom Services (IYZ): #4 (+1.0 pct); bounce in T & VZ
55: Utilities (XLU): #6 (+0.2 pct); more "Dead Cat Bounce"

Bonds: Bonds were down this week but recovered a bit Thurs-Fri with help from the Fed; watch AGG and IEF on Monday to see if it continues to come back. I doubt it because I see last week as more Fed talk than specific action that would boost bonds long-term. And to those who say that there was a lot of positive economic news this week, my point is simply that bonds didn't move up until the Bernanke dog & pony show started.

Commodities: Finally; a break in the "same old" rallies. Everybody needs relief.

Oil & Gas: Smashed for now; but shall recover with driving season, hurricanes and more tensions to come in the Middle East, Nigeria and Venezuela. Iraq no longer exports oil " if you can believe it (and I do). Why are the Americans in Iraq if the 3rd biggest producer can't produce?

Gold: A veritable war zone between the Little People and the Fed; this week the slight edge went to the Fed, actually. Next week will be interesting

Goldminers: Up, down and all over the board, but at the end of the week I have to admit I see profit-taking in the leading Canadian-listeds, although the U.S.-listeds went up on the back of a strong opening day for SLV (Silver bullion ETF)

Forex: The $USD continues to plummet and the Euro rally strongly, (breaking out of reverse head-ad-shoulders) which is what happens when traders and central bankers wake up to what really is going on in Washington " i.e., Bernanke talking nice while discussing the future of rates, but quietly reflating in the background to try to hold the USD from outright collapse, while Precious Metals are re-loading for the rest of their quarter century moonshot.


Sector ETF:

Check this out: Tuesday morning the U.S. econ data is strong, including (among others) Consumer Confidence; and on Wednesday afternoon the Beige Book info was strong. Meanwhile the $USD is tanking. So why were the commodity and basic materials producers and capital goods exporters being shoved nose down in the manure pile? I don't get it man.

Well, actually I do. Bernanke is in his first championship fight. He is supposed to be the new Great American Hope " but his knees are buckling, his voice quivering, and his face pale. He's taking shot after shot (foreigners selling his paper; Iraq producing no oil; and the Little People seeking bobbles and bars of things gold and silver).

So the bearded wonder (I cut mine off, some say in protest) called out for help from his friends.

The President (does the man do nothing else but press conferences?) then told us in yet another seemingly daily briefing that (i) things are going well in the economy and Iraq (NOT), (ii) the U.N. will look into Iran (what, another 20 failed resolutions, while other nations look to the U.S. to spend their money on the next war?), (iii) Congress may have to look into price gouging at the pump (NOT), (iv) we all will soon be using alternative fuels (NOT) or driving smaller hybrid cars (MAYBE in my next lifetime), (v) his new ‘Snow'man will bring a whole new positive face to his White House (???), (vi) and yada yada.

What he didn't say was the world is now against him. Even the IMF apparently thinks so. So, he's real happy that his man Bernanke is screwing with the free market system the President so (publicly anyway) champions. And, while Bush is jabbering about nothing of consequence, he's quietly imploring his fighter to get back in there and hook, cross, uppercut, kick, ; whatever it takes.

But the Unhappy Little People are going to win this thing, aren't we?

Let's sing along:

There ain't no Fed big enough.. Ain't no war that's bad enough.. No data rigged enough.. To keep the Little People down, babe

For the U.S. equity market, as you know, I study it top down by sector. Here is the weekly performance of my favorite ten Sector Index Funds. The table is sorted by price performance Week over Week (W/W), i.e. 1W%N.

Symbol Close 1Day
Change
1Day
%Change
1W
%Change
2W
%Change
4W
%Change
YTD
%Change
3M
%Change
6M
%Change
12M
%Change
XLF 33.96 0.32 0.95% 2.54% 4.56% 4.36% 5.47% 5.56% 12.04% 21.24%
XLP 23.83 0.06 0.25% 1.75% 2.45% 0.59% 1.66% 1.27% 3.25% 4.89%
XLY 34.09 -0.02 -0.06% 1.25% 1.46% 0.98% 3.30% 1.97% 8.88% 10.04%
IYZ 25.56 -0.07 -0.27% 0.95% 0.43% -1.31% 11.28% 7.08% 11.23% 11.76%
SMH 37.65 -0.35 -0.92% 0.61% 2.31% 2.48% -0.71% -1.52% 13.03% 22.32%
XLU 31.32 0.09 0.29% 0.22% 3.57% 0.84% -2.13% -3.18% 0.87% 5.70%
IYH 61.81 0.64 1.05% -0.40% 0.31% -3.51% -2.86% -3.80% 3.10% 3.62%
XLI 34.53 -0.07 -0.20% -1.03% 1.98% 2.13% 9.17% 9.20% 16.46% 19.15%
XLB 33.50 0.15 0.45% -2.62% 1.67% 2.57% 8.34% 6.01% 21.95% 22.58%
XLE 57.14 0.64 1.13% -4.35% 2.33% 3.57% 8.43% 0.86% 18.38% 42.74%

You can do this table yourself by entering the following string into your browser and then clicking on the link for Performance.

XLE XLB XLI XLY XLP IYH XLF SMH IYZ XLU

I think it's important to look at this 60-minute data across the U.S. market spectrum and check the ups and downs with the economic data. For example this week there was the Consumer Confidence on Tues. morning, Durable Goods Orders on Wed. morning, and the Beige Book on Wed. mid-afternoon, which were positive (for the commodity producers and the economically-sensitive sectors). But nothing happened to rally stocks until JUST BEFORE Bernanke got in front of Congress and the spinmeisters went into action, as I knew they would. Then look at XLF.

Go to this Link at Econoday and click on "Bernanke Speaks" on Thursday to retrieve Evelina Tainer's always objective report.

10 (energy: XLE)

ETF Chart for Energy:XLE

15 (basic materials: XLB)ETF Chart for Basic Materials:XLB

20 (industrial: XLI)

ETF Chart for Industrial:XLI

25 (consumer discretionary: XLY)

ETF Chart for Energy:XLY

30 (consumer staples: XLP)

ETF Chart for Consumer Staples:XLP

35 (healthcare: IYH)

ETF Chart for Health Care:IYH

40 (financial: XLF)

ETF Chart for Financial:XLF

45 (technology, semiconductor: SMH)

ETF Chart for Technology, Semiconductor:SMH

50 (telecom: IYZ)

ETF Chart for Telecom:IYZ

55 (utilities: XLU)

ETF Chart for Utilities:XLU



Sector 10 (energy: XLE, IYE, VDE, OIH, PBW and IXC)


Here's the XLE Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

The Energy sector ETF (XLE) was for the first time in 12 weeks the worst performer. XLE has enjoyed a great run of #1 and #2 performances, but even Pavarotti needs to take a seat now and then.

Some of you are, like me, obviously moving from being over-weighted to being market-weighted in energy " and that's ok, but just remember that driving season is upon us, Iraq has stopped exporting oil, and hurricanes are going to hit the Gulf of Mexico in a month or so.

But for this week, XLE got smashed, going down -4.35 pct to close at 57.14 (down from 59.74, not 56.33 as was my typo last week). $WTIC (near futures for the Crude Oil) closed at $70.72, down almost -6.0 pct, which sums it up for the ETF.

XLE Weekly data:

XLE Weekly Data

XLE Daily data:

XLE Daily Data

XLE Hourly data:

XLE Hourly Data




Sector 15 (basic materials: IYM, XLB, IGE and VAW)


The Basic Materials sector ETF (XLB) was down -2.62 pct w/w to close at 33.50, so the beat has changed. Alcoa (NYSE: AA) was leading on the downside this week, going down -4.6 pct. AA's phenomenal run is over because the price was over-bought, but the company will continue to do well, and this is a stock that will consolidate in the low 30's and then rally again off a weekly RSI=50.

The big Wall Street firms are continuing to raise their price targets on the Basic Materials, particularly the metals. The big miners are in the sweet spot of their long-term earnings cycle.

Interestingly, this is one reason why I think that any broad market pull-back is going to be a short and sharp one " the first segment (GICS 10, 15 and 20) of the broad market is likely to stay strong and show market leadership. These companies are flush with cash, have solid cash flow and will continue to experience high earnings growth along with rising dividends and share buy-backs.

Here's the XLB Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

XLB Weekly data:

XLB Weekly Data

XLB Daily data:

XLB Daily Data

XLB Hourly data:

XLB Hourly Data




Sector 20 (industrial: IYJ, XLI, VIS, and IYT)


The ETF for the Industrials and Transport sector, aka capital goods producers, (XLI) was down -1.03 pct W/W to close at 34.53.

BA (loser #3), CAT (loser #5), HON (loser #6), and UTX (loser #7), were Dow 30 worst performers this week.

Last week, I noted: "I still say that traders should look at the Daily data RSI-current price divergence from mid-March. Not good. Some of these big U.S. Industrials have had quite a run. They need to be watched carefully from here." So, I'm not surprised at BA, CAT, HON and UTX.

GE would have been listed here too except it has a big finance unit (GE Capital), which saved its bacon as the financial sector was strong this week (XLF #1).

The thing is that U.S. capital goods producers usually benefit from a falling $USD " and for sure $USD has been falling. But, that's moreso the case when unemployment is high and the order books are low. That's not the case today with these industrial conglomerates. So, late in this business cycle, these stocks will probably hang in better than most.

Here's the XLI Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

XLI Weekly data:

XLI Weekly Data

XLI Daily data:

XLI Daily Data

XLI Hourly data:

XLI Hourly Data


Sector 25 (consumer discretionary: XLY, IYC and VCR)

The Consumer Discretionary sector ETF (XLY) was up +1.25 pct W/W, to close at 34.09.

I still believe that this sector, along with consumer staples and (consumer) healthcare and telco will suffer from a terminating housing boom (as wealth effect dries up). Higher mortgage costs, and costs of driving to and from work and shopping, and all the other rising costs (CPI and non-CPI) add up to financial hardship for many people. And wage increases are hard to get at a time employers can threaten to close plants or " get this " just openly discriminate against older age workers as did Swedish firm Ericcson this week.

The lack of disposable income and the need to dip into savings is really the biggest problem facing the U.S. market today. On the other hand, the aging population is causing estate monies to flow to the younger and big spender demographic. And the immigration window (legal/illegal) is open.

Here's the XLY Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

XLY Weekly data:

XLY Weekly Data

XLY Daily data:

XLY Daily Data

XLY Hourly data:

XLY Hourly Data



Sector 30 (consumer staples: XLP, VDC, RTH and IYK)

The Consumer Staples sector ETF (XLP) was up +1.75 pct W/W, to close at 23.83.

XLP was #2 top-performer. MO and PG led the way. But these are not leaders of new bull markets, so I don't put too much faith in the price bump.

Here's the XLP Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

XLP Weekly data:


XLP Weekly Data

XLP Daily data:


XLP Daily Data


XLP Hourly data:


XLP Hourly Data


Sector 35 (healthcare: IYH, XLV, VHT, IXJ, and IBB)

The healthcare ETF (IYH) was down -0.40 pct W/W to close at 61.81.

Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE) minority shareholders and others were screaming over the pay package for Hank McKinnell, but they lost because the Old Boys Club (McKinnell's friends in Corporate America told sufficient number of financial institutions they would cut back on the corp finance and trading business if they didn't vote the "right" way.

This is a much bigger joke on Americans than alleged price gouging at the fuel pumps by oil companies. To even suggest to a financial institution they have to vote a certain way or else is an outright criminal act " but we'll only find out if it happened by investigating people under oath.

The bigger issue that I told the Dow Jones reporter his week is the true independence of so-called independent directors. Mark my words; this is an issue that is not going to die. Eliot Spitzer got it started with ex-CEO of the NYSE, Richard Grasso, and now corporate governance organizations are sprouting up to make demands that sooner or later will cause change.

For Hank McKinnell to look the camera in the eye and say that $83 million was the dollar figure of personal compensation to keep him on the job " in spite of a poor record " shows me just how screwed up this world has gotten. The man could and should be replaced in a heartbeat.

The compensation committee of a Board ought to put their recommendations to an independent shareholder vote, and if it gets rejected, these directors should be forced to resign as a matter of non-confidence. Otherwise, where is the check and balance?

Here's the IYH Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:


IYH Weekly data:


IYH Weekly Data

IYH Daily data:


IYH Daily Data

IYH Hourly data:


IYH Hourly Data



Sector 40 (financial: IYG, IYF, XLF, VFH, IXG, VNQ, RWR, IYR, and ICF)

The Financial sector ETF (XLF) was up +2.54 pct W/W to close at 33.96. As I wrote a week ago, "Just when I thought the financials would run into more difficulty, the yield curve started to rise, which gives the lending banks some breathing room."

JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) was up +6.78 pct, and Citigroup (NYSE: C) was up +4.04 pct W/W. And TLT (Lehman 20+ year Treasury Bonds) closed Friday with a flourish. Oh, I'm left wondering how much stock the Fed bought.

Unfortunately, I cannot get it out of my head that the market today just reeks of interposers like Bernanke and his A-List of friends who run the U.S. Money Center Banks. They call it $USD Stabilization; I call it Screwing With Markets.

Here's the XLF Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

XLF Weekly data:

XLF Weekly Data

XLF Daily data:

XLF Daily Data

XLF Hourly data:

XLF Hourly Data


Sector 45 (technology: IGM, IGV, IGW, XLK, VGT, IYW, IGN, IXN, MTK and SMH)

The semi-conductor ETF (SMH) was up +0.61 pct W/W to close at 37.65.

INTC was up +4.83 pct W/W, which I suggested was likely, and much for the same reasons as I now like MSFT.

When you see Weekly, Daily and Hourly RSI numbers in the teens, you have to figure that the Big Swinging Dicks on Wall Street are just loading their guns. Pretty soon you'll start to hear from the same Talking Heads, who crapped on Dow 30 component Intel for the past year, tell you Alice really does live in Intel Land.

Here's the SMH Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:


SMH Weekly data:

SMH Weekly Data

SMH Daily data:

SMH Daily Data

SMH Hourly data:

SMH Hourly Data



Sector 50 (telecom: IYZ, VOX and IXP)

The Telco sector ETF (IYZ) was up +0.95 pct W/W, closing Friday at 25.95.

This move was all about the possible relief in servicing debt, as the big telco's have issued a gazillion bonds, and if Bernanke can tell Congress lies about interest rate direction, then telco shareholders can play with themselves too. For a while anyway.

I say that as soon as rates start to pick up steam again, these stocks are going in reverse.

Here's the IYZ Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:


IYZ Weekly data:

IYZ Weekly Data

IYZ Daily data:

IYZ Daily Data

IYZ Hourly data:

IYZ Hourly Data


Sector 55 (utilities: IDU, XLU, and VPU)

The Utilities ETF (XLU) closed at 31.32, up +0.22 pct (7 cents) this week. That was the 6th best performer W/W for the 10 ETF's, and was almost a loser on the week, making it 5 ETF's both up and down.

I call it a mere bounce because of temporary buying action in the 2-year bonds. But, these utilities, like telco's, are laden in debt, not gold.

Here's the XLU Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

XLU Weekly data:


XLU Weekly Data

XLU Daily data:

XLU Daily Data

XLU Hourly data:

XLU Hourly Data


Bonds:

The Fed was obviously in buying a lot of toilet paper (U.S. Treasury paper) from the Money Center Banks early Thursday " right before Bernanke got to face the softballs from Congress. And Bernanke hit his homerun, thanks to the Republicans who then tipped their hat to the White House, and the bankers got to buy up their own stock (JPM +6.8 pct) and have loads of cash to lend (isn't fractional-reserve banking wonderful?).

That is precisely why Bernanke stopped publishing M3. He didn't want us to see the moves he was making in doing the exact opposite of what is called 'controlling the money supply'.

In my book, this is flat-out deceit. Senator Sarbanes made reference to this while questioning Bernanke on Thursday. That was a joke. If he was really serious, Sarbanes would have been banging his shoe on the table and making demands. And as soon as his voters order him to act in their interests, he will. He could demand M3 be re-published.

Anyway, turn to the 10-year Treasury Note Index, and watch the yield plummet on Thursday morning (27th).

Now look at the lift-off at JPM on Thursday morning, and again Friday morning, with these bankers smug in the knowledge we weren't getting to see M3 on Thursday night.

003v012.gif

Are you starting to get it?

Weekly data charts:

TNX0X Weekly Data

IRX0X Weekly Data


Daily data charts:


TNX0X Daily Data

IRX0X Daily Data


Hourly data charts:


TNX0X Daily Data

IRX0X Daily Data

US Treasury Bonds
Maturity Yield Yesterday Last Week Last Month
3 Month 4.64 4.64 4.62 4.49
6 Month 4.72 4.74 4.71 4.63
2 Year 4.86 4.89 4.89 4.79
3 Year 4.87 4.90 4.89 4.80
5 Year 4.91 4.94 4.91 4.80
10 Year 5.06 5.07 5.01 4.80
30 Year 5.16 5.17 5.09 4.84
Municipal Bonds
Maturity Yield Yesterday Last Week Last Month
2yr AA 3.61 3.62 3.63 3.52
2yr AAA 3.63 3.63 3.61 3.51
2yr A 3.61 3.61 3.58 3.60
5yr AAA 3.73 3.75 3.73 3.59
5yr AA 3.73 3.76 3.73 3.63
5yr A 3.75 3.76 3.78 3.67
10yr AAA 4.03 4.06 4.04 3.88
10yr AA 4.01 4.04 4.02 3.85
10yr A 4.12 4.15 4.15 4.05
20yr AAA 4.34 4.37 4.35 4.21
20yr AA 4.35 4.38 4.31 4.18
20yr A 4.51 4.53 4.53 4.36
Corporate Bonds
Maturity Yield Yesterday Last Week Last Month
2yr AA 5.25 5.26 5.30 5.20
2yr A 5.32 5.35 5.35 5.26
5yr AAA 5.37 5.42 5.40 5.28
5yr AA 5.49 5.51 5.49 5.39
5yr A 5.57 5.59 5.57 5.44
10yr AAA 5.76 5.89 5.80 5.56
10yr AA 5.89 5.87 5.85 5.63
10yr A 5.92 5.91 5.86 5.68
20yr AAA 6.11 6.15 6.09 5.88
20yr AA 6.47 6.45 6.43 6.13
20yr A 6.40 6.42 6.37 6.17


Interest rates and bond yields.


Bond Yields Curve


The 30-year T-Bond yield jumped from 5.09 to 5.16 pct this week, and the 10-year bond, went from a 5.01 pct yield to 5.06. So the beat goes on.

But there was some help for the lending banks because the 2-year Treasury yield fell from 4.89 pct to 4.86. So the yield spread on the very important 10 to 2 year paper went from +12 to +20 basis points. At the end of March, it was -5 bp and the bankers were calling the Fed screaming bloody murder.

I don't much care for any positives I saw this week for bonds or bankers because it will all be a passing imposition. Three weeks ago I said that interest-sensitive securities were getting close to tipping over the U.S. economy and equity market, and this week brought no change.


US Bond Funds -- Monthly Data Charts


SHY Monthly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Monthly Data For SHY

IEF Monthly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Monthly Data For IEF

TLT Monthly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Monthly Data For TLT

AGG Monthly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Monthly Data For AGG

LQD Monthly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Monthly Data For LQD

TIP Monthly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Monthly Data For TIP

US Bond Funds -- Weekly Data Charts


SHY Weekly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Weekly Data For SHY

IEF Weekly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Weekly Data For IEF

TLT Weekly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Weekly Data For TLT

AGG Weekly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Weekly Data For AGG

LQD Weekly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Weekly Data For LQD

TIP Weekly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Weekly Data For TIP


US Bond Funds -- Daily Data Charts


SHY Daily data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Daily Data For SHY

IEF Daily data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Daily Data For IEF

TLT Daily data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Daily Data For TLT

AGG Daily data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Daily Data For AGG

LQD Daily data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Daily Data For LQD

TIP Daily data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Daily Data For TIP


US Bond Funds -- Hourly Data Charts


SHY Hourly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Hourly Data For SHY

IEF Hourly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Hourly Data For IEF

TLT Hourly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Hourly Data For TLT

AGG Hourly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Hourly Data For AGG

LQD Hourly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Hourly Data For LQD

TIP Hourly data series chart:
US Bond Funds - Hourly Data For TIP


Consumer Finance -USA -- Weekly Data Charts

Consumer Finance -USA- Weekly Data Charts CIT

Consumer Finance -USA- Weekly Data Charts CFC

Consumer Finance -USA- Weekly Data Charts FNM

Consumer Finance -USA- Weekly Data Charts FRE

Consumer Finance -USA- Weekly Data Charts SLM



Consumer Finance -USA -- Daily Data Charts

Consumer Finance -USA- Daily Data Charts CIT

Consumer Finance -USA- Daily Data Charts CFC

Consumer Finance -USA- Daily Data Charts FNM

Consumer Finance -USA- Daily Data Charts FRE

Consumer Finance -USA- Daily Data Charts SLM

Consumer Finance -USA -- Hourly Data Charts

Consumer Finance -USA- Hourly Data Charts CIT

Consumer Finance -USA- Hourly Data Charts CFC

Consumer Finance -USA- Hourly Data Charts FNM

Consumer Finance -USA- Hourly Data Charts FRE

Consumer Finance -USA- Hourly Data Charts SLM

Before we leave these interest-sensitive securities, I'd point out that there was quite a high close in the TLT and AGG on Friday. Let's see if this was a head fake for Monday. And the SHY (1-3 year bonds) rallied through Thurs-Fri along with JPM for the same reason). Let's see what happens to the 2-year yields on Monday?

And Freddie Mac made quite a move Wed, and again at the open Thurs. I doubt well see any follow through this week.



Commodities:


The $CRB index rally ran into a wall set up between Bernanke and Congress. $CRB had a tough Mon-Thurs, closing the week at 349.89, down -2.43 pct W/W " but Friday was positive, going up +1.21 pct.

I look at this as consolidation of the prior week's MONSTER MOVE " but it could be that Congress wants Big Oil as a whipping boy. I have always said that people in govt should look down a pointing finger the opposite way. But that finger is pointing, nonetheless.

Weekly CRB Commodities Index:


CRB Commodities Index - Weekly Chart

Daily CRB Commodities Index:

CRB Commodities Index - Daily Chart


After being rallying +5.1 pct two weeks ago, and then +3.0 pct a week ago, this week was quite the opposite for Crude oil futures (the near contracts known as $WTIC).

$WTIC dropped -5.92 pct W/W to close at 70.72. Traders do love those dividends and share buybacks from the oils, but even more they don't like politicians talking about things like formal investigations and excess profits taxes.

A week ago I wrote: "Yes, I do think this fall we are likely to see $55 oil before $90 oil, so I think the long-term trend will reverse."

Just think, on Monday this week $WTIC hit a new long-cycle peak of 75.35. So consolidation is needed. I'm glad this trend reversal is happening, but the pull-back probably will be short-lived. I think we'll see $80 oil before the bear sets in.

Weekly Crude Oil:

Crude Oil- Weekly Chart

Daily Crude Oil:

Crude Oil- Daily Chart


Yes, I still think that the long-term play in the Alberta oil sands is a good one. After a significant pull-back, the Canadian oil sands stocks will have another big run.

Integrated Oil & Gas - Canada


Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -Canada


Gold:

At mid-day Monday I took a stand regarding what I perceived as the Fed trying to pull off a miracle by divine intervention for an Administration in deep doo-doo. On principle, I ranted about the stupidity of people who think they are bigger than the market. I was miffed, and said "There ain't no Fed big enough; Anyway, this is a marvellous opportunity to jump into precious metals."

My charts at that moment showed spot Gold at $625.60 and Silver at $12.23. Fortunately, the week closed with spot Gold at $652.40, up $26.80 (+4.3 pct), and Silver at $13.67, up $1.44 (+11.8 pct).

That's just half the story. Note that spot prices have jumped above forward prices.

This week, $GOLD (which is an index based on near futures contracts) moved up by $0.57 only (+0.09 pct), but on Friday was down -1.2 pct, closing at 634.40.

Traders have to be watching the futures markets carefully here because backwardation has crept in. That simply means that current (spot) prices in the cash market (for immediate delivery of the physicals) is higher than the forward contracts.

Backwardation can be a sign of dealers unable to find physical supply for delivery, so they have to pump up the price to entice selling.

Some of that is going on obviously because of the new SLV ETF for Silver. But the ETF's for Gold are mature, and backardation is happening there. And it's happening in the Platinum market as well. I think it is a result of the higher margins, causing the pro's to sell their near contracts.

But it may also be forward selling by the miners themselves, which has crossed my mind.

I have to ask myself why miners would do this when they already have basically zero debt in their treasuries. The only thing I can think of is that (i) they are worried that the Fed will cause margin rates to continue to increase to kill this market and they want to lock in high prices now, and/or (ii) they want to raise even more money to buy assets in the ground (from the juniors) to replace their diminishing resources.

But then you'd think they wouldn't just sell the nearest forward contract, but several more. However, it's just a problem with the near contract, so I doubt this is happening.

Anyway, as I'm long the precious metals complex, I am concerned about backwardation. I like to see what is a contango on these contracts. And as soon as I find a miner selling forward in a bull market, I'd sell that stock in a heartbeat, and so should you.

As a matter of fact, I only put Barrick Gold onto the Cara 100 because I believed they had stopped selling forward. I never minded forward selling during a bear market. It makes sense, but selling forward in a bull market is a sign of weakness (perhaps legitimate) or stupidity.

To see whether there is backwardation or contango going on in precious metal markets, turn to the Metals tab at www.INO.com. Eyeball the prices between spot and the near forward price for each of the metals.

Weekly Gold EOD Continuous Contract Index:

GOLD EOD Continuous Contract Index - Weekly Chart


Daily Gold EOD Continuous Contract Index:

GOLD EOD Continuous Contract Index- Daily Chart

This interactive chart shows the recent trading for the Gold Bullion index.


$SILVER closed up +2.94 pct W/W at 12.96, but was down -1.88 pct on Friday and even hit a low of 12.24.

The high for the week was $13.21; the week before it was $14.74. So this is extreme trading at its best. Day traders love it. It's hard on the rest of us.

I still say we're on our way back to $15, then to $18. I think the Fed can no longer hide the truth about money supply, and the pickle it's in regarding interest rates and the housing market.

Weekly Silver EOD Continuous Contract Index:

SILVER EOD Continuous Contract Index - Weekly Chart


Daily Silver EOD Continuous Contract Index:

SILVER EOD Continuous Contract Index- Daily Chart

This interactive chart shows the recent trading for the Silver Bullion index.



$PLAT was up +0.66 pct W/W to close at $1,146.10. But it was off -0.17 pct on Friday.

I have already noted backwardation.

Weekly Platinum EOD Continuous Contract Index:

PLAT EOD Continuous Contract Index - Weekly Chart


Daily Platinum EOD Continuous Contract Index:

PLAT EOD Continuous Contract Index- Daily Chart

This interactive chart shows the recent trading for the Platinum metal index.



This week, $PALL gained +1.35 pct W/W, closing Friday at 365.68, but that was after dropping -1.3 pct on Friday.

Since on the prior Friday $PALL got SMASHED, then maybe this week was just a mild recovery bounce.


Weekly Palladium EOD Continuous Contract Index:

PALL EOD Continuous Contract Index - Weekly Chart


Daily Palladium EOD Continuous Contract Index:

PALL EOD Continuous Contract Index- Daily Chart

This interactive chart shows the recent trading for the Palladium metal index.



$COPPER was YET YET again the talk of the week. The contracts reached a new all-time INTRA-WEEK high of $334.55 on Thurs, but then sold off violently.

Still, $COPPER closed up +$8.10 or +2.60 pct W/W.

Three weeks ago, the all-time record was 264.23. That's about a +27 pct move (peak to peak) in 3 weeks.

Two weeks ago I wrote: "At this point cease listening to fundamental analysts. This is (all about) pure trading." Since I cannot believe the world economy is demanding so much copper, it must be a case of traders being caught short.

I see the June contracts are at 348 whereas the April contracts are at 328.

Weekly Copper EOD Continuous Contract Index:

COPPER EOD Continuous Contract Index - Weekly Chart


Daily Copper EOD Continuous Contract Index:

COPPER EOD Continuous Contract Index- Daily Chart

This interactive chart shows the recent trading for the Copper metal index.



To spot the moves in precious metal miners, you will have to monitor the individual stock charts, as follows:


AAUK NEM ABX AU GFI GG HMY GLG KGC BVN
15-minute data
60-minute data
Daily data
Weekly data


MDG LIHRY AEM BGO IAG EGO PAAS GOLD CDE GRS
15-minute data
60-minute data
Daily data
Weekly data


CBJ SSRI RGLD SIL NG KRY HL TSE_HRG TSE_GUY TSE_AGI
15-minute data
60-minute data
Daily data
Weekly data


NXG GSS MNG DROOY MFN RNO RANGY MRB CLG GRZ
15-minute data
60-minute data
Daily data
Weekly data


Here are the key Silver miners:

SIL CDE HL PAAS SSRI SLW WTZ MGN

15-minute data
60-minute data
Daily data
Weekly data


And for the Silver Crazies, here is your favorite link:


This week the U.S.-listed goldminers index ($XAU) was up +2.79 pct to close at 158.11. The junior promoters are calling this a ‘work in progress'.

Here are the Weekly and Daily Data charts of the indexes:

Weekly U.S. Goldminers Index:

Weekly U.S. Goldmines Index - Weekly Chart


Daily U.S. Goldminers Index:

Daily U.S. Goldminers Index - Daily Chart


Unlike the $XAU, the Toronto Exchange-listed goldminers ETF (XGD) was down -2.12 pct W/W to 79.43.

I am not surprised. At PDAC 2006 (March 5-8: Week 10), XGD was trading at or below 65. This week (Week 17), XGD hit 83. That was a +28 pct move in 7 weeks. Loving it, but let's be practical.

Having said that, it is my honest belief that some of these Canadian junior miners and prospectors (and many penny dreadfuls too) will move from cycle bottoms May 17 2005 (the day I announced to readers that the Gold bull was in action) of say $0.50 to $5.00 and from $1.00 to $10.00 or more before the top is reached.

Let's just say I smell speculation on the way " the SLV gave you just a whiff.

(Note: Investertech Hourly and part-hourly charts are incorrect for Canadian markets.)

Here are the Weekly and Daily data charts for the TSX Goldshares (XGD) index:

XGD Weekly data:

XGD Weekly Data Chart

XGD Daily data:

XGD Daily Data Chart


Forex:

If the trade-weighted USD was CRUSHED last week (down -1.72 pct), this week it was CRUSHED MORE, going down -2.16 pct W/W, to close at 86.11 " after toughing 86.00.

The $USD has plunged from 89.86 to 86.11 in 12 trading sessions. That's a drop of -4.2 pct.

If a nation's currency is a reflection of the well-being of its economy, then America is getting about 1/3 of a percent sicker by the day. I'd say Dr. Bernanke is no Doctor.

That's what happens when a stiff gets wheeled into an emergency room. It's too late to operate.

Weekly U.S. Dollar Index:

Weekly U.S. Dollar Index - Weekly Chart


Daily U.S. U.S. Dollar Index:


Daily U.S. Dollar Index - Weekly Chart

The Euro (priced in USD) was up with a bullet again this week, closing at 126.23, up +2.25 pct, after the gain of +2.01 pct a week ago.

What the Americans are doing of course, is shifting the solution to European bankers who now have to cut rates to keep their economy afloat. Then, and only then, can Bernanke move to cut U.S. rates.

And by then, Gold could be $1,000, and some of those Dollar Store mining stocks I referred to will be in the $5 to $10 Department Store shelves. Many will still be junk of course, but that's what happens when currencies get "rebalanced".

The key here is that a two-year technical reverse head and shoulders formation has broken out with strength in the Euro. This is a powerful indicator to traders who follow such things.

Weekly Euro Dollar Index, priced in USD:

Weekly Euro Dollar Index - Priced in USD

Daily Euro Dollar Index, priced in USD:

Daily Euro Dollar Index - Priced in USD



International Equities:

The Nikkei and Toronto had small offsetting moves, but the Footsie was up a lot. But everybody has their eye on the S&P 500. Can it hold 1295? If not, it must hold 1285 or else these foreign stocks will likely get taken down with a global ebb tide.



Japanese equity market ETF: EWJ

The Japanese equity market ETF (EWJ, priced in USD), was up +0.14 pct W/W to 14.80 (which is just 2 cents). But the Nikkei Dow remains in a strong primary up-trend.

The Weekly data RSI is showing negative divergence.

Here is the Japanese (EWJ) equity market ETF Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

EWJ Weekly data:


Weekly EWJ


EWJ Daily data:

Daily EWJ

EWJ Hourly data:

Hourly EWJ



U.K. equity market ETF: EWU

The EWU (U.K. equity market ETF that trades in the U.S. in USD) was up sharply again. This week EWU was up +1.23 pct (it was +3.37 pct a week ago) W/W to 21.45. That's confirmation of a strong primary market bull trend.

Foreign investors are leaving the U.S. and venturing into Europe.

Here is the United Kingdom (EWU) equity market ETF Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

EWU Weekly data:


Weekly EWU Data

EWU Daily data:


Daily EWU Data

EWU Hourly data:


Hourly EWU Data


Canadian equity market ETF: EWC

The EWC (Canada's equity market ETF that trades in the U.S. in USD) was down a bit (-0.20 pct) to 24.86 (a nickel) to 24.86.

The (bull) move that was happening here has paused because of weakness this week in the oils.

Here is the Canadian (EWC) equity market ETF Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

EWC Weekly data:


Weekly EWC Data

EWC Daily data:


Daily EWC Data


EWC Hourly data:


Hourly EWC Data

(Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore)

(U.K., Germany, France, Italy)

(Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Australia).


U.S. Equities:

There was not much happening in the Dow 30 (up +0.20 pct) and S&P 500 (down -0.05 pct). The Nasdaq dropped -0.87 pct mostly because of Microsoft (NDQ: MSFT), which was down -11.2 pct on concerns that future weakness is in store for the company.

Here is the Monthly data chart of the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.


Monthly Nasdaq Composite Data

Monthly S&P 500 Data

Monthly Dow 30 Data

Monthly Russell 2000 Data

Here is the Weekly data chart of the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.


Weekly Nasdaq Composite Data

Weekly S&P 500 Data

Weekly Dow 30 Data

Weekly Russell 2000 Data


Here is the Daily data chart of the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.


Daily Nasdaq Composite Data

Daily S&P 500 Data

Daily Dow 30 Data

Daily Russell 2000 Data

Here is the Hourly data chart of the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.


Hourly Nasdaq Composite Data

Hourly S&P 500 Data

Hourly Dow 30 Data

Hourly Russell 2000 Data


The following table shows the weekly price performance of the Dow 30 stocks, which I sorted by 1-week price change. There were 17 Dow stocks up, and 13 down on the week.

Symbol Close 1Day
Change
1Day
%Change
1W
%Change
2W
%Change
4W
%Change
YTD
%Change
3M
%Change
6M
%Change
12M
%Change
JPM 45.38 1.43 3.25% 6.78% 7.56% 9.27% 12.91% 14.16% 24.53% 29.58%
GM 22.88 -0.29 -1.25% 5.00% 12.16% 8.64% 21.06% -3.87% -16.07% -14.47%
INTC 19.98 -0.10 -0.50% 4.83% 2.72% 1.42% -21.86% -7.80% -14.36% -13.84%
C 49.95 1.80 3.74% 4.04% 3.95% 5.65% 1.34% 6.57% 8.82% 8.14%
MO 73.16 1.23 1.71% 3.71% 6.03% 2.01% -2.43% -2.10% -2.60% 13.48%
DIS 27.96 0.20 0.72% 3.48% 0.29% 0.32% 14.59% 11.48% 17.38% 7.95%
T 26.21 -0.17 -0.64% 3.39% 2.46% -3.00% 6.07% 1.24% 9.71% 11.44%
PG 58.21 -0.17 -0.29% 3.32% 2.84% 1.01% -0.97% -2.56% 4.10% 7.82%
AXP 53.81 0.11 0.20% 2.99% 5.08% 3.22% 2.34% 0.96% 8.62% 4.08%
AIG 65.25 0.31 0.48% 2.21% 2.92% -1.24% -6.28% -2.10% 1.48% 27.57%
PFE 25.33 0.47 1.89% 1.85% 3.39% 0.52% 6.52% -2.54% 17.81% -5.10%
GE 34.59 0.16 0.46% 1.83% 2.07% -0.17% -2.21% 4.98% 1.59% -3.03%
VZ 33.03 -0.29 -0.87% 1.57% 0.67% -4.23% 8.72% 2.77% 4.20% -5.79%
IBM 82.34 -1.54 -1.84% 0.83% 0.44% -1.03% 0.34% 1.63% 1.13% 8.47%
MMM 85.43 0.20 0.23% 0.43% 5.51% 11.64% 7.99% 17.59% 12.05% 13.56%
JNJ 58.61 -0.04 -0.07% 0.41% 1.21% -1.25% -4.90% -0.17% -6.89% -13.38%
KO 41.96 -0.09 -0.21% 0.26% 1.70% -0.38% 2.59% -0.02% -2.03% -1.71%
MCD 34.57 -0.05 -0.14% -0.09% -0.80% 0.06% 3.13% -1.37% 7.06% 16.75%
HD 39.93 -0.29 -0.72% -0.87% -2.89% -5.78% -3.18% -0.17% -1.46% 13.79%
MRK 34.42 -0.18 -0.52% -0.92% 1.41% -3.34% 5.10% -0.81% 24.98% 1.86%
DD 44.10 0.53 1.22% -1.14% 1.85% 3.74% 2.42% 10.72% 5.00% -4.05%
HPQ 32.47 -0.79 -2.38% -1.49% -0.46% -0.31% 12.86% 3.77% 16.13% 59.95%
WMT 45.03 -0.61 -1.34% -1.72% -1.62% -5.52% -2.60% -1.77% -1.03% -4.29%
UTX 62.81 -1.09 -1.71% -2.20% 9.92% 8.26% 11.11% 6.91% 22.25% 25.82%
HON 42.50 -0.63 -1.46% -2.41% -2.10% 0.38% 13.45% 12.40% 26.49% 18.29%
CAT 75.74 0.68 0.91% -2.74% -1.56% 4.61% 31.04% 12.16% 48.31% 74.72%
XOM 63.08 0.66 1.06% -2.95% 2.47% 3.21% 7.88% 2.92% 12.02% 12.64%
BA 83.45 -0.65 -0.77% -3.48% 0.63% 6.41% 18.64% 21.72% 27.13% 42.12%
AA 33.78 0.38 1.14% -4.55% 0.21% 9.96% 12.98% 7.92% 40.63% 18.24%
MSFT 24.15 -3.10 -11.38% -11.05% -10.79% -11.31% -10.02% -13.10% -5.41% -1.27%

The Dow 30 winners this past week:
JPM, up +6.78-pct; and C (+4.0) and AXP (+3.0) were also strong
GM, up +5.00-pct; up on 1-hour's trading at the open Wed.
INTC, up +4.83-pct; up +7.5 pct Tues-Thurs
C, up +4.04-pct; Up w/ hopes Fed stops raising rates
MO, up +3.71-pct; Staples were strong w/dividend raises
DIS, up +3.48-pct; Extreme moves this week
T, up +3.43-pct; Up w/ hopes Fed stops raising rates
PG, up +3.47-pct; Staples were strong w/dividend raises
AXP, up +2.99-pct; Up w/ hopes Fed stops raising rates
AIG, up +2.21-pct; Up w/ hopes Fed stops raising rates

The Dow 30 losers this past week:
MSFT, down -11.15-pct; Last Q was great; next one dubious
AA, down -4.55-pct; was over-bought on copper alternative story
BA, down -3.48; sector 20 consolidation
XOM, down -2.95-pct; traders don't like politicians
CAT, down -2.74-pct; fell w/sector 20 and fell with the metals
HON, down -2.41-pct; another sector 20 consolidation
UTX, down -2.20-pc; another sector 20 consolidation

Here are the links to interactive Dow charts from Investertech.com that I broke into groups of ten, which you can add technical indicators for as well. (list one) (list two) (list three)


Here are the latest Value Line Reports on Dow 30 stocks CAT, HON and UTX, which are all Sector 20 capital goods manufacturers that typically outperform during times of a falling $USD. This week, however, CAT, HON and UTX all got hammered, so the Value Line report should be graded #1 for its own timeliness.


(CAT) (CAT) Financials (Here is the Apr. 28 Value Line report on CAT: next one is due Jul. 28)


(HON) (HON) Financials (Here is the Apr. 28 Value Line report on HON: next one is due Jul. 28)


(UTX) (UTX) Financials (Here is the Apr. 28 Value Line report on UTX: next one is due Jul. 28)


Wrap up:

Be wary of Fed bankers promising to cut rates during econ expansion and rising commodity prices and speculative market environments. The interventionist moves Bernanke made to grease the wheels for his dubious message to Congress was the story this week. I'm getting a little tired of these authorities saying we have free markets. We know better.

BCara@BillCara.com

Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 29, 2006 02:36:18 PM | Category: Cara Week in Review

Discourse

Bill-

Makes me wonder what they will do next. I don't think they are done running interference. I think they'll engineer a little counter-rally in $USD. That will be about as effective as Monday's amusing exercise (China is suspected to be one of the big gold buyers) but should allow people to bring on more of their positions.

Richard Russell, who writes the esteemed Dow 30 Letter, bought more GLD YESTERDAY. He hasn't bought since gold was in the 500s. He now has "his largest position ever in gold on", he says. I think that says something, don't you?

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 6:12 AM [link]

Bill , I enjoy your site , keep up the good work.

Posted by: real1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 6:32 AM [link]

real1-

Comments re possible corrective action coming? I see Grandich has joined the "bearish" side also. Intermediate top.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 7:53 AM [link]

Sorry, sub$ rqd so I have to post article. WSJ op ed from Friday

The Dollar at Home -- and Abroad
By MARTIN FELDSTEIN
April 28, 2006; Page A14

For more than a decade, under Democrats and Republicans, Washington has emphasized that "a strong dollar is good for America." It's time to change the message. We need a strong dollar at home and a competitive dollar abroad: i.e., an exchange rate that will make American goods more attractive to foreign buyers and that will cause American consumers and firms to choose American-made goods and services. The administration has called for such a competitive dollar relative to the Chinese yuan. But while that bilateral exchange rate is important, it is responsible for only a fraction of our trade deficit. The overall international value of the dollar must be more competitive if we want to shrink our enormous trade imbalance and limit the rise in our debt to the rest of the world.

It is important to distinguish between the strength of the dollar at home and the value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies. A strong dollar at home is one that maintains its overall purchasing power in the domestic market -- that is, one whose purchasing power is not eroded by domestic inflation.

These two goals -- strong at home, competitive internationally -- are compatible in practice. With an appropriate monetary policy, we can shift to a competitive level of the dollar without raising the future rate of inflation. Consider what happened in the '80s, the last time that the dollar fell sharply. In April 1985 the dollar began a decline, falling 23% in 12 months and a total of 37% by the beginning of 1988. Although the price of imports rose sharply, the overall inflation rate did not increase. CPI inflation, 3.9% in 1984 (and almost exactly the same in the previous two years), actually declined to 3.8% in 1985 and to 1.1% in 1986. Between 1985 and the start of 1988, while the dollar fell 37%, the inflation rate averaged only 3.1%. Although a decline in oil prices contributed to this lower rate of inflation, the core rate of inflation that excludes energy prices also fell. That's not a guarantee that a dollar decline now wouldn't raise inflation, but it shows that it is possible to have a sharp dollar decline with no adverse effect on inflation.

The fall in the value of the dollar turned around the trade deficit. Merchandise exports rose more than 40% in two years while the corresponding imports increased at only half that pace. Since imports were initially much larger than exports, it took a few years for the trade deficit to decline. But by 1989 it was down by more than 40% from its peak. The decline of the dollar in the '80s also had no adverse effect on economic activity. The rise in national saving that was needed to reduce net imports happened without higher unemployment. Thanks to the improved trade balance, aggregate demand increased and the unemployment rate came down from 7.5% in 1984 to 5.5% in 1988. Bond yields also fell and the stock market rose sharply, with the S&P index up 40% from 1985 to 1988.

This favorable experience was different from the recent experience of emerging market countries in which sharp currency declines occurred. In Korea, Thailand and Argentina, currency declines in the late '90s led to falling GDP and rising inflation. The primary reason for the poor performance is that business firms there had borrowed in dollars rather than in their own currency. When their currency fell sharply relative to the dollar, their debts measured in domestic currency rose sharply, often pushing them into bankruptcy. Because we in the U.S. finance our current account deficit by borrowing in our own currency, we can move to a more competitive dollar without the adverse effects that followed currency declines in other countries.

Skeptics argue that a more competitive dollar would not reduce our large trade deficit. Despite the favorable impact of the lower dollar on our trade deficit in the '80s, they fear that U.S. exporters can no longer compete with foreign products and that U.S. manufacturers could not compete with imports from low-wage countries even if the dollar declined again by nearly 40%. These skeptics are wrong. The U.S. is a major exporter even with today's overstrong dollar. In 2005, the U.S. exported $892 billion worth of goods, including $450 billion of capital goods, $116 billion of consumer goods and $230 billion of industrial supplies and materials. A lower dollar would raise sales volume in all of these categories.

The response of imports to a more competitive dollar would be more complex. Although U.S. manufacturers would still generally be unable to compete with producers in low-wage countries, it is important to realize that nearly half of our imports come from high-wage Europe, Canada and Japan. A dollar that is more competitive relative to currencies there will cause Americans to buy more U.S.-made products instead of imports from those countries. The increase in the relative price of products from low-wage manufacturers in Asia and Latin America that would result from a lower dollar would also make those products less attractive to American consumers. Even if the same kinds of products are no longer made in the U.S., consumers will respond to the higher price of those products by buying less of them and spending more on other goods and services produced in the U.S.

Although economists have studied the sensitivity of import and export volumes to changes in the exchange rate, there is still much uncertainty about just how much the dollar must change to bring about any given reduction in our trade deficit. But that should not be interpreted as saying that the deficit reduction will not happen in response to a lower dollar. Rather, it says that we cannot know how large the fall in the dollar must be to bring the trade deficit down to a sustainable level.

There are two reasons to hope that the dollar will become more competitive soon. First, the longer we wait, the larger our accumulated debt will be to the rest of the world. And when that imbalance is larger, it will take a larger fall for the dollar to repay the debt incurred by today's imports. The gain in purchasing power we enjoy as a result of the overstrong dollar today will be offset by the extra loss in future purchasing power of the dollar that will be needed to service and repay the future debt.

But the primary reason for wanting the dollar to become more competitive in the near future is that we may need an improved trade balance over the next few years to sustain the economy's expansion. Although forecasters generally believe that the likely outlook for the economy in 2006 and 2007 is a continuation of solid economic growth, there is a serious risk that the combination of falling house values and an end to the low-interest incentive to refinance mortgages will cause consumer spending to decline relative to incomes. A sharp slowdown in consumer spending could cause an economic downturn.

What can take the place of the lower consumer spending to maintain overall aggregate demand? Business investment is unlikely to rise faster when sales to consumers are declining. Housing construction is already in decline. The key to maintaining aggregate demand, i.e., the key to our continued expansion if consumer spending slows, must be a shift in our trade balance -- increased exports, lower imports and more spending on goods and services produced in the U.S. For this, the dollar must decline to make U.S. goods and services more attractive.

Even if the dollar does decline during the coming months, the delays in the response of exports and imports to the more competitive dollar will mean that the increase in aggregate demand from this source may not happen for a year or more. That's why the U.S. needs to shift to a more competitive dollar as soon as possible.

What would make that happen? A rising U.S. saving rate and a narrowing gap between U.S. and foreign interest rates provides the right macroeconomic framework for the dollar decline. But exchange market participants are understandably reluctant to pursue a lower dollar when they hear the Treasury advocating a strong one. The 1985 Plaza Accord suggests a possible approach: Then, G-5 finance ministers acknowledged that the dollar was overvalued and needed to decline further. Monetary policies and national saving rates were changing appropriately in the U.S. and foreign countries, just as they are beginning to now. With the official statement that the dollar needed to decline relative to our trading partners, the markets did the rest, confident that the U.S. government did not have a plan to punish those who sold dollars by engineering a sudden reversal of the dollar.

G-5 finance ministers may not be the appropriate group now, since much of the U.S. trade imbalance is with countries that are not part of G-5. It might be best to start with a meeting with major Asian trade surplus countries that leads to a call for coordinated appreciation. But the specific institutional arrangement is less important than the official acknowledgment that the dollar has to come down and that there is no program or desire to support it at its overvalued level.

If the Fed pursues a strong dollar at home while the dollar becomes more competitive in global markets, we can achieve price stability and a more balanced path of economic growth.

Mr. Feldstein, professor of economics at Harvard University, is a member of The Wall Street Journal's Board of Contributors.

Also see:

The Return of Saving, Foreign Affairs , May/June
http://www.nber.org/feldstein/returnofsaving.pdf2006

Posted by: stockman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 8:01 AM [link]

Now let's see .. If one (1) SLV share represents 10 oz. of SILVER, and didn't I read the issuer put 1.5 million ounces in the vault to start up his ETF and then had a first day trading volume of 2,343,100 shares Friday? And lets just say only half of the shares were new and the remainder were recycled throughout the session being bought and resold, wouldn't Barclays now need to go out on the market or somewhere and acquire 10,215,500 z's of the precious stuff to cover all the new proud share owners? (Geee is the math correct?)

Hey, I got several SILVER mines that can supply your needs buddy and a couple of Jrs that will be producing soon.

Posted by: C.Note [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 10:20 AM [link]

C. Note

I am not an expert on the mechanics of the ETF but as I understand it the price and activity in the ETF shares will have a mirror impact to the underlying securities and/or commodity. In other words if NEW shares were created then the silver would have been purchased at the same time.

see: http://www.ishares.com/intermediary/how_ishares_work.jhtml;jsessionid=MZDGVQLVQ31J0RJUGQOBBGSFGRSEWD50

While there could be some intraday distortion wouldn't it be corrected quickly as traders could arb any disparity that occurs?

That being said your observation is valid in that ETFs in gold and silver are in fact removing supply from the market. Never before has it been so easy for individuals to invest in a 'hard asset' alternative to financial assets. Rising demand, limited ability to bring on new supply. Good times indeed.

As discussed here in the past this new capability for investors may have the temporary effect of shifting dollars that would have gone to miners into the metal itself, causing the metals to outpace the stocks at times. As a result this elevation of the metal price could prove to be longer lasting and more meaningful than pre-ETF; pre-BRIC analasys would suggest.

Of course the mining stocks are no where near historic highs relative to the metal OR relative to the SPX. Given the new public access to the metal, BRIC global commodity bull and the historic U.S. imbalances.... before this secular move is over wouldn't you expect to see both of those ratios see prior cycle highs?

Between here and there will be many spikes in both directions for the short term trader, but as others (Bill, g034, MarkM) have pointed out there is a bigger picture here that suggest larger profits ahead for those that can 'sit on their hands'.

Posted by: stockman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 12:04 PM [link]

when i look at the charts of the spot price of gold the way we have gone vertical since Bill's call in early nov. i am starting to think we will have 1000 gold by the end of the year....now i had never owned a gold stock until bill mentioned them and educated this reader to gold with his website.....so my opinion is of little value....but when charts go vertical there is no telling where they will stop...so why not 1000 gold?.....at this point there does not appear to be anything in the news to change the direction......btw interesting post on the dollar stockman thanks.

Posted by: Bullring [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 8:48 AM [link]

I'm a small investor with a $200K portfolio and from the comments I've read from various contributors to this site, I may be out of my league.

My investment strategy is simply this "not having the financial resources to trade the market, when researching an investment for purchase, it is usually with a time horizon of 5 years to life."

My questions are: is there any value to holding securities long term?

Are there other "long term" investors monitoring billcara.com who care to share their investment strategies?

Thanks

Posted by: oratier [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 10:44 AM [link]

oratier-

All investors and all portfolio sizes are welcome HERE.

Actually, Bill's techniques, tools, and timeframe are a conservative long term approach built around buying securities when they are "on sale" and gradually reducing one's position cost over time such that dividends received per capital outlay produce wealth producing returns. As an example read carefully through the discussion on MSFT and recently T and VZ as well as WMT and JNJ to see what I mean. You can search these names on this site by googling them. See especially Bill's entries filed under Trading Tools and also Trend and Cycle Phases in the right side bars.

To answer your broader question regarding buy and hold, my personal opinion is that for the next few years that approach will be a difficult way to make and preserve gains for THE U.S. MARKET. It's overvalued, with historically high PE ratios and very low dividends. It is also at top of channel for earnings. Until PE ratios revert to mean or below, gains will be tough to hold. As you can see from posts, most here are trying to obtain gains from the market in sectors that are bullish at this point in the economic cycle in the firm belief that at some point we are due for a significant correctionin the broader indices.

Hope some of this helps. Ask questions. Its a very sharing community Bill has put together here.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 11:39 AM [link]

MarkM-
Thanks for your insights on the market!

Generally, it is difficult for me to fully understand the day-to-day ramifications of the excellent ideas, thoughts, documents, etc., Bill delivers to this Blog.

Your comments are helpful to my understanding of the US equity market fundamentals and I'm constantly reading Bill's Equity tab above to remain focused on my investment objectives.

Posted by: oratier [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 12:51 PM [link]

Oratier-

Not a problem. Like I said, ask questions. Bill or I or one of the many pros who hang out here are always glad to answer non-intrusive inquiries.

My opinion doesn't mean that buy and hold can't work. Buy and hold what though? For the US Market, I think some disappointing periods are ahead. For geographically diversified portfolios, acceptable returns can be had. There's always a bull market SOMEWHERE.

Good luck!

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 1:04 PM [link]

oratier-

I hope these links come through. Here are several L/T buy and hold portfolios that I found useful to read about and consider.

Scott Burns' Couch Potato Portfolio

William Bernstein's No-Brainer Portfolio

Bill Schultheis' Coffeehouse Portfolio

Ted Aronson's Lazy Portfolio

David Swensen's Yale Portfolio

Frank Armstrong's Smoothie Portfolio

Ben Stein's Retirement Portfolio

Links:

http://tinyurl.com/lurhb

http://tinyurl.com/mrxdc

http://tinyurl.com/lcjnv

http://tinyurl.com/n4vgx

http://tinyurl.com/oy4cy

http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/P128311.asp

http://finance.yahoo.com/columnist/article/yourlife/1218

Okay, I'm done for today!

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 1:15 PM [link]

Long term investment syndrome...

I also suffered this affliction for many years. I have gone from one extreme to the other in order to insure I do not fall back into that hazardous practice. 'Dream merchants' have done a great job on keeping the masses hooked. Much to the Dream Merchant's benefit and to the detriment of the poor souls who are 'believers'.

But seriously, I would suggest following Bill's guidance here if one cannot actively follow/trade the markets. His is a relatively long term approach to buying the best (Cara 100), but only doing so when they are in longer term accumulation zones AND the market is offering these opportunities broadly. Further, using his option strategies can even further improve your risk return. 200k in today's low cost trading environment can be adequately diversified and/or traded.

Posted by: stockman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 2:13 PM [link]

LTIS (long term investment syndrome)-

A key advantage individual investor/traders (IIT) have over the DM (Dream Merchants) is their flexibility. IIT can trade circles around the DM. Now that could pose a problem for the DM... so if you want to help them out give up your advantage and become a victim of LTIS. The DM and corporate America will be so grateful. They will give you truck loads of data to PROVE the Dream can be yours if you'll just give up your advantage.

Now don't get me wrong. If you are the 'average investor' you will fail at being a good IIT. You will spin away your money being caught in every emotional swing- as the DM and media spin the news out... you'll do exactly what they want and help them prove their case. So you better devote time, learn quick, THINK for yourself and have a disciplined approach... or you might just as well sign up for the LTIS, it'll do better than the average investor. It's not easy but it beats the alternatives IMO.

Forgive me. It's like the x-smoker thing. Once you quit you become extreme.

Posted by: stockman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 2:43 PM [link]

stockman-

I would be interested in your opinions on types of investors Bill has described and whether you think the style can work: intra-week;intra-month; intra-year; extra-year, and the returns Bill has described as worth shooting for from these profiles.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 3:33 PM [link]

Stockman-

IMHO, the key to beating the "average investor" is adequate capitalization.

Also IMHO, the Dream Merchants (DMs) are those salepersons who lure investors with the promised of fabulous wealth if they only purchase their penny stock newsletter that's guaranteed to double, no quadruple their investment(?)in a month. We see them advertising their wares 24 hours per day in Cyberspace, and would probably be shocked to learn how many intelligent people are lured into that greed trap.

Realistically, unless an investor is adequately funded to ride the inevitable market cycles, long term investment is the only sensible option availble. Again IMHO.

MarkM -

Thanks for the links.

Posted by: oratier [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 4:53 PM [link]

Do you think the US$ made a bottom in early 2005 and is now completing a reverse H&S before moving higher? The 10 year monthly chart of the US$ makes this outcome a possibility. There is so much negative sentiment toward the $, could this be the start of a move UP?

Posted by: Joe Bren [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 8:12 PM [link]

oratier-

Agree to disagree on what is 'key'. An active approach puts me at a distinct advantage relative to institutional managers. Active management, avoiding emotional decisions, thinking for oneself and developing an investment discipline that is suitable for their individual personality- keys for IIT in my opinion.

The DM from my view includes virtually the entire industry. I believe Jesse Livermore said 'The common man wants to be told what to do. He doesn't want to have to think.' I believe that is still true today and is the root of the success of the DM.

Let me be clear that I do not consider the DM as huksters as you might penny stock promoters. There are many good people in the industry working at helping people manage their assets. They can in fact help one do something near a market return on average. This is better than the average person does left to their own whims, but not nearly as well as the exceptional IIT can do.

So one must judge, perhaps through experience whether they are 'good' at this game or not AND whether they have the time to devote to this exercise. If not, a good DM can help you. (I would say that a DM that thinks independently, has a disciplined approach, is an active manager and detached emotionally will do a better job than average! In other words they are a good IIT.) He/she is also probably 'seasoned' with at least 10 years of experience and should able to provide documentation of a standardized performance comparison of accounts he/she is responsible for.

Agree to disagree?

JMHO

MarkM- To respond you'd have to take me back or summarize the 'types' of invetsors Bill has discussed. But I have to say that I have seen very little from Bill that I would disagree with.

Posted by: stockman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 8:24 PM [link]

IMO,
The decline in the USD may end/pause when the Fed starts tighening again, which it probably will.(All the better for commodities if it doesnt')
Right now, I still see a lot of Dollar bulls, or Euro/other currencies bears, that are saying that the EUR/USD is overbought, there's no reason for the EUR/USD to go that high. It might be true since the Eurozone doesn't want to see that high an exchange rate and may not hike rates at their next interest rate meeting(which is soon)
Looking at the daily chart though it's all bullish.
Intraday, the EUR/USD gapped down today at open... if it cannot recover, it should be sold.
Another one of my predictions will be sugar bottoming soon. I might buy 10 tons of it sometime soon...

Posted by: FirstConsul [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2006 10:29 PM [link]

Stockman-

I'm not in disgreement with your world view of investing, it just doesn't fit mine.

I consider my world view that of a small fish investor, trying to swim and flourish in the same ocean with shark and whale investors. And I'm enjoying the swim!(:

For example, I would not hesitate to take a 3% profit minus commission on $100.000 stock trade. However, that same trade at $1000.00, while equal percent-wise, is not very cost beneficial.

Here is a real-world example: Bill recently provided a favorable report on McDonald's Corp (MCD) AT 34.93. Since that report, the stock peaked at 35.19 and closed last Friday at 34.57.
Now an adequately funded trader (you) could have ridden that short cycle and realized a nice profit. However, a small investor (me) would have endured a loss after commission.

Once again "adequate funds" is key.

Thanks for the exchange, it is indeed a learning experience.

Posted by: oratier [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 1, 2006 7:53 AM [link]

Thanks Bill for the information on the futures curve.

Posted by: davidtr4 [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 1, 2006 10:04 AM [link]

Q: "Why are the Americans in Iraq if the 3rd biggest producer can't produce?"

A: That's not why the are there.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 1, 2006 2:48 PM [link]