« The exogenous concept replayed, Mon., Apr. 10, 2006, 11:50 AM | Main | The base metals in play, Tues., Apr. 11, 2006, 6:59 AM »

April 10, 2006

The game face, Mon., Apr. 10, 2006, 2:08 PM

It's true. I am now officially out of retirement. That's me in the top corner with my game face on. And when I lose 29 other pounds, I'll be ready, willing and able to get my Bahamas project underway.

Yes, I have been busy on other matters, but that's not to say I'm changing this blog. I'm actually working on a "Trades" section (linked to the top nav bar) that will list specific buys and sells on a weekly or bi-weekly basis. I was hoping to have it finished by today but there are two data bases (long term and intra-day) involved from the one source plus a different sub-system being done by another source. Like most things, the Rule of Five applies: the finished product takes five times longer and is five times more costly. But, I am persistent. It's going to add value.

I also have a full-blown addition to this site, which at 32 pages long, covers all you might like to know about my project in Bahamas. The top extensive section is finished, but needs to be vetted by others. Just like this site, this is static top section material, and the lower part is for blogging. I'm not planning on blogging much there -- maybe a couple times a week just to let you see progress.

I'm also waiting for some new data downloads from ADVFN, which when I run the price data on all the markets they cover through my black box, I'll be able to write daily with more focus on what I can see going on in the global markets.

Now that I have lost the beard, I'm not embarrassed travelling into the bowels of the financial district. I'm actually late, so I have to go.

Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 10, 2006 02:08:26 PM | Category: Cara re: Cara

Discourse

i think you look better without the beard

Posted by: Bullring [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 10, 2006 2:51 PM [link]

That jaw and nose profile reminds me of another prominent BILL .. he also had an excellent handle on how to store up gold but lost his weight the hard way. Can you play the saxophone?

Posted by: C.Note [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 10, 2006 3:23 PM [link]

g034/spot/stockman/C.Note/Bill/All-

I thought this was an extremely interesting observation by one writer, discussing the future valuations of the SP500:

"We have no doubt that the S&P500 Index is immersed in a secular bear market that will continue for another 5-15 years, but, as we keep emphasizing, secular bear markets are about declining VALUATIONS; they do not necessarily involve declining prices. It is extremely likely that the price/earnings ratio of the S&P500 will drop to 10 or lower at some point over the next several years, but this fall in the P/E ratio could be driven more by a rise in earnings than a fall in prices. And if you think it is unlikely that the S&P500's earnings will rise by much over the next several years, consider that the composition of the senior stock indices will change. In particular, if commodities are in a secular bull market then 10 years from now oil and other commodity-related stocks -- the stocks of companies that are likely to experience very strong earnings growth for many years to come -- will probably make up 30%-40% of the market-cap-weighted S&P500 Index."

If I recall correctly, this is the same thing that happened during the 80s. Commodity related companies started making up a greater and greater percentage of the SP500 as the Bear wore on, eventually reaching a peak of over 30% of the composition. Then as the economy expanded they were replaced by the leaders of the day-- tech, financial, etc- eventually reaching the current composition.

Does this have any meaningful impact on portfolio composition going forward, knowing that maybe indices valuations may not decline significantly? To me it says that LT short positions may not be profitable, but there certainly could be profitable ST net short plays. But other than saying what we all know here (Commodity Bull) is there anything else to take away from this?

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 5:29 AM [link]

Bill-

This chart pattern for gold early morning is typical of a raid. Not saying it's going to happen but this is very similar to the way other sharp sell-offs have started: early morning strength, top, straight down in London into the NY open. That way those turning on their screens first time in the morning get the maximum jolt.

(When I began typing this gold was still up a dollar. That is now gone. We'll see.)

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 6:48 AM [link]

Since 6:05AM ET this morning, Gold off $5.20@599.30

Posted by: C.Note [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 8:44 AM [link]

C. Note-

Did you see the article in Fortune on the Top 500? LYO was in there for a HUGE increase in revenues YOY. Thought of you.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 8:59 AM [link]

Mark:

After whining when I missed the low, LYO has provided nothing but smiles and is a tribute to Bill and his Top 100. Thanks for the heads up on the article.

Posted by: C.Note [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 9:25 AM [link]

C.Note-

The best attribute that Bill teaches is PATIENCE. Let the stock come to you. I am reminded of a trap door spider in this regard. It feels the vibration of another insect nearby and just sits there waiting. If the prey comes right over it, it pounces. If it doesn't, it waits.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 9:29 AM [link]

Amen!!!

Posted by: C.Note [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 9:41 AM [link]

TLT-

Fingers at risk.

Scaling in. With this add will be at about 2/3 of maximum exposure to fixed income. Crude is supportive of bonds here. Move down in sentiment (as measured at Rydex cash flows) has lost mo, 20 dma downtick... if it can now rollover decisively I will add the last 1/3 to allocation.

Not a recommendation to anyone. I am required to be long and the TLT becomes a hedge. Long equity exposure is extended and popular; bonds are oversold and at negative extreme in sentiment.

long TLT

Posted by: stockman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 10:23 AM [link]

stockman-

Did you read Hussman's latest? Says that it looked tempting to go longer but that it would likely prove only a ST benefit. Still believes environment at risk for higher yields. Therefore he didn't change maturity profile in HSTRX, which is around 2 years presently.

Long: HSTRX

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 11, 2006 11:45 AM [link]

MarkM

Thanks for the reminder, I like Hussman.

As I recall he has been in ST treasuries for a while, right? I mean YEARS.

If I can pick up 1-200 bps above risk free, I'll seek that and earn management expenses. Look at a weekly chart of the IEF... how many times have you been able to buy at $81 and then sell at $84?

With Rydex B:B ratio 20 dma now decisively turned I will add further exposure today. While I could still extend maturity these purchaese will take me to maximum exposure in bonds.

Posted by: stockman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 12, 2006 9:18 AM [link]

stockman-

Hussman has actively managed the duration of his portfolio since inception. Present duration is about two years. The returns from HSTRX vis a vis Lehman Bond Aggregate are favorable so it gives me what I need (bond exposure) without having to think about it. Not intended as advice for anyone and certainly not anyone knowledgeable enough to actively trade bonds, which I am not. So just sent as data point, not as suggestion and certainly not a criticism.

Posted by: MarkM [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 12, 2006 10:20 AM [link]