« Technical indicators at work, Mon., Apr. 3, 2006, 11:17 AM | Main | Different views re gold and gold stocks, Mon., Apr. 3, 2006, 4:51 PM »

April 3, 2006

Deceit is their stock in trade, Mon., Apr. 3, 2006, 4:17 PM

The ROBTV stock reporter just made the following statement: "A good day for Stelco; A tripling of the stock price". No this wasn't a good day for Stelco; Stelco was raped, then died, and family and friends are in mourning. This was a tragedy.

Let's for once call a spade a spade: Brascan/Brookfield/Tricap and their friends had the good day. They got away with fraud. The rest of us want to throw up.

The old owners were stripped of all their stock -- left with zero to show for their investment in Stelco. And the new owners added about $400 million in debt, after they caused $150 million to be paid out to lawyers and accountants to make this fraud look like a legitimate deal. Even writing off these costs, the Company barely lost any money.

Please, anybody, tell me how adding $400 million in debt and virtually no equity to a bankrupt company suddenly makes it a healthy one? Mark my words; Stelco will now make profits of $300 million or more every year. The Company was NEVER worth less than $1 billion, and probably double that. The old shareholders just had $10 a share stolen and the shares taken from them. The Toronto Exchange and Ontario Securities Commission never lifted a finger.

In 40 years I have never seen anything like this.

Read the Globe & Mail report today and tell me if this isn't enough to turn off any person who actually believes that equity markets are not a scam.


"Shares of Stelco Inc. rocketed as much as 239 per cent higher on the Toronto Stock Exchange in their first day of trading since the steel maker emerged from court-supervised bankruptcy protection.

The shares, issued at $5.50 and trading under the ticker STE-T, opened Monday at $15 and rose as high as $18.65. At last check, they were up $18.01, or 228 per cent, to $12.51.

The Hamilton-based company, Canada's second-largest integrated steel producer, emerged from more than two years of court-supervised bankruptcy protection on Friday. Stelco's previous shares were delisted on March 10.

The company is emerging from restructuring with Rodney Mott at the helm. Mr. Mott, the former chief executive officer of International Steel Group Inc., took over as the new president and CEO on Monday from Courtney Pratt, who took on the role of chairman.

Mr. Mott bought 1 million new company shares "as a personal investment" on Monday at a price of $5.50 a share, for a total cost of $5.5-million, Stelco said in a weekend release.

John Novak, who follows the industry for CIBC World Markets in Toronto, pegged Stelco's restructured value at $15 a share and gave the company a "sector outperformer" rating.

"While the new cost structure of the recapitalized company is rather uncertain at the current time, we believe the shares could represent decent value once current cost reduction initiatives are completed," he wrote in a note.

"We also believe the quality of the Stelco assets, particularly the Lake Erie operations and the company's iron ore assets, makes Stelco an attractive acquisition target for both potential North American and international acquirers as the steel industry consolidation theme continues to unfold."

Mr. Novak estimated that the Lake Erie operations are worth $1.4-billion while the iron ore interests are worth $500-million.

The global steel industry is undergoing a period of consolidation. Stelco's Hamilton neighbour and rival Dofasco Inc. was bought by Luxemburg-based Arcelor SA earlier this month for $4.85-billion (U.S.).

Mr. Novak stressed, however, that Stelco's success depends on operational execution and stable steel prices. "Any investment in Stelco is speculative and carries significant risks beyond the general risks of investing in the North American steel sector."

Restructuring firm Tricap Management Ltd., which is partly owned by Toronto-based Brookfield Asset Management Inc., has lent Stelco $375-million (Canadian) and invested $50-million for a 38-per-cent stake in the company as part of Stelco's restructuring.

Tricap, one of three firms acting as Stelco's financial sponsors, owned about one-third of the new stock before it began trading. The two other firms that are also financing Stelco — money manager Sunrise Partners LP of Toronto and U.S. hedge fund Appaloosa Management LP — split an ownership stake of at least 34.9 per cent.

As part of its restructuring, Stelco sold several subsidiaries and cut 1,500 jobs. The company raised $125-million by selling plants and equipment and the Ontario government, which kicked in a $150-million loan.

One of Mr. Mott's first major challenges will be to negotiate a new collective agreement with Stelco workers at its Hilton Works facility in Hamilton, Ont. Stelco says its Hamilton operations are not competitive.

Stelco's re-birth comes 26 months after it filed for creditor protection. What followed was one of the most convoluted, expensive, and unusual restructurings in Canadian corporate history.

The restructuring was unusual because steel prices rebounded strongly after the creditor protection filing, leading to big profits at a company that had been losing money.

However, steel prices started to fall again in 2005, and the company lost $73-million in 2005, compared with a profit of $64-million the previous year.

/Roma Luciw
Globe & Mail
"


I am appalled.

Don't anyone ever again say to me that capital markets are not managed by crooks.

A reader once wrote to say that he liked my style as it was somewhat jaded, but very much based in reality. Now you see why. I have watched these Stelco-type deals repeat themselves time and again over the years.

You know, I never ever had a dime invested in Stelco. I just spent hundreds of hours of my valuable time to prove a point. I have made it.

Actually Brascan/Brookfield made it for me -- as I knew they would.


Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 3, 2006 04:17:18 PM | Category: Canada

Discourse

Well it sounds to me like another ENRON case. Not the first one and certainly not the last one

Posted by: Bigblock [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 3, 2006 6:59 PM [link]

Bill, You are to be commended on speaking out against the fraud and disentitlement going on in the securities business. Ever the optimist, I will hold fast to my 26,000 shares of Ste.a and await my day in court - and I really believe that day will come . Forget about SROs such as the Investment Dealers Association - they only go after brokers who go "off-side" in stealing from widows and the gullable. We are talking about a Billion Dollar Fraud which has been perpetrated by rogue investment bankers who have made a mockery of the judicial system as it relates to corporate law. It will take a Judicial Inquiry into CCAA and Judge Farley's interpretation of insolvency before there is restitution to shareholders and bondholders. Because there is monumental greed at work here it won't be long before the "New Stelco" is sold and these fraudsters cash in. Then, hopefully, the courts will be asking how it is that worthless assets are suddenly worth billions and the problems and the financial conditions as they appear on audited statements are not unlike what appeared when Stelco was engineered into CCAA. Nothing material has really changed at Stelco from an operational perspective so why are asssets suddenly valuable when put into the hands of these thieves? The courts must also be required to explain how the capital structure can be dissolved and shares deemed worthless before the "plan" was approved by all required to do so under CCAA. It is also intriguing how my shares suddenly disappeared from my holdings as a "liquidation" transaction on April 3rd, although other entities that have been de-listed or gone bankrupt still appear on my account years later to remind me of the accumulated losses. Why is everyone so anxious to make the "old Stelco" disappear? I would only recommend that you inform your readers to stay away from this crap-shoot called the Canadian securities industry, at least until there is a national regulatory body that is under Federal Government control.

Posted by: TerryC [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 4, 2006 5:35 PM [link]