« BillCara.com blows bandwidth, Sunday, August 21, 2005, 11:06 AM | Main | Zero personal savings, Mon., August 22, 2005, 10:05 AM »

August 22, 2005

State of the market, Monday, August 22, 2005, 7:00 AM

It's the dog days of summer. A good time to navel gaze. First up is the question as to where capital markets are going, and why. Some of you call this The Big Picture.

The bond market started to give a message this week that strong economic growth is being hurt by high oil prices, so I feel we have come to the point of no return. The issue now is, will central bankers stop being so hawkish on inflation, and just allow market forces to assume control for a while.

That is not an advocacy on my part; just a question.

I think the capital market is now at a turning point because if short rates cease to rise (from the pressure of central banker policies), I feel that the huge price increases in real estate prices can (will?) be locked in and that the (inflation-beneficiary) phenomenon in real estate would then transfer to the equity market.

Without committing to a forecast on what policy change the U.S. Fed might make here, I think the market will tell us before we figure it out.

Why? That's because "The New Fed" will be the fiefdom of the individual whom President Bush installs to replace the retiring Alan Greenspan. So just like the policies of "The New SEC" are going to change because of the intentions of Chris Cox, which were known in advance and accepted (which is to say desired) by the President, so too will the Fed be constructed.

Therefore the message in the form of the choice for the next Fed chairman will be the primary signal for future direction of the capital markets. If there is to be a hawk on inflation like Greenspan, then the amplitude of future stock and bond market cycles will remain fairly narrow. But, if the new chairperson is not going to be so restrictive in policy with respect to inflation, then the marketplace will react accordingly, i.e., more extreme trading cycles.

After we know who is selected to become the next Fed Head, I say that whether the U.S. Congress plans to continue its costly War on Terrorism, or not, would then become the key factor that takes control of the market. For instance, higher levels of inflation will follow continued high levels of spending, budget deficits and government debt, and traders should not expect otherwise.

Given the present make-up of Congress, where I see no major change to policies in place today, but where I do see upcoming reflation policies of the Fed (along with higher interest rates), I happen to believe that the amplitude in price cycles of stocks and bonds will become increasingly exaggerated.

In my view, prices for most equities will rise for a while " like the latter 1990s " and then they will fall " like 2000 through 2002, or possibly worse.

I wrote about this situation a week ago as I started to get a sense that the housing bubble might take some time to pop, and that perhaps we all should not be so focused on it.

There is so much cash about, caused by the increase in personal and government debt, not just in America but also abroad in economies like China, that the extent of inflation in capital markets in future years will depend on how that cash is used.

If cash is used to chase the price of certain goods, with real estate being one example in the past couple years " diamonds and gold could be another in the next couple " then value (i.e., wealth) is not being created, and inflation will become a serious problem, like it was in the 1970s after Vietnam.

But if that cash is put to work building economic infrastructure, like massive new power generation plants, or the building of new cities and rebuilding of old ones, at prices the lower and middle class can afford, then equity markets will boom.

I see that happening today in the real estate market. If investors are buying homes to obtain cash returns of two or three pct, then the boom will continue. Developers will exploit that opportunity.

But the point at which real estate investors decide en masse that they are not going to wait for inflation to drive up prices, and they choose to reinvest their capital in wealth creating ventures, with higher cash on cash returns, then the cycle of rising house prices will end. Like I say; that doesn't necessarily mean a popping of the bubble. It could just be that the real estate phenomenon is transferred to equities, which would lead to the bond market being a victim until the economy starts growing full-time jobs in North America and Europe.

So, that is the state of the market this summer, as I see it.

Have a good day.

Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on August 22, 2005 07:01:57 AM | Category: The Big Picture

Discourse

Bill-
I have serious doubts whether sufficient maturity to invest in true wealth producing activities exists after years of bubble-induced highs. We are still chasing big returns. I see us perhaps inducing one more sector bubble before the game is figured out, then the stock market goes into decline. Perhaps worse than 2000-2002 as you say. I certainly see that as more likely scenario than the present holding pattern or any gains. Too many pressures in the downward direction. But I agree that we still have a little bit of time to batten down the hatches.

here's an example of some of the blindness nowadays. Some "expert" commenting to one of the talking heads on the CPI and so-called core inflation numbers said that "the numbers shouldn't be all that disconcerting, especially if you were not a user of energy". Please tell me if you know any non-dead that don't use energy!

Posted by: Mark at August 22, 2005 7:56 AM [link]