« Week #17 (2005-04-30) in Review | Main | Where to for bond yields? Mon., May 2, 2005, 11:22 AM »
May 2, 2005
What inverted yield curve? Monday, May 2, 2005, 7:02 AM
There is far too much talk these days about the possibility of an inverted yield curve. Well it's possible, but not very likely.
While everybody is awaiting the outcome of tomorrow's meeting of the Fed, all bond investors already know the Fed has to raise the federal funds rate, likely by 25 basis points, in order to alleviate PPI/CPI inflationary pressures.
With the drop in crude oil prices and the much lower than expected GDP growth, as reported last week, equity traders are hoping that the Fed does not raise rates, but that will not happen.
The following chart of the U.S. Treasury Bond yield chart shows that except for the 3-month T-Bill rate, which is rising, the other Treasury instrument yields fell about 25 basis points. That move reflects the belief by bond investors that the fed funds rate is going higher.

But to get an inverted yield curve, the T-Bill yields would have to rise above 3.50 pct from today's 2.74 pct, and the 30-year T-Bond yield would have to fall from today's 4.51 pct to below 3.50 pct. As I say, that possibility is extremely unlikely.
So, it's best to stop talking and thinking about an inverted yield curve, or in fact about the Fed itself, as there is not much real news to come on this front for a couple months at least.
Friday's U.S. Jobs Report, and to a lesser extent, Thursday's report of the U.S. Money Supply, will be more important data to consider. That's because the most important drivers of international equity prices in the next several months will be the employment situation and inflation in the United States.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 2, 2005 07:01:59 AM | Category: Economics

Is there something special about 3.50? Why can't the inversion happen at 4.00 (if it happens at all)? Or, are you looking at what is priced into Fed Fund futures when making that determination?
Thanks!
Posted by: Achal at May 2, 2005 11:01 AM [link]